In SelectionDAGBuilder always translate the fshl and fshr intrinsics to
FSHL and FSHR (or ROTL and ROTR) instead of lowering them to shifts and
ORs. Improve the legalization of FSHL and FSHR to avoid code quality
regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77152
Fix 64-bit copy to SCC by restricting the pattern resulting
in such a copy to subtargets supporting 64-bit scalar compare,
and mapping the copy to S_CMP_LG_U64.
Before introducing the S_CSELECT pattern with explicit SCC
(0045786f14), there was no need
for handling 64-bit copy to SCC ($scc = COPY sreg_64).
The proposed handling to read only the low bits was however
based on a false premise that it is only one bit that matters,
while in fact the copy source might be a vector of booleans and
all bits need to be considered.
The practical problem of mapping the 64-bit copy to SCC is that
the natural instruction to use (S_CMP_LG_U64) is not available
on old hardware. Fix it by restricting the problematic pattern
to subtargets supporting the instruction (hasScalarCompareEq64).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85207
If it is load cluster, we don't need to create the dependency edges(SUb->reg) from SUb to SUa
as they both depend on the base register "reg"
+-------+
+----> reg |
| +---+---+
| ^
| |
| |
| |
| +---+---+
| | SUa | Load 0(reg)
| +---+---+
| ^
| |
| |
| +---+---+
+----+ SUb | Load 4(reg)
+-------+
But if it is store cluster, we need to create it as follow shows to avoid the instruction store
depend on scheduled in-between SUb and SUa.
+-------+
+----> reg |
| +---+---+
| ^
| | Missing +-------+
| | +-------------------->+ y |
| | | +---+---+
| +---+-+-+ ^
| | SUa | Store x 0(reg) |
| +---+---+ |
| ^ |
| | +------------------------+
| | |
| +---+--++
+----+ SUb | Store y 4(reg)
+-------+
Reviewed By: evandro, arsenm, rampitec, foad, fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72031
Get rid of all fixmes and base heuristic on `num-clustered-dwords`. The main intuition behind this is as
follows. The existing heuristic roughly summarizes as below:
* Assume, all the mem ops instructions participating in the clustering process, loads/stores same num bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 4 bytes, then cluster at max 5 mem ops, that is at max 20 bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 8 bytes, then cluster at max 3 mem ops, that is at max 24 bytes
* If num bytes loaded by each mem op is 16 bytes, then cluster at max 2 mem ops, that is at max 32 bytes
So, we need to make sure that the new heuristic do not completey deviate away from the above one, and it
properly handles both the sub-word loads and the wide loads.
Reviewed By: arsenm, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84354
Summary:
Add patterns to select s_cselect in the isel.
Handle more cases of implicit SCC accesses in si-fix-sgpr-copies
to allow new patterns to work.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, asbirlea, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Re-commit D81925 with a bugfix D82370.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81925
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82370
Summary:
Add patterns to select s_cselect in the isel.
Handle more cases of implicit SCC accesses in si-fix-sgpr-copies
to allow new patterns to work.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, asbirlea, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81925
If the SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits calls BITCASTs that peek through back to the original type then we can remove the BITCASTs entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79572
Followup to D75114, this patch reuses the existing MatchRotate ROTL/ROTR rotation pattern code to also recognize the more general FSHL/FSHR funnel shift patterns when we have variable shift amounts, matched with MatchFunnelPosNeg which acts in an (almost) equivalent manner to MatchRotatePosNeg.
This patch allows ISD::FSHR(i32) patterns to lower to ALIGNBIT instructions.
This improves test coverage of ISD::FSHR matching - x86 has both FSHL/FSHR instructions and we prefer FSHL by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76070
Jay Foad