The addend in a REL32 reloc needs to be adjusted to account for the
offset from the PC value returned by the s_getpc instruction to the
point where the reloc is applied. This was being done correctly for
(GOTPC)REL32_LO but not for (GOTPC)REL32_HI. This will only make a
difference if the target symbol happens to get loaded almost exactly
a multiple of 4G away from the relocated instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86938
tryLatency compares two sched candidates. For the top zone it prefers
the one with lesser depth, but only if that depth is greater than the
total latency of the instructions we've already scheduled -- otherwise
its latency would be hidden and there would be no stall.
Unfortunately it only tests the depth of one of the candidates. This can
lead to situations where the TopDepthReduce heuristic does not kick in,
but a lower priority heuristic chooses the other candidate, whose depth
*is* greater than the already scheduled latency, which causes a stall.
The fix is to apply the heuristic if the depth of *either* candidate is
greater than the already scheduled latency.
All this also applies to the BotHeightReduce heuristic in the bottom
zone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72392
The AMDGPU target has a convention that defined all VGPRs
(execept the initial 32 argument registers) as callee-saved.
This convention is not efficient always, esp. when the callee
requiring more registers, ended up emitting a large number of
spills, even though its caller requires only a few.
This patch revises the ABI by introducing more scratch registers
that a callee can freely use.
The 256 vgpr registers now become:
32 argument registers
112 scratch registers and
112 callee saved registers.
The scratch registers and the CSRs are intermixed at regular
intervals (a split boundary of 8) to obtain a better occupancy.
Reviewers: arsenm, t-tye, rampitec, b-sumner, mjbedy, tpr
Reviewed By: arsenm, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76356
This will likely introduce catastrophic performance regressions on
older subtargets, but should be correct. A follow up change will
remove the old fp32-denormals subtarget features, and switch to using
the new denormal-fp-math/denormal-fp-math-f32 attributes. Frontends
should be making sure to add the denormal-fp-math-f32 attribute when
appropriate to avoid performance regressions.
Remove the gap left between the stack pointer (s32) and frame pointer
(s34) now that the scratch wave offset is no longer a part of the
calling convention ABI.
Update llvm/docs/AMDGPUUsage.rst to reflect the change.
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75657
Only collapse inner endcf if the outer one belongs to SI_IF.
If it does belong to SI_ELSE then mask being restored in fact
a partial inverse of what we need.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76154
There are some functional regressions and I suspect our
scopes are not as perfectly enclosed as I expected.
Disable it for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76148
This is to replace the optimization from the SIOptimizeExecMaskingPreRA.
We have less opportunities in the control flow lowering because many
VGPR copies are still in place and will be removed later, but we know
for sure an instruction is SI_END_CF and not just an arbitrary S_OR_B64
with EXEC.
The subsequent change needs to convert s_and_saveexec into s_and and
address new TODO lines in tests, then code block guarded by the
-amdgpu-remove-redundant-endcf option in the pre-RA exec mask optimizer
will be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76033
Summary:
RCP has the accuracy limit. If FDIV fpmath require high accuracy rcp may not
meet the requirement. However, in DAG lowering, fpmath information gets lost,
and thus we may generate either inaccurate rcp related computation or slow code
for fdiv.
In patch implements fdiv optimizations in the AMDGPUCodeGenPrepare, which could
exactly know !fpmath.
FastUnsafeRcpLegal: We determine whether it is legal to use rcp based on
unsafe-fp-math, fast math flags, denormals and fpmath
accuracy request.
RCP Optimizations:
1/x -> rcp(x) when fast unsafe rcp is legal or fpmath >= 2.5ULP with
denormals flushed.
a/b -> a*rcp(b) when fast unsafe rcp is legal.
Use fdiv.fast:
a/b -> fdiv.fast(a, b) when RCP optimization is not performed and
fpmath >= 2.5ULP with denormals flushed.
1/x -> fdiv.fast(1,x) when RCP optimization is not performed and
fpmath >= 2.5ULP with denormals.
Reviewers:
arsenm
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71293
The current implementation of skip insertion (SIInsertSkip) makes it a
mandatory pass required for correctness. Initially, the idea was to
have an optional pass. This patch inserts the s_cbranch_execz upfront
during SILowerControlFlow to skip over the sections of code when no
lanes are active. Later, SIRemoveShortExecBranches removes the skips
for short branches, unless there is a sideeffect and the skip branch is
really necessary.
This new pass will replace the handling of skip insertion in the
existing SIInsertSkip Pass.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68092
The current implementation of skip insertion (SIInsertSkip) makes it a
mandatory pass required for correctness. Initially, the idea was to
have an optional pass. This patch inserts the s_cbranch_execz upfront
during SILowerControlFlow to skip over the sections of code when no
lanes are active. Later, SIRemoveShortExecBranches removes the skips
for short branches, unless there is a sideeffect and the skip branch is
really necessary.
This new pass will replace the handling of skip insertion in the
existing SIInsertSkip Pass.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68092
The mul24 matching could interfere with SLSR and the other addressing
mode related passes. This probably is not the optimal placement, but
is an intermediate step. This should probably be moved after all the
generic IR passes, particularly LSR. Moving this after LSR seems to
help in some cases, and hurts others.
As-is in this patch, in idiv-licm, it saves 1-2 instructions inside
some of the loop bodies, but increases the number in others. Moving
this later helps these loops. In the new lsr tests in
mul24-pass-ordering, the intrinsic prevents introducing more
instructions in the loop preheader, so moving this later ends up
hurting them. This shouldn't be any worse than before the intrinsics
were introduced in r366094, and LSR should probably be smarter. I
think it's because it doesn't know the and inside the loop will be
folded away.
llvm-svn: 369991
Jay Foad