Ilya Leoshkevich (<iii@linux.ibm.com>) reported an issue that
with -mattr=+alu32 CO-RE has a segfault in BPF MISimplifyPatchable
pass.
The pattern will be transformed by MISimplifyPatchable
pass looks like below:
r5 = ld_imm64 @"b:0:0$0:0"
r2 = ldw r5, 0
... r2 ... // use r2
The pass will remove the intermediate 'ldw' instruction
and replacing all r2 with r5 likes below:
r5 = ld_imm64 @"b:0:0$0:0"
... r5 ... // use r5
Later, the ld_imm64 insn will be replaced with
r5 = <patched immediate>
for field relocation purpose.
With -mattr=+alu32, the input code may become
r5 = ld_imm64 @"b:0:0$0:0"
w2 = ldw32 r5, 0
... w2 ... // use w2
Replacing "w2" with "r5" is incorrect and will
trigger compiler internal errors.
To fix the problem, if the register class of ldw* dest
register is sub_32, we just replace the original ldw*
register with:
w2 = w5
Directly replacing all uses of w2 with in-place
constructed w5 for the use operand seems not working in all cases.
The latest kernel will have -mattr=+alu32 on by default,
so added this flag to all CORE tests.
Tested with latest kernel bpf-next branch as well with this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69438
With newly added debuginfo type
metadata for preserve_array_access_index() intrinsic,
this patch did the following two things:
(1). checking validity before adding a new access index
to the access chain.
(2). calculating access byte offset in IR phase
BPFAbstractMemberAccess instead of when BTF is emitted.
For (1), the metadata provided by all preserve_*_access_index()
intrinsics are used to check whether the to-be-added type
is a proper struct/union member or array element.
For (2), with all available metadata, calculating access byte
offset becomes easier in BPFAbstractMemberAccess IR phase.
This enables us to remove the unnecessary complexity in
BTFDebug.cpp.
New tests are added for
. user explicit casting to array/structure/union
. global variable (or its dereference) as the source of base
. multi demensional arrays
. array access given a base pointer
. cases where we won't generate relocation if we cannot find
type name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65618
llvm-svn: 367735