tryLatency compares two sched candidates. For the top zone it prefers
the one with lesser depth, but only if that depth is greater than the
total latency of the instructions we've already scheduled -- otherwise
its latency would be hidden and there would be no stall.
Unfortunately it only tests the depth of one of the candidates. This can
lead to situations where the TopDepthReduce heuristic does not kick in,
but a lower priority heuristic chooses the other candidate, whose depth
*is* greater than the already scheduled latency, which causes a stall.
The fix is to apply the heuristic if the depth of *either* candidate is
greater than the already scheduled latency.
All this also applies to the BotHeightReduce heuristic in the bottom
zone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72392
Summary: A bug is reported in bugzilla-45628, where the swap_with_shift case can’t be matched to a single HW instruction xxswapd as expected.
In fact the case matches the idiom of rotate. We have MatchRotate to handle an ‘or’ of two operands and generate a rot[lr] if the case matches the idiom of rotate. While PPC doesn’t support ROTL v1i128. We can custom lower ROTL v1i128 to the vector_shuffle. The vector_shuffle will be matched to a single HW instruction during the phase of instruction selection.
Reviewed By: steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81076
Summary: A bug is reported in bugzilla-45628, where the swap_with_shift case can’t be matched to a single HW instruction xxswapd as expected. In fact the case matches the idiom of rotate, but PPC doesn’t support ROTL v1i128.
This is a NFC patch for testing ROTL with v1i128 at master.
Reviewed By: steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81073
Jay Foad