Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Florian Hahn e717fdb0f1 [DSE,MemorySSA] Traverse use-def chain without MemSSA Walker.
For DSE with MemorySSA it is beneficial to manually traverse the
defining access, instead of using a MemorySSA walker, so we can
better control the number of steps together with other limits and
also weed out invalid/unprofitable paths early on.

This patch requires a follow-up patch to be most effective, which I will
share soon after putting this patch up.

This temporarily XFAIL's the limit tests, because we now explore more
MemoryDefs that may not alias/clobber the killing def. This will be
improved/fixed by the follow-up patch.

This patch also renames some `Dom*` variables to `Earlier*`, because the
dominance relation is not really used/important here and potentially
confusing.

This patch allows us to aggressively cut down compile time, geomean
-O3 -0.64%, ReleaseThinLTO -1.65%, at the expense of fewer stores
removed. Subsequent patches will increase the number of removed stores
again, while keeping compile-time in check.

http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=d8e3294118a8c5f3f97688a704d5a05b67646012&to=0a929b6978a068af8ddb02d0d4714a2843dd8ba9&stat=instructions

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86486
2020-08-27 10:02:02 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks 339eed5d0b [NewPM][BasicAA] basicaa -> basic-aa in Transforms/DeadStoreElimination
Summary: Following https://reviews.llvm.org/D82607.

Reviewers: ychen

Subscribers: george.burgess.iv, asbirlea, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82689
2020-06-26 20:13:37 -07:00
Florian Hahn 4e62c6359c [DSE] Eliminate stores at the end of the function.
This patch add support for eliminating MemoryDefs that do not have any
aliasing users, which indicates that there are no reads/writes to the
memory location until the end of the function.

To eliminate such defs, we have to ensure that the underlying object is
not visible in the caller and does not escape via returning. We need a
separate check for that, as InvisibleToCaller does not consider returns.

Reviewers: dmgreen, rnk, efriedma, bryant, asbirlea, Tyker, george.burgess.iv

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72631
2020-06-24 12:58:20 +01:00
Florian Hahn 97e7147e34 [DSE,MSSA] Fix location order in isOverwrite call.
isOverwrite expects the later location as first argument and the earlier
result later. The adjusted call is intended to check whether CC
overwrites DefLoc.
2020-06-13 20:39:00 +01:00
Florian Hahn 67671024c8 [DSE,MSSA] Relax post-dom restriction for objs visible after return.
This patch relaxes the post-dominance requirement for accesses to
objects visible after the function returns.

Instead of requiring the killing def to post-dominate the access to
eliminate, the set of 'killing blocks' (= blocks that completely
overwrite the original access) is collected.

If all paths from the access to eliminate and an exit block go through a
killing block, the access can be removed.

To check this property, we first get the common post-dominator block for
the killing blocks. If this block does not post-dominate the access
block, there may be a path from DomAccess to an exit block not involving
any killing block.

Otherwise we have to check if there is a path from the DomAccess to the
common post-dominator, that does not contain a killing block. If there
is no such path, we can remove DomAccess. For this check, we start at
the common post-dominator and then traverse the CFG backwards. Paths are
terminated when we hit a killing block or a block that is not executed
between DomAccess and a killing block according to the post-order
numbering (if the post order number of a block is greater than the one
of DomAccess, the block cannot be in in a path starting at DomAccess).

This gives the following improvements on the total number of stores
after DSE for MultiSource, SPEC2K, SPEC2006:

Tests: 237
Same hash: 206 (filtered out)
Remaining: 31
Metric: dse.NumRemainingStores

Program                                        base      new100    diff
 test-suite...CFP2000/188.ammp/188.ammp.test   3624.00   3544.00   -2.2%
 test-suite...ch/g721/g721encode/encode.test   128.00    126.00    -1.6%
 test-suite.../Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst.test    73.00     72.00    -1.4%
 test-suite...CFP2006/433.milc/433.milc.test   3202.00   3163.00   -1.2%
 test-suite...000/186.crafty/186.crafty.test   5062.00   5010.00   -1.0%
 test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test   40460.00  40248.00  -0.5%
 test-suite...Source/Benchmarks/sim/sim.test   642.00    639.00    -0.5%
 test-suite...nchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor.test   642.00    644.00     0.3%
 test-suite...lications/sqlite3/sqlite3.test   35664.00  35563.00  -0.3%
 test-suite...T2000/300.twolf/300.twolf.test   7202.00   7184.00   -0.2%
 test-suite...lications/ClamAV/clamscan.test   19475.00  19444.00  -0.2%
 test-suite...INT2000/164.gzip/164.gzip.test   2199.00   2196.00   -0.1%
 test-suite...peg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode.test   2380.00   2378.00   -0.1%
 test-suite.../Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test   39335.00  39309.00  -0.1%
 test-suite...:: External/Povray/povray.test   36951.00  36927.00  -0.1%
 test-suite...marks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test   67396.00  67356.00  -0.1%
 test-suite...6/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test   31497.00  31481.00  -0.1%
 test-suite...006/453.povray/453.povray.test   51441.00  51416.00  -0.0%
 test-suite...T2006/401.bzip2/401.bzip2.test   4450.00   4448.00   -0.0%
 test-suite...Applications/kimwitu++/kc.test   23481.00  23471.00  -0.0%
 test-suite...chmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs.test   6286.00   6284.00   -0.0%
 test-suite.../CINT2000/254.gap/254.gap.test   13719.00  13715.00  -0.0%
 test-suite.../Applications/SPASS/SPASS.test   30345.00  30338.00  -0.0%
 test-suite...006/450.soplex/450.soplex.test   15018.00  15016.00  -0.0%
 test-suite...ications/JM/lencod/lencod.test   27780.00  27777.00  -0.0%
 test-suite.../CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc.test   105285.00 105276.00 -0.0%

There might be potential to pre-compute some of the information of which
blocks are on the path to an exit for each block, but the overall
benefit might be comparatively small.

On the set of benchmarks, 15738 times out of 20322 we reach the
CFG check, the CFG check is successful. The total number of iterations
in the CFG check is 187810, so on average we need less than 10 steps in
the check loop. Bumping the threshold in the loop from 50 to 150 gives a
few small improvements, but I don't think they warrant such a big bump
at the moment. This is all pending further tuning in the future.

Reviewers: dmgreen, bryant, asbirlea, Tyker, efriedma, george.burgess.iv

Reviewed By: george.burgess.iv

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78932
2020-06-10 10:39:25 +01:00
Florian Hahn 7a325c14b4 [DSE,MSSA] Add additional multiblock tests. 2020-05-22 18:24:43 +01:00
Eli Friedman 11aa3707e3 StoreInst should store Align, not MaybeAlign
This is D77454, except for stores.  All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
2020-05-15 12:26:58 -07:00
Florian Hahn cf9ee49b4d [DSE] Lift post-dominance for objs not accessible in caller.
We can eliminate MemoryDefs of objects not accessible after the function
returns (e.g. alloca), if there are no reads between the MemoryDef and
any function exits. We can stop traversing paths that completely
overwrite the memory location of the MemoryDef.

This patch was split off D73763.

Reviewers: dmgreen, bryant, asbirlea, Tyker, efriedma, george.burgess.iv

Reviewed By: asbirlea, george.burgess.iv

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77736
2020-04-15 11:37:14 +01:00
Florian Hahn 4184b2e034 [DSE,MSSA] Add additional test cases for multi-path elimination (NFC).
This adds additional test cases for more scenarios and also with objects
that are accessible after the functions return and allocas.
2020-04-08 15:26:26 +01:00
Florian Hahn ece6cf0fa5 [DSE,MSSA] Precommit additional tests for D73763. 2020-03-20 13:39:46 +00:00