Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Clement Courbet 699dc025a6 [X86MacroFusion] Handle branch fusion (AMD CPUs).
Summary:
This adds a BranchFusion feature to replace the usage of the MacroFusion
for AMD CPUs.

See D59688 for context.

Reviewers: andreadb, lebedev.ri

Subscribers: hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59872

llvm-svn: 357171
2019-03-28 14:12:46 +00:00
Clement Courbet f8666b0649 [X86MacroFusion][NFC] Add a bulldozer test.
llvm-svn: 357099
2019-03-27 17:44:16 +00:00
Sanjay Patel d7c702b451 [LoopStrengthReduce, x86] don't add cost for a cmp that will be macro-fused (PR35681)
In the motivating case from PR35681 and represented by the macro-fuse-cmp test:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35681
...there's a 37 -> 31 byte size win for the loop because we eliminate the big base 
address offsets.

SPEC2017 on Ryzen shows no significant perf difference.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42607

llvm-svn: 324289
2018-02-05 23:43:05 +00:00
Mikael Holmen 6d06976e74 [LSR] Don't force bases of foldable formulae to the final type.
Summary:
Before emitting code for scaled registers, we prevent
SCEVExpander from hoisting any scaled addressing mode
by emitting all the bases first. However, these bases
are being forced to the final type, resulting in some
odd code.

For example, if the type of the base is an integer and
the final type is a pointer, we will emit an inttoptr
for the base, a ptrtoint for the scale, and then a
'reverse' GEP where the GEP pointer is actually the base
integer and the index is the pointer. It's more intuitive
to use the pointer as a pointer and the integer as index.

Patch by: Bevin Hansson

Reviewers: atrick, qcolombet, sanjoy

Reviewed By: qcolombet

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42103

llvm-svn: 323946
2018-02-01 06:38:34 +00:00
Sanjay Patel ffb37a29d1 [LoopStrengthReduce] add test to show potential macro-fusion-based diff (PR35681); NFC
This is the baseline output for the test proposed with D42607.

llvm-svn: 323806
2018-01-30 19:17:38 +00:00