Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Clement Courbet a95d95d392 [MergeICmps] Preserve the dominator tree.
Summary: In preparation for D60318 .

Reviewers: gchatelet, efriedma

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62068

llvm-svn: 361239
2019-05-21 11:02:23 +00:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Taewook Oh 2b7ae47ccb [MergeICmps] Do not perform the transformation if GEP is used outside of block
Summary:
This patch prevents MergeICmps to performn the transformation if the address operand GEP of the load instruction has a use outside of the load's parent block. Without this patch, compiler crashes with the given test case because the use of `%first.i` is still around when the basic block is erased from https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MergeICmps.cpp#L620. I think checking `isUsedOutsideOfBlock` with `GEP` is the original intention of the code, as the checking for `LoadI` is already performed in the same function.

This patch is incomplete though, as this makes the pass overly conservative and fails the test `tuple-four-int8.ll`. I believe what needs to be done is checking if GEP has a use outside of block that is not the part of "Comparisons" chain. Submit the patch as of now to prevent compiler crash.

Reviewers: courbet, trentxintong

Reviewed By: courbet

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54089

llvm-svn: 346151
2018-11-05 18:16:32 +00:00
Xin Tong 0efadbbcde [MergeICmp] Split blocks that do other work.
Summary:
We do not try to move the instructions and split the block till we
know the blocks can be split, i.e. BCE-cmp-insts can be separated from
non-BCE-cmp-insts.

Reviewers: davide, courbet

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44443

llvm-svn: 329564
2018-04-09 13:14:06 +00:00
Clement Courbet e2e8a5c496 Re-land "[MergeICmps] Disable mergeicmps if the target does not want to handle memcmp expansion."
(fixed stability issues)

This reverts commit d6492333d3b478a1d88163315002022f8d5e58dc.

llvm-svn: 315281
2017-10-10 08:00:45 +00:00
Clement Courbet d12c189e2e Revert "[MergeICmps] Disable mergeicmps if the target does not want to handle memcmp expansion."
Still a few stability issues on windows.

This reverts commit 67e3db9bc121ba244e20337aabc7cf341a62b545.

llvm-svn: 315058
2017-10-06 13:02:24 +00:00
Clement Courbet 4e1bae8136 Re-land "[MergeICmps] Disable mergeicmps if the target does not want to handle memcmp expansion."
(fixed unit tests by making comparisons stable)

This reverts commit 1b2d359ce256fd6737da4e93833346a0bd6d7583.

llvm-svn: 315056
2017-10-06 12:12:35 +00:00
Clement Courbet 922e5bc698 Revert "Re-land "[MergeICmps] Disable mergeicmps if the target does not want to handle memcmp expansion."""
broken test on windows

This reverts commit c91479518344fd1fc071c5bd5848f6eb83e53dca.

llvm-svn: 314985
2017-10-05 14:42:06 +00:00
Clement Courbet 4cafbb9b5e Re-land "[MergeICmps] Disable mergeicmps if the target does not want to handle memcmp expansion.""
llvm-svn: 314980
2017-10-05 12:39:57 +00:00
Clement Courbet 6603fc0e7b Revert "[MergeICmps] Disable mergeicmps if the target does not want to handle memcmp expansion."
Breaks
clang-stage1-cmake-RA-incremental/llvm/test/Transforms/MergeICmps/X86/tuple-four-int8.ll

This reverts commit 3038c459d67f8898ffa295d54a013b280690abfa.

llvm-svn: 314972
2017-10-05 08:03:39 +00:00
Clement Courbet 902eef32eb [MergeICmps] Disable mergeicmps if the target does not want to handle memcmp expansion.
Summary: This is to avoid e.g. merging two cheap icmps if the target is not going to expand to something nice later.

Reviewers: dberlin, spatel

Subscribers: davide, nemanjai

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38232

llvm-svn: 314970
2017-10-05 07:49:09 +00:00