Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
This reverts commit 7c51f02eff because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
---
Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:
1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
print types as written. There are customization options there, but
not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
the so called canonical types.
Example:
```
namespace foo {
struct A {};
A a;
};
```
If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
will make it print it accurately even when written without
qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.
2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
the name of the canonical type is the better choice.
3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
dealing with will always include some source location.
4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
`dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.
5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.
Let me know if you need any help!
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
This reverts commit bdc6974f92 because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.
import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py
https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.
The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.
An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
Previously, system globals were treated as immutable regions, unless it
was the `errno` which is known to be frequently modified.
D124244 wants to add a check for stores to immutable regions.
It would basically turn all stores to system globals into an error even
though we have no reason to believe that those mutable sys globals
should be treated as if they were immutable. And this leads to
false-positives if we apply D124244.
In this patch, I'm proposing to treat mutable sys globals actually
mutable, hence allocate them into the `GlobalSystemSpaceRegion`, UNLESS
they were declared as `const` (and a primitive arithmetic type), in
which case, we should use `GlobalImmutableSpaceRegion`.
In any other cases, I'm using the `GlobalInternalSpaceRegion`, which is
no different than the previous behavior.
---
In the tests I added, only the last `expected-warning` was different, compared to the baseline.
Which is this:
```lang=C++
void test_my_mutable_system_global_constraint() {
assert(my_mutable_system_global > 2);
clang_analyzer_eval(my_mutable_system_global > 2); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
invalidate_globals();
clang_analyzer_eval(my_mutable_system_global > 2); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} It was previously TRUE.
}
void test_my_mutable_system_global_assign(int x) {
my_mutable_system_global = x;
clang_analyzer_eval(my_mutable_system_global == x); // expected-warning {{TRUE}}
invalidate_globals();
clang_analyzer_eval(my_mutable_system_global == x); // expected-warning {{UNKNOWN}} It was previously TRUE.
}
```
---
Unfortunately, the taint checker will be also affected.
The `stdin` global variable is a pointer, which is assumed to be a taint
source, and the rest of the taint propagation rules will propagate from
it.
However, since mutable variables are no longer treated immutable, they
also get invalidated, when an opaque function call happens, such as the
first `scanf(stdin, ...)`. This would effectively remove taint from the
pointer, consequently disable all the rest of the taint propagations
down the line from the `stdin` variable.
All that said, I decided to look through `DerivedSymbol`s as well, to
acquire the memregion in that case as well. This should preserve the
previously existing taint reports.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127306
This new CTU implementation is the natural extension of the normal single TU
analysis. The approach consists of two analysis phases. During the first phase,
we do a normal single TU analysis. During this phase, if we find a foreign
function (that could be inlined from another TU) then we don’t inline that
immediately, we rather mark that to be analysed later.
When the first phase is finished then we start the second phase, the CTU phase.
In this phase, we continue the analysis from that point (exploded node)
which had been enqueued during the first phase. We gradually extend the
exploded graph of the single TU analysis with the new node that was
created by the inlining of the foreign function.
We count the number of analysis steps of the first phase and we limit the
second (ctu) phase with this number.
This new implementation makes it convenient for the users to run the
single-TU and the CTU analysis in one go, they don't need to run the two
analysis separately. Thus, we name this new implementation as "onego" CTU.
Discussion:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-much-faster-cross-translation-unit-ctu-analysis-implementation/61728
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123773
Do import the definition of objects from a foreign translation unit if that's type is const and trivial.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122805
The "in-class initializer" expression should be set in the field of a
default initialization expression before this expression node is created.
The `CXXDefaultInitExpr` objects are created after the AST is loaded and
at import not present in the "To" AST. And the in-class initializers of
the used fields can be missing too, these must be set at import.
This fixes a github issue #54061.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120824
This error was found when analyzing MySQL with CTU enabled.
When there are space characters in the lookup name, the current
delimiter searching strategy will make the file path wrongly parsed.
And when two lookup names have the same prefix before their first space
characters, a 'multiple definitions' error will be wrongly reported.
e.g. The lookup names for the two lambda exprs in the test case are
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator int (*)(char)#1` and
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator bool (*)(char)#1` respectively. And their
prefixes are both `c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator` when using the first space
character as the delimiter.
Solving the problem by adding a length for the lookup name, making the
index items in the format of `<USR-Length>:<USR File> <Path>`.
---
In the test case of this patch, we found that it will trigger a "triple
mismatch" warning when using `clang -cc1` to analyze the source file
with CTU using the on-demand-parsing strategy in Darwin systems. And
this problem is also encountered in D75665, which is the patch
introducing the on-demand parsing strategy.
We temporarily bypass this problem by using the loading-ast-file
strategy.
Refer to the [discourse topic](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/60762) for
more details.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102669
Add a checker to maintain the system-defined value 'errno'.
The value is supposed to be set in the future by existing or
new checkers that evaluate errno-modifying function calls.
Reviewed By: NoQ, steakhal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120310
Add a checker to maintain the system-defined value 'errno'.
The value is supposed to be set in the future by existing or
new checkers that evaluate errno-modifying function calls.
Reviewed By: NoQ, steakhal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120310
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the ninth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the eighth batch of tests being updated (there are a
significant number of other tests left to be updated).
This error was found when analyzing MySQL with CTU enabled.
When there are space characters in the lookup name, the current
delimiter searching strategy will make the file path wrongly parsed.
And when two lookup names have the same prefix before their first space
characters, a 'multiple definitions' error will be wrongly reported.
e.g. The lookup names for the two lambda exprs in the test case are
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator int (*)(char)#1` and
`c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator bool (*)(char)#1` respectively. And their
prefixes are both `c:@S@G@F@G#@Sa@F@operator` when using the first space
character as the delimiter.
Solving the problem by adding a length for the lookup name, making the
index items in the format of `USR-Length:USR File-Path`.
Reviewed By: steakhal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102669
[NFC] This patch replaces `masterPort` with `mainPort` in these
testcases.
Reviewed By: ZarkoCA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113505
This patch adds a checker checking `std::string` operations.
At first, it only checks the `std::string` single `const char *`
constructor for nullness.
If It might be `null`, it will constrain it to non-null and place a note
tag there.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111247
This patch handles the `<<` operator defined for `std::unique_ptr` in
the std namespace (ignores custom overloads of the operator).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105421
This patch handles all the comparision methods (defined via overloaded
operators) on std::unique_ptr. These operators compare the underlying
pointers, which is modelled by comparing the corresponding inner-pointer
SVal. There is also a special case for comparing the same pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104616
Previously, information about `ConstructionContextLayer` was not
propagated thru causing the expression like:
Var c = (createVar());
To produce unrelated temporary for the `createVar()` result and conjure
a new symbol for the value of `c` in C++17 mode.
Reviewed By: steakhal
Patch By: tomasz-kaminski-sonarsource!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102835
When searching for stores and creating corresponding notes, the
analyzer is more specific about the target region of the store
as opposed to the stored value. While this description was tweaked
for constant and undefined values, it lacked in the most general
case of symbolic values.
This patch tries to find a memory region, where this value is stored,
to use it as a better alias for the value.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101041
Since we can report memory leaks on one variable, while the originally
allocated object was stored into another one, we should explain
how did it get there.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100852
When reporting leaks, we try to attach the leaking object to some
variable, so it's easier to understand. Before the patch, we always
tried to use the first variable that stored the object in question.
This can get very confusing for the user, if that variable doesn't
contain that object at the moment of the actual leak. In many cases,
the warning is dismissed as false positive and it is effectively a
false positive when we fail to properly explain the warning to the
user.
This patch addresses the bigest issue in cases like this. Now we
check if the variable still contains the leaking symbolic object.
If not, we look for the last variable to actually hold it and use
that variable instead.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100839
This category is generic enough to hold a variety of checkers.
Currently it contains the Dead Stores checker and an alpha unreachable
code checker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98741
Before `bc713f6a004723d1325bc16e1efc32d0ac82f939` landed, the analyzer
crashed on this reduced example.
It seems important to have bot `ctu` and `-analyzer-opt-analyze-headers`
enabled in the example.
This test file ensures that no regression happens in the future in this regard.
Reviewed By: martong, NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96586
The SwitchStmt::FirstCase member is not initialized when the AST is
built by the ASTStmtReader. See the below code of
ASTStmtReader::VisitSwitchStmt in the case where the for loop does not
have any iterations:
```
// ... more code ...
SwitchCase *PrevSC = nullptr;
for (auto E = Record.size(); Record.getIdx() != E; ) {
SwitchCase *SC = Record.getSwitchCaseWithID(Record.readInt());
if (PrevSC)
PrevSC->setNextSwitchCase(SC);
else
S->setSwitchCaseList(SC); // Sets FirstCase !!!
PrevSC = SC;
}
} // return
```
Later, in ASTNodeImporter::VisitSwitchStmt,
we have a condition that depends on this uninited value:
```
for (SwitchCase *SC = S->getSwitchCaseList(); SC != nullptr;
SC = SC->getNextSwitchCase()) {
// ... more code ...
}
```
This is clearly an UB. This causes non-deterministic crashes when
ClangSA analyzes some code with CTU. See the below report by valgrind
(the whole valgrind output is attached):
```
==31019== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==31019== at 0x12ED1983: clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitSwitchStmt(clang::SwitchStmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:6195)
==31019== by 0x12F1D509: clang::StmtVisitorBase<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Stmt*>>::Visit(clang::Stmt*) (StmtNodes.inc:591)
==31019== by 0x12EE4FDF: clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Stmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:8484)
==31019== by 0x12F09498: llvm::Expected<clang::Stmt*> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::Stmt>(clang::Stmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:164)
==31019== by 0x12F3A1F5: llvm::Error clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportArrayChecked<clang::Stmt**, clang::Stmt**>(clang::Stmt**, clang::Stmt**, clang::Stmt**) (ASTImporter.cpp:653)
==31019== by 0x12F13152: llvm::Error clang::ASTNodeImporter::ImportContainerChecked<llvm::iterator_range<clang::Stmt**>, llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 8u> >(llvm::iterator_range<clang::Stmt**> const&, llvm::SmallVector<clang::Stmt*, 8u>&) (ASTImporter.cpp:669)
==31019== by 0x12ED099F: clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCompoundStmt(clang::CompoundStmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:6077)
==31019== by 0x12F1CC2D: clang::StmtVisitorBase<std::add_pointer, clang::ASTNodeImporter, llvm::Expected<clang::Stmt*>>::Visit(clang::Stmt*) (StmtNodes.inc:73)
==31019== by 0x12EE4FDF: clang::ASTImporter::Import(clang::Stmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:8484)
==31019== by 0x12F09498: llvm::Expected<clang::Stmt*> clang::ASTNodeImporter::import<clang::Stmt>(clang::Stmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:164)
==31019== by 0x12F13275: clang::Stmt* clang::ASTNodeImporter::importChecked<clang::Stmt*>(llvm::Error&, clang::Stmt* const&) (ASTImporter.cpp:197)
==31019== by 0x12ED0CE6: clang::ASTNodeImporter::VisitCaseStmt(clang::CaseStmt*) (ASTImporter.cpp:6098)
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97849
Removes the obsolete ad-hoc macro expansions during bugreport constructions.
It will skip the macro expansion if the expansion happened in an imported TU.
Also removes the expected plist file, while expanding matching context for
the tests.
Adds a previously crashing `plist-macros-with-expansion.c` testfile.
Temporarily marks `plist-macros-with-expansion-ctu.c ` to `XFAIL`.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93224
Add the BufferSize argument constraint to fread and fwrite. This change
itself makes it possible to discover a security critical case, described
in SEI-CERT ARR38-C.
We also add the not-null constraint on the 3rd arguments.
In this patch, I also remove those lambdas that don't take any
parameters (Fwrite, Fread, Getc), thus making the code better
structured.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87081
In short, macro expansions handled the case where a variadic parameter mapped to
multiple arguments, but not the other way around. An internal ticket was
submitted that demonstrated that we fail an assertion. Macro expansion so far
worked by lexing the source code token-by-token and using the Preprocessor to
turn these tokens into identifiers or just get their proper spelling, but what
this counter intuitively doesn't do, is actually expand these macros, so we have
to do the heavy lifting -- in this case, figure out what __VA_ARGS__ expands
into. Since this case can only occur in a nested macro, the information we
gathered from the containing macro does contain this information. If a parameter
resolves to __VA_ARGS__, we need to temporarily stop getting our tokens from the
lexer, and get the tokens from what __VA_ARGS__ maps to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86135
llvm::isa<>() and llvm::isa_and_not_null<>() template functions recently became
variadic. Unfortunately this causes crashes in case of isa_and_not_null<>()
and incorrect behavior in isa<>(). This patch fixes this issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85728
We found a case where Typedef Name Declarations were not being added
correctly when importing builtin types. This exposed the need for a
TypedefNameDecl visitor so these types can be added by RecordDecl and
fields.
This code is covered by the ASTImporterTest cases that use the implicit
struct __NSConstantString_tag definitions.
Thanks to @martong for the debugging assist!
Depends on D83970.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83992
Summary:
Random access iterators must handle operator+, where the iterator is on the
RHS. The system header simulator library is extended with these operators.
Reviewers: Szelethus
Subscribers: whisperity, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, Charusso, steakhal, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83226
Similarly to other patches of mine, I'm trying to uniformize the checker
interface so that dependency checkers don't emit diagnostics. The checker that
made me most anxious so far was definitely RetainCount, because it is definitely
impacted by backward compatibility concerns, and implements a checker hierarchy
that is a lot different to other examples of similar size. Also, I don't have
authority, nor expertise regarding ObjC related code, so I welcome any
objection/discussion!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78099
Matheus Izvekov