No behavior change as GNU ld/gold/ld.lld ignore --dynamic-linker in -r mode.
This change makes the intention clearer as we already suppress --dynamic-linker
for -shared, -static, and -static-pie.
Reviewed by: MaskRay, phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129714
The majority of tests omit testing "clang" for -cc1 command lines. In addition,
some distributions symlink %clang to an executable with a content hash based
filename so clang{{.*}} check won't work.
With this change, we can remove many -no-canonical-prefixes whose purpose was to
make the tests pass on such distributions.
In a recent run, temp files got created in /tmp/lit-tmp-2wcrtcx1/foo-xxx.o.
Since the tmp path contained "crt", this made a few tests fail:
http://45.33.8.238/linux/72221/step_7.txt
Not allowing '/' as path of the file name prevents this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122547
Very few ELF platforms still use .ctors/.dtors now. Linux (glibc: 1999-07),
DragonFlyBSD, FreeBSD (2012-03) and Solaris have supported .init_array
for many years. Some architectures like AArch64/RISC-V default to
.init_array . GNU ld and gold can even convert .ctors to .init_array .
It makes more sense to flip the CC1 default, and only uses
-fno-use-init-array on platforms that don't support .init_array .
For example, OpenBSD did not support DT_INIT_ARRAY before Aug 2016
(86fa57a279)
I may miss some ELF platforms that still use .ctors, but their
maintainers can easily diagnose such problems.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71393
This currently changes the default toward the more historic -Av8/-Av9,
but as discussed with James Y Knight, consistency is for now more
important than figuring out which default CPU each OS should be using.
llvm-svn: 252571
The test should be looking for gcrt0.o not crt0.o. Clang was already printing
"gcrt0", but the test was looking for "{{.*}}crt0.o", and the .* regexp
consumed "g".
Patch by Brad Smith.
llvm-svn: 171815
clang itself. This dates back to clang's early days and while it looks like
some of it is still used (for kext for example), other parts are probably dead.
Remove the -ccc-clang-archs option and associated code. I don't think there
is any remaining setup where clang doesn't support an architecture but it can
expect an working gcc cross compiler to be available.
A nice side effect is that tests no longer need to differentiate architectures
that are included in production builds of clang and those that are not.
llvm-svn: 165545
Brad Smith