Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jordan Rupprecht 4fdda4f82d [lldb][fuzz] Allow expression fuzzer to be passed as a flag.
The expression fuzzer checks an environment variable, `LLDB_FUZZER_TARGET`, to get the fuzzer target binary. This is fine, but internally our tooling for running fuzz tests only has proper handling for flag values. It's surprisingly complicated to add support for that, and allowing it to be passed via flag seems reasonable anyway.

Reviewed By: cassanova

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133546
2022-09-13 15:39:15 -07:00
Chelsea Cassanova bcf6ffb87e Reland "[lldb/Fuzzer] Add fuzzer for expression evaluator"
This reverts commit d959324e1e.

The target_include_directories in the clang-fuzzer CMake files
are set to PRIVATE instead of PUBLIC to prevent the clang buildbots
from breaking when symlinking clang into llvm.

The expression evaluator fuzzer itself has been modified to prevent a
bug that occurs when running it without a target.
2022-08-04 11:47:06 -04:00
Med Ismail Bennani d959324e1e Revert "[lldb/Fuzzer] Add fuzzer for expression evaluator"
This reverts commit b797834748, since it
breaks building Clang: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129377
2022-07-22 15:24:40 -07:00
Chelsea Cassanova b797834748 [lldb/Fuzzer] Add fuzzer for expression evaluator
This commit adds a fuzzer for LLDB's expression evaluator.
The fuzzer takes a different approach than the current fuzzers
present, and uses an approach that is currently being used for
clang fuzzers.

Instead of fuzzing the evaluator with randomly mutated
characters, protobufs are used to generate a subset of C++. This
is then converted to valid C++ code and sent to the expression
evaluator. In addition, libprotobuf_mutator is used to mutate
the fuzzer's inputs from valid C++ code to valid C++ code, rather
than mutating from valid code to total nonsense.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129377
2022-07-22 17:32:00 -04:00