Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joseph Huber 47166968db [OpenMP] Deprecate the old driver for OpenMP offloading
Recently OpenMP has transitioned to using the "new" driver which
primarily merges the device and host linking phases into a single
wrapper that handles both at the same time. This replaced a few tools
that were only used for OpenMP offloading, such as the
`clang-offload-wrapper` and `clang-nvlink-wrapper`. The new driver
carries some marked benefits compared to the old driver that is now
being deprecated. Things like device-side LTO, static library
support, and more compatible tooling. As such, we should be able to
completely deprecate the old driver, at least for OpenMP. The old driver
support will still exist for CUDA and HIP, although both of these can
currently be compiled on Linux with `--offload-new-driver` to use the new
method.

Note that this does not deprecate the `clang-offload-bundler`, although
it is unused by OpenMP now, it is still used by the HIP toolchain both
as their device binary format and object format.

When I proposed deprecating this code I heard some vendors voice
concernes about needing to update their code in their fork. They should
be able to just revert this commit if it lands.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert, MaskRay, ye-luo

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130020
2022-08-26 13:47:09 -05:00
Joseph Huber 1d03b2efcd [Libomptarget] Disable testing map_back_race.cpp
This test hasn't been fixed and causes spurious failures when testing.
This patch sets it as unsupported until we have a reliable fix.

Reviewed By: ronlieb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130789
2022-07-30 15:01:47 -04:00
Joseph Huber d5d836635c [Libomptarget] Add test config for compiling in LTO-mode
We are planning on making LTO the default compilation mode for
offloading. In order to make sure it works we should run these tests on
the test suite. AMDGPU already uses the LTO compilation path for its
linking, but in LTO mode it also links the static library late.

Performing LTO requires the static library to be built, if we make the
change this will be a hard requirement and the old bitcode library will
go away. This means users will need to use either a two-step build or a
runtimes build for libomptarget.

Reviewed By: JonChesterfield

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127512
2022-06-14 10:16:03 -04:00
Joseph Huber 80787213ea [Libomptarget] Fix test using old unsupported lit string
Summary:
One test had an old "unsupported" string that used the old `newDriver`
string which was removed. This test should be updated to use the
`oldDriver` one instead.
2022-04-18 23:08:12 -04:00
Ron Lieberman 95eac47260 [libomptarget] x86 offloading fails map_back_race.cpp intermittently
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122658
2022-03-29 16:01:17 +00:00
Johannes Doerfert b803f06901 [OpenMP] The test does not have check lines 2022-03-29 00:02:55 -05:00
Johannes Doerfert b309bdb970 [OpenMP][FIX] Use clang++ for the C++ test case 2022-03-28 23:14:24 -05:00
Johannes Doerfert b316126887 [OpenMP][FIX] Avoid races in the handling of to be deleted mapping entries
If we decided to delete a mapping entry we did not act on it right away
but first issued and waited for memory copies. In the meantime some
other thread might reuse the entry. While there was some logic to avoid
colliding on the actual "deletion" part, there were two races happening:

1) The data transfer back of the thread deleting the entry and
   the data transfer back of the thread taking over the entry raced.
2) The update to the shadow map happened regardless if the entry was
   actually reused by another thread which left the shadow map in a
   inconsistent state.

To fix both issues we will now update the shadow map and delete the
entry only if we are sure the thread is responsible for deletion, hence
no other thread took over the entry and reused it. We also wait for a
potential former data transfer from the device to finish before we issue
another one that would race with it.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54216

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121058
2022-03-28 22:33:18 -05:00