C++11 [expr.call]p1: ...If the selected function is non-virtual, or if the
id-expression in the class member access expression is a qualified-id,
that function is called. Otherwise, its final overrider in the dynamic type
of the object expression is called.
<rdar://problem/12255556>
llvm-svn: 163577
The option allows to always inline very small functions, whose size (in
number of basic blocks) is set using -analyzer-config
ipa-always-inline-size option.
llvm-svn: 163558
This is a (heavy-handed) solution to PR13724 -- until we know we can do
a good job inlining the STL, it's best to be consistent and not generate
more false positives than we did before. We can selectively whitelist
certain parts of the 'std' namespace that are known to be safe.
This is controlled by analyzer config option 'c++-stdlib-inlining', which
can be set to "true" or "false".
This commit also adds control for whether or not to inline any templated
functions (member or non-member), under the config option
'c++-template-inlining'. This option is currently on by default.
llvm-svn: 163548
I need to see how this breaks on other platforms when I fix the issue
that Benjamin Kramer pointed out.
This includes r163489 and r163490, plus a two line change.
llvm-svn: 163512
r163489, "Take another crack at stabilizing the emission order of analyzer"
r163490, "Use isBeforeInTranslationUnitThan() instead of operator<."
llvm-svn: 163497
diagnostics without using FoldingSetNodeIDs. This is done
by doing a complete recursive comparison of the PathDiagnostics.
Note that the previous method of comparing FoldingSetNodeIDs did
not end up relying on unstable things such as pointer addresses, so
I suspect this may still have some issues on various buildbots because
I'm not sure if the true source of non-determinism has been eliminated.
The tests pass for me, so the only way to know is to commit this change
and see what happens.
llvm-svn: 163489
ObjCSelfInitChecker stashes information in the GDM to persist it across
function calls; it is stored in pre-call checks and retrieved post-call.
The post-call check is supposed to clear out the stored state, but was
failing to do so in cases where the call did not have a symbolic return
value.
This was actually causing the inappropriate cache-out from r163361.
Per discussion with Anna, we should never actually cache out when
assuming the receiver of an Objective-C message is non-nil, because
we guarded that node generation by checking that the state has changed.
Therefore, the only states that could reach this exact ExplodedNode are
ones that should have merged /before/ making this assumption.
r163361 has been reverted and the test case removed, since it won't
actually test anything interesting now.
llvm-svn: 163449
Previously, we'd just keep constraints around forever, which means we'd
never be able to merge paths that differed only in constraints on dead
symbols.
Because we now allow constraints on symbolic expressions, not just single
symbols, this requires changing SymExpr::symbol_iterator to include
intermediate symbol nodes in its traversal, not just the SymbolData leaf
nodes.
llvm-svn: 163444
RegionStoreManager was only treating a SymbolicRegion's symbel as live
if there was a binding referring to the region itself.
No test case because constraints are currently not being cleaned out
of the constraint manager at all (even if the symbol is legitimately dead).
llvm-svn: 163443
This is necessary because further analysis will assume that the SVal's
type matches the AST type. This caused a crash when trying to perform
a derived-to-base cast on a C++ object that had been new'd to be another
object type.
Yet another crash in PR13763.
llvm-svn: 163442
with at least one subtle bug in MacOSXKeyChainAPIChecker where the
calling the method was a substitute for assuming a symbolic value
was null (which is not the case).
We still keep ConstraintManager::getSymVal(), but we use that as
an optimization in SValBuilder and ProgramState::getSVal() to
constant-fold SVals. This is only if the ConstraintManager can
provide us with that information, which is no longer a requirement.
As part of this, introduce a default implementation of
ConstraintManager::getSymVal() which returns null.
For Checkers, introduce ConstraintManager::isNull(), which queries
the state to see if the symbolic value is constrained to be a null
value. It does this without assuming it has been implicitly constant
folded.
llvm-svn: 163428
When adding the next statement to the CoreEngine's work list, we take care
of all the special cases first. We certainly shouldn't be building
PostStmts with null statements (the diagnostics machinery assumes such
StmtPoints do not exist), and we should find out sooner if we're missing
a special case.
A refinement of r163402 that should help prevent further issues like PR13760.
llvm-svn: 163409
GCC destroys temporary objects more aggressively than clang, so this
results in incorrect behavior when compiling GCC Release builds.
We could avoid this issue under C++11 by preventing getAs from being
called when 'this' is an rvalue:
template<class ElemTy> const ElemTy *getAs() const & { ... }
template<class ElemTy> const ElemTy *getAs() const && = delete;
Unfortunately, we do not have compatibility macros for this behavior yet.
This will hopefully fix PR13760 and PR13762.
llvm-svn: 163402
While the check itself should count 0-based for the parameter index,
the diagnostic should be 1-based (first, second, third, not start at 0).
Fixes <rdar://problem/12249569>.
llvm-svn: 163375
(as this previously was the case before this was refactored). We also shouldn't
need to specially handle BinaryOperators since the eagerly-assume heuristic tags
such nodes.
llvm-svn: 163374
implicit pointer-to-boolean conversions in condition expressions. This would
result in inconsistent diagnostic emission between C and C++.
A consequence of this is now ConditionBRVisitor and TrackConstraintBRVisitor may
emit redundant diagnostics, for example:
"Assuming pointer value is null" (TrackConstraintBRVisitor)
"Assuming 'p' is null" (ConditionBRVisitor)
We need to reconcile the two, and perhaps prefer one over the other in some
cases.
llvm-svn: 163372
With some particularly evil casts, we can get an object whose dynamic type
is not actually a subclass of its static type. In this case, we won't even
find the statically-resolved method as a devirtualization candidate.
Rather than assert that this situation cannot occur, we now simply check
that the dynamic type is not an ancestor or descendent of the static type,
and leave it at that.
This error actually occurred analyzing LLVM: CallEventManager uses a
BumpPtrAllocator to allocate a concrete subclass of CallEvent
(FunctionCall), but then casts it to the actual subclass requested
(such as ObjCMethodCall) to perform the constructor.
Yet another crash in PR13763.
llvm-svn: 163367
A bizarre series of coincidences led us to generate a previously-seen
node in the middle of processing an Objective-C message, where we assume
the receiver is non-nil. We were assuming that such an assumption would
never "cache out" like this, and blithely went on using a null ExplodedNode
as the predecessor for the next step in evaluation.
Although the test case committed here is complicated, this could in theory
happen in other ways as well, so the correct fix is just to test if the
non-nil assumption results in an ExplodedNode we've seen before.
<rdar://problem/12243648>
llvm-svn: 163361
are used in EH code. Right now the CFG doesn't support exceptions well,
so we need this hack to avoid bogus dead store warnings.
Fixes <rdar://problem/12147586>
llvm-svn: 163353
CXXDestructorCall now has a flag for when it is a base destructor call.
Other kinds of destructor calls (locals, fields, temporaries, and 'delete')
all behave as "whole-object" destructors and do not behave differently
from one another (specifically, in these cases we /should/ try to
devirtualize a call to a virtual destructor).
This was causing crashes in both our internal buildbot, the crash still
being tracked in PR13765, and some of the crashes being tracked in PR13763,
due to a assertion failure. (The behavior under -Asserts happened to be
correct anyway.)
Adding this knowledge also allows our DynamicTypePropagation checker to do
a bit less work; the special rules about virtual method calls during a
destructor only require extra handling during base destructors.
llvm-svn: 163348
While destructors will continue to not be inlined (unless the analyzer
config option 'c++-inlining' is set to 'destructors'), leaving them out
of the CFG is an incomplete model of the behavior of an object, and
can cause false positive warnings (like PR13751, now working).
Destructors for temporaries are still not on by default, since
(a) we haven't actually checked this code to be sure it's fully correct
(in particular, we probably need to be very careful with regard to
lifetime-extension when a temporary is bound to a reference,
C++11 [class.temporary]p5), and
(b) ExprEngine doesn't actually do anything when it sees a temporary
destructor in the CFG -- not even invalidate the object region.
To enable temporary destructors, set the 'cfg-temporary-dtors' analyzer
config option to '1'. The old -cfg-add-implicit-dtors cc1 option, which
controlled all implicit destructors, has been removed.
llvm-svn: 163264
If a region is binded to a symbolic value, we should track the symbol.
(The code I changed was not previously exercised by the regression
tests.)
llvm-svn: 163261
Jordan Rose