Refactorings of watchpoint creation APIs so that SBTarget::WatchAddress(), SBValue::Watch(), and SBValue::WatchPointee()
now take an additional 'SBError &error' parameter (at the end) to contain the reason if there is some failure in the
operation. Update 'watchpoint set variable/expression' commands to take advantage of that.
Update existing test cases to reflect the API change and add test cases to verify that the SBError mechanism works for
SBTarget::WatchAddress() by passing an invalid watch_size.
llvm-svn: 157964
We previously weren't catching that SBValue::Cast(...) would crash
if we had an invalid (empty) SBValue object.
Cleaned up the SBType API a bit.
llvm-svn: 149447
a watchpoint for either the variable encapsulated by SBValue (Watch) or the pointee
encapsulated by SBValue (WatchPointee).
Removed SBFrame::WatchValue() and SBFrame::WatchLocation() API as a result of that.
Modified the watchpoint related test suite to reflect the change.
Plus replacing WatchpointLocation with Watchpoint throughout the code base.
There are still cleanups to be dome. This patch passes the whole test suite.
Check it in so that we aggressively catch regressions.
llvm-svn: 141925
represent pointers and arrays by adding an extra parameter to the
SBValue
SBValue::GetChildAtIndex (uint32_t idx,
DynamicValueType use_dynamic,
bool can_create_synthetic);
The new "can_create_synthetic" will allow you to create child values that
aren't actually a part of the original type. So if you code like:
int *foo_ptr = ...
And you have a SBValue that contains the value for "foo_ptr":
SBValue foo_value = ...
You can now get the "foo_ptr[12]" item by doing this:
v = foo_value.GetChiltAtIndex (12, lldb.eNoDynamicValues, True);
Normall the "foo_value" would only have one child value (an integer), but
we can create "synthetic" child values by treating the pointer as an array.
Likewise if you have code like:
int array[2];
array_value = ....
v = array_value.GetChiltAtIndex (0); // Success, v will be valid
v = array_value.GetChiltAtIndex (1); // Success, v will be valid
v = array_value.GetChiltAtIndex (2); // Fail, v won't be valid, "2" is not a valid zero based index in "array"
But if you use the ability to create synthetic children:
v = array_value.GetChiltAtIndex (0, lldb.eNoDynamicValues, True); // Success, v will be valid
v = array_value.GetChiltAtIndex (1, lldb.eNoDynamicValues, True); // Success, v will be valid
v = array_value.GetChiltAtIndex (2, lldb.eNoDynamicValues, True); // Success, v will be valid
llvm-svn: 135292
Fixed crashes for SBValue fuzz calls.
And change 'bool SBType::IsPointerType(void)' to
'bool SBType::IsAPointerType(void)' to avoid name collision with the static 'bool SBType::IsPointerType(void *)'
function, which SWIG cannot handle.
llvm-svn: 134096
Johnny Chen