is_empty, is_polymorphic, and is_abstract didn't handle incomplete types
correctly. Only non-union class types must be complete for these
traits.
is_final and is_sealed don't care about the particular spelling of the
FinalAttr.
is_interface_class should always return false regardless of its input.
The type trait can only be satisfied in a mode we do not support (/CLR).
llvm-svn: 253184
The ``disable_tail_calls`` attribute instructs the backend to not
perform tail call optimization inside the marked function.
For example,
int callee(int);
int foo(int a) __attribute__((disable_tail_calls)) {
return callee(a); // This call is not tail-call optimized.
}
Note that this attribute is different from 'not_tail_called', which
prevents tail-call optimization to the marked function.
rdar://problem/8973573
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12547
llvm-svn: 252986
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Typeof.html
Differences from the GCC extension:
* __auto_type is also permitted in C++ (but only in places where
it could appear in C), allowing its use in headers that might
be shared across C and C++, or used from C++98
* __auto_type can be combined with a declarator, as with C++ auto
(for instance, "__auto_type *p")
* multiple variables can be declared in a single __auto_type
declaration, with the C++ semantics (the deduced type must be
the same in each case)
This patch also adds a missing restriction on applying typeof to
a bit-field, which GCC has historically rejected in C (due to
lack of clarity as to whether the operand should be promoted).
The same restriction also applies to __auto_type in C (in both
GCC and Clang).
This also fixes PR25449.
Patch by Nicholas Allegra!
llvm-svn: 252690
std::initializer_list<T> type. Instead, the list must contain a single element
and the type is deduced from that.
In Clang 3.7, we warned by default on all the cases that would change meaning
due to this change. In Clang 3.8, we will support only the new rules -- per
the request in N3922, this change is applied as a Defect Report against earlier
versions of the C++ standard.
This change is not entirely trivial, because for lambda init-captures we
previously did not track the difference between direct-list-initialization and
copy-list-initialization. The difference was not previously observable, because
the two forms of initialization always did the same thing (the elements of the
initializer list were always copy-initialized regardless of the initialization
style used for the init-capture).
llvm-svn: 252688
The attrubite is applicable to functions and variables and changes
the linkage of the subject to internal.
This is the same functionality as C-style "static", but applicable to
class methods; and the same as anonymouns namespaces, but can apply
to individual methods of a class.
Following the proposal in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045580.html
llvm-svn: 252648
This attribute is used to prevent tail-call optimizations to the marked
function. For example, in the following piece of code, foo1 will not be
tail-call optimized:
int __attribute__((not_tail_called)) foo1(int);
int foo2(int a) {
return foo1(a); // Tail-call optimization is not performed.
}
The attribute has effect only on statically bound calls. It has no
effect on indirect calls. Also, virtual functions and objective-c
methods cannot be marked as 'not_tail_called'.
rdar://problem/22667622
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12922
llvm-svn: 252369
This new builtin template allows for incredibly fast instantiations of
templates like std::integer_sequence.
Performance numbers follow:
My work station has 64 GB of ram + 20 Xeon Cores at 2.8 GHz.
__make_integer_seq<std::integer_sequence, int, 90000> takes 0.25
seconds.
std::make_integer_sequence<int, 90000> takes unbound time, it is still
running. Clang is consuming gigabytes of memory.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13786
llvm-svn: 252036
particular don't assume that two declarations of the same kind in the same
context are declaring the same entity. That's not true when the same name is
declared multiple times as internal-linkage symbols within a module.
(getCanonicalDecl is cheap now, so we can just use it here.)
llvm-svn: 251898
We permit implicit conversion from pointer-to-function to
pointer-to-object when -fms-extensions is specified. This is rather
unfortunate, move this into -fms-compatibility and only permit it within
system headers unless -Wno-error=microsoft-cast is specified.
llvm-svn: 251738
Handle blocks in the tree transform for the typo correction as otherwise, the
capture may miss. This would trigger an assertion. Thanks to Doug Gregor for
the help with this!
Fixes PR25001.
llvm-svn: 251729
Summary:
In `MismatchingNewDeleteDetector::analyzeInClassInitializer`, if
`Field`'s initializer expression is null, lookup the field in
implicit instantiation, and use found field's the initializer.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9898
llvm-svn: 251335
Microsoft's ATL headers make use of this MSVC extension, add support for
it and issue a diagnostic under -Wmicrosoft-exception-spec.
This fixes PR25265.
llvm-svn: 250854
Clang will now accept this valid C++11 code:
struct A { int field; };
struct B : A {
using A::field;
enum { TheSize = sizeof(field) };
};
Previously we would classify the 'field' reference as something other
than a field, and then forget to apply the C++11 rule to allow
non-static data member references in unevaluated contexts.
This usually arises in class templates that want to reference fields of
a dependent base in an unevaluated context outside of an instance
method. Such contexts do not allow references to 'this', so the only way
to access the field is with a using decl and an implicit member
reference.
llvm-svn: 250839
This reverts commit r250592.
It has issues around unevaluated contexts, like this:
template <class T> struct A { T i; };
template <class T>
struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::i;
typedef decltype(i) U;
};
template struct B<int>;
llvm-svn: 250774
During the initial template parse for this code, 'member' is unresolved
and we don't know anything about it:
struct A { int member };
template <typename T>
struct B : public T {
using T::member;
static void f() {
(void)member; // Could be static or non-static.
}
};
template class B<A>;
The pattern declaration contains an UnresolvedLookupExpr rather than an
UnresolvedMemberExpr because `f` is static, and `member` should never be
a field. However, if the code is invalid, it may become a field, in
which case we should diagnose it.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6700
llvm-svn: 250592
Previously, our logic when taking the address of an overloaded function
would not consider enable_if attributes, so long as all of the enable_if
conditions on a given candidate were true. So, two functions with
identical signatures (one with enable_if attributes, the other without),
would be considered equally good overloads. If we were calling the
function instead of taking its address, then the function with enable_if
attributes would be preferred.
This patch makes us prefer the candidate with enable_if regardless of if
we're calling or taking the address of an overloaded function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13795
llvm-svn: 250486
This fixes a bug where one can take the address of a conditionally
enabled function to drop its enable_if guards. For example:
int foo(int a) __attribute__((enable_if(a > 0, "")));
int (*p)(int) = &foo;
int result = p(-1); // compilation succeeds; calls foo(-1)
Overloading logic has been updated to reflect this change, as well.
Functions with enable_if attributes that are always true are still
allowed to have their address taken.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13607
llvm-svn: 250090
Fixed a bug where we'd emit multiple diagnostics if there was a problem
taking the address of an overloaded template function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13664
llvm-svn: 250078
Our self hosting buildbots found a few more tests which weren't updated
to reflect that the enum semantics are part of the Microsoft ABI.
llvm-svn: 249670
the "" and the suffix; that breaks names such as 'operator""if'. For symmetry,
also remove the space between the 'operator' and the '""'.
llvm-svn: 249641
With -fms-extensions it is possible to have a non-class record that is a
template specialization cause an assertion failure via the call to
Type::getAsCXXRecordDecl. Fixes PR 24246.
llvm-svn: 249090
specification) to an error. No compiler other than Clang seems to allow this,
and it doesn't seem like a useful thing to accept as an extension in general.
The current behavior was added for PR5957, where the problem was specifically
related to mismatches of the exception specification on the implicitly-declared
global operator new and delete. To retain that workaround, we downgrade the
error to an ExtWarn when the declaration is of a replaceable global allocation
function.
Now that this is an error, stop trying (and failing) to recover from a missing
computed noexcept specification. That recovery didn't work, and led to crashes
in code like the added testcase.
llvm-svn: 248867
This patch fixes the order in which we evaluate the different ways that
a function call could be disallowed. Now, if you call a non-overloaded
function with an incomplete type and failing enable_if, we'll prioritize
reporting the more obvious error (use of incomplete type) over reporting
the failing enable_if.
Thanks to Ettore Speziale for the patch!
llvm-svn: 248595
someone thought all the bits would be value bits in this case.
Also fix the wording of the warning -- it claimed that the width of 'bool' is
8, which is not correct; the width is 1 bit, whereas the size is 8 bits in our
implementation.
llvm-svn: 248435
We took both source locations from the end of the initializer list what
the code below doesn't expect. This can lead to a crash when rendering
the diagnostic (PR24816). Assert that we have more than one element in
a scalar initializer with too many elements.
llvm-svn: 248391
Overwide bool bitfields have eight bits of storage size, make sure we
take the padding into account when determining whether or not they are
problematic.
llvm-svn: 247651
MS compiler ignores calling convention modifiers for structors. This patch makes
clang do the same (for MS ABI). This fixes PR24595 and makes vswriter.h header
(from Windows SDK 8.1) compilable.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12402
llvm-svn: 247619
They might technically have external linkage, but it still doesn't make sense
for the user to try and export such variables. This matches MSVC's and MinGW's
behaviour.
llvm-svn: 246864
Charles Li