Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 371834
constant-folding mode regardless of the original evaluation mode.
In order for this to be correct, we need to track whether we're checking
for a potential constant expression or checking for undefined behavior
separately from the evaluation mode enum, since we don't want to clobber
those states when entering constant-folding mode.
llvm-svn: 371557
Breaks BUILD_SHARED_LIBS build, introduces cycles in library dependency
graphs. (clangInterp depends on clangAST which depends on clangInterp)
This reverts r370839, which is an yet another recommit of D64146.
llvm-svn: 370874
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370839
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370636
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370584
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370531
Summary:
This patch introduces the skeleton of the constexpr interpreter,
capable of evaluating a simple constexpr functions consisting of
if statements. The interpreter is described in more detail in the
RFC. Further patches will add more features.
Reviewers: Bigcheese, jfb, rsmith
Subscribers: bruno, uenoku, ldionne, Tyker, thegameg, tschuett, dexonsmith, mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64146
llvm-svn: 370476
This patch adds the SVE built-in types defined by the Procedure Call
Standard for the Arm Architecture:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/100986/0000
It handles the types in all relevant places that deal with built-in types.
At the moment, some of these places bail out with an error, including:
(1) trying to generate LLVM IR for the types
(2) trying to generate debug info for the types
(3) trying to mangle the types using the Microsoft C++ ABI
(4) trying to @encode the types in Objective C
(1) and (2) are fixed by follow-on patches but (unlike this patch)
they deal mostly with target-specific LLVM details, so seemed like
a logically separate change. There is currently no spec for (3) and
(4), so reporting an error seems like the correct behaviour for now.
The intention is that the types will become sizeless types:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062523.html
The main purpose of the sizeless type extension is to diagnose
impossible or dangerous uses of the types, such as any that would
require sizeof to have a meaningful defined value.
Until then, the patch sets the alignments of the types to the values
specified in the link above. It also sets the sizes of the types to
zero, which is chosen to be consistently wrong and shouldn't affect
correctly-written code (i.e. code that would compile even with the
sizeless type extension).
The patch adds the common subset of functionality needed to test the
sizeless type extension on the one hand and to provide SVE intrinsic
functions on the other. After this patch, the two pieces of work are
essentially independent.
The patch is based on one by Graham Hunter:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59245
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62960
llvm-svn: 368413
Summary:
Prior to r329065, we used [-max, max] as the range of representable
values because LLVM's `fptrunc` did not guarantee defined behavior when
truncating from a larger floating-point type to a smaller one. Now that
has been fixed, we can make clang follow normal IEEE 754 semantics in this
regard and take the larger range [-inf, +inf] as the range of representable
values.
In practice, this affects two parts of the frontend:
* the constant evaluator no longer treats floating-point evaluations
that result in +-inf as being undefined (because they no longer leave
the range of representable values of the type)
* UBSan no longer treats conversions to floating-point type that are
outside the [-max, +max] range as being undefined
In passing, also remove the float-divide-by-zero sanitizer from
-fsanitize=undefined, on the basis that while it's undefined per C++
rules (and we disallow it in constant expressions for that reason), it
is defined by Clang / LLVM / IEEE 754.
Reviewers: rnk, BillyONeal
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63793
llvm-svn: 365272
This commit adds a new builtin, __builtin_bit_cast(T, v), which performs a
bit_cast from a value v to a type T. This expression can be evaluated at
compile time under specific circumstances.
The compile time evaluation currently doesn't support bit-fields, but I'm
planning on fixing this in a follow up (some of the logic for figuring this out
is in CodeGen). I'm also planning follow-ups for supporting some more esoteric
types that the constexpr evaluator supports, as well as extending
__builtin_memcpy constexpr evaluation to use the same infrastructure.
rdar://44987528
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825
llvm-svn: 364954
Summary:
this patch has multiple small improvements related to the APValue in ConstantExpr.
changes:
- APValue in ConstantExpr are now cleaned up using ASTContext::addDestruction instead of there own system.
- ConstantExprBits Stores the ValueKind of the result beaing stored.
- VerifyIntegerConstantExpression now stores the evaluated value in ConstantExpr.
- the Constant Evaluator uses the stored value of ConstantExpr when available.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63376
llvm-svn: 364011
Summary:
Since the addition of __builtin_is_constant_evaluated the result of an expression can change based on whether it is evaluated in constant context. a lot of semantic checking performs evaluations with out specifying context. which can lead to wrong diagnostics.
for example:
```
constexpr int i0 = (long long)__builtin_is_constant_evaluated() * (1ll << 33); //#1
constexpr int i1 = (long long)!__builtin_is_constant_evaluated() * (1ll << 33); //#2
```
before the patch, #2 was diagnosed incorrectly and #1 wasn't diagnosed.
after the patch #1 is diagnosed as it should and #2 isn't.
Changes:
- add a flag to Sema to passe in constant context mode.
- in SemaChecking.cpp calls to Expr::Evaluate* are now done in constant context when they should.
- in SemaChecking.cpp diagnostics for UB are not checked for in constant context because an error will be emitted by the constant evaluator.
- in SemaChecking.cpp diagnostics for construct that cannot appear in constant context are not checked for in constant context.
- in SemaChecking.cpp diagnostics on constant expression are always emitted because constant expression are always evaluated.
- semantic checking for initialization of constexpr variables is now done in constant context.
- adapt test that were depending on warning changes.
- add test.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62009
llvm-svn: 363488
As reported here https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42000, it was
possible to get the constexpr version of __builtin_*_overflow to give
the wrong answer.
This was because when extending the operands to fit the largest type (so
that the math could be done), the decision on whether to sign/zero
extend the operands was based on the result signedness, not on the
operands signedness.
In the reported case, (unsigned char)255 - (int)100 needed
to have each extended to the int in order to do the math. However, when
extending the first operand to 'int', we incorrectly sign extended it
instead of zero extending. Thus, the result didnt fit back into the
unsigned char.
The fix for this was simply to choose zero/sign extension based on the
sign of the operand itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62665
llvm-svn: 362157
HandleUnionActiveMemberChange forgot to walk over a nop implicit
conversion node and got stuck in the process.
As a cleanup I changed the declaration of `E` so it can't
be accidentally accessed after the loop.
llvm-svn: 361571
representing no such object, and an "Indeterminate" state representing
an uninitialized object. The latter is not yet used, but soon will be.
llvm-svn: 361328
Without the fix at least clang 3.6 complains with
../tools/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp:90:24: error: unused variable 'TI' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable]
if (TypeInfoLValue TI = B.dyn_cast<TypeInfoLValue>())
^
1 error generated.
llvm-svn: 361145
class type in constant evaluation.
This reinstates r360977, reverted in r360987, now that its rerequisite
patch is reinstated and fixed.
llvm-svn: 361067
Summary:
Constant evaluator does not work on value-dependent or type-dependent
expressions.
Also fixed bugs uncovered by these assertions.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61522
llvm-svn: 361050
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
This reinstates r360974, reverted in r360988, with a fix for a
static_assert failure on 32-bit builds: force Type base class to have
8-byte alignment like the rest of Clang's AST nodes.
llvm-svn: 360995
object rather than tracking the originating expression.
This is groundwork for supporting polymorphic typeid expressions. (Note
that this somewhat regresses our support for DR1968, but it turns out
that that never actually worked anyway, at least in non-trivial cases.)
llvm-svn: 360974
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
evaluation.
This reinstates r360559, reverted in r360580, with a fix to avoid
crashing if evaluation-for-overflow mode encounters a virtual call on an
object of a class with a virtual base class, and to generally not try to
resolve virtual function calls to objects whose (notional) vptrs are not
readable. (The standard rules are unclear here, but this seems like a
reasonable approach.)
llvm-svn: 360635
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
This reinstates r360499, reverted in r360531.
llvm-svn: 360538
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
This reinstates r360464 (reverted in r360531) with a workaround for an
MSVC bug that previously caused the Windows bots to fail.
llvm-svn: 360537
Reject attempts to call non-static member functions on objects outside
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
........
Fix handling of objects under construction during constant expression
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
........
Fixes windows buildbots
llvm-svn: 360531
their lifetime in constant expressions.
This is undefined behavior per [class.cdtor]p2.
We continue to allow this for objects whose values are not visible
within the constant evaluation, because there's no way we can tell
whether the access is defined or not, existing code relies on the
ability to make such calls, and every other compiler allows such
calls.
llvm-svn: 360499
evaluation.
It's not enough to just track the LValueBase that we're evaluating, we
need to also track the path to the objects whose constructors are
running.
llvm-svn: 360464
Nandor Licker