Summary:
ASTImporter makes now difference between function templates with same
name in different translation units if these are not visible outside.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67490
llvm-svn: 371820
Summary:
ASTImporter makes now difference between typedefs and type aliases
with same name in different translation units
if these are not visible outside.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64480
llvm-svn: 370903
Summary:
The structural equivalence check stores now pairs of nodes in the
'from' and 'to' context instead of only the node in 'from' context
and a corresponding one in 'to' context. This is needed to handle
cases when a Decl in the 'from' context is to be compared with
multiple Decls in the 'to' context.
Reviewers: martong, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66538
llvm-svn: 370639
Summary:
Correct order of fields and indirect fields in imported RecordDecl
is needed for correct work of record layout calculations.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66866
llvm-svn: 370621
Summary:
Consider this code:
```
void f() {
auto L0 = [](){};
auto L1 = [](){};
}
```
First we import `L0` then `L1`. Currently we end up having only one
CXXRecordDecl for the two different lambdas. And that is a problem if
the body of their op() is different. This happens because when we import
`L1` then lookup finds the existing `L0` and since they are structurally
equivalent we just map the imported L0 to be the counterpart of L1.
We have the same problem in this case:
```
template <typename F0, typename F1>
void f(F0 L0 = [](){}, F1 L1 = [](){}) {}
```
In StructuralEquivalenceContext we could distinquish lambdas only by
their source location in these cases. But we the lambdas are actually
structrually equivalent they differn only by the source location.
Thus, the solution is to disable lookup completely if the decl in
the "from" context is a lambda.
However, that could have other problems: what if the lambda is defined
in a header file and included in several TUs? I think we'd have as many
duplicates as many includes we have. I think we could live with that,
because the lambda classes are TU local anyway, we cannot just access
them from another TU.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66348
llvm-svn: 370461
Summary:
If importing overridden methods fails for a method it can be seen
incorrectly as non-virtual. To avoid this inconsistency the method
is marked with import error to avoid later use of it.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66933
llvm-svn: 370457
There are numorous flaws about the name conflict handling, this patch
attempts fixes them. Changes in details:
* HandleNameConflict return with a false DeclarationName
Hitherto we effectively never returned with a NameConflict error, even
if the preceding StructuralMatch indicated a conflict.
Because we just simply returned with the parameter `Name` in
HandleNameConflict and that name is almost always `true` when converted to
`bool`.
* Add tests which indicate wrong NameConflict handling
* Add to ConflictingDecls only if decl kind is different
Note, we might not indicate an ODR error when there is an existing record decl
and a enum is imported with same name. But there are other cases. E.g. think
about the case when we import a FunctionTemplateDecl with name f and we found a
simple FunctionDecl with name f. They overload. Or in case of a
ClassTemplateDecl and CXXRecordDecl, the CXXRecordDecl could be the 'templated'
class, so it would be false to report error. So I think we should report a
name conflict error only when we are 100% sure of that. That is why I think it
should be a general pattern to report the error only if the kind is the same.
* Fix failing ctu test with EnumConstandDecl
In ctu-main.c we have the enum class 'A' which brings in the enum
constant 'x' with value 0 into the global namespace.
In ctu-other.c we had the enum class 'B' which brought in the same name
('x') as an enum constant but with a different enum value (42). This is clearly
an ODR violation in the global namespace. The solution was to rename the
second enum constant.
* Introduce ODR handling strategies
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59692
llvm-svn: 370045
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
If there is a friend class template "prototype" (forward declaration)
and later a definition for it in the existing code, this existing
definition may be not found by ASTImporter because it is not linked
to the prototype (under the friend AST node). The problem is fixed by
looping over all found matching decls instead of break after the first
found one.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65269
llvm-svn: 368551
This patch adds the SVE built-in types defined by the Procedure Call
Standard for the Arm Architecture:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/100986/0000
It handles the types in all relevant places that deal with built-in types.
At the moment, some of these places bail out with an error, including:
(1) trying to generate LLVM IR for the types
(2) trying to generate debug info for the types
(3) trying to mangle the types using the Microsoft C++ ABI
(4) trying to @encode the types in Objective C
(1) and (2) are fixed by follow-on patches but (unlike this patch)
they deal mostly with target-specific LLVM details, so seemed like
a logically separate change. There is currently no spec for (3) and
(4), so reporting an error seems like the correct behaviour for now.
The intention is that the types will become sizeless types:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-June/062523.html
The main purpose of the sizeless type extension is to diagnose
impossible or dangerous uses of the types, such as any that would
require sizeof to have a meaningful defined value.
Until then, the patch sets the alignments of the types to the values
specified in the link above. It also sets the sizes of the types to
zero, which is chosen to be consistently wrong and shouldn't affect
correctly-written code (i.e. code that would compile even with the
sizeless type extension).
The patch adds the common subset of functionality needed to test the
sizeless type extension on the one hand and to provide SVE intrinsic
functions on the other. After this patch, the two pieces of work are
essentially independent.
The patch is based on one by Graham Hunter:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59245
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62960
llvm-svn: 368413
Summary:
For functions there is a check to not duplicate the declaration if it is in a
record (class). For function templates there was no similar check, if a
template (in the same class) was imported multiple times the
FunctionTemplateDecl was created multiple times with the same templated
FunctionDecl. This can result in problems with the declaration chain.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65203
llvm-svn: 368163
Summary:
Instead of traversing inside the TraverseDecl() function.
Previously the attributes were traversed after Travese(Some)Decl
returns.
Logically attributes are properties of particular Decls and should be
traversed alongside other "child" nodes.
None of the tests relied on this behavior, hopefully this is an indication
that the change is relatively safe.
This change started with a discussion on cfe-dev, for details see:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062899.html
Reviewers: rsmith, gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64907
llvm-svn: 368052
We reorder declarations in RecordDecls because they may have another order
in the "to" context than they have in the "from" context. This may happen
e.g when we import a class like this:
struct declToImport {
int a = c + b;
int b = 1;
int c = 2;
};
During the import of `a` we import first the dependencies in sequence,
thus the order would be `c`, `b`, `a`. We will get the normal order by
first removing the already imported members and then adding them in the
order as they apper in the "from" context.
Keeping field order is vital because it determines structure layout.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, shafik
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44100
llvm-svn: 366997
Summary:
We falsely state inequivalence if the template parameter is a
qualified/nonquialified template in the first/second instantiation.
Also, different kinds of TemplateName should be equal if the template
decl (if available) is equal (even if the name kind is different).
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64241
llvm-svn: 366818
Summary:
The structural equivalence check reported false eq between lambda classes
with different parameters in their call signature.
The solution is to check the methods for equality too in case of lambda
classes.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64075
llvm-svn: 366332
Summary:
With LLDB we use localUncachedLookup(), however, that fails to find
Decls when a transparent context is involved and the given DC has
external lexical storage. The solution is to use noload_lookup, which
works well with transparent contexts. But, we cannot use only the
noload_lookup since the slow case of localUncachedLookup is still needed
in some other cases.
These other cases are handled in ASTImporterLookupTable, but we cannot
use that with LLDB since that traverses through the AST which initiates
the load of external decls again via DC::decls().
We must avoid loading external decls during the import becuase
ExternalASTSource is implemented with ASTImporter, so external loads
during import results in uncontrolled and faulty import.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, jingham, clayborg, a_sidorin, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61333
llvm-svn: 366325
Summary:
These tests may work with C++14 language constructs in the future
(variable templates and others).
To avoid warnings about language version C++ version constants in the tests
are updated.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64477
llvm-svn: 366061
Summary:
ASTImporter makes now difference between enums with same name in different translation
units if these are not visible outside.
("Scoped enums" are not handled yet.)
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62484
llvm-svn: 365464
Summary:
The current import implementation fails to import the definition of a
lambda class if the lambda class is defined in a function param.
E.g., the lambda class below will be imported without any methods:
```
template <typename F>
void f(F L = [](){}) {}
```
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64073
llvm-svn: 365315
Summary:
Now we store the errors for the Decls in the "to" context too. For
that, however, we have to put these errors in a shared state (among all
the ASTImporter objects which handle the same "to" context but different
"from" contexts).
After a series of imports from different "from" TUs we have a "to" context
which may have erroneous nodes in it. (Remember, the AST is immutable so
there is no way to delete a node once we had created it and we realized
the error later.) All these erroneous nodes are marked in
ASTImporterSharedState::ImportErrors. Clients of the ASTImporter may
use this as an input. E.g. the static analyzer engine may not try to
analyze a function if that is marked as erroneous (it can be queried via
ASTImporterSharedState::getImportDeclErrorIfAny()).
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62376
llvm-svn: 364785
Summary:
During import of a specific Decl D, it may happen that some AST nodes
had already been created before we recognize an error. In this case we
signal back the error to the caller, but the "to" context remains
polluted with those nodes which had been created. Ideally, those nodes
should not had been created, but that time we did not know about the
error, the error happened later. Since the AST is immutable (most of
the cases we can't remove existing nodes) we choose to mark these nodes
as erroneous.
Here are the steps of the algorithm:
1) We keep track of the nodes which we visit during the import of D: See
ImportPathTy.
2) If a Decl is already imported and it is already on the import path
(we have a cycle) then we copy/store the relevant part of the import
path. We store these cycles for each Decl.
3) When we recognize an error during the import of D then we set up this
error to all Decls in the stored cycles for D and we clear the stored
cycles.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62375
llvm-svn: 364771
Summary:
During analysis of one project we failed to import one
CXXDestructorDecl. But since we did not propagate the error in
importDeclContext we had a CXXRecordDecl without a destructor. Then the
analyzer engine had a CallEvent where the nonexistent dtor was requested
(crash).
Solution is to propagate the errors we have during importing a
DeclContext.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63603
llvm-svn: 364752
Summary:
We add a new member which is a mapping from the already-imported
declarations in the "from" context to the error status of the import of
that declaration. This map contains only the declarations that were not
correctly imported. The same declaration may or may not be included in
ImportedDecls. This map is updated continuously during imports and never
cleared (like ImportedDecls). In Import(Decl*) we use this mapping, so
if there was a previous failed import we return with the existing error.
We add/remove from the Lookuptable in consistency with ImportedFromDecls.
When we map a decl in the 'to' context to something in the 'from'
context then and only then we add it to the lookup table. When we
remove a mapping then and only then we remove it from the lookup table.
This patch is the first in a series of patches whose aim is to further
strengthen the error handling in ASTImporter.
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62373
llvm-svn: 364279
Summary:
In most cases the FriendDecl contains the declaration of the befriended
class as a child node, so it is discovered during the recursive
visitation. However, there are cases when the befriended class is not a
child, thus it must be fetched explicitly from the FriendDecl, and only
then can we add it to the lookup table.
(Note, this does affect only CTU and does not affect LLDB, because we
cannot and do not use the ASTImporterLookupTable in LLDB.)
Reviewers: a_sidorin, a.sidorin, shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62064
llvm-svn: 363062
Summary:
ASTImporter makes now difference between classes with same name in different
translation units if these are not visible outside. These classes are not linked
into one decl chain.
Reviewers: martong, a.sidorin, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62312
llvm-svn: 361752
Summary:
This is the final phase of the refactoring towards using llvm::Expected
and llvm::Error in the ASTImporter API.
This involves the following:
- remove old Import functions which returned with a pointer,
- use the Import_New functions (which return with Err or Expected) everywhere
and handle their return value
- rename Import_New functions to Import
This affects both Clang and LLDB.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, aprantl, a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61438
llvm-svn: 360760
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
Changes:
- The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
- The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
- Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
- Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
- The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
- Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
Patch by Tyker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 359949
Summary:
We are currently implementing support in LLDB that reconstructs the STL templates from
the target program in the expression evaluator. This reconstruction happens during the
import process from our debug info AST into the expression evaluation AST, which means
we need a way to intercept the ASTImporter import process.
This patch adds an protected ImportImpl method that we can overwrite in LLDB to implement
our special importing logic (which is essentially just looking into a C++ module that is attached to
the target context). Because ImportImpl has to call MapImported/AddToLookup for the decls it
creates, this patch also exposes those via a new unified method and checks that we call it when
importing decls.
Reviewers: martong, balazske, a.sidorin, shafik, a_sidorin
Reviewed By: martong, a_sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits, lldb-commits, aprantl
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59485
llvm-svn: 359502
Balazs Keri