Renames GTEST_NO_LLVM_RAW_OSTREAM -> GTEST_NO_LLVM_SUPPORT and guards
the new features behind it.
This reverts commit a063bcf3ef5a879adbe9639a3c187d876eee0e66.
llvm-svn: 369527
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Patch By: metzman
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: #sanitizers, delcypher, morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
llvm-svn: 341082
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: #sanitizers, delcypher, morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
llvm-svn: 340949
Summary:
Port libFuzzer to windows-msvc.
This patch allows libFuzzer targets to be built and run on Windows, using -fsanitize=fuzzer and/or fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link. It allows these forms of coverage instrumentation to work on Windows as well.
It does not fix all issues, such as those with -fsanitize-coverage=stack-depth, which is not usable on Windows as of this patch.
It also does not fix any libFuzzer integration tests. Nearly all of them fail to compile, fixing them will come in a later patch, so libFuzzer tests are disabled on Windows until them.
Patch By: metzman
Reviewers: morehouse, rnk
Reviewed By: morehouse, rnk
Subscribers: morehouse, kcc, eraman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51022
llvm-svn: 340860
It doesn't make sense to non-deterministically choose between
`CopyPart(..)` and `InsertPart(..)` when it is known that
`InsertPart(..)` will fail.
This upstream's a change from JFS solver's fork of LibFuzzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45693
llvm-svn: 330687
This test is failing on my Linux box. Just increasing the number of
iterations works around this. The divergence is likely due to
our reliance on `std::shuffle()` which is not guaranteed to have
the same behaviour across platforms.
This is a strong argument for us to implement our own shuffle
function to avoid divergence in behaviour across platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45767
llvm-svn: 330390
Summary: With 3 Dictionary objects, each containing space of ~16k DictionaryEntry objects, the MutationDispatcher object is fairly memory heavy. On platforms with a lower default stack size, this can cause panics in FuzzerUnittest as those tests stack-allocate the MutationDispatcher. This may be especially problematic for platforms that do not (yet) have a way to programmatically change their stack size, aside from link-time flags. In general, it seems more prudent to use the heap for an object of this size.
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40926
llvm-svn: 319988
Summary:
To be more portable (especially w.r.t. platforms without system()),
commands should be managed programmatically rather than via string
manipulation on the command line. This change introduces
Fuzzer::Command, with methods to manage arguments and flags, set output
options, and execute the command.
Patch By: aarongreen
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: kcc, morehouse
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40103
llvm-svn: 319680
Resulting library binaries will be named libclang_rt.fuzzer*, and will
be placed in Clang toolchain, allowing redistribution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36908
llvm-svn: 311407
Sam McCall