A couple of UBSan-* :: TestCases/ImplicitConversion testcases FAIL on Solaris/x86
(and Solaris/SPARC with https://reviews.llvm.org/D40900):
FAIL: UBSan-AddressSanitizer-i386 :: TestCases/ImplicitConversion/signed-integer-truncation-or-sign-change-blacklist.c (49187 of 49849)
******************** TEST 'UBSan-AddressSanitizer-i386 :: TestCases/ImplicitConversion/signed-integer-truncation-or-sign-change-blacklist.c' FAILED ********************
[...]
Command Output (stderr):
--
/vol/llvm/src/compiler-rt/local/test/ubsan/TestCases/ImplicitConversion/signed-integer-truncation-or-sign-change-blacklist.c:53:11: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
// CHECK: {{.*}}signed-integer-truncation-or-sign-change-blacklist.c:[[@LINE-1]]:10: runtime error: implicit conversion from type '{{.*}}' (aka 'unsigned int') of value 4294967295 (32-bit, unsigned) to type '{{.*}}' (aka 'signed char') changed the value to -1 (8-bit, signed)
^
<stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
/vol/llvm/src/compiler-rt/local/test/ubsan/TestCases/ImplicitConversion/signed-integer-truncation-or-sign-change-blacklist.c:52:10: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') of value 4294967295 (32-bit, unsigned) to type 'int8_t' (aka 'char') changed the value to -1 (8-bit, signed)
^
<stdin>:1:1: note: with "@LINE-1" equal to "52"
/vol/llvm/src/compiler-rt/local/test/ubsan/TestCases/ImplicitConversion/signed-integer-truncation-or-sign-change-blacklist.c:52:10: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') of value 4294967295 (32-bit, unsigned) to type 'int8_t' (aka 'char') changed the value to -1 (8-bit, signed)
^
<stdin>:1:69: note: possible intended match here
/vol/llvm/src/compiler-rt/local/test/ubsan/TestCases/ImplicitConversion/signed-integer-truncation-or-sign-change-blacklist.c:52:10: runtime error: implicit conversion from type 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') of value 4294967295 (32-bit, unsigned) to type 'int8_t' (aka 'char') changed the value to -1 (8-bit, signed)
^
This is always a difference for int8_t where signed char is expected, but only
char seen.
I could trace this to <sys/int_types.h> which has
/*
* Basic / Extended integer types
*
* The following defines the basic fixed-size integer types.
*
* Implementations are free to typedef them to Standard C integer types or
* extensions that they support. If an implementation does not support one
* of the particular integer data types below, then it should not define the
* typedefs and macros corresponding to that data type. Note that int8_t
* is not defined in -Xs mode on ISAs for which the ABI specifies "char"
* as an unsigned entity because there is no way to define an eight bit
* signed integral.
*/
#if defined(_CHAR_IS_SIGNED)
typedef char int8_t;
#else
#if defined(__STDC__)
typedef signed char int8_t;
#endif
#endif
_CHAR_IS_SIGNED is always defined on both sparc and x86. Since it seems ok
to have either form, I've changed the affected tests to use
'{{(signed )?}}char' instead of 'signed char'.
Tested on x86_64-pc-solaris2.11, sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63984
llvm-svn: 365303
Summary:
The NetBSD headers use internal indirect type for
standard *int*_t definitions. The internal type is unrolled
inside the sanitizer into e.g. __int32_t from int32_t.
This symbol mangling causes pattern mismatch in
the interger truncation tests as they expect exact
types such as 'int32_t'.
Change the pattern rules so every acceptable internal
form of *int*_t will be accepted flawlessly.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, vitalybuka, joerg
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: kubamracek, dmgreen, llvm-commits, mgorny, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54150
llvm-svn: 346228
Just to be consistent with the rest.
I should have done that in the commit itself, but the filepaths
is one thing i forgot to verify :S
llvm-svn: 338307
Rainer Orth