We never compare these directories (where ConstString would be good) and
essentially just convert this back to a normal string in the end. So we might
as well just use std::string. Also makes it easier to unittest this code
(which was the main motivation for this change).
llvm-svn: 371623
Summary:
Currently, clang's FileManager uses NULL as an indicator that a particular file
did not exist, but would not propagate errors like permission issues. Instead,
teach FileManager to use llvm::ErrorOr internally and return rich errors for
failures.
Reviewers: arphaman, bruno, martong, shafik
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, jkorous, dexonsmith, kadircet, jsji, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65534
llvm-svn: 367618
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64763
llvm-svn: 366148
Summary:
IRDynamicChecks in its current form is specific to Clang since it deals
with the C language family. It is possible that we may want to
instrument code generated for other languages, but we can factor in a
more general mechanism to do so at a later time.
This decouples ObCLanguageRuntime from Expression!
Reviewers: compnerd, clayborg, jingham, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64591
llvm-svn: 365853
Summary:
I saw while debugging that we call this file `ParseInternal`, which is not a very good name for our
fake expression file and also adds this unnecessary link between the way we name this function
and the other source location names we get from the expression parser. This patch is renaming
it to `<lldb-expr>` which is closer to the way Clang names its buffers, it doesn't depend on the
function name (which changes when I refactor this code) and it's easier to grep for.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64545
llvm-svn: 365812
Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
This was added to support FreeBSD. The inclusion of this header increases the
size of `lldb-server` due to MCJIT being forcefully preserved. Conditionalise
the inclusion to shared builds of LLVM which will allow for MCJIT to be stripped
if unnecessary when performing static linking of tools. This shaves off ~28% of
the binary size for lldb-server when linked with gold using
`-ffunction-sections` and `-fdata-sections`.
llvm-svn: 359944
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
Summary:
This patch is a follow-up for D58125. It implements the manual instantiation and merging of 'std' templates like
`std::vector` and `std::shared_ptr` with information from the debug info AST. This (finally) allows using these classes
in the expression evaluator like every other class (i.e. things like `vec.size()` and shared_ptr debugging now works, yay!).
The main logic is the `CxxModuleHandler` which intercept the ASTImporter import process and replaces any `std` decls
by decls from the C++ module. The decls from the C++ module are "imported" by just deserializing them directly in
the expression evaluation context. This is mostly because we don't want to rely on the ASTImporter to correctly import
these declarations, but in the future we should also move to the ASTImporter for that.
This patch doesn't contain the automatic desugaring for result variables. This means that if you call for example
`size` of `std::vector` you maybe get some very verbose typedef'd type as the variable type, e.g.
`std::vector<int, std::allocator<int>>::value_type`.
This is not only unreadable, it also means that our ASTImporter has to import all these types and associated
decls into the persisent variable context. This currently usually leads to some assertion getting triggered
in Clang when the ASTImporter either makes a mistake during importing or our debug info AST is inconsitent.
The current workaround I use in the tests is to just cast the result to it's actual type (e.g. `size_t` or `int`) to prevent
the ASTImporter from having to handle all these complicated decls.
The automatic desugaring will be a future patch because I'm not happy yet with the current code for that and because
I anticipate that this will be a controversial patch.
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik, jingham, martong, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: martong
Subscribers: balazske, rnkovacs, mgorny, mgrang, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59537
llvm-svn: 359538
Summary:
It's never set to true. Its only effect would be to set stdout to binary mode.
Hopefully we have better ways of doing this by now :-)
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60871
llvm-svn: 358696
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Remove CompilerInstance::VirtualFileSystem and
CompilerInstance::setVirtualFileSystem, instead relying on the VFS in
the FileManager. CompilerInstance and its clients already went to some
trouble to make these match. Now they are guaranteed to match.
As part of this, I added a VFS parameter (defaults to nullptr) to
CompilerInstance::createFileManager, to avoid repeating construction
logic in clients that just wanted to customize the VFS.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59377
llvm-svn: 357037
Summary:
Makes the code a bit safer in the unlikely situation that we don't get a ClangUserExpression
when doing code completion.
Reviewers: aprantl, jingham
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: labath, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59359
llvm-svn: 356174
Summary:
This patch is the MVP version of importing the std module into the expression parser to improve C++ debugging.
What happens in this patch is that we inject a `@import std` into our expression source code. We also
modify our internal Clang instance for parsing this expression to work with modules and debug info
at the same time (which is the main change in terms of LOC). We implicitly build the `std` module on the first use. The
C++ include paths for building are extracted from the debug info, which means that this currently only
works if the program is compiled with `-glldb -fmodules` and uses the std module. The C include paths
are currently specified by LLDB.
I enabled the tests currently only for libc++ and Linux because I could test this locally. I'll enable the tests
for other platforms once this has landed and doesn't break any bots (and I implemented the platform-specific
C include paths for them).
With this patch we can now:
* Build a libc++ as a module and import it into the expression parser.
* Read from the module while also referencing declarations from the debug info. E.g. `std::abs(local_variable)`.
What doesn't work (yet):
* Merging debug info and C++ module declarations. E.g. `std::vector<CustomClass>` doesn't work.
* Pretty much anything that involves the ASTImporter and templated code. As the ASTImporter is used for saving the result declaration, this means that we can't
call yet any function that returns a non-trivial type.
* Use libstdc++ for this, as it requires multiple include paths and Clang only emits one include path per module. Also libstdc++ doesn't support Clang modules without patches.
Reviewers: aprantl, jingham, shafik, friss, davide, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58125
llvm-svn: 355939
In r353906 we hooked up clang and lldb's reproducer infrastructure to
capture files used by clang. This patch adds the necessary logic to have
clang reuse the files from lldb's reproducer during replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58309
llvm-svn: 354283
I was looking at the ClangExpressionParser and noticed that we have a
FileManager owned by the expression parser and later ask the compiler
instance to create a new FileManager, owned by the clang CI. Looking at
the code I don't see a good reason for having two instances. This patch
removes the one owned by LLDB.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58222
llvm-svn: 354041
This patch properly extracts the full submodule path as well as its
search paths from DWARF import decls and passes it on to the
ClangModulesDeclVendor.
rdar://problem/47970144
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58090
llvm-svn: 353961
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
This patch hooks up clang and lldb's reproducers functionality. It
ensures that when capturing a reproducer, headers and modules imported
through the expression parser are collected.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58076
llvm-svn: 353906
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary: Instead use a more reasonable value to start and rely on the fact that SmallString will resize if necessary.
Reviewers: labath, asmith
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55457
llvm-svn: 348775
Summary:
This patch adds the check of the language before ignoring names like `id` or
`Class`, which are reserved in Objective C, but are allowed in C++. It is needed
to make it possible to evaluate expressions in a C++ program containing names
like `id` or `Class`.
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: jingham, clayborg
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54843
llvm-svn: 348240
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This patch removes the comments following the header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54385
llvm-svn: 346625
We haven't supported compiling ObjC1 for a long time (and never will again), so
there isn't any reason to keep these separate. This patch replaces
LangOpts::ObjC1 and LangOpts::ObjC2 with LangOpts::ObjC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53547
llvm-svn: 345637
Summary:
Completing inside the expression command now uses the new description API
to also provide additional information to the user. For now this information
are the types of variables/fields and the signatures of completed function calls.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52103
llvm-svn: 342385
Summary:
The check is inverted here: If we have error messages, we should print those instead
of our default error message. But currently we print the default message when we
actually have a sensible error to print.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38383
Thanks Nat for the patch!
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51602
llvm-svn: 341940
The patch was originally written before we had a CompletionRequest,
so it still used a StringList to pass back the completions to
the request.
llvm-svn: 341124
Summary:
This patch adds initial code completion support for the `expr` command.
We now have a completion handler in the expression CommandObject that
essentially just attempts to parse the given user expression with Clang with
an attached code completion consumer. We filter and prepare the
code completions provided by Clang and send them back to the completion
API.
The current completion is limited to variables that are in the current scope.
This includes local variables and all types used by local variables. We however
don't do any completion of symbols that are not used in the local scope (or
in some other way already in the ASTContext).
This is partly because there is not yet any code that manually searches for additiona
information in the debug information. Another cause is that for some reason the existing
code for loading these additional symbols when requested by Clang doesn't seem to work.
This will be fixed in a future patch.
Reviewers: jingham, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, aprantl, JDevlieghere, friss, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48465
llvm-svn: 341086
Summary:
Now that we moved the BuiltinContext and SelectorTable to the
CompilerInstance, we can also get rid of manually creating our
own ASTContext, but just use the one from the CompilerInstance
(which will be created with the same settings).
Reviewers: vsk, aprantl, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51253
llvm-svn: 340748
Summary:
At the moment we create our own SelectorTable even though the Preprocessor always
creates one for us that we can (and should) reuse.
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51185
llvm-svn: 340585
Summary:
Calling any non-libc builtin function in the expression command currently just causes Clang
to state that the function is not known. The reason for this is that we actually never
initialize the list of builtin functions in the Builtin::Context.
This patch just calls the initializer for the builtins in the preprocessor. Also adds some tests
for the new builtins.
It also gets rid of the extra list of builtins in the ClangExpressionParser, as we can just reuse
the existing list in the Preprocessor for the ASTContext. Having just one list of builtins around
is also closer to the standard Clang behavior.
Reviewers: #lldb, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: sgraenitz, clayborg, vsk, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50481
llvm-svn: 340571
Summary:
Instead of a function taking an enum value determining which path to
return, we now have a suite of functions, each returning a single path
kind. This makes it easy to move the python-path function into a
specific plugin in a follow-up commit.
All the users of GetLLDBPath were converted to call specific functions
instead. Most of them were hard-coding the enum value anyway, so this
conversion was simple. The only exception was SBHostOS, which I've
changed to use a switch on the incoming enum value.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48272
llvm-svn: 335052
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
Clang recently switched to C++14 (with GNU extensions) as the default
dialect, but LLDB didn't catch up. This causes failures as LLDB still
evaluates ObjectiveC expressions as Objective C++ using C++98 as standard.
There are things not available in C++98, including, e.g. nullptr.
In some cases Objective-C `nil` is defined as `nullptr` so this causes
an evaluation failure. Switch the default to overcome this issue
(actually, currently lldb evaluates both C++11 and C++14 as C++11,
but that seems a larger change and definitely could be re-evaluated
in the future).
No test as this is currently failing on the LLDB bots after the clang
switch (so, de facto, there's a test already for it).
This is a recommit, with a thinko fixed (the code was previously
placed incorrectly).
<rdar://problem/36011995>
llvm-svn: 320778
Raphael Isemann