This reverts commit 21641a2f6d.
It was causing the following test failures:
lldb-Suite.lang/objc/objc-class-method.TestObjCClassMethod.py
lldb-Suite.lang/objc/foundation.TestObjCMethodsString.py
lldb-Suite.lang/objc/foundation.TestConstStrings.py
lldb-Suite.lang/objc/radar-9691614.TestObjCMethodReturningBOOL.py
lldb-Suite.lang/objc/foundation.TestObjCMethodsNSArray.py
llvm-svn: 372057
We never compare these directories (where ConstString would be good) and
essentially just convert this back to a normal string in the end. So we might
as well just use std::string. Also makes it easier to unittest this code
(which was the main motivation for this change).
llvm-svn: 371623
Summary:
After rL368069 I noticed that HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined in
Platform.h, or anywhere else in lldb. This change fixes that.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65822
llvm-svn: 368125
The UpdateLanguageForExpr should only update the language, but over
time it started to do also do different things related to the generation
of the expression source code. This patch refactors all the source code
generation part into its own function.
llvm-svn: 367922
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
Summary:
In r259902, LLDB started injecting all the locals in every expression
evaluation. This fixed a bunch of issues, but also caused others, mostly
performance regressions on some codebases. The regressions were bad
enough that we added a setting in r274783 to control the behavior and
we have been shipping with the setting off to avoid the perf regressions.
This patch changes the logic injecting the local variables to only inject
the ones present in the expression typed by the user. The approach is
fairly simple and just scans the typed expression for every local name.
Hopefully this gives us the best of both world as it just realizes the
types of the variables really used by the expression.
Landing this requires the 2 other issues I pointed out today to be addressed
but I wanted to gather comments right away.
Original patch by Frédéric Riss!
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg, friss, shafik
Reviewed By: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: teemperor, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46551
llvm-svn: 359773
Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.
However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```
Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.
I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.
This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.
This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth
Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667
llvm-svn: 359281
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Summary:
This patch is the MVP version of importing the std module into the expression parser to improve C++ debugging.
What happens in this patch is that we inject a `@import std` into our expression source code. We also
modify our internal Clang instance for parsing this expression to work with modules and debug info
at the same time (which is the main change in terms of LOC). We implicitly build the `std` module on the first use. The
C++ include paths for building are extracted from the debug info, which means that this currently only
works if the program is compiled with `-glldb -fmodules` and uses the std module. The C include paths
are currently specified by LLDB.
I enabled the tests currently only for libc++ and Linux because I could test this locally. I'll enable the tests
for other platforms once this has landed and doesn't break any bots (and I implemented the platform-specific
C include paths for them).
With this patch we can now:
* Build a libc++ as a module and import it into the expression parser.
* Read from the module while also referencing declarations from the debug info. E.g. `std::abs(local_variable)`.
What doesn't work (yet):
* Merging debug info and C++ module declarations. E.g. `std::vector<CustomClass>` doesn't work.
* Pretty much anything that involves the ASTImporter and templated code. As the ASTImporter is used for saving the result declaration, this means that we can't
call yet any function that returns a non-trivial type.
* Use libstdc++ for this, as it requires multiple include paths and Clang only emits one include path per module. Also libstdc++ doesn't support Clang modules without patches.
Reviewers: aprantl, jingham, shafik, friss, davide, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58125
llvm-svn: 355939
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
The `ClangUserExpression::GetLanguageForExpr` method is currently a big
source of sadness, as it's name implies that it's an accessor method, but it actually
is also initializing some variables that we need for parsing. This caused that we
currently call this getter just for it's side effects while ignoring it's return value,
which is confusing for the reader.
This patch renames it to `UpdateLanguageForExpr` and merges all calls to the
method into a single call in `ClangUserExpression::PrepareForParsing` (as calling
this method is anyway mandatory for parsing to succeed)
While looking at the code, I also found that we actually have two language
variables in this class hierarchy. The normal `Language` from the UserExpression
class and the `LanguageForExpr` that we implemented in this subclass. Both
don't seem to actually contain the same value, so we probably should look at this
next.
Reviewers: xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52561
llvm-svn: 343191
AbsPosToLineColumnPos is the only reader of m_user_expression_start_pos
and actually treats it like a size_t. Also the value we store in
m_user_expression_start_pos is originally a size_t, so it makes sense
to change the type of this variable to size_t.
llvm-svn: 342804
The GetLanguageForExpr has side effects, so we can't remove this
call without breaking the completion mechanism. However, we can
keep the change that gets rid of this unnecessary variable.
llvm-svn: 341535
The patch was originally written before we had a CompletionRequest,
so it still used a StringList to pass back the completions to
the request.
llvm-svn: 341124
Summary:
This patch adds initial code completion support for the `expr` command.
We now have a completion handler in the expression CommandObject that
essentially just attempts to parse the given user expression with Clang with
an attached code completion consumer. We filter and prepare the
code completions provided by Clang and send them back to the completion
API.
The current completion is limited to variables that are in the current scope.
This includes local variables and all types used by local variables. We however
don't do any completion of symbols that are not used in the local scope (or
in some other way already in the ASTContext).
This is partly because there is not yet any code that manually searches for additiona
information in the debug information. Another cause is that for some reason the existing
code for loading these additional symbols when requested by Clang doesn't seem to work.
This will be fixed in a future patch.
Reviewers: jingham, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: labath, aprantl, JDevlieghere, friss, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48465
llvm-svn: 341086
Summary:
This patch splits out functionality from the `Parse` method into different methods.
This benefits the code completion work (which should reuse those methods) and makes the
code a bit more readable.
Note that this patch is as minimal as possible. Some of the code in the new methods definitely
needs more refactoring.
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48339
llvm-svn: 336734
Summary:
OnExit ensures we call `ResetDeclMap` before this method ends. However,
we also have a few manual calls to ResetDeclMap in there that are actually unnecessary
because of this (calling the method multiple times has no effect). This patch also moves
the class out of the method that we can reuse it for the upcoming method that handles
parsing for completion.
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48337
llvm-svn: 335078
that takes a prefix string. This simplifies the implementation and
allows plugins such as the Swift plugin to supply different prefixes
for return and error variables.
rdar://problem/39299889
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46088
llvm-svn: 331235
so it can be shared across multiple language plugins.
In a multi-language project it is counterintuitive to have a result
variables reuse numbers just because they are using a different
language plugin in LLDB (but not for example, when they are
Objective-C versus C++, since they are both handled by Clang).
This is NFC on llvm.org except for the Go plugin.
rdar://problem/39299889
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46083
llvm-svn: 331234
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
In templated const functions, trying to run an expression would produce the
error
error: out-of-line definition of '$__lldb_expr' does not match any declaration
in 'foo' member declaration does not match because it is const qualified
error: 1 error parsing expression
which is no good. It turned out we don't actually need to worry about "const,"
we just need to be consistent about the declaration of the expression and the
FunctionDecl we inject into the class for "this."
Also added a test case.
<rdar://problem/24985958>
llvm-svn: 268083
This reverts commit r267833 as it breaks the build. It looks like some work in progress got
committed together with the actual fix, but I'm not sure which one is which, so I'll revert the
whole patch and let author resumbit it after fixing the build error.
llvm-svn: 267861
In templated const functions, trying to run an expression would produce the
error
error: out-of-line definition of '$__lldb_expr' does not match any declaration in 'foo'
member declaration does not match because it is const qualified
error: 1 error parsing expression
which is no good. It turned out we don't actually need to worry about "const,"
we just need to be consistent about the declaration of the expression and the
FunctionDecl we inject into the class for "this."
Also added a test case.
<rdar://problem/24985958>
llvm-svn: 267833
quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits.
Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression
to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present.
<rdar://problem/25351938>
llvm-svn: 264793
Blocks and lambdas have their implementation functions stored in the IR for an
expression. If we put the block/lambda into a result variable it needs to stay
around. As a heuristic, remember any execution unit that has more than one
function in it.
<rdar://problem/22864976>
llvm-svn: 264483
Raphael Isemann