Summary:
These classes describe the details of the process we are about to
launch, and so they are naturally used by the launching code in the Host
module. Previously they were present in Target because that is the most
important (but by far not the only) user of the launching code.
Since the launching code has other customers, must of which do not care
about Targets, it makes sense to move these classes to the Host layer,
next to the launching code.
This move reduces the number of times that Target is included from host
to 8 (it used to be 14).
Reviewers: zturner, clayborg, jingham, davide, teemperor
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56602
llvm-svn: 353047
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch simplifies boolean expressions acorss LLDB. It was generated
using clang-tidy with the following command:
run-clang-tidy.py -checks='-*,readability-simplify-boolean-expr' -format -fix $PWD
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55584
llvm-svn: 349215
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This patch removes the logic for resolving paths out of FileSpec and
updates call sites to rely on the FileSystem class instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53915
llvm-svn: 345890
Summary:
LLDB_PLUGINS doesn't exist as a variable, so this line doesn't add any dependencies and is
just confusing. It seems this slipped in from the gdb-remote CMake I was using as a CMake template.
The gdb-remote CMake itself is using a local LLDB_PLUGINS variable, so that code is fine.
Reviewers: davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: davide, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49695
llvm-svn: 337741
Summary:
This patch adds a modulemap which allows compiling the lldb headers into C++ modules
(for example in builds with LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=On).
Even though most of the affected code has been cleaned up to work with the more strict
C++ module semantics, there are still some workarounds left in the current modulemap
(the most obvious one is the big `lldb` wrapper module).
It also moves the Obj-C++ files in lldb to their own subdirectories. This was necessary
because we need to filter out the modules flags for this code.
Note: With the latest clang and libstdc++ it seems necessary to have a STL C++ module
to get a working LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES build for lldb. Otherwise clang will falsely
detect ODR violations in the textually included STL code inside the lldb modules.
Reviewers: aprantl, bruno
Reviewed By: aprantl, bruno
Subscribers: mgorny, yamaguchi, v.g.vassilev, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47929
llvm-svn: 334611
Pavel Labath