This is a minimal start to correcting a problem most directly discussed in PR38086:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
We have been hacking around a limitation for FP select patterns by using the
fast-math-flags on the condition of the select rather than the select itself.
This patch just allows FMF to appear with the 'select' opcode. No changes are
needed to "FPMathOperator" because it already includes select-of-FP because
that definition is based on the (return) value type.
Once we have this ability, we can start correcting and adding IR transforms
to use the FMF on a 'select' instruction. The instcombine and vectorizer test
diffs only show that the IRBuilder change is behaving as expected by applying
an FMF guard value to 'select'.
For reference:
rL241901 - allowed FMF with fcmp
rL255555 - allowed FMF with FP calls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917
llvm-svn: 361401
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 signed integers with the scale of them provided
as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on them. The
result is saturated and clamped between the largest and smallest representable
values of the first 2 operands.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55720
llvm-svn: 361289
We shouldn't really make assumptions about possible sizes for long and long long. And longer term we should probably support vectorizing these intrinsics. By making the result types not fixed we can support vectors as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62026
llvm-svn: 361169
The scalar start/accumulator value of the fadd- and fmul reduction
should match the result type of the reduction, as well as the vector
element-type of the input vector. Although this was not explicitly
specified in the LangRef, it was taken for granted in code implementing
the reductions. The patch also fixes the LangRef by adding this
constraint.
Reviewed By: aemerson, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60260
llvm-svn: 361133
This patch implements a limited form of autolinking primarily designed to allow
either the --dependent-library compiler option, or "comment lib" pragmas (
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/preprocessor/comment-c-cpp?view=vs-2017) in
C/C++ e.g. #pragma comment(lib, "foo"), to cause an ELF linker to automatically
add the specified library to the link when processing the input file generated
by the compiler.
Currently this extension is unique to LLVM and LLD. However, care has been taken
to design this feature so that it could be supported by other ELF linkers.
The design goals were to provide:
- A simple linking model for developers to reason about.
- The ability to to override autolinking from the linker command line.
- Source code compatibility, where possible, with "comment lib" pragmas in other
environments (MSVC in particular).
Dependent library support is implemented differently for ELF platforms than on
the other platforms. Primarily this difference is that on ELF we pass the
dependent library specifiers directly to the linker without manipulating them.
This is in contrast to other platforms where they are mapped to a specific
linker option by the compiler. This difference is a result of the greater
variety of ELF linkers and the fact that ELF linkers tend to handle libraries in
a more complicated fashion than on other platforms. This forces us to defer
handling the specifiers to the linker.
In order to achieve a level of source code compatibility with other platforms
we have restricted this feature to work with libraries that meet the following
"reasonable" requirements:
1. There are no competing defined symbols in a given set of libraries, or
if they exist, the program owner doesn't care which is linked to their
program.
2. There may be circular dependencies between libraries.
The binary representation is a mergeable string section (SHF_MERGE,
SHF_STRINGS), called .deplibs, with custom type SHT_LLVM_DEPENDENT_LIBRARIES
(0x6fff4c04). The compiler forms this section by concatenating the arguments of
the "comment lib" pragmas and --dependent-library options in the order they are
encountered. Partial (-r, -Ur) links are handled by concatenating .deplibs
sections with the normal mergeable string section rules. As an example, #pragma
comment(lib, "foo") would result in:
.section ".deplibs","MS",@llvm_dependent_libraries,1
.asciz "foo"
For LTO, equivalent information to the contents of a the .deplibs section can be
retrieved by the LLD for bitcode input files.
LLD processes the dependent library specifiers in the following way:
1. Dependent libraries which are found from the specifiers in .deplibs sections
of relocatable object files are added when the linker decides to include that
file (which could itself be in a library) in the link. Dependent libraries
behave as if they were appended to the command line after all other options. As
a consequence the set of dependent libraries are searched last to resolve
symbols.
2. It is an error if a file cannot be found for a given specifier.
3. Any command line options in effect at the end of the command line parsing apply
to the dependent libraries, e.g. --whole-archive.
4. The linker tries to add a library or relocatable object file from each of the
strings in a .deplibs section by; first, handling the string as if it was
specified on the command line; second, by looking for the string in each of the
library search paths in turn; third, by looking for a lib<string>.a or
lib<string>.so (depending on the current mode of the linker) in each of the
library search paths.
5. A new command line option --no-dependent-libraries tells LLD to ignore the
dependent libraries.
Rationale for the above points:
1. Adding the dependent libraries last makes the process simple to understand
from a developers perspective. All linkers are able to implement this scheme.
2. Error-ing for libraries that are not found seems like better behavior than
failing the link during symbol resolution.
3. It seems useful for the user to be able to apply command line options which
will affect all of the dependent libraries. There is a potential problem of
surprise for developers, who might not realize that these options would apply
to these "invisible" input files; however, despite the potential for surprise,
this is easy for developers to reason about and gives developers the control
that they may require.
4. This algorithm takes into account all of the different ways that ELF linkers
find input files. The different search methods are tried by the linker in most
obvious to least obvious order.
5. I considered adding finer grained control over which dependent libraries were
ignored (e.g. MSVC has /nodefaultlib:<library>); however, I concluded that this
is not necessary: if finer control is required developers can fall back to using
the command line directly.
RFC thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/131004.html.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60274
llvm-svn: 360984
This patch add the ISD::LROUND and ISD::LLROUND along with new
intrinsics. The changes are straightforward as for other
floating-point rounding functions, with just some adjustments
required to handle the return value being an interger.
The idea is to optimize lround/llround generation for AArch64
in a subsequent patch. Current semantic is just route it to libm
symbol.
llvm-svn: 360889
The 3-field form was introduced by D3499 in 2014 and the legacy 2-field
form was planned to be removed in LLVM 4.0
For the textual format, this patch migrates the existing 2-field form to
use the 3-field form and deletes the compatibility code.
test/Verifier/global-ctors-2.ll checks we have a friendly error message.
For bitcode, lib/IR/AutoUpgrade UpgradeGlobalVariables will upgrade the
2-field form (add i8* null as the third field).
Reviewed By: rnk, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61547
llvm-svn: 360742
The new fptrunc and fpext intrinsics are constrained versions of the
regular fptrunc and fpext instructions.
Reviewed by: Andrew Kaylor, Craig Topper, Cameron McInally, Conner Abbot
Approved by: Craig Topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55897
llvm-svn: 360581
Just as as llvm IR supports explicitly specifying numeric value ids
for instructions, and emits them by default in textual output, now do
the same for blocks.
This is a slightly incompatible change in the textual IR format.
Previously, llvm would parse numeric labels as string names. E.g.
define void @f() {
br label %"55"
55:
ret void
}
defined a label *named* "55", even without needing to be quoted, while
the reference required quoting. Now, if you intend a block label which
looks like a value number to be a name, you must quote it in the
definition too (e.g. `"55":`).
Previously, llvm would print nameless blocks only as a comment, and
would omit it if there was no predecessor. This could cause confusion
for readers of the IR, just as unnamed instructions did prior to the
addition of "%5 = " syntax, back in 2008 (PR2480).
Now, it will always print a label for an unnamed block, with the
exception of the entry block. (IMO it may be better to print it for
the entry-block as well. However, that requires updating many more
tests.)
Thus, the following is supported, and is the canonical printing:
define i32 @f(i32, i32) {
%3 = add i32 %0, %1
br label %4
4:
ret i32 %3
}
New test cases covering this behavior are added, and other tests
updated as required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58548
llvm-svn: 356789
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
This is a recommit of r356442 with trivial fixes for the failing tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356451
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356442
This indicates an intrinsic parameter is required to be a constant,
and should not be replaced with a non-constant value.
Add the attribute to all AMDGPU and generic intrinsics that comments
indicate it should apply to. I scanned other target intrinsics, but I
don't see any obvious comments indicating which arguments are intended
to be only immediates.
This breaks one questionable testcase for the autoupgrade. I'm unclear
on whether the autoupgrade is supposed to really handle declarations
which were never valid. The verifier fails because the attributes now
refer to a parameter past the end of the argument list.
llvm-svn: 355981
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
llvm-svn: 355685
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
llvm-svn: 355585
Use this feature to fix a bug on ARM where 4 byte alignment is
incorrectly assumed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57335
llvm-svn: 355522
Fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38583: Describe
how memcpy/memmove/memset behave when len=0. Also fix
some fallout from when the alignment parameter was
replaced by an attribute.
This closes PR38583.
Patch by RalfJung (Ralf)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57600
llvm-svn: 354911
We have all the necessary legalization, expansion and unrolling support required for the *.overflow intrinsics with vector types, so update the docs to make that clear.
Note: vectorization is not in place yet (the non-homogenous return types aren't well supported) so we still must explicitly use the vectors intrinsics and not reply on slp/loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58618
llvm-svn: 354821
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
llvm-svn: 353563
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 unsigned integers with the scale of them
provided as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on
them.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55625
llvm-svn: 353059
This is meant to be used with clang's __builtin_dynamic_object_size.
When 'true' is passed to this parameter, the intrinsic has the
potential to be folded into instructions that will be evaluated
at run time. When 'false', the objectsize intrinsic behaviour is
unchanged.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56761
llvm-svn: 352664
Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However,
the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
`noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
`_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important
for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan
cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack
unwinding is used.
Changes:
# UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes
the `noreturn` attribute from a function
# ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute
Generated code:
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
unreachable
```
The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be
cleaned up in a follow-up patch.
rdar://problem/40723397
Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624
llvm-svn: 352003
This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.
This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.
llvm-svn: 351796
Specifically, clarify the following:
1. Volatile load and store may access addresses that are not memory.
2. Volatile load and store do not modify arbitrary memory.
3. Volatile load and store do not trap.
Prompted by recent volatile discussion on llvmdev.
Currently, there's sort of a split in the source code about whether
volatile operations are allowed to trap; this resolves that dispute in
favor of not allowing them to trap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53184
llvm-svn: 351772
An abstract call site is a wrapper that allows to treat direct,
indirect, and callback calls the same. If an abstract call site
represents a direct or indirect call site it behaves like a stripped
down version of a normal call site object. The abstract call site can
also represent a callback call, thus the fact that the initially
called function (=broker) may invoke a third one (=callback callee).
In this case, the abstract call side hides the middle man, hence the
broker function. The result is a representation of the callback call,
inside the broker, but in the context of the original instruction that
invoked the broker.
Again, there are up to three functions involved when we talk about
callback call sites. The caller (1), which invokes the broker
function. The broker function (2), that may or may not invoke the
callback callee. And finally the callback callee (3), which is the
target of the callback call.
The abstract call site will handle the mapping from parameters to
arguments depending on the semantic of the broker function. However,
it is important to note that the mapping is often partial. Thus, some
arguments of the call/invoke instruction are mapped to parameters of
the callee while others are not. At the same time, arguments of the
callback callee might be unknown, thus "null" if queried.
This patch introduces also !callback metadata which describe how a
callback broker maps from parameters to arguments. This metadata is
directly created by clang for known broker functions, provided through
source code attributes by the user, or later deduced by analyses.
For motivation and additional information please see the corresponding
talk (slides/video)
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#talk20
as well as the LCPC paper
http://compilers.cs.uni-saarland.de/people/doerfert/par_opt_lcpc18.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54498
llvm-svn: 351627
The current llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata has a problem in that
it uses LoopIDs. LoopID unfortunately is not loop identifier. It is
neither unique (there's even a regression test assigning the some LoopID
to multiple loops; can otherwise happen if passes such as LoopVersioning
make copies of entire loops) nor persistent (every time a property is
removed/added from a LoopID's MDNode, it will also receive a new LoopID;
this happens e.g. when calling Loop::setLoopAlreadyUnrolled()).
Since most loop transformation passes change the loop attributes (even
if it just to mark that a loop should not be processed again as
llvm.loop.isvectorized does, for the versioned and unversioned loop),
the parallel access information is lost for any subsequent pass.
This patch unlinks LoopIDs and parallel accesses.
llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata on instruction is replaced by
llvm.access.group metadata. llvm.access.group points to a distinct
MDNode with no operands (avoiding the problem to ever need to add/remove
operands), called "access group". Alternatively, it can point to a list
of access groups. The LoopID then has an attribute
llvm.loop.parallel_accesses with all the access groups that are parallel
(no dependencies carries by this loop).
This intentionally avoid any kind of "ID". Loops that are clones/have
their attributes modifies retain the llvm.loop.parallel_accesses
attribute. Access instructions that a cloned point to the same access
group. It is not necessary for each access to have it's own "ID" MDNode,
but those memory access instructions with the same behavior can be
grouped together.
The behavior of llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access is not changed by this
patch, but should be considered deprecated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52116
llvm-svn: 349725
When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g.
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
is the same as
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used.
This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance,
!0 = !{!0, !1, !2}
!1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"}
!2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3}
!3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"}
defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop.
Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account.
For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations.
Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated.
To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied.
With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling).
Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288
llvm-svn: 348944
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 signed integers with the scale of them provided
as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on them.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54719
llvm-svn: 348912
This patch introduces a new instinsic `@llvm.experimental.widenable_condition`
that allows explicit representation for guards. It is an alternative to using
`@llvm.experimental.guard` intrinsic that does not contain implicit control flow.
We keep finding places where `@llvm.experimental.guard` is not supported or
treated too conservatively, and there are 2 reasons to that:
- `@llvm.experimental.guard` has memory write side effect to model implicit control flow,
and this sometimes confuses passes and analyzes that work with memory;
- Not all passes and analysis are aware of the semantics of guards. These passes treat them
as regular throwing call and have no idea that the condition of guard may be used to prove
something. One well-known place which had caused us troubles in the past is explicit loop
iteration count calculation in SCEV. Another example is new loop unswitching which is not
aware of guards. Whenever a new pass appears, we potentially have this problem there.
Rather than go and fix all these places (and commit to keep track of them and add support
in future), it seems more reasonable to leverage the existing optimizer's logic as much as possible.
The only significant difference between guards and regular explicit branches is that guard's condition
can be widened. It means that a guard contains (explicitly or implicitly) a `deopt` block successor,
and it is always legal to go there no matter what the guard condition is. The other successor is
a guarded block, and it is only legal to go there if the condition is true.
This patch introduces a new explicit form of guards alternative to `@llvm.experimental.guard`
intrinsic. Now a widenable guard can be represented in the CFG explicitly like this:
%widenable_condition = call i1 @llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()
%new_condition = and i1 %cond, %widenable_condition
br i1 %new_condition, label %guarded, label %deopt
guarded:
; Guarded instructions
deopt:
call type @llvm.experimental.deoptimize(<args...>) [ "deopt"(<deopt_args...>) ]
The new intrinsic `@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition` has semantics of an
`undef`, but the intrinsic prevents the optimizer from folding it early. This form
should exploit all optimization boons provided to `br` instuction, and it still can be
widened by replacing the result of `@llvm.experimental.widenable.condition()`
with `and` with any arbitrary boolean value (as long as the branch that is taken when
it is `false` has a deopt and has no side-effects).
For more motivation, please check llvm-dev discussion "[llvm-dev] Giving up using
implicit control flow in guards".
This patch introduces this new intrinsic with respective LangRef changes and a pass
that converts old-style guards (expressed as intrinsics) into the new form.
The naming discussion is still ungoing. Merging this to unblock further items. We can
later change the name of this intrinsic.
Reviewed By: reames, fedor.sergeev, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51207
llvm-svn: 348593
Summary:
Resubmit this with no changes because I think the build was broken
by a different diff.
-----
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
----- Summary from Previous Diff (Still Accurate) -----
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
llvm-svn: 347701
until I figure out why the build is failing or timing out
***************************
Summary:
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function
basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
This reverts commit a5b3c232d1e3613f23efbc3960f8e23ea70f2a79.
(r347617)
llvm-svn: 347628
Summary:
The prior diff had to be reverted because there were two tests
that failed. I updated the two tests in this diff
clang/test/Misc/pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test
clang/test/SemaCXX/attr-speculative-load-hardening.cpp
----- Summary from Previous Diff (Still Accurate) -----
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo, kristof.beyls, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54915
llvm-svn: 347617
Summary:
LLVM IR already has an attribute for speculative_load_hardening. Before
this commit, when a user passed the -mspeculative-load-hardening flag to
Clang, every function would have this attribute added to it. This Clang
attribute will allow users to opt into SLH on a function by function basis.
This can be applied to functions and Objective C methods.
Reviewers: chandlerc, echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54555
llvm-svn: 347586
A call to @llvm.trap can be expected to be cold (i.e. unlikely to be
reached in a normal program execution).
Outlining paths which unconditionally trap is an important memory
saving. As the hot/cold splitting pass (imho) should not treat all
noreturn calls as cold, explicitly mark @llvm.trap cold so that it can
be outlined.
Split out of https://reviews.llvm.org/D54244.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54329
llvm-svn: 346885
This adds the llvm-side support for post-inlining evaluation of the
__builtin_constant_p GCC intrinsic.
Also fixed SCCPSolver::visitCallSite to not blow up when seeing a call
to a function where canConstantFoldTo returns true, and one of the
arguments is a struct.
Updated from patch initially by Janusz Sobczak.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D4276
llvm-svn: 346322
Allows to disable direct TLS segment access (%fs or %gs). GCC supports
a similar flag, it can be useful in some circumstances, e.g. when a thread
context block needs to be updated directly from user space. More info
and specific use cases: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16145
There is another revision for clang as well.
Related: D53102
All X86 CodeGen tests appear to pass:
```
[46/47] Running lit suite /SourceCache/llvm-trunk-8.0/test/CodeGen
Testing Time: 23.17s
Expected Passes : 3801
Expected Failures : 15
Unsupported Tests : 8021
```
Reviewed by: Craig Topper.
Patch by nruslan (Ruslan Nikolaev).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53103
llvm-svn: 344723
Summary:
These new intrinsics have the semantics of the `minimum` and `maximum`
operations specified by the latest draft of IEEE 754-2018. Unlike
llvm.minnum and llvm.maxnum, these new intrinsics propagate NaNs and
always treat -0.0 as less than 0.0. `minimum` and `maximum` lower
directly to the existing `fminnan` and `fmaxnan` ISel DAG nodes. It is
safe to reuse these DAG nodes because before this patch were only
emitted in situations where there were known to be no NaN arguments or
where NaN propagation was correct and there were known to be no zero
arguments. I know of only four backends that lower fminnan and
fmaxnan: WebAssembly, ARM, AArch64, and SystemZ, and each of these
lowers fminnan and fmaxnan to instructions that are compatible with
the IEEE 754-2018 semantics.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff, sunfish, javed.absar
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, dexonsmith, kristina, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52764
llvm-svn: 344437
Summary:
Remove note about summary being ignored. Update to reflect the
fact that summary is now parsed by llvm-as.
While here, fix one summary format that changed since the initial
implementation.
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: inglorion, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51540
llvm-svn: 342479
Load Hardening.
Wires up the existing pass to work with a proper IR attribute rather
than just a hidden/internal flag. The internal flag continues to work
for now, but I'll likely remove it soon.
Most of the churn here is adding the IR attribute. I talked about this
Kristof Beyls and he seemed at least initially OK with this direction.
The idea of using a full attribute here is that we *do* expect at least
some forms of this for other architectures. There isn't anything
*inherently* x86-specific about this technique, just that we only have
an implementation for x86 at the moment.
While we could potentially expose this as a Clang-level attribute as
well, that seems like a good question to defer for the moment as it
isn't 100% clear whether that or some other programmer interface (or
both?) would be best. We'll defer the programmer interface side of this
for now, but at least get to the point where the feature can be enabled
without relying on implementation details.
This also allows us to do something that was really hard before: we can
enable *just* the indirect call retpolines when using SLH. For x86, we
don't have any other way to mitigate indirect calls. Other architectures
may take a different approach of course, and none of this is surfaced to
user-level flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51157
llvm-svn: 341363
Most users won't have to worry about this as all of the
'getOrInsertFunction' functions on Module will default to the program
address space.
An overload has been added to Function::Create to abstract away the
details for most callers.
This is based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D37054 but without the changes to
make passing a Module to Function::Create() mandatory. I have also added
some more tests and fixed the LLParser to accept call instructions for
types in the program address space.
Reviewed By: bjope
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47541
llvm-svn: 340519
highlighting syntax.
Most of them already were like this, and the Sphinx runs on the docs
build bot seems to be substantially more picky and/or not have support
for a bunch of the syntax here. Hopefully this will let it progress past
this.
My previous attempt to fix the syntax made the `opt` tool happy, but no
idea what the Sphinx stuff is really looking for, and the fact that
other blocks already just use `text` led me to this solution.
llvm-svn: 338983
Notably, just close two of the debug info metadata nodes early rather
than leaving them open with `...` which won't ever lex correctly. And
add the missing `:` on the count labels.
Slowly progressing through all of the warnings on the documentation
build bot. Sorry to do this one commit at a time, but despite my best
efforts I can't trigger these errors locally.
llvm-svn: 338982
Sphinx syntax highlighter.
This example also doesn't really make sense. There is no control flow or
clarification of what the `Safe:` block exists to do... If we want
examples here, we should make them much more clear in addition to making
them well formed IR sequences.
llvm-svn: 338981
This should make the semantics of DIExpressions within llvm.dbg.{addr,
declare, value} easier to understand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49572
llvm-svn: 338182
Violating the invariants specified by attributes is undefined behavior.
Maybe we could use poison instead for some of the parameter attributes,
but I don't think it's worthwhile.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49041
llvm-svn: 337947
Add some quick words for unroll and jam to the list of passes and add
unroll_and_jam metadata to the language ref.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49349
llvm-svn: 337448
We need to explicitly state what happens when an invariant promised by
load metadata is violated at runtime, since it's come up repeatedly.
It's possible we want to specify that the result of the load is poison
in some cases, rather than undefined behavior, if the constraint is
violated. That would allow preserving the metadata when the load is
hoisted, but doesn't allow propagating metadata based on control flow.
We currently do transforms based on control flow for nonnull metadata
(in PromoteMemToReg).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47854
llvm-svn: 337325
Clarify that violating nnan and ninf can lead to undefined behavior.
This allows more aggressive optimizations based on those assumptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47963
llvm-svn: 337323
As discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123292.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124400.html
We want to add rotate intrinsics because the IR expansion of that pattern is 4+ instructions,
and we can lose pieces of the pattern before it gets to the backend. Generalizing the operation
by allowing 2 different input values (plus the 3rd shift/rotate amount) gives us a "funnel shift"
operation which may also be a single hardware instruction.
Initially, I thought we needed to define new DAG nodes for these ops, and I spent time working
on that (much larger patch), but then I concluded that we don't need it. At least as a first
step, we have all of the backend support necessary to match these ops...because it was required.
And shepherding these through the IR optimizer is the primary concern, so the IR intrinsics are
likely all that we'll ever need.
There was also a question about converting the intrinsics to the existing ROTL/ROTR DAG nodes
(along with improving the oversized shift documentation). Again, I don't think that's strictly
necessary (as the test results here prove). That can be an efficiency improvement as a small
follow-up patch.
So all we're left with is documentation, definition of the IR intrinsics, and DAG builder support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49242
llvm-svn: 337221
Let's be conservative here; it matches what we actually implemented, and
it should be rare in practice anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49042
llvm-svn: 336744
Summary:
Support for this option is needed for building Linux kernel.
This is a very frequently requested feature by kernel developers.
More details : https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/4/601
GCC option description for -fdelete-null-pointer-checks:
This Assume that programs cannot safely dereference null pointers,
and that no code or data element resides at address zero.
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks is the inverse of this implying that
null pointer dereferencing is not undefined.
This feature is implemented in LLVM IR in this CL as the function attribute
"null-pointer-is-valid"="true" in IR (Under review at D47894).
The CL updates several passes that assumed null pointer dereferencing is
undefined to not optimize when the "null-pointer-is-valid"="true"
attribute is present.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma, jyknight, chandlerc, rnk, srhines, void, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: efriedma, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: eraman, haicheng, george.burgess.iv, drinkcat, theraven, reames, sanjoy, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47895
llvm-svn: 336613
In non-zero address spaces, we were reporting that an object at `null`
always occupies zero bytes. This is incorrect in many cases, so just
return `unknown` in those cases for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48860
llvm-svn: 336611
Summary:
This patch introduce new intrinsic -
strip.invariant.group that was described in the
RFC: Devirtualization v2
Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, nlopes, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, hiraditya, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47103
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 336073
IEEE 754 defines the expected result on overflow. As far as I know,
hardware implementations (of f16), and compiler-rt (__floatuntisf)
correctly return +-Inf on overflow. And I can't think of any useful
transform that would take advantage of overflow being undefined here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47807
llvm-svn: 334777
I think we assume poison, not undef, for certain transforms we
currently do. In any case, we should clarify the language here.
(This sort of conversion is undefined behavior according to the C
and C++ standards. And in practice, hardware implementations handle
overflow inconsistently, so it would be difficult to define the
result here.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47851
llvm-svn: 334326
We need to clarify the language here. I think poison makes more sense
than undef, since it's an undefined operation rather than uninitialized
memory. I don't think anything depends on the difference at the moment,
though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47859
llvm-svn: 334325
Summary:
Implements AsmWriter support for printing the module summary index to
assembly with the format discussed in the RFC "LLVM Assembly format for
ThinLTO Summary".
Implements just enough of the parsing support to recognize and ignore
the summary entries. As agreed in the RFC thread, this will be the
behavior when assembling the IR. A follow on change will implement
parsing/assembling of the summary entries for use by tools that
currently build the summary index from bitcode.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, pcc
Subscribers: inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46699
llvm-svn: 333335
Summary:
This feature is not needed, but it might be usefull in the future
to use metadata to mark what which function should support it
(and strip it when not).
Reviewers: rsmith, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45419
llvm-svn: 332787
Reid Kleckner