Add an option to control whether or not to enable store merging in dag combiner
so we can workaround some bugs more easily.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65482
llvm-svn: 367365
The function was calling getNode() on an SDValue to return and the
caller turned the result back into a SDValue. So just return the
original SDValue to avoid this.
llvm-svn: 366779
Summary:
As per title. DAGCombiner only mathes the special case where b = 0, this patches extends the pattern to match any value of b.
Depends on D57302
Reviewers: hfinkel, RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59208
llvm-svn: 366214
We already split extract_subvector(binop(insert_subvector(v,x),insert_subvector(w,y))) -> binop(x,y).
This patch adds support for extract_subvector(binop(concat_vectors(),concat_vectors())) cases as well.
In particular this means we don't have to wait for X86 lowering to convert concat_vectors to insert_subvector chains, which helps avoid some cases where demandedelts/combine calls occur too late to split large vector ops.
The fast-isel-store.ll load folding regression is annoying but I don't think is that critical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63653
llvm-svn: 365785
Summary: Unsafe does not map well alone for each of these three cases as it is missing NoNan context when accessed directly with clang. I have migrated the fold guards to reflect the expectations of handing nan and zero contexts directly (NoNan, NSZ) and some tests with it. Unsafe does include NSZ, however there is already precedent for using the target option directly to reflect that context.
Reviewers: spatel, wristow, hfinkel, craig.topper, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: michele.scandale, wdng, javed.absar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64450
llvm-svn: 365679
Basically the problem is that X86 doesn't set the Fast flag from
allowsMemoryAccess on certain CPUs due to slow unaligned memory
subtarget features. This prevents bitcasts from being folded into
loads and stores. But all vector loads and stores of the same width
are the same cost on X86.
This patch merges the allowsMemoryAccess call into isLoadBitCastBeneficial to allow X86 to skip it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64295
llvm-svn: 365549
Summary:
The uaddo won't be removed and the addcarry will still be
dependent on the uaddo. So we'll just increase the use count
of X and Y and potentially require a COPY.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, deadalnix
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64190
llvm-svn: 365149
Summary:
This diff improve the capability of DAGCOmbine to generate linear carries propagation in presence of a diamond pattern. It is now able to match a large variety of different patterns rather than some hardcoded one.
Arguably, the codegen in test cases is not better, but this is to be expected. The goal of this transformation is more about canonicalisation than actual optimisation.
Reviewers: hfinkel, RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57302
llvm-svn: 365051
Summary:
This is the backend part of [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42457 | PR42457 ]].
In middle-end, we'd want to prefer the form with two adds - D63992,
but as this diff shows, not every target will prefer that pattern.
Out of 4 targets for which i added tests all seem to be ok with inc-of-add for scalars,
but only X86 prefer that same pattern for vectors.
Here i'm adding a new TLI hook, always defaulting to the inc-of-add,
but adding AArch64,ARM,PowerPC overrides to prefer inc-of-add only for scalars.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, hfinkel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64090
llvm-svn: 365010
For a given floating point load / store pair, if the load value isn't used by any other operations,
then consider transforming the pair to integer load / store operations if the target deems the transformation profitable.
And we can exploiting much more when there are other operation nodes with chain operand between the load/store pair
so long as we keep the chain ordering original. We only replace the register used to load/store from float to integer.
I only add testcase in ARM because the TLI.isDesirableToTransformToIntegerOp hook is only enabled in ARM target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60601
llvm-svn: 364883
We support 'big to little' (e.g. extract_subvector(v16i8 bitcast(v2i64))) but not 'little to big' cases (e.g. extract_subvector(v2i64 bitcast(v16i8)))
llvm-svn: 364405
This can occur under certain circumstances when undefs are created later on in the constant multipliers (e.g. in this case due to SimplifyDemandedVectorElts). Its better to let the shift by zero to occur and perform any cleanup afterward.
Fixes OSS Fuzz #15429
llvm-svn: 364179
The code divides the alignment by 2 if the original alignment is
equal to the original VT size. But this wouldn't be correct
if the alignment was larger than the VT size.
The memory operand object already takes care of calling MinAlign
on the base alignment and the memory pointer offset. So we don't
need any special code at all.
llvm-svn: 364151
We tend to only test for scalar/scalar consts when really we could support non-uniform vectors using ISD::matchUnaryPredicate/matchBinaryPredicate etc.
llvm-svn: 363924
Use getAPIntValue() in a few more places. Most of the time getZExtValue() is fine, but occasionally there's fuzzed code or someone decides to create i65536 or something.....
llvm-svn: 363887
Use matchBinaryPredicate instead of isConstOrConstSplat to let us handle non-uniform shift cases.
This requires us to tweak matchBinaryPredicate to allow it to (optionally) handle constants with different type widths.
llvm-svn: 363792
Some GEPs were not being split, presumably because that split would just be
undone by the DAGCombiner. Not performing those splits can prevent important
optimizations, such as preventing the element indices / member offsets from
being (partially) folded into load/store instruction immediates. This patch:
- Makes the splits also occur in the cases where the base address and the GEP
are in the same BB.
- Ensures that the DAGCombiner doesn't reassociate them back again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60294
llvm-svn: 363544
This reverts rL363474. -debug-only=isel was added to some tests that
don't specify `REQUIRES: asserts`. This causes failures on
-DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=off builds.
I chose to revert instead of fixing the tests because I'm not sure
whether we should add `REQUIRES: asserts` to more tests.
llvm-svn: 363482
As discussed on D62910, we need to check whether particular types of memory access are allowed, not just their alignment/address-space.
This NFC patch adds a MachineMemOperand::Flags argument to allowsMemoryAccess and allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses, and wires up calls to pass the relevant flags to them.
If people are happy with this approach I can then update X86TargetLowering::allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses to handle misaligned NT load/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63075
llvm-svn: 363179
As suggested by @arsenm on D63075 - this adds a TargetLowering::allowsMemoryAccess wrapper that takes a Load/Store node's MachineMemOperand to handle the AddressSpace/Alignment arguments and will also implicitly handle the MachineMemOperand::Flags change in D63075.
llvm-svn: 363048
This opportunity is found from spec 2017 557.xz_r. And it is used by the sha encrypt/decrypt. See sha-2/sha512.c
static void store64(u64 x, unsigned char* y)
{
for(int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
y[i] = (x >> ((7-i) * 8)) & 255;
}
static u64 load64(const unsigned char* y)
{
u64 res = 0;
for(int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
res |= (u64)(y[i]) << ((7-i) * 8);
return res;
}
The load64 has been implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D26149
This patch is trying to implement the store pattern.
Match a pattern where a wide type scalar value is stored by several narrow
stores. Fold it into a single store or a BSWAP and a store if the targets
supports it.
Assuming little endian target:
i8 *p = ...
i32 val = ...
p[0] = (val >> 0) & 0xFF;
p[1] = (val >> 8) & 0xFF;
p[2] = (val >> 16) & 0xFF;
p[3] = (val >> 24) & 0xFF;
>
*((i32)p) = val;
i8 *p = ...
i32 val = ...
p[0] = (val >> 24) & 0xFF;
p[1] = (val >> 16) & 0xFF;
p[2] = (val >> 8) & 0xFF;
p[3] = (val >> 0) & 0xFF;
>
*((i32)p) = BSWAP(val);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62897
llvm-svn: 362921
This patch is the first step towards ensuring MergeConsecutiveStores correctly handles non-temporal loads\stores:
1 - When merging load\stores we must ensure that they all have the same non-temporal flag. This is unlikely to occur, but can in strange cases where we're storing at the end of one page and the beginning of another.
2 - The merged load\store node must retain the non-temporal flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62910
llvm-svn: 362723
This is a special case of a more general transform (not (sub Y, X)) -> (add X, ~Y). InstCombine knows the general form. I've restricted to the special case to fix the motivating case PR42118. I tried handling any case where Y was constant, but got some changes on some Mips tests that I couldn't quickly prove where beneficial.
Fixes PR42118
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62828
llvm-svn: 362533
The proposal in D62498 showed that x86 would benefit from vector
store splitting, but that may conflict with the generic DAG
combiner's store merging transforms.
Add memory type to the existing TLI hook that enables the merging
transforms, so we can limit those changes to scalars only for x86.
llvm-svn: 362507
Summary:
This *might* be the last fold for `sink-addsub-of-const.ll`, but i'm not sure yet.
As far as i can tell, there are no regressions here (ignoring x86-32),
all changes are either good or neutral.
This, almost surprisingly to me, fixes the motivational tests (in `shift-amount-mod.ll`)
`@reg32_lshr_by_sub_from_negated` from [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/vMd3
Reviewers: RKSimon, t.p.northover, craig.topper, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: sdardis, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62774
llvm-svn: 362488
This opportunity is found from spec 2017 557.xz_r. And it is used by the sha encrypt/decrypt. See sha-2/sha512.c
static void store64(u64 x, unsigned char* y)
{
for(int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
y[i] = (x >> ((7-i) * 8)) & 255;
}
static u64 load64(const unsigned char* y)
{
u64 res = 0;
for(int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
res |= (u64)(y[i]) << ((7-i) * 8);
return res;
}
The load64 has been implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D26149
This patch is trying to implement the store pattern.
Match a pattern where a wide type scalar value is stored by several narrow
stores. Fold it into a single store or a BSWAP and a store if the targets
supports it.
Assuming little endian target:
i8 *p = ...
i32 val = ...
p[0] = (val >> 0) & 0xFF;
p[1] = (val >> 8) & 0xFF;
p[2] = (val >> 16) & 0xFF;
p[3] = (val >> 24) & 0xFF;
>
*((i32)p) = val;
i8 *p = ...
i32 val = ...
p[0] = (val >> 24) & 0xFF;
p[1] = (val >> 16) & 0xFF;
p[2] = (val >> 8) & 0xFF;
p[3] = (val >> 0) & 0xFF;
>
*((i32)p) = BSWAP(val);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61843
llvm-svn: 362472
Summary: This change facilitates propagating fmf which was placed on setcc from fcmp through folds with selects so that back ends can model this path for arithmetic folds on selects in SDAG.
Reviewers: qcolombet, spatel
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: nemanjai, jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62552
llvm-svn: 362439
We were missing this fold in the DAG, which I've copied directly from llvm::ConstantFoldCastInstruction
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62807
llvm-svn: 362397
If we hit the limit, we do expand the outstanding tokenfactors.
Otherwise, we might drop nodes with users in the unexpanded
tokenfactors. This fixes the crashes reported by Jordan Rupprecht.
Reviewers: niravd, spatel, craig.topper, rupprecht
Reviewed By: niravd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62633
llvm-svn: 362350
Move this combine from x86 into generic DAGCombine, which currently only manages cases where the bitcast is between types of the same scalarsize.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59188
llvm-svn: 362324
The results of the dyn_casts were immediately dereferenced on the next line
so they had better not be null.
I don't think there's any way for these dyn_casts to fail, so use a cast
of adding null check.
llvm-svn: 362315
I don't have a test case for these, but there is a test case for D62266
where, even after all the constant-folding patches, we still end up
with endless combine loop. Which makes sense, since we don't constant
fold for opaque constants.
llvm-svn: 362156
Summary:
Only vector tests are being affected here,
since subtraction by scalar constant is rewritten
as addition by negated constant.
No surprising test changes.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pbT
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62257
llvm-svn: 362146
Summary:
Again only vectors affected. Frustrating. Let me take a look into that..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/AAq
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62294
llvm-svn: 362145
Summary:
This prevents regressions in next patch,
and somewhat recovers from the regression to AMDGPU test in D62223.
It is indeed not great that we leave vector decrement,
don't transform it into vector add all-ones..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZRl
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62263
llvm-svn: 362144
Summary:
Direct sibling of D62223 patch.
While i don't have a direct motivational pattern for this,
it would seem to make sense to handle both patterns (or none),
for symmetry?
The aarch64 changes look neutral;
sparc and systemz look like improvement (one less instruction each);
x86 changes - 32bit case improves, 64bit case shows that LEA no longer
gets constructed, which may be because that whole test is `-mattr=+slow-lea,+slow-3ops-lea`
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ffh
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, jyknight, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62252
llvm-svn: 362143
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 362142
Summary:
Direct sibling of D62662, the root cause of the endless combine loop in D62257
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/d3W
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62664
llvm-svn: 362133
Summary:
No tests change, and i'm not sure how to test this, but it's better safe than sorry.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, craig.topper, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62663
llvm-svn: 362132
Summary:
This was the root cause of the endless combine loop in D62257
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/d3W
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, craig.topper, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62662
llvm-svn: 362131
Summary: No tests change, and i'm not sure how to test this, but it's better safe than sorry.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, craig.topper, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62661
llvm-svn: 362130
I was looking into an endless combine loop the uncommitted follow-up patch
was causing, and it appears even these patches can exibit such an
endless loop. The root cause is that we try to hoist one binop (add/sub) with
constant operand, and if we get two such binops both of which are
eligible for this hoisting, we get stuck.
Some cases may highlight missing constant-folds.
Reverts r361871,r361872,r361873,r361874.
llvm-svn: 362109
Summary:
Again only vectors affected. Frustrating. Let me take a look into that..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/AAq
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361856, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62294
llvm-svn: 361874
Summary:
This prevents regressions in next patch,
and somewhat recovers from the regression to AMDGPU test in D62223.
It is indeed not great that we leave vector decrement,
don't transform it into vector add all-ones..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZRl
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361855, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62263
llvm-svn: 361873
Summary:
Direct sibling of D62223 patch.
While i don't have a direct motivational pattern for this,
it would seem to make sense to handle both patterns (or none),
for symmetry?
The aarch64 changes look neutral;
sparc and systemz look like improvement (one less instruction each);
x86 changes - 32bit case improves, 64bit case shows that LEA no longer
gets constructed, which may be because that whole test is `-mattr=+slow-lea,+slow-3ops-lea`
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ffh
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361853, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, jyknight, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62252
llvm-svn: 361872
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 361871
Summary:
Again only vectors affected. Frustrating. Let me take a look into that..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/AAq
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62294
llvm-svn: 361856
Summary:
This prevents regressions in next patch,
and somewhat recovers from the regression to AMDGPU test in D62223.
It is indeed not great that we leave vector decrement,
don't transform it into vector add all-ones..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZRl
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62263
llvm-svn: 361855
Summary:
Only vector tests are being affected here,
since subtraction by scalar constant is rewritten
as addition by negated constant.
No surprising test changes.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pbT
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62257
llvm-svn: 361854
Summary:
Direct sibling of D62223 patch.
While i don't have a direct motivational pattern for this,
it would seem to make sense to handle both patterns (or none),
for symmetry?
The aarch64 changes look neutral;
sparc and systemz look like improvement (one less instruction each);
x86 changes - 32bit case improves, 64bit case shows that LEA no longer
gets constructed, which may be because that whole test is `-mattr=+slow-lea,+slow-3ops-lea`
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ffh
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, jyknight, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62252
llvm-svn: 361853
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 361852
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
This commit was reverted because of the build failure.
The reason was mlformed patch.
Build failure fixed.
llvm-svn: 361741
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
llvm-svn: 361644
This patch adds the overridable TargetLowering::getTargetConstantFromLoad function which allows targets to return any constant value loaded by a LoadSDNode node - only X86 makes use of this so far but everything should be in place for other targets.
computeKnownBits then uses this function to improve codegen, notably vector code after legalization.
A future commit will do the same for ComputeNumSignBits but computeKnownBits sees the bigger benefit.
This required a couple of fixes:
* SimplifyDemandedBits must early-out for getTargetConstantFromLoad cases to prevent infinite loops of constant regeneration (similar to what we already do for BUILD_VECTOR).
* Fix a DAGCombiner::visitTRUNCATE issue as we had trunc(shl(v8i32),v8i16) <-> shl(trunc(v8i16),v8i32) infinite loops after legalization on AVX512 targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61887
llvm-svn: 361620
This is no-functional-change-intended currently because the definition
of isBinOp() only includes opcodes that produce 1 value. But if we
share that implementation with isCommutativeBinOp() as proposed in
D62191, then we need to make sure that the callers bail out for
opcodes that they are not prepared to handle correctly.
llvm-svn: 361547
There are no FP callers of DAGCombiner::reassociateOps() currently,
but we can add a fast-math check to make sure this API is not being
misused.
This was noted as a potential risk (and that risk might increase) with:
D62191
llvm-svn: 361268
This changes the isShift variable to include the constant operand
check that was previously in the if statement.
While there fix an 80 column violation and an unnecessary use of
getNode. Also fix variable name capitalization.
llvm-svn: 361168
Summary:
That check claims that the transform is illegal otherwise.
That isn't true:
1. For `ISD::ADD`, we only process `ISD::SHL` outer shift => sign bit does not matter
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/K4A
2. For `ISD::AND`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Wy3
3. For `ISD::OR`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/GOH
3. For `ISD::XOR`, there is no restriction on constants:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ml6
So, why is it there then?
This changes the testcase that was touched by @spatel in rL347478,
but i'm not sure that test tests anything particular?
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, craig.topper, jojo, rengolin
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, spatel
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61918
llvm-svn: 361044
Wei Mi