Unlike SelectionDAG, treat this as a normally legalizable operation.
In SelectionDAG this is supposed to only ever formed if it's legal,
but I've found that to be restricting. For AMDGPU this is contextually
legal depending on whether denormal flushing is allowed in the use
function.
Technically we currently treat the denormal mode as a subtarget
feature, so custom lowering could be avoided. However I consider this
to be a defect, and this should be contextually dependent on the
controllable rounding mode of the parent function.
llvm-svn: 371800
f64 doesn't work yet because tablegen currently doesn't handlde
REG_SEQUENCE.
This does regress some multi use VALU fneg cases since now the
immediate remains in an SGPR, and more moves are used for legalizing
the xor. This is a SIFixSGPRCopies deficiency.
llvm-svn: 371540
There's still a lot more to do, but this handles decomposing due to
alignment. I've gotten it to the point where nothing crashes or
infinite loops the legalizer.
llvm-svn: 371533
Handle it the same way as G_BUILD_VECTOR_TRUNC. Arguably only
G_BUILD_VECTOR_TRUNC should be legal for this, but G_BUILD_VECTOR will
probably be more convenient in most cases.
llvm-svn: 371440
Treat this as legal on gfx9 since it can use S_PACK_* instructions for
this.
This isn't used by anything yet. The same will probably apply to
16-bit G_BUILD_VECTOR without the trunc.
llvm-svn: 371423
This is necessary for handling <3 x s16> on AMDGPU, assuming this
should be handled as 2 separate legalization actions. The alternative
would be for fewerElementsVector to handle 3->2.
llvm-svn: 369547
Summary:
Targets often have instructions that can sign-extend certain cases faster
than the equivalent shift-left/arithmetic-shift-right. Such cases can be
identified by matching a shift-left/shift-right pair but there are some
issues with this in the context of combines. For example, suppose you can
sign-extend 8-bit up to 32-bit with a target extend instruction.
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24 # (I've inlined the G_CONSTANT for brevity)
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
would reasonably combine to:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 25
which no longer matches the special case. If your shifts and extend are
equal cost, this would break even as a pair of shifts but if your shift is
more expensive than the extend then it's cheaper as:
%2:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG %0:_(s32), i32 8
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2:_(s32), i32 1
It's possible to match the shift-pair in ISel and emit an extend and ashr.
However, this is far from the only way to break this shift pair and make
it hard to match the extends. Another example is that with the right
known-zeros, this:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 24
%3:_(s32) = G_MUL %2:_(s32), i32 2
can become:
%1:_(s32) = G_SHL %0:_(s32), i32 24
%2:_(s32) = G_ASHR %1:_(s32), i32 23
All upstream targets have been configured to lower it to the current
G_SHL,G_ASHR pair but will likely want to make it legal in some cases to
handle their faster cases.
To follow-up: Provide a way to legalize based on the constant. At the
moment, I'm thinking that the best way to achieve this is to provide the
MI in LegalityQuery but that opens the door to breaking core principles
of the legalizer (legality is not context sensitive). That said, it's
worth noting that looking at other instructions and acting on that
information doesn't violate this principle in itself. It's only a
violation if, at the end of legalization, a pass that checks legality
without being able to see the context would say an instruction might not be
legal. That's a fairly subtle distinction so to give a concrete example,
saying %2 in:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, %1
is legal is in violation of that principle if the legality of %2 depends
on %1 being constant and/or being 16. However, legalizing to either:
%2 = G_SEXT_INREG %0, 16
or:
%1 = G_CONSTANT 16
%2:_(s32) = G_SHL %0, %1
%3:_(s32) = G_ASHR %2, %1
depending on whether %1 is constant and 16 does not violate that principle
since both outputs are genuinely legal.
Reviewers: bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, aemerson, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61289
llvm-svn: 368487
AMDGPU sometimes has legal s16 and <2 x s16> operations, but all
registers are really 32-bit. An unmerge destination really should ben
widened to a 32-bit register. If widening a scalarizing vector with a
target size that matches the vector size, bitcast to integer and
extract the relevant bits with shifts.
I'm not sure if this is the right place for this. This could arguably
be part of widenScalar for the result. I also have a growing feeling
that we're missing a bitcast legalize action.
llvm-svn: 367604
Now that the patterns use the new PatFrag address space support, the
only blocker to importing most load patterns is the addressing mode
complex patterns.
llvm-svn: 366237
Apparently the check for legal instructions during instruction
select does not happen without an asserts build, so these would
successfully select in release, and fail in debug.
Make s16 and/or/xor legal. These can just be selected directly
to the 32-bit operation, as is already done in SelectionDAG, so just
make them legal.
llvm-svn: 366210
In SelectionDAG AMDGPU treated these as legal, but this was mostly
because the bitcasts required for FP types were painful. Theoretically
the bitpattern should eventually match to bfi, so don't bother trying
to get the patterns to import.
llvm-svn: 365583
Tests don't cover the masked input path since non-kernel arguments
aren't lowered yet.
Test is copied directly from the existing test, with 2 additions.
llvm-svn: 364833
Replace the brcond for the 2 cases that act as branches. For now
follow how the current system works, although I think we can
eventually get rid of the pseudos.
llvm-svn: 364832
Matt Arsenault