While lowering test.set.loop.iterations, it wasn't checked how the
brcond was using the result and so the wls could branch to the loop
preheader instead of not entering it. The same was true for
loop.decrement.reg.
So brcond and br_cc and now lowered manually when using the hwloop
intrinsics. During this we now check whether the result has been
negated and whether we're using SETEQ or SETNE and 0 or 1. We can
then figure out which basic block the WLS and LE should be targeting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64616
llvm-svn: 366809
ARM has code to recognise uses of the "returned" function parameter
attribute which guarantee that the value passed to the function in r0
will be returned in r0 unmodified. IPRA replaces the regmask on call
instructions, so needs to be told about this to avoid reverting the
optimisation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64986
llvm-svn: 366669
Summary:
PerformVMOVRRDCombine ommits adding a offset
of 4 to the PointerInfo, when converting a
f64 = load[M]
to
{i32, i32} = {load[M], load[M + 4]}
Which would allow the machine scheduller
to break dependencies with the second load.
- pr42638
Reviewers: eli.friedman, dmgreen, ostannard
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: ostannard, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64870
llvm-svn: 366423
We need to make sure that we are sensibly dealing with vectors of types v2i64
and v2f64, even if most of the time we cannot generate native operations for
them. This mostly adds a lot of testing, plus fixes up a couple of the issues
found. And, or and xor can be legal for v2i64, and shifts combining needs a
slight fixup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64316
llvm-svn: 366106
This adds basic lowering for MVE shifts. There are many shifts in MVE, but the
instructions handled here are:
VSHL (imm)
VSHRu (imm)
VSHRs (imm)
VSHL (vector)
VSHL (register)
MVE, like NEON before it, doesn't have shift right by a vector (or register).
We instead have to negate the amount and shift in the opposite direction. This
means we have to convert any SHR's into a form of SHL (that is still signed or
unsigned) with a negated condition and selecting from there. MVE still does
have shifting by an immediate for SHL, ASR and LSR.
This adds lowering for these and for register forms, which work well for shift
lefts but may require an extra fold of neg(vdup(x)) -> vdup(neg(x)) to potentially
work optimally for right shifts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64212
llvm-svn: 366056
This adjusts the way that we lower NEON shifts to use a DAG target node, not
via a neon intrinsic. This is useful for handling MVE shifts operations in the
same the way. It also renames some of the immediate shift nodes for
consistency, and moves some of the processing of immediate shifts into
LowerShift allowing it to capture more cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64426
llvm-svn: 366051
The vmovlb instructions can be uses to sign or zero extend vector registers
between types. This adds some patterns for them and relevant testing. The
VBICIMM generation is also put behind a hasNEON check (as is already done for
VORRIMM).
Code originally by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64069
llvm-svn: 366008
This simply makes the MVE integer min and max instructions legal and adds the
relevant patterns for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64026
llvm-svn: 366004
This adds support for the floor/ceil/trunc/... series of instructions,
converting to various forms of VRINT. They use the same suffixes as their
floating point counterparts. There is not VTINTR, so nearbyint is expanded.
Also added a copysign test, to show it is expanded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63985
llvm-svn: 366003
This adds the patterns for minnm and maxnm from the fminnum and fmaxnum nodes,
similar to scalar types.
Original patch by Simon Tatham
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63870
llvm-svn: 366002
This patch addresses a couple of problems:
1) The maximum supported offset of LE is -4094.
2) The offset of WLS also needs to be checked, this uses a
maximum positive offset of 4094.
The use of BasicBlockUtils has been changed because the block offsets
weren't being initialised, but the isBBInRange checks both positive
and negative offsets.
ARMISelLowering has been tweaked because the test case presented
another pattern that we weren't supporting.
llvm-svn: 365749
This adds some handling for VMOVimm, using the same method that NEON uses. We
create VMOVIMM/VMVNIMM/VMOVFPIMM nodes based on the immediate, and select them
using the now renamed ARMvmovImm/etc. There is also an extra 64bit immediate
mode that I have not yet added here.
Code by David Sherwood
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63884
llvm-svn: 365178
The arm condition codes for GE is N==V (and for LT is N!=V). If the source of
flags cannot set V (overflow), such as a cmp against #0, then we can use the
simpler PL and MI conditions that only check N. As these PL/MI conditions are
simpler than GE/LT, other passes like the peephole optimiser can have a better
time optimising away the redundant CMPs.
The exception is the VSEL instruction, which cannot take the PL code, so there
the transform favours GE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64160
llvm-svn: 365117
Summary:
This is the backend part of [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42457 | PR42457 ]].
In middle-end, we'd want to prefer the form with two adds - D63992,
but as this diff shows, not every target will prefer that pattern.
Out of 4 targets for which i added tests all seem to be ok with inc-of-add for scalars,
but only X86 prefer that same pattern for vectors.
Here i'm adding a new TLI hook, always defaulting to the inc-of-add,
but adding AArch64,ARM,PowerPC overrides to prefer inc-of-add only for scalars.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, hfinkel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64090
llvm-svn: 365010
Passing a vector type over the soft-float ABI involves it being split
into four GPRs, so the first thing that has to happen at the start of
the function is to recombine those into a vector register. The ABI
types all vectors as v2f64, so we need to support BUILD_VECTOR for
that type, which I do in this patch by allowing it to be expanded in
terms of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, and writing an ISel pattern for that in
turn. Similarly, I provide a rule for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT so that a
returned vector can be marshalled back into GPRs.
While I'm here, I've also added ISD::UNDEF to the list of operations
we turn back on in `setAllExpand`, because I noticed that otherwise it
gets expanded into a BUILD_VECTOR with explicit zero inputs, leading
to pointless machine instructions to zero out a vector register that's
about to have every lane overwritten of in any case.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63937
llvm-svn: 364910
If you compile with `-mattr=+mve` (enabling integer MVE instructions
but not floating-point ones), then the scalar FP //registers// exist
and it's legal to move things in and out of them, load and store them,
but it's not legal to do arithmetic on them.
In D60708, the calls to `addRegisterClass` in ARMISelLowering that
enable use of the scalar FP registers became conditionalised on
`Subtarget->hasFPRegs()` instead of `Subtarget->hasVFP2Base()`, so
that loads, stores and moves of those registers would work. But I
didn't realise that that would also enable all the operations on those
types by default.
Now, if the target doesn't have basic VFP, we follow up those
`addRegisterClass` calls by turning back off all the nontrivial
operations you can perform on f32 and f64. That causes several
knock-on failures, which are fixed by allowing the `VMOVDcc` and
`VMOVScc` instructions to be selected even if all you have is
`HasFPRegs`, and adjusting several checks for 'is this a double in a
single-precision-only world?' to the more general 'is this any FP type
we can't do arithmetic on?'. Between those, the whole of the
`float-ops.ll` and `fp16-instructions.ll` tests can now run in
MVE-without-FP mode and generate correct-looking code.
One odd side effect is that I had to relax the check lines in that
test so that they permit test functions like `add_f` to be generated
as tailcalls to software FP library functions, instead of ordinary
calls. Doing that is entirely legal, but the mystery is why this is
the first RUN line that's needed the relaxation: on the usual kind of
non-FP target, no tailcalls ever seem to be generated. Going by the
llc messages, I think `SoftenFloatResult` must be perturbing the code
generation in some way, but that's as much as I can guess.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63938
llvm-svn: 364909
Backend changes to enable WLS/LE low-overhead loops for armv8.1-m:
1) Use TTI to communicate to the HardwareLoop pass that we should try
to generate intrinsics that guard the loop entry, as well as setting
the loop trip count.
2) Lower the BRCOND that uses said intrinsic to an Arm specific node:
ARMWLS.
3) ISelDAGToDAG the node to a new pseudo instruction:
t2WhileLoopStart.
4) Add support in ArmLowOverheadLoops to handle the new pseudo
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63816
llvm-svn: 364733
MVE adds the lsll, lsrl and asrl instructions, which perform a shift on a 64 bit value separated into two 32 bit registers.
The Expand64BitShift function is modified to accept ISD::SHL, ISD::SRL and ISD::SRA and convert it into the appropriate opcode in ARMISD. An SHL is converted into an lsll, an SRL is converted into an lsrl for the immediate form and a negation and lsll for the register form, and SRA is converted into an asrl.
test/CodeGen/ARM/shift_parts.ll is added to test the logic of emitting these instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63430
llvm-svn: 364654
This adds handling and tests for a number of floating point math routines,
which have no MVE instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63725
llvm-svn: 364641
MVE has instructions to widen as it loads, and narrow as it stores. This adds
the required patterns and legalisation to make them work including specifying
that they are legal, patterns to select them and test changes.
Patch by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63839
llvm-svn: 364636
This fills in the gaps for basic MVE loads and stores, allowing unaligned
access and adding far too many tests. These will become important as
narrowing/expanding and pre/post inc are added. Big endian might still not be
handled very well, because we have not yet added bitcasts (and I'm not sure how
we want it to work yet). I've included the alignment code anyway which maps
with our current patterns. We plan to return to that later.
Code written by Simon Tatham, with additional tests from Me and Mikhail Maltsev.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63838
llvm-svn: 364633
We don't have vector operations for these, so they need to be expanded for both
integer and float.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63595
llvm-svn: 364631
This patch adds necessary shuffle vector and buildvector support for ARM MVE.
It essentially adds support for VDUP, VREVs and some VMOVs, which are often
required by other code (like upcoming patches).
This mostly uses the same code from Neon that already generated
NEONvdup/NEONvduplane/NEONvrev's. These have been renamed to ARMvdup/etc and
moved to ARMInstrInfo as they are common to both architectures. Most of the
selection code seems to be applicable to both, but NEON does have some more
instructions making some parts specific.
Most code originally by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63567
llvm-svn: 364626
The current implementation of ThumbRegisterInfo::saveScavengerRegister
is bad for two reasons: one, it's buggy, and two, it blocks using R12
for other optimizations. So this patch gets rid of it, and adds the
necessary support for using an ordinary emergency spill slot on Thumb1.
(Specifically, I think saveScavengerRegister was broken by r305625, and
nobody noticed for two years because the codepath is almost never used.
The new code will also probably not be used much, but it now has better
tests, and if we fail to emit a necessary emergency spill slot we get a
reasonable error message instead of a miscompile.)
A rough outline of the changes in the patch:
1. Gets rid of ThumbRegisterInfo::saveScavengerRegister.
2. Modifies ARMFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves to allocate an
emergency spill slot for Thumb1.
3. Implements useFPForScavengingIndex, so the emergency spill slot isn't
placed at a negative offset from FP on Thumb1.
4. Modifies the heuristics for allocating an emergency spill slot to
support Thumb1. This includes fixing ExtraCSSpill so we don't try to
use "lr" as a substitute for allocating an emergency spill slot.
5. Allocates a base pointer in more cases, so the emergency spill slot
is always accessible.
6. Modifies ARMFrameLowering::ResolveFrameIndexReference to compute the
right offset in the new cases where we're forcing a base pointer.
7. Ensures we never generate a load or store with an offset outside of
its frame object. This makes the heuristics more straightforward.
8. Changes Thumb1 prologue and epilogue emission so it never uses
register scavenging.
Some of the changes to the emergency spill slot heuristics in
determineCalleeSaves affect ARM/Thumb2; hopefully, they should allow
the compiler to avoid allocating an emergency spill slot in cases
where it isn't necessary. The rest of the changes should only affect
Thumb1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63677
llvm-svn: 364490
"To" selects an odd-numbered GPR, and "Te" an even one. There are some
8.1-M instructions that have one too few bits in their register fields
and require registers of particular parity, without necessarily using
a consecutive even/odd pair.
Also, the constraint letter "t" should select an MVE q-register, when
MVE is present. This didn't need any source changes, but some extra
tests have been added.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60709
llvm-svn: 364331
This provides the low-level support to start using MVE vector types in
LLVM IR, loading and storing them, passing them to __asm__ statements
containing hand-written MVE vector instructions, and *if* you have the
hard-float ABI turned on, using them as function parameters.
(In the soft-float ABI, vector types are passed in integer registers,
and combining all those 32-bit integers into a q-reg requires support
for selection DAG nodes like insert_vector_elt and build_vector which
aren't implemented yet for MVE. In fact I've also had to add
`arm_aapcs_vfpcc` to a couple of existing tests to avoid that
problem.)
Specifically, this commit adds support for:
* spills, reloads and register moves for MVE vector registers
* ditto for the VPT predication mask that lives in VPR.P0
* make all the MVE vector types legal in ISel, and provide selection
DAG patterns for BITCAST, LOAD and STORE
* make loads and stores of scalar FP types conditional on
`hasFPRegs()` rather than `hasVFP2Base()`. As a result a few
existing tests needed their llc command lines updating to use
`-mattr=-fpregs` as their method of turning off all hardware FP
support.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60708
llvm-svn: 364329
If an FP_EXTEND or FP_ROUND isel dag node converts directly between
f16 and f32 when the target CPU has no instruction to do it in one go,
it has to be done in two steps instead, going via f32.
Previously, this was done implicitly, because all such CPUs had the
storage-only implementation of f16 (i.e. the only thing you can do
with one at all is to convert it to/from f32). So isel would legalize
the f16 into an f32 as soon as it saw it, by inserting an fp16_to_fp
node (or vice versa), and then the fp_extend would already be f32->f64
rather than f16->f64.
But that technique can't support a target CPU which has full f16
support but _not_ f64, such as some variants of Arm v8.1-M. So now we
provide custom lowering for FP_EXTEND and FP_ROUND, which checks
support for f16 and f64 and decides on the best thing to do given the
combination of flags it gets back.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60692
llvm-svn: 364294
As discussed on D62910, we need to check whether particular types of memory access are allowed, not just their alignment/address-space.
This NFC patch adds a MachineMemOperand::Flags argument to allowsMemoryAccess and allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses, and wires up calls to pass the relevant flags to them.
If people are happy with this approach I can then update X86TargetLowering::allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses to handle misaligned NT load/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63075
llvm-svn: 363179
Types such as float and i64's do not have legal loads in Thumb1, but will still
be loaded with a LDR (or potentially multiple LDR's). As such we can treat the
cost of addressing mode calculations the same as an i32 and get some optimisation
benefits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62968
llvm-svn: 362874
Now with MVE being added, we can add the vector addressing mode costs for it.
These are generally imm7 multiplied by the size of the type being loaded /
stored.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62967
llvm-svn: 362873
The fp16 version of VLDR takes a imm8 multiplied by 2. This updates the costs
to account for those, and adds extra testing. It is dependant upon hasFPRegs16
as this is what the load/store instructions require.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62966
llvm-svn: 362872
Summary:
- pr42062
When compiling for MinSize,
ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall decides to indirect
multiple calls to a same function. However,
it disconsiders the limitation that thumb1
indirect calls require the callee to be in a
register from r0 to r3 (llvm limiation).
If all those registers are used by arguments, the
compiler dies with "error: run out of registers
during register allocation".
This patch tells the function
IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization if we intend to
perform indirect calls, as to avoid tail call
optimization.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62683
llvm-svn: 362366
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
This commit was reverted because of the build failure.
The reason was mlformed patch.
Build failure fixed.
llvm-svn: 361741
This add patterns for fp16 round and ceil etc. Same as the float and double
patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62326
llvm-svn: 361718
Promote a number of fp16 math intrinsics to float, so that the relevant float
math routines can be used. Copysign is expanded so as to be handled in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62325
llvm-svn: 361717
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
llvm-svn: 361644
The new cortex-m schedule in rL360768 helps performance, but can increase the
amount of high-registers used. This, on average, ends up increasing the
codesize by a fair amount (because less instructions are converted from T2 to
T1). On cortex-m at -Oz, where we are quite size-paranoid, it is better to use
the existing DAG scheduler with the RegPressure scheduling preference (at least
until the issues around T2 vs T1 instructions can be improved).
I have also made sure that the Sched::RegPressure dag scheduler is always
chosen for MinSize.
The test shows one case where we increase the number of registers used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61882
llvm-svn: 360769
This generally follows what other targets do. I don't completely
understand why the special case for tail calls existed in the first
place; even when the code was committed in r105413, call lowering didn't
work in the way described in the comments.
Stack protector lowering breaks if the register copies are not glued to
a tail call: we have to insert the stack protector check before the tail
call, and we choose the location based on the assumption that all
physical register dependencies of a tail call are adjacent to the tail
call. (See FindSplitPointForStackProtector.) This is sort of fragile,
but I don't see any reason to break that assumption.
I'm guessing nobody has seen this before just because it's hard to
convince the scheduler to actually schedule the code in a way that
breaks; even without the glue, the only computation that could actually
be scheduled after the register copies is the computation of the call
address, and the scheduler usually prefers to schedule that before the
copies anyway.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41417
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60427
llvm-svn: 360099
The MachineFunction wasn't used in getOptimalMemOpType, but more importantly,
this allows reuse of findOptimalMemOpLowering that is calling getOptimalMemOpType.
This is the groundwork for the changes in D59766 and D59787, that allows
implementation of TTI::getMemcpyCost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59785
llvm-svn: 359537
This does two main things, firstly adding some at least basic addressing modes
for i64 types, and secondly treats floats and doubles sensibly when there is no
fpu. The floating point change can help codesize in some cases, especially with
D60294.
Most backends seems to not consider the exact VT in isLegalAddressingMode,
instead switching on type size. That is now what this does when the target does
not have an fpu (as the float data will be loaded using LDR's). i64's currently
use the address range of an LDRD (even though they may be legalised and loaded
with an LDR). This is at least better than marking them all as illegal
addressing modes.
I have not attempted to do much with vectors yet. That will need changing once
MVE is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60677
llvm-svn: 358845
As discussed on PR41359, this patch renames the pair of shift-mask target feature functions to make their purposes more obvious.
shouldFoldShiftPairToMask -> shouldFoldConstantShiftPairToMask
preferShiftsToClearExtremeBits -> shouldFoldMaskToVariableShiftPair
llvm-svn: 358526
There's an existing optimization for x != C, but somehow it was missing
a special case for 0.
While I'm here, also cleaned up the code/comments a bit: the second
value produced by the MERGE_VALUES was actually dead, since a CMOV only
produces one result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59616
llvm-svn: 357437
This should hopefully lead to minor improvements in code generation, and
more accurate spill/reload comments in assembly.
Also fix isLoadFromStackSlotPostFE/isStoreToStackSlotPostFE so they
don't lead to misleading assembly comments for merged memory operands;
this is technically orthogonal, but in practice the relevant memory
operand lists don't show up without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59713
llvm-svn: 356963
These changes are related to PR37743 and include:
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitSelect handles the unary SelectPatternFlavor::SPF_ABS case to build ABS node.
Delete the redundant recognizer of the integer ABS pattern from the DAGCombiner.
Add promoting the integer ABS node in the LegalizeIntegerType.
Expand-based legalization of integer result for the ABS nodes.
Expand-based legalization of ABS vector operations.
Add some integer abs testcases for different typesizes for Thumb arch
Add the custom ABS expanding and change the SAD pattern recognizer for X86 arch: The i64 result of the ABS is expanded to:
tmp = (SRA, Hi, 31)
Lo = (UADDO tmp, Lo)
Hi = (XOR tmp, (ADDCARRY tmp, hi, Lo:1))
Lo = (XOR tmp, Lo)
The "detectZextAbsDiff" function is changed for the recognition of pattern with the ABS node. Given a ABS node, detect the following pattern:
(ABS (SUB (ZERO_EXTEND a), (ZERO_EXTEND b))).
Change integer abs testcases for codegen with the ABS node support for AArch64.
Indicate that the ABS is legal for the i64 type when the NEON is supported.
Change the integer abs testcases to show changing of codegen.
Add combine and legalization of ABS nodes for Thumb arch.
Extend 'matchSelectPattern' to recognize the ABS patterns with ICMP_SGE condition.
For discussion, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37743
Patch by: @ikulagin (Ivan Kulagin)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49837
llvm-svn: 356468
This allows better code size for aarch64 floating point materialization
in a future patch.
Reviewers: evandro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58690
llvm-svn: 356389
I am about to introduce some non-power-of-2 width vector MVTs. This
commit fixes a power-of-2 assumption that my forthcoming change would
otherwise break, as shown by test/CodeGen/ARM/vcvt_combine.ll and
vdiv_combine.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58927
Change-Id: I56a282e365d3874ab0621e5bdef98a612f702317
llvm-svn: 356341
This uses the infrastructure added in rL353152 to sink zext and sexts to
sub/add users, to enable vsubl/vaddl generation when NEON is available.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58063
llvm-svn: 355460
When lowering a select_cc node where the true and false values are of type f16,
we can't use a general conditional move because the FP16 instructions do not
support conditional execution. Instead, we must ensure that the condition code
is one of the four supported by the VSEL instruction.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58813
llvm-svn: 355385
This function was not checking for the condition code variants which are
undefined if either input is NaN, so we were missing selection of the VSEL
instruction in some cases when using -fno-honor-nans or -ffast-math.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58812
llvm-svn: 355199
Summary:
The description of KnownBits::zext() and
KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() has confusingly been telling
that the operation is equivalent to zero extending the
value we're tracking. That has not been true, instead
the user has been forced to explicitly set the extended
bits as known zero afterwards.
This patch adds a second argument to KnownBits::zext()
and KnownBits::zextOrTrunc() to control if the extended
bits should be considered as known zero or as unknown.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58650
llvm-svn: 355099
In many places in the backend, we like to know whether we're
optimising for code size and this is performed by checking the
current machine function attributes. A subtarget is created on a
per-function basis, so it's possible to know when we're compiling for
code size on construction so record this in the new object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57812
llvm-svn: 353501
This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173
llvm-svn: 352913
This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.
This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.
llvm-svn: 351796
This patch may seem familiar... but my previous patch handled the
equivalent lsls+and, not this case. Usually instcombine puts the
"and" after the shift, so this case doesn't come up. However, if the
shift comes out of a GEP, it won't get canonicalized by instcombine,
and DAGCombine doesn't have an equivalent transform.
This also modifies isDesirableToCommuteWithShift to suppress DAGCombine
transforms which would make the overall code worse.
I'm not really happy adding a bunch of code to handle this, but it would
probably be tricky to substantially improve the behavior of DAGCombine
here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56032
llvm-svn: 351776
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This patch adds the sign/zero extension done by
vgetlane to ARM computeKnownBitsForTargetNode.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56098
llvm-svn: 350553
This saves materializing the immediate. The additional forms are less
common (they don't usually show up for bitfield insert/extract), but
they're still relevant.
I had to add a new target hook to prevent DAGCombine from reversing the
transform. That isn't the only possible way to solve the conflict, but
it seems straightforward enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55630
llvm-svn: 349857
These features (fairly) recently got split out into their own feature, so we
should make CodeGen use them when available. The main change here is that the
check used to be based on the triple, but now it's based on CPU features.
llvm-svn: 349355
This has two positive effects. First, using a custom node prevents
recombination leading to an infinite loop since the output DAG is notionally a
little more complex than the input one. Using a flag-setting instruction also
allows the subtraction to be folded with the related comparison more easily.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53190
llvm-svn: 348122
Don't expand SDIV with an immediate that is a power of 2 if we optimise for
minimum code size. For example:
sdiv %1, i32 4
gets expanded to a sequence of 3 instructions, but this is suboptimal for
minimum code size so instead we just generate a MOV and a SDIV if integer
division is supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54546
llvm-svn: 347965
The lowering was missing live-ins in certain cases, like a sequence of
multiple tMOVCCr_pseudo instructions. This would lead to a verifier
failure, and on pre-v6 Thumb CPSR would be incorrectly clobbered.
For reasons I don't completely understand, it's hard to get a sequence
of multiple tMOVCCr_pseudo instructions; the issue only seems to show up
with 64-bit comparisons where the result is zero-extended. I added some
extra testcases in case that changes in the future. Probably some
optimization opportunities here if anyone is interested. (@test_slt_not
is the case that was getting miscompiled.)
The code to check the liveness of CPSR was stolen from
X86ISelLowering.cpp; maybe it could be refactored into common helper,
but I have no idea where to put it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54192
llvm-svn: 346355
Summary:
Changes all uses of minnan/maxnan to minimum/maximum
globally. These names emphasize that the semantic difference between
these operations is more than just NaN-propagation.
Reviewers: arsenm, aheejin, dschuff, javed.absar
Subscribers: jholewinski, sdardis, wdng, sbc100, jgravelle-google, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53112
llvm-svn: 345218
The BKPT instruction is specified to cause a software breakpoint,
and at least on Linux results in a SIGTRAP. This makes it more
suitable for implementing debugtrap than TRAP (aka UDF #254), which
is specified to cause an undefined instruction exception and results
in a SIGILL on Linux.
Moreover, BKPT is not marked as a terminator, which is not only
consistent with the IR instruction but allows the analyzeBlock
function to correctly analyze a basic block containing the instruction,
which fixes an assertion failure in the machine block placement pass
previously triggered by the included test case.
Because BKPT is only supported starting with ARMv5T, we continue to
use UDF #254 when targeting v4T.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53614
llvm-svn: 345171
A global alias may use indices which are not considered in bounds. In
such a case, accessing the base object will fail as it only peers
through inbounds accesses. This pattern is used by the swift compiler
to create references to preceeding members in the type metadata. This
would cause the code generation to fail when targeting a platform that
used ELF as the object file format. Be conservative and fail the
read-only check if we run into an alias that we cannot peer through.
llvm-svn: 345107
As I suggested on PR39281, this patch uses PADDL pairwise addition to widen from the vXi8 CTPOP result to the target vector type.
This is a blocker for moving more x86 code to generic vector CTPOP expansion (P32655 + D53258) - ARM's vXi64 CTPOP currently expands, which would generate a vXi64 MUL but ARM's custom lowering expands the general MUL case and vectors aren't well handled in LegalizeDAG - improving the CTPOP lowering was a lot easier than fixing the MUL lowering for this one case......
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53257
llvm-svn: 344512
Correctly check for relocations in the constant to promote. And don't
allow promoting a constant multiple times.
This partially fixes https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32780 ;
it's not a complete fix because we also need to prevent
ARMConstantIslands from cloning the constant.
(-arm-promote-constant is currently off by default, and it stays off
with this patch. I'll look into turning it on again when all the known
issues are fixed.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51472
llvm-svn: 343361
This mostly affects IR generated by non-clang frontends because clang
generally sets the alignment of globals explicitly.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32394 .
(-arm-promote-constant is currently off by default, and it stays off
with this patch. I'll look into turning it on again when all the known
issues are fixed.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51469
llvm-svn: 343359
This involves changing the shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR interface, but I have
updated the in-tree backends using this hook (ARM, AArch64, Hexagon) so they
will see no functional change. Previously this hook returned bool, but it now
returns AtomicExpansionKind.
This hook allows targets to select how a given cmpxchg is to be expanded.
D48131 uses this to expand part-word cmpxchg to a target-specific intrinsic.
See my associated RFC for more info on the motivation for this change
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123993.html>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48130
llvm-svn: 342550
The Technical Reference Manuals for these two CPUs state that branching
to an unaligned 32-bit instruction incurs an extra pipeline reload
penalty. That's bad.
This also enables the optimization at -Os since it costs on average one
byte per loop in return for 1 cycle per iteration, which is pretty good
going.
llvm-svn: 342127
On Windows, if shouldAssumeDSOLocal returns false, it's either a
dllimport reference, or a reference that we should treat as non-local
and create a stub for.
Clean up AArch64Subtarget::ClassifyGlobalReference a little while
touching the flag handling relating to dllimport.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51590
llvm-svn: 341402
The runtime pseudo relocations can't handle the ARM format embedded
addresses in movw/movt pairs. By using stubs, the potentially
dllimported addresses can be touched up by the runtime pseudo relocation
framework.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51450
llvm-svn: 341176
The inline sequence is very long (about 70 bytes on Thumb1), so it's
not really a good idea to inline it, especially when optimizing for
size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47917
llvm-svn: 340458
This avoids a potential infinite loop setting and unsetting bits in the
mask.
Reduced from a failure on the polly-aosp bot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51066
llvm-svn: 340446
This adds the plumbing for the Tiny code model for the AArch64 backend. This,
instead of loading addresses through the normal ADRP;ADD pair used in the Small
model, uses a single ADR. The 21 bit range of an ADR means that the code and
its statically defined symbols need to be within 1MB of each other.
This makes it mostly interesting for embedded applications where we want to fit
as much as we can in as small a space as possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49673
llvm-svn: 340397
`MachineMemOperand` pointers attached to `MachineSDNodes` and instead
have the `SelectionDAG` fully manage the memory for this array.
Prior to this change, the memory management was deeply confusing here --
The way the MI was built relied on the `SelectionDAG` allocating memory
for these arrays of pointers using the `MachineFunction`'s allocator so
that the raw pointer to the array could be blindly copied into an
eventual `MachineInstr`. This creates a hard coupling between how
`MachineInstr`s allocate their array of `MachineMemOperand` pointers and
how the `MachineSDNode` does.
This change is motivated in large part by a change I am making to how
`MachineFunction` allocates these pointers, but it seems like a layering
improvement as well.
This would run the risk of increasing allocations overall, but I've
implemented an optimization that should avoid that by storing a single
`MachineMemOperand` pointer directly instead of allocating anything.
This is expected to be a net win because the vast majority of uses of
these only need a single pointer.
As a side-effect, this makes the API for updating a `MachineSDNode` and
a `MachineInstr` reasonably different which seems nice to avoid
unexpected coupling of these two layers. We can map between them, but we
shouldn't be *surprised* at where that occurs. =]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50680
llvm-svn: 339740
Intentionally excluding nodes from the DAGCombine worklist is likely to
lead to weird optimizations and infinite loops, so it's generally a bad
idea.
To avoid the infinite loops, fix DAGCombine to use the
isDesirableToCommuteWithShift target hook before performing the
transforms in question, and implement the target hook in the ARM backend
disable the transforms in question.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38530 . (I don't have a
reduced testcase for that bug. But we should have sufficient test
coverage for PerformSHLSimplify given that we're not playing weird
tricks with the worklist. I can try to bugpoint it if necessary,
though.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50667
llvm-svn: 339734
Sam Parker