Summary:
This reuses the getArithmeticInstrCost, but passes dummy values of the second
operand flags.
The X86 costs are wrong and can be improved in a follow up. I just wanted to
stop it from reporting an unknown cost first.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, andrew.w.kaylor, cameron.mcinally
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62444
llvm-svn: 361788
Noticed in D56011 - handle the case that scalar fp ops are quicker on P3 than P4
Add the other costs so that we're not relying on the default "is legal/custom" cost logic.
llvm-svn: 350403
The script allows the auto-generation of checks for cost model tests to speed up their creation and help improve coverage, which will help a lot with PR36550.
If the need arises we can add support for other analyze passes as well, but the cost models was the one I needed to get done - at the moment it just warns that any other analysis mode is unsupported.
I've regenerated a couple of x86 test files to show the effect.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45272
llvm-svn: 329390
Add fdiv costs for Goldmont using table 16-17 of the Intel Optimization Manual. Also add overrides for FSQRT for Goldmont and Silvermont.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44644
llvm-svn: 328451
Agner's tables indicate that for SSE42+ targets (Core2 and later) we can reduce the FADD/FSUB/FMUL costs down to 1, which should fix the Himeno benchmark.
Note: the AVX512 FDIV costs look rather dodgy, but this isn't part of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43733
llvm-svn: 326133
There are too many perf regressions resulting from this, so we need to
investigate (and add tests for) targets like ARM and AArch64 before
trying to reinstate.
llvm-svn: 325658
This change was mentioned at least as far back as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26837#c26
...and I found a real program that is harmed by this:
Himeno running on AMD Jaguar gets 6% slower with SLP vectorization:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36280
...but the change here appears to solve that bug only accidentally.
The div/rem costs for x86 look very wrong in some cases, but that's already true,
so we can fix those in follow-up patches. There's also evidence that more cost model
changes are needed to solve SLP problems as shown in D42981, but that's an independent
problem (though the solution may be adjusted after this change is made).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43079
llvm-svn: 325515
getIntrinsicInstrCost() used to only compute scalarization cost based on types.
This patch improves this so that the actual arguments are checked when they are
available, in order to handle only unique non-constant operands.
Tests updates:
Analysis/CostModel/X86/arith-fp.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/interleaved_cost.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/ARM/interleaved_cost.ll
The improvement in getOperandsScalarizationOverhead() to differentiate on
constants made it necessary to update the interleaved_cost.ll tests even
though they do not relate to intrinsics.
Review: Hal Finkel
https://reviews.llvm.org/D29540
llvm-svn: 297705
Summary:
This extends FCOPYSIGN support to 512-bit vectors.
I've also added tests to show what the 128-bit and 256-bit cases look like with broadcast loads.
Reviewers: delena, zvi, RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26791
llvm-svn: 287298
There is a bug describing poor cost model for floating point operations:
Bug 29083 - [X86][SSE] Improve costs for floating point operations. This
patch is the second one in series of patches dealing with cost model.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25722
llvm-svn: 285564
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30433
There are a couple of open questions about the codegen:
1. Should we let scalar ops be scalars and avoid vector constant loads/splats?
2. Should we have a pass to combine constants such as the inverted pair that we have here?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25165
llvm-svn: 283119
Craig Topper