Commit Graph

120 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Simon Pilgrim a075ce04d8 Regenerate shuffle sink test. NFCI.
llvm-svn: 323264
2018-01-23 21:50:11 +00:00
Zvi Rackover 87937e8ed2 X86 Tests: Add AVX512BW config to CodeGenPrepare test. NFC
Case points out that we don't consider shifts supported by AVX512BW
in isVectorShiftByScalarCheap()

llvm-svn: 323242
2018-01-23 19:20:39 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 17e5794f11 [CGP] Fix the GV handling in complex addressing mode
If in complex addressing mode the difference is in GV then
base reg should not be installed because we plan to use
base reg as a merge point of different GVs.

This is a fix for PR35980.

Reviewers: reames, john.brawn, santosh
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42230

llvm-svn: 323192
2018-01-23 12:07:49 +00:00
Daniel Neilson 1e68724d24 Remove alignment argument from memcpy/memmove/memset in favour of alignment attributes (Step 1)
Summary:
 This is a resurrection of work first proposed and discussed in Aug 2015:
   http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089384.html
and initially landed (but then backed out) in Nov 2015:
   http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html

 The @llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset intrinsics currently have an explicit argument
which is required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
dest (and source), and so must be the minimum of the actual alignment of the
two.

 This change is the first in a series that allows source and dest to each
have their own alignments by using the alignment attribute on their arguments.

 In this change we:
1) Remove the alignment argument.
2) Add alignment attributes to the source & dest arguments. We, temporarily,
   require that the alignments for source & dest be equal.

 For example, code which used to read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 100, i32 4, i1 false)
will now read
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 4 %dest, i8* align 4 %src, i32 100, i1 false)

 Downstream users may have to update their lit tests that check for
@llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset call/declaration patterns. The following extended sed script
may help with updating the majority of your tests, but it does not catch all possible
patterns so some manual checking and updating will be required.

s~declare void @llvm\.mem(set|cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)\((.*), i32, i1\)~declare void @llvm.mem\1.p\2(\3, i1)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i8\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i8 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i8(i8\2* \3, i8 \4, i8 \5, i1 \6)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i16\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i16 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i16(i8\2* \3, i8 \4, i16 \5, i1 \6)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i32\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i32 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i32(i8\2* \3, i8 \4, i32 \5, i1 \6)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i64\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i64 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i64(i8\2* \3, i8 \4, i64 \5, i1 \6)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i128\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i128 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i128(i8\2* \3, i8 \4, i128 \5, i1 \6)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i8\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i8 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i8(i8\2* align \6 \3, i8 \4, i8 \5, i1 \7)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i16\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i16 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i16(i8\2* align \6 \3, i8 \4, i16 \5, i1 \7)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i32\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i32 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i32(i8\2* align \6 \3, i8 \4, i32 \5, i1 \7)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i64\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i64 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i64(i8\2* align \6 \3, i8 \4, i64 \5, i1 \7)~g
s~call void @llvm\.memset\.p([^(]*)i128\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i128 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.memset.p\1i128(i8\2* align \6 \3, i8 \4, i128 \5, i1 \7)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i8\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i8(i8\3* \4, i8\5* \6, i8 \7, i1 \8)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i16\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i16 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i16(i8\3* \4, i8\5* \6, i16 \7, i1 \8)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i32\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i32 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i32(i8\3* \4, i8\5* \6, i32 \7, i1 \8)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i64\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i64 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i64(i8\3* \4, i8\5* \6, i64 \7, i1 \8)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i128\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i128 (.*), i32 [01], i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i128(i8\3* \4, i8\5* \6, i128 \7, i1 \8)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i8\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i8(i8\3* align \8 \4, i8\5* align \8 \6, i8 \7, i1 \9)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i16\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i16 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i16(i8\3* align \8 \4, i8\5* align \8 \6, i16 \7, i1 \9)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i32\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i32 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i32(i8\3* align \8 \4, i8\5* align \8 \6, i32 \7, i1 \9)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i64\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i64 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i64(i8\3* align \8 \4, i8\5* align \8 \6, i64 \7, i1 \9)~g
s~call void @llvm\.mem(cpy|move)\.p([^(]*)i128\(i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i8([^*]*)\* (.*), i128 (.*), i32 ([0-9]*), i1 ([^)]*)\)~call void @llvm.mem\1.p\2i128(i8\3* align \8 \4, i8\5* align \8 \6, i128 \7, i1 \9)~g

 The remaining changes in the series will:
Step 2) Expand the IRBuilder API to allow creation of memcpy/memmove with differing
   source and dest alignments.
Step 3) Update Clang to use the new IRBuilder API.
Step 4) Update Polly to use the new IRBuilder API.
Step 5) Update LLVM passes that create memcpy/memmove calls to use the new IRBuilder API,
        and those that use use MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() to use
        getDestAlignment() and getSourceAlignment() instead.
Step 6) Remove the single-alignment IRBuilder API for memcpy/memmove, and the
        MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() methods.

Reviewers: pete, hfinkel, lhames, reames, bollu

Reviewed By: reames

Subscribers: niosHD, reames, jholewinski, qcolombet, jfb, sanjoy, arsenm, dschuff, dylanmckay, mehdi_amini, sdardis, nemanjai, david2050, nhaehnle, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, eraman, aheejin, kbarton, JDevlieghere, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, jordy.potman.lists, apazos, sabuasal, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41675

llvm-svn: 322965
2018-01-19 17:13:12 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 4d1dd6b53a [CGP] Fix Complex addressing mode for offset
If the offset is differ in two addressing mode we can continue only if
ScaleReg is not set due to we will use it as merge of different offsets.

It should fix PR35799 and PR35805.

Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41227

llvm-svn: 322056
2018-01-09 04:37:06 +00:00
Serguei Katkov b0b67a8d38 [CGP] Fix the handling select inst in complex addressing mode
When we put the value in select placeholder we must pass
the value through simplification tracker due to the value might
be already simplified and erased.

This is a fix for PR35658.

Reviewers: john.brawn, uabelho
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41251

llvm-svn: 320956
2017-12-18 04:25:07 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 5036459ae3 [CGP] Fix common type handling in optimizeMemoryInst
If common type is different we should bail out due to we will not be
able to create a select or Phi of these values.

Basically it is done in ExtAddrMode::compare however it does not work
if we handle the null first and then two values of different types.
so add a check in initializeMap as well. The check in ExtAddrMode::compare
is used as earlier bail out.

Reviewers: reames, john.brawn
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40479

llvm-svn: 319292
2017-11-29 05:51:26 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 505359f705 [CGP] Fix the crash caused by enable of complex addr mode
We must collect all AddModes even if they are the same.
This is due to Original value is different but we need all original
values collected as they are used as anchors in common phi finding.

Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40166

llvm-svn: 318638
2017-11-20 05:42:36 +00:00
John Brawn c3347d4247 Remove stray comma in sink-addrmode test
The extra comma meant it wasn't correctly checking that we weren't getting an
extra getelementptr.

llvm-svn: 318406
2017-11-16 15:15:00 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 365200295a [CGP] Disable Select instruction handling in optimizeMemoryInst. NFC
This patch disables the handling of selects in optimization
extensing scope of optimizeMemoryInst.

The optimization itself is disable by default.
The idea here is just to switch optimiztion level step by step.

Specifically, first optimization will be enabled only for Phi nodes,
then select instructions will be added.

In case someone will complain about perfromance it will be easier to
detect what part of optimizations is responsible for that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36073

llvm-svn: 317555
2017-11-07 09:43:08 +00:00
Serguei Katkov cde03f3d27 [CGP] Extends the scope of optimizeMemoryInst optimization. NFC
Commit tests for previous commit.

Reviewers: efriedma, dberlin, mkazantsev, reames, john.brawn
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: javed.absar, john.brawn, dneilson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36073

llvm-svn: 317430
2017-11-05 05:51:44 +00:00
Clement Courbet 063bed9baf re-land [ExpandMemCmp] Split ExpandMemCmp from CodeGen into its own pass."
Fix undefined references: ExpandMemCmp belongs to CodeGen/, not Scalar/.

llvm-svn: 317318
2017-11-03 12:12:27 +00:00
Clement Courbet 82bade615b Revert "[ExpandMemCmp] Split ExpandMemCmp from CodeGen into its own pass."
undefined reference to `llvm::TargetPassConfig::ID' on
clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage

This reverts commit eea333c33fa73ad225ef28607795984829f65688.

llvm-svn: 317213
2017-11-02 15:53:10 +00:00
Clement Courbet 1dc37b9c3b [ExpandMemCmp] Split ExpandMemCmp from CodeGen into its own pass.
Summary:
This is mostly a noop (most of the test diffs are renamed blocks).
There are a few temporary register renames (eax<->ecx) and a few blocks are
shuffled around.

See the discussion in PR33325 for more details.

Reviewers: spatel

Subscribers: mgorny

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39456

llvm-svn: 317211
2017-11-02 15:02:51 +00:00
Philip Reames 9c3cbeea39 [CGP] Fix crash on i96 bit multiply
Issue found by llvm-isel-fuzzer on OSS fuzz, https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=3725

If anyone actually cares about > 64 bit arithmetic, there's a lot more to do in this area.  There's a bunch of obviously wrong code in the same function.  I don't have the time to fix all of them and am just using this to understand what the workflow for fixing fuzzer cases might look like.

llvm-svn: 316967
2017-10-30 23:59:51 +00:00
Clement Courbet b2c3eb8cf1 [CodeGen][ExpandMemcmp] Allow memcmp to expand to vector loads (2).
- Targets that want to support memcmp expansions now return the list of
   supported load sizes.
 - Expansion codegen does not assume that all power-of-two load sizes
   smaller than the max load size are valid. For examples, this is not the
   case for x86(32bit)+sse2.

Fixes PR34887.

llvm-svn: 316905
2017-10-30 14:19:33 +00:00
John Brawn eb83c7554e [CGP] In optimizeMemoryInst handle select similarly to phi
This lets us optimize away selects that perform the same address computation in
two different ways and is also the first step towards being able to handle
selects between two different, but compatible, address computations.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38242

llvm-svn: 314794
2017-10-03 13:04:15 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 4dbdd470a8 [CGP] use narrower types in memcmp expansion when possible
This only affects very small memcmp on x86 for now, but it
will become more important if we allow vector-sized load and
compares.

llvm-svn: 309711
2017-08-01 17:24:54 +00:00
Sanjay Patel fea731a4aa [CGP] use subtract or subtract-of-cmps for result of memcmp expansion
As noted in the code comment, transforming this in the other direction might require 
a separate transform here in CGP given the block-at-a-time DAG constraint.

Besides that theoretical motivation, there are 2 practical motivations for the 
subtract-of-cmps form:

1. The codegen for both x86 and PPC is better for this IR (though PPC could be better still). 
   There is discussion about canonicalizing IR to the select form 
   ( http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/114885.html ), 
   so we probably need to add DAG transforms for those patterns anyway, but this improves the 
   memcmp output without waiting for that step.

2. If we allow vector-sized chunks for the load and compare, x86 is better prepared to convert
   that to optimal code when using subtract-of-cmps, so another prerequisite patch is avoided
   if we choose to enable that.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34904

llvm-svn: 309597
2017-07-31 18:08:24 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 18b97f78fe [X86][CGP] Reduce memcmp() expansion to 2 load pairs (PR33914)
D35067/rL308322 attempted to support up to 4 load pairs for memcmp inlining which resulted in regressions for some optimized libc memcmp implementations (PR33914).

Until we can match these more optimal cases, this patch reduces the memcmp expansion to a maximum of 2 load pairs (which matches what we do for -Os).

This patch should be considered for the 5.0.0 release branch as well

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35830

llvm-svn: 308986
2017-07-25 17:04:37 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 4ea855ebe5 [CGP] Allow cycles during Phi traversal in OptimizaMemoryInst
Allowing cycles in Phi traversal increases the scope of optimize memory instruction
in case we are in loop.

The added test shows an example of enabling optimization inside a loop.

Reviewers: loladiro, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35294

llvm-svn: 308419
2017-07-19 04:49:17 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 483927aefb [x86, CGP] increase memcmp() expansion up to 4 load pairs
It should be a win to avoid going out to the system lib for all small memcmp() calls using scalar ops. For x86 32-bit, this means most everything up to 16 bytes. For 64-bit, that doubles because we can do 8-byte loads.

Notes:

    Reduced from 4 to 2 loads for -Os behavior, which might not be optimal in all cases. It's effectively a question of how much do we trust the system implementation. Linux and macOS (and Windows I assume, but did not test) have optimized memcmp() code for x86, so it's probably not bad either way? PPC is using 8/4 for defaults on these. We do not expand at all for -Oz.

    There are still potential improvements to make for the CGP expansion IR and/or lowering such as avoiding select-of-constants (D34904) and not doing zexts to the max load type before doing a compare.

    We have special-case SSE/AVX codegen for (memcmp(x, y, 16/32) == 0) that will no longer be produced after this patch. I've shown the experimental justification for that change in PR33329:

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33329#c12
TLDR: While the vector code is a likely winner, we can't guarantee that it's a winner in all cases on all CPUs, so I'm willing to sacrifice it for the greater good of expanding all small memcmp(). If we want to resurrect that codegen, it can be done by adjusting the CGP params or poking a hole to let those fall-through the CGP expansion.

Committed on behalf of Sanjay Patel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35067

llvm-svn: 308322
2017-07-18 15:55:30 +00:00
Eli Friedman 6f7c9ad7d4 [CodeGenPrepare] Don't create dead instructions in addrmode sinking
When we fail to sink an instruction, we must make sure not to modify
the function; otherwise, we end up in an infinite loop because
CodeGenPrepare iterates until it doesn't make any changes.

Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33608 .

llvm-svn: 307866
2017-07-12 23:30:02 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 0c37b19331 [CGP, x86] update test checks; NFC
This was auto-generated using an older version of the script,
and that version does not work with phis, so if we enable
expansion it will go bad.

llvm-svn: 307267
2017-07-06 15:31:38 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 4b23fa0abf [CGP] add specialization for memcmp expansion with only one basic block
llvm-svn: 306485
2017-06-27 23:15:01 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 70b36f193d [CGP] eliminate a sub instruction in memcmp expansion
As noted in D34071, there are some IR optimization opportunities that could be 
handled by normal IR passes if this expansion wasn't happening so late in CGP.

Regardless of that, it seems wasteful to knowingly produce suboptimal IR here, 
so I'm proposing this change:
  %s = sub i32 %x, %y
  %r = icmp ne %s, 0
    =>
  %r = icmp ne %x, %y

Changing the predicate to 'eq' mimics what InstCombine would do, so that's just
an efficiency improvement if we decide this expansion should happen sooner.

The fact that the PowerPC backend doesn't eliminate the 'subf.' might be 
something for PPC folks to investigate separately.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34416

llvm-svn: 306471
2017-06-27 21:46:34 +00:00
Sanjay Patel deed579140 [x86] set the datalayout to match the RUN line triple; NFC
I don't think there's any visible difference from having the wrong layout
for the 32-bit case at this point, but that could change in the future.

llvm-svn: 305931
2017-06-21 17:06:24 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 0656629b87 [x86] enable CGP memcmp() expansion for 2/4/8 byte sizes
There are a couple of potential improvements as seen in the IR and asm:
1. We're unnecessarily extending to a larger type to compare values.
2. The codegen for (select cond, 1, -1) could avoid a cmov.
(or we could change the order of the compares, so we have a select with 0 operand)

llvm-svn: 305802
2017-06-20 15:58:30 +00:00
Sanjay Patel bc6d8b0f51 [CGP, x86] add tests for potential memcmp expansion; NFC
No IR tests were added with rL304313 ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D28637 ),
so I want these for extra coverage if we enable memcmp expansion for x86.
As shown, nothing is expanded for x86 in CGP yet.

Also fundamentally, we're doing an IR transform, so we should have IR tests 
for just that part. If something goes wrong, we need to know if the bug is
in CGP or later lowering.

llvm-svn: 305011
2017-06-08 20:40:39 +00:00
Eli Friedman 5fba1e53f2 Turn on -addr-sink-using-gep by default.
The new codepath has been in the tree for years, and there isn't any
reason to use two codepaths here.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30596

llvm-svn: 299723
2017-04-06 22:42:18 +00:00
Sanjay Patel caf369bd03 [SimplifyCFG] move tests for PR31028 from CGP
Hopefully, this will make sense with a forthcoming patch. If not, we can move these back.

llvm-svn: 297660
2017-03-13 19:59:14 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 6023a2501c [CGP] add tests for PR31028; NFC
llvm-svn: 297629
2017-03-13 15:45:37 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein 13bf8a2684 [CGP] Split some critical edges coming out of indirect branches
Splitting critical edges when one of the source edges is an indirectbr
is hard in general (because it requires changing the memory the indirectbr
reads). But if a block only has a single indirectbr predecessor (which is
the common case), we can simulate splitting that edge by splitting
the destination block, and retargeting the *direct* branches.

This is motivated by the use of computed gotos in python 2.7: PyEval_EvalFrame()
ends up using an indirect branch with ~100 successors, and passing a constant to
each of those. Since MachineSink can't break indirect critical edges on demand
(and doing this in MIR doesn't look feasible), this causes us to emit about ~100
defs of registers containing constants, which we in the predecessor block, where
only one of those constants is used in each successor. So, at each computed goto,
we needlessly spill about a 100 constants to stack. The end result is that a
clang-compiled python interpreter can be about ~2.5x slower on a simple python
reduction loop than a gcc-compiled interpreter.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29916

llvm-svn: 296416
2017-02-28 00:11:34 +00:00
Daniel Jasper 3ca4525612 Revert "[CGP] Split some critical edges coming out of indirect branches"
This reverts commit r296149 as it leads to crashes when compiling for
PPC.

llvm-svn: 296295
2017-02-26 11:09:12 +00:00
Eli Friedman c12a5a7595 [CodeGenPrepare] Make -addr-sink-using-gep work with address spaces.
When we construct addressing modes, we use isNoopAddrSpaceCast to ignore
addrspacecast instructions. Make sure we insert the correct addrspacecast
when we reconstruct the addressing mode.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30114

llvm-svn: 296167
2017-02-24 20:51:36 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein 46b131e3f8 [CGP] Split some critical edges coming out of indirect branches
Splitting critical edges when one of the source edges is an indirectbr
is hard in general (because it requires changing the memory the indirectbr
reads). But if a block only has a single indirectbr predecessor (which is
the common case), we can simulate splitting that edge by splitting
the destination block, and retargeting the *direct* branches.

This is motivated by the use of computed gotos in python 2.7: PyEval_EvalFrame()
ends up using an indirect branch with ~100 successors, and passing a constant to
each of those. Since MachineSink can't break indirect critical edges on demand
(and doing this in MIR doesn't look feasible), this causes us to emit about ~100
defs of registers containing constants, which we in the predecessor block, where
only one of those constants is used in each successor. So, at each computed goto,
we needlessly spill about a 100 constants to stack. The end result is that a
clang-compiled python interpreter can be about ~2.5x slower on a simple python
reduction loop than a gcc-compiled interpreter.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29916

llvm-svn: 296149
2017-02-24 18:41:32 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim 90b6b5074a [CodeGenPrep] Skip merging empty case blocks
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block and unit test failures in AVR and WebAssembly :

Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.

Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl

Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696

llvm-svn: 289988
2016-12-16 20:38:39 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim f9416af191 Revert "[CodeGenPrep] Skip merging empty case blocks"
This reverts commit r289951.

llvm-svn: 289960
2016-12-16 17:06:14 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim 85347dde27 [CodeGenPrep] Skip merging empty case blocks
This is recommit of r287553 after fixing the invalid loop info after eliminating an empty block:

Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.

Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, joerg, davidxl

Subscribers: joerg, qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696

llvm-svn: 289951
2016-12-16 16:03:31 +00:00
Joerg Sonnenberger caaa82d90d Revert r287553: [CodeGenPrep] Skip merging empty case blocks
It results in assertions in lib/Analysis/BlockFrequencyInfoImpl.cpp line
670 ("Expected irreducible CFG").

llvm-svn: 288052
2016-11-28 18:56:54 +00:00
Jun Bum Lim 82f55c5446 [CodeGenPrep] Skip merging empty case blocks
Summary: Merging an empty case block into the header block of switch could cause
ISel to add COPY instructions in the header of switch, instead of the case
block, if the case block is used as an incoming block of a PHI. This could
potentially increase dynamic instructions, especially when the switch is in a
loop. I added a test case which was reduced from the benchmark I was targetting.

Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, manmanren, wmi, davidxl

Subscribers: qcolombet, danielcdh, hfinkel, mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22696

llvm-svn: 287553
2016-11-21 16:47:28 +00:00
David Majnemer 0c80e2eac6 [CodeGenPrepare] Don't sink a cast past its user
The sink cast machinery is supposed to sink casts as close to their user
as possible.  However, an EH pad is the first instruction in it's basic
block.  Don't sink if the user is an EH pad.

This fixes PR27536.

llvm-svn: 267767
2016-04-27 19:36:38 +00:00
Sanjay Patel a31b0c0ece [CodeGenPrepare] don't convert an unpredictable select into control flow
Suggested in the review of D19488:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19488

llvm-svn: 267504
2016-04-26 00:47:39 +00:00
Adrian Prantl 75819aedf6 [PR27284] Reverse the ownership between DICompileUnit and DISubprogram.
Currently each Function points to a DISubprogram and DISubprogram has a
scope field. For member functions the scope is a DICompositeType. DIScopes
point to the DICompileUnit to facilitate type uniquing.

Distinct DISubprograms (with isDefinition: true) are not part of the type
hierarchy and cannot be uniqued. This change removes the subprograms
list from DICompileUnit and instead adds a pointer to the owning compile
unit to distinct DISubprograms. This would make it easy for ThinLTO to
strip unneeded DISubprograms and their transitively referenced debug info.

Motivation
----------

Materializing DISubprograms is currently the most expensive operation when
doing a ThinLTO build of clang.

We want the DISubprogram to be stored in a separate Bitcode block (or the
same block as the function body) so we can avoid having to expensively
deserialize all DISubprograms together with the global metadata. If a
function has been inlined into another subprogram we need to store a
reference the block containing the inlined subprogram.

Attached to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27284 is a python script
that updates LLVM IR testcases to the new format.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D19034
<rdar://problem/25256815>

llvm-svn: 266446
2016-04-15 15:57:41 +00:00
Peter Zotov 0b6d7bc682 [CodeGenPrepare] Avoid sinking soft-FP comparisons
Sinking comparisons in CGP can undo the job of hoisting them done
earlier by LICM, and soft-FP makes this an expensive mistake.

A common pattern that produces floating point comparisons uniform
over a loop is an explicit check for division by zero. If the divisor
is hoisted out of the loop, the comparison can also be, but hoisting
the function that unwinds is never legal, since it may cause side
effects in the loop body prior to the unwinding to not be executed.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18744

llvm-svn: 265264
2016-04-03 16:36:17 +00:00
Adrian Prantl b8089516a5 testcase gardening: update the emissionKind enum to the new syntax. (NFC)
llvm-svn: 265081
2016-04-01 00:16:49 +00:00
Philip Reames ac115ed72f [CGP] Duplicate addressing computation in cold paths if required to sink addressing mode
This patch teaches CGP to duplicate addressing mode computations into cold paths (detected via explicit cold attribute on calls) if required to let addressing mode be safely sunk into the basic block containing each load and store.

In general, duplicating code into cold blocks may result in code growth, but should not effect performance. In this case, it's better to duplicate some code than to put extra pressure on the register allocator by making it keep the address through the entirely of the fast path.

This patch only handles addressing computations, but in principal, we could implement a more general cold cold scheduling heuristic which tries to reduce register pressure in the fast path by duplicating code into the cold path. Getting the profitability of the general case right seemed likely to be challenging, so I stuck to the existing case (addressing computation) we already had.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17652

llvm-svn: 263074
2016-03-09 23:13:12 +00:00
Junmo Park 161dc1c605 [CodeGenPrepare] Remove load-based heuristic
Summary:
Both the hardware and LLVM have changed since 2012.
Now, load-based heuristic don't show big differences any more on OoO cores.

There is no notable regressons and improvements on spec2000/2006. (Cortex-A57, Core i5).

Reviewers: spatel, zansari
    
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16836

llvm-svn: 261809
2016-02-25 00:23:27 +00:00
Keno Fischer 81e2e9ef86 Reapply r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"
I originally reapplied this in 257550, but had to revert again due to bot
breakage. The only change in this version is to allow either the TypeSize
or the TypeAllocSize of the variable to be the one represented in debug info
(hopefully in the future we can figure out how to encode the difference).
Additionally, several bot failures following r257550, were due to
optimizer bugs now fixed in r257787 and r257795.

r257550 commit message was:

```
The follow extra changes were made to test cases:

Manually making the variable be the actual type instead of a pointer
to avoid pointer-size differences in generic code:

    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-03-24-MemberFn.ll
    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-04-06-NestedFnDbgInfo.ll
    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-DisableFramePtr.ll
    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/varargs.ll

Delete sizing information from debug info for the same reason
(but the presence of the pointer was important to the test case):

    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/restrict.ll
    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/tu-composite.ll
    LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-type-array-a.ll
    LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-simple2.ll

Fixing an incorrect DW_OP_deref

    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-OriginDIE.ll

Fixing a missing DW_OP_deref

    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/incorrect-variable-debugloc.ll

Additionally, clang should no longer complain during bootstrap should no
longer happen after r257534.

The original commit message was:
``
Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.

One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.

Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
  it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
  variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
  supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
  discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref
``

```

llvm-svn: 257850
2016-01-15 00:46:17 +00:00
Keno Fischer 78e5c9e6e2 Re-Revert r257105 (Verifier debug info changes)
While I investigate some new buildbot failures. This was originally reapplied
as r257550 and r257558.

llvm-svn: 257563
2016-01-13 02:31:14 +00:00
Keno Fischer 25916079ff Reapply r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"
The follow extra changes were made to test cases:

Manually making the variable be the actual type instead of a pointer
to avoid pointer-size differences in generic code:

    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-03-24-MemberFn.ll
    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-04-06-NestedFnDbgInfo.ll
    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-DisableFramePtr.ll
    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/varargs.ll

Delete sizing information from debug info for the same reason
(but the presence of the pointer was important to the test case):

    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/restrict.ll
    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/tu-composite.ll
    LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-type-array-a.ll
    LLVM :: Linker/type-unique-simple2.ll

Fixing an incorrect DW_OP_deref

    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/2010-05-03-OriginDIE.ll

Fixing a missing DW_OP_deref

    LLVM :: DebugInfo/Generic/incorrect-variable-debugloc.ll

Additionally, clang should no longer complain during bootstrap should no
longer happen after r257534.

The original commit message was:
```
Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.

One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.

Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
  it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
  variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
  supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
  discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref
```

llvm-svn: 257550
2016-01-13 00:31:44 +00:00
Keno Fischer ea33a25816 Temporarily revert r257105 "[Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size"
Looks like there's a case where clang generates debug info that triggers
the new verifier check. Reverting while investigating.

llvm-svn: 257107
2016-01-07 22:39:11 +00:00
Keno Fischer b3326be6ad [Verifier] Check that debug values have proper size
Summary:
Teach the Verifier to make sure that the storage size given to llvm.dbg.declare
or the value size given to llvm.dbg.value agree with what is declared in
DebugInfo. This is implicitly assumed in a number of passes (e.g. in SROA).
Additionally this catches a number of common mistakes, such as passing a
pointer when a value was intended or vice versa.

One complication comes from stack coloring which modifies the original IR when
it merges allocas in order to make sure that if AA falls back to the IR it gets
the correct result. However, given this new invariant, indiscriminately
replacing one alloca by a different (differently sized one) is no longer valid.
Fix this by just undefing out any use of the alloca in a dbg.declare in this
case.

Additionally, I had to fix a number of test cases. Of particular note:
- I regenerated dbg-changes-codegen-branch-folding.ll from the given source as
  it was affected by the bug fixed in r256077
- two-cus-from-same-file.ll was changed to avoid having a variable-typed debug
  variable as that would depend on the target, even though this test is
  supposed to be generic
- I had to manually declared size/align for reference type. See also the
  discussion for D14275/r253186.
- fpstack-debuginstr-kill.ll required changing `double` to `long double`
- most others were just a question of adding OP_deref

Reviewers: aprantl
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14276

llvm-svn: 257105
2016-01-07 22:18:37 +00:00
David Majnemer 550654aaf1 Move catchpad-phi-cast.ll to the X86 specific subdirectory
It is X86 specific and will not be properly exercised unless LLVM is
built with the X86 target.

llvm-svn: 255426
2015-12-12 06:21:08 +00:00
Sanjay Patel ae3680cbcd this new test file was accidentally left out of r253573
llvm-svn: 253574
2015-11-19 16:39:00 +00:00
Pete Cooper 67cf9a723b Revert "Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments."
This reverts commit r253511.

This likely broke the bots in
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/20202
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-i686-linux/builds/3787

llvm-svn: 253543
2015-11-19 05:56:52 +00:00
Pete Cooper 72bc23ef02 Change memcpy/memset/memmove to have dest and source alignments.
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html

These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer.  It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.

This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments.  The alignment
argument itself is removed.

There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe.  For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.

For example, code which used to read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
  call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)

For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
  (call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
  $1i1 false)

and similarly for memmove and memcpy.

I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.

A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.

In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added.  Instead of calling:
  CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
  CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)

There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool.  This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.

Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen.  I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.

Reviewed by Hal Finkel.

llvm-svn: 253511
2015-11-18 22:17:24 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 0ed9aeaa5f [CGP] widen switch condition and case constants to target's register width (2nd try)
This is a redo of r251849 except the tests have been split into arch-specific folders
to hopefully make the bots happy.

This is a follow-up from the discussion in D12965. The block-at-a-time limitation of
SelectionDAG also came up in D13297.

Without the InstCombine change from D12965, I don't expect this patch to make any
difference in the real world because InstCombine does not shrink cases like this in
visitSwitchInst(). But we need to have this CGP safety harness in place before
proceeding with any shrinkage in D12965, so we won't generate extra extends for compares.

I've opted for IR regression tests in the patch because that seems like a clearer way to
test the transform, but PowerPC CodeGen for an i16 widening test is shown below. x86
will need more work to solve: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22473

Before:
BB#0:
  mr 4, 3
  extsh. 3, 4
  ble 0, .LBB0_5
 BB#1:
  cmpwi  3, 99
  bgt    0, .LBB0_9
 BB#2:
  rlwinm 4, 4, 0, 16, 31      <--- 32-bit mask/extend
  li 3, 0
  cmplwi         4, 1
  beqlr 0
 BB#3:
  cmplwi         4, 10
  bne    0, .LBB0_12
 BB#4:
  li 3, 1
  blr
.LBB0_5:
  rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31      <--- 32-bit mask/extend
  cmplwi         3, 65436
  beq    0, .LBB0_13
 BB#6:
  cmplwi         3, 65526
  beq    0, .LBB0_15
 BB#7:
  cmplwi         3, 65535
  bne    0, .LBB0_12
 BB#8:
  li 3, 4
  blr
.LBB0_9:
  rlwinm 3, 4, 0, 16, 31      <--- 32-bit mask/extend
  cmplwi         3, 100
  beq    0, .LBB0_14
...

After:
BB#0:
  rlwinm 4, 3, 0, 16, 31      <--- mask/extend to 32-bit and then use that for comparisons
  cmpwi  4, 999
  ble 0, .LBB0_5
 BB#1:
  lis 3, 0
  ori 3, 3, 65525
  cmpw   4, 3
  bgt    0, .LBB0_9
 BB#2:
  cmplwi         4, 1000
  beq    0, .LBB0_14
 BB#3:
  cmplwi         4, 65436
  bne    0, .LBB0_13
 BB#4:
  li 3, 6
  blr
.LBB0_5:
  li 3, 0
  cmplwi         4, 1
  beqlr 0
 BB#6:
  cmplwi         4, 10
  beq    0, .LBB0_12
 BB#7:
  cmplwi         4, 100
  bne    0, .LBB0_13
 BB#8:
  li 3, 2
  blr
.LBB0_9:
  cmplwi         4, 65526
  beq    0, .LBB0_15
 BB#10:
  cmplwi         4, 65535
  bne    0, .LBB0_13
...


Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13532

llvm-svn: 251857
2015-11-02 23:22:49 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 69a50a1e17 [CGP] transform select instructions into branches and sink expensive operands
This was originally checked in at r250527, but reverted at r250570 because of PR25222.
There were at least 2 problems: 
1. The cost check was checking for an instruction with an exact cost of TCC_Expensive;
that should have been >=.
2. The cause of the clang stage 1 failures was illegally sinking 'call' instructions;
we can't sink instructions that may have side effects / are not safe to execute speculatively.

Fixed those conditions in sinkSelectOperand() and added test cases.

Original commit message:
This is a follow-up to the discussion in D12882.

Ideally, we would like SimplifyCFG to be able to form select instructions even when the operands
are expensive (as defined by the TTI cost model) because that may expose further optimizations.
However, we would then like a later pass like CodeGenPrepare to undo that transformation if the
target would likely benefit from not speculatively executing an expensive op (this patch).

Once we have this safety mechanism in place, we can adjust SimplifyCFG to restore its
select-formation behavior that changed with r248439.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13297

llvm-svn: 250743
2015-10-19 21:59:12 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer b43d33bf0f Revert "This is a follow-up to the discussion in D12882."
Breaks clang selfhost, see PR25222. This reverts commits r250527 and r250528.

llvm-svn: 250570
2015-10-16 23:00:29 +00:00
Sanjay Patel bb5d550c3d move test case to x86 directory because it specifies an x86 target
llvm-svn: 250528
2015-10-16 17:18:07 +00:00
Ahmed Bougacha 408d010a7c [SimplifyLibCalls] Ignore nobuiltin/unavailable fortified libcalls.
We used to do this before refactorings around r225640.
Some clang users checked for _chk libcall availability using:
  __has_builtin(__builtin___memcpy_chk)
When compiling with -fno-builtin, this is always true.
When passing -ffreestanding/-mkernel, which both imply -fno-builtin, we
end up with fortified libcalls, which isn't acceptable in a freestanding
environment which only provides their non-fortified counterparts.

Until we change clang and/or teach external users to check for availability
differently, disregard the "nobuiltin" attribute and TLI::has.

Workaround for PR23093.

llvm-svn: 233776
2015-04-01 00:45:09 +00:00
David Blaikie a79ac14fa6 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-27 21:17:42 +00:00
David Blaikie 79e6c74981 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to getelementptr instruction
One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers,
replacing them with a single opaque pointer type.

This adds an explicit type parameter to the gep instruction so that when the
first parameter becomes an opaque pointer type, the type to gep through is
still available to the instructions.

* This doesn't modify gep operators, only instructions (operators will be
  handled separately)

* Textual IR changes only. Bitcode (including upgrade) and changing the
  in-memory representation will be in separate changes.

* geps of vectors are transformed as:
    getelementptr <4 x float*> %x, ...
  ->getelementptr float, <4 x float*> %x, ...
  Then, once the opaque pointer type is introduced, this will ultimately look
  like:
    getelementptr float, <4 x ptr> %x
  with the unambiguous interpretation that it is a vector of pointers to float.

* address spaces remain on the pointer, not the type:
    getelementptr float addrspace(1)* %x
  ->getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %x
  Then, eventually:
    getelementptr float, ptr addrspace(1) %x

Importantly, the massive amount of test case churn has been automated by
same crappy python code. I had to manually update a few test cases that
wouldn't fit the script's model (r228970,r229196,r229197,r229198). The
python script just massages stdin and writes the result to stdout, I
then wrapped that in a shell script to handle replacing files, then
using the usual find+xargs to migrate all the files.

update.py:
import fileinput
import sys
import re

ibrep = re.compile(r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr inbounds )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
normrep = re.compile(       r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")

def conv(match, line):
  if not match:
    return line
  line = match.groups()[0]
  if len(match.groups()[5]) == 0:
    line += match.groups()[2]
  line += match.groups()[3]
  line += ", "
  line += match.groups()[1]
  line += "\n"
  return line

for line in sys.stdin:
  if line.find("getelementptr ") == line.find("getelementptr inbounds"):
    if line.find("getelementptr inbounds") != line.find("getelementptr inbounds ("):
      line = conv(re.match(ibrep, line), line)
  elif line.find("getelementptr ") != line.find("getelementptr ("):
    line = conv(re.match(normrep, line), line)
  sys.stdout.write(line)

apply.sh:
for name in "$@"
do
  python3 `dirname "$0"`/update.py < "$name" > "$name.tmp" && mv "$name.tmp" "$name"
  rm -f "$name.tmp"
done

The actual commands:
From llvm/src:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
From llvm/src/tools/clang:
find test/ -name *.mm -o -name *.m -o -name *.cpp -o -name *.c | xargs -I '{}' ../../apply.sh "{}"
From llvm/src/tools/polly:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh

After that, check-all (with llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld,
compiler-rt, and polly all checked out).

The extra 'rm' in the apply.sh script is due to a few files in clang's test
suite using interesting unicode stuff that my python script was throwing
exceptions on. None of those files needed to be migrated, so it seemed
sufficient to ignore those cases.

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7636

llvm-svn: 230786
2015-02-27 19:29:02 +00:00
Alp Toker d3d017cf00 Reduce verbiage of lit.local.cfg files
We can just split targets_to_build in one place and make it immutable.

llvm-svn: 210496
2014-06-09 22:42:55 +00:00
Eli Bendersky f13a05607c Similar to bitcast, treat addrspacecast as a foldable operand.
Added a test sink-addrspacecast.ll to verify this change.

Patch by Jingyue Wu.

llvm-svn: 209343
2014-05-22 00:02:52 +00:00
Manuel Jacob a7c48f99ae CodeGenPrep: sink extends of illegal types into use block.
Summary:
This helps the instruction selector to lower an i64 * i64 -> i128
multiplication into a single instruction on targets which support it.

This is an update of D2973 which was reverted because of a bug reported
as PR19084.

Reviewers: t.p.northover, chapuni

Reviewed By: t.p.northover

CC: llvm-commits, alex, chapuni

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3021

llvm-svn: 203797
2014-03-13 13:36:25 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi 1783e1e984 Revert r203230, "CodeGenPrep: sink extends of illegal types into use block."
It choked i686 stage2.

llvm-svn: 203386
2014-03-09 11:01:07 +00:00
Tim Northover ad3d81d320 CodeGenPrep: sink extends of illegal types into use block.
This helps the instruction selector to lower an i64 * i64 -> i128
multiplication into a single instruction on targets which support it.

Patch by Manuel Jacob.

llvm-svn: 203230
2014-03-07 11:04:30 +00:00
Tim Northover d495642c54 X86: move test requiring X86TargetLowering info into its own directory
If LLVM is built without X86 as a supported target then the test would
mysteriously fail.

llvm-svn: 201668
2014-02-19 12:24:19 +00:00