As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
In PR41304:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41304
...we have a case where we want to fold a binop of select-shuffle (blended) values.
Rather than try to match commuted variants of the pattern, we can canonicalize the
shuffles and check for mask equality with commuted operands.
We don't produce arbitrary shuffle masks in instcombine, but select-shuffles are a
special case that the backend is required to handle because we already canonicalize
vector select to this shuffle form.
So there should be no codegen difference from this change. It's possible that this
improves CSE in IR though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60016
llvm-svn: 357366
Follow-up to rL342324 (D52059):
Missing optimizations with blendv are shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38814
This is an easier and more powerful solution than adding pattern matching for a few
special cases in the backend. The potential danger with this transform in IR is that
the condition value can get separated from the select, and the backend might not be
able to make a blendv out of it again.
llvm-svn: 342806
Missing optimizations with blendv are shown in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38814
If this works, it's an easier and more powerful solution than adding pattern matching
for a few special cases in the backend. The potential danger with this transform in IR
is that the condition value can get separated from the select, and the backend might
not be able to make a blendv out of it again. I don't think that's too likely, but
I've kept this patch minimal with a 'TODO', so we can test that theory in the wild
before expanding the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52059
llvm-svn: 342324
Tests with target intrinsics are inherently target specific, so it
doesn't actually make sense to run them if we've excluded their
target.
llvm-svn: 302979
Eric Christopher