I've copied and regenerated a resource file from btver2 to every x86 scheduler model supported by llvm-mca so we have at least some basic coverage.
For most this has been the avx1 tests, but for silvermont I've used sse42 as thats the latest it supports.
More will be added later.
llvm-svn: 330352
This script can be used to regenerate tests in the
test/tools/llvm-mca directory (PR36904).
Regenerated a number of tests using the pattern: test/tools/llvm-mca/*/*/*.s
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45369
llvm-svn: 330246
Normally, the Scheduler prioritizes older instructions over younger instructions
during the instruction issue stage. In one particular case where a dependent
instruction had a schedule read-advance associated to one of the input operands,
this rule was not correctly applied.
This patch fixes the issue and adds a test to verify that we don't regress that
particular case.
llvm-svn: 330032
This patch moves the logic that collects and analyzes dispatch events to the
DispatchStatistics view.
Added flag -dispatch-stats to print statistics related to the dispatch logic.
llvm-svn: 329708
This patch teaches llvm-mca how to parse code comments in search for special
"markers" used to select regions of code.
Example:
# LLVM-MCA-BEGIN My Code Region
....
# LLVM-MCA-END
The MCAsmLexer now delegates to an object of class MCACommentParser (i.e. an
AsmCommentConsumer) the parsing of code comments to search for begin/end code
region markers.
A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-BEGIN" marks the beginning of a new
region of code. A comment starting with substring "LLVM-MCA-END" marks the end
of the last region.
This implementation doesn't allow regions to overlap. Each region can have a
optional description; internally, each region is identified by a range of source
code locations (SMLoc).
MCInst objects are added to a region R only if the source location for the
MCInst is in the range of locations specified by R.
By default, the tool allocates an implicit "Default" code region which contains
every source location. See new tests llvm-mca-marker-*.s for a few examples.
A new Backend object is created for every region. So, the analysis is conducted
on every parsed code region. The final report is the union of the reports
generated for every code region. Note that empty regions are skipped.
Special "[#] Code Region - ..." strings are used in the report to mark the
portion which is specific to a code region only. For example, see
llvm-mca-markers-5.s.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45433
llvm-svn: 329590
This patch adds the ability to describe properties of the hardware retire
control unit.
Tablegen class RetireControlUnit has been added for this purpose (see
TargetSchedule.td).
A RetireControlUnit specifies the size of the reorder buffer, as well as the
maximum number of opcodes that can be retired every cycle.
A zero (or negative) value for the reorder buffer size means: "the size is
unknown". If the size is unknown, then llvm-mca defaults it to the value of
field SchedMachineModel::MicroOpBufferSize. A zero or negative number of
opcodes retired per cycle means: "there is no restriction on the number of
instructions that can be retired every cycle".
Models can optionally specify an instance of RetireControlUnit. There can only
be up-to one RetireControlUnit definition per scheduling model.
Information related to the RCU (RetireControlUnit) is stored in (two new fields
of) MCExtraProcessorInfo. llvm-mca loads that information when it initializes
the DispatchUnit / RetireControlUnit (see Dispatch.h/Dispatch.cpp).
This patch fixes PR36661.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45259
llvm-svn: 329304
Before this patch, the "BackendStatistics" view was responsible for printing the
register file usage (as well as many other statistics).
Now users can enable register file usage statistics using the command line flag
`-register-file-stats`. By default, the tool doesn't print register file
statistics.
llvm-svn: 329083
This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling
models. This addresses PR36662.
A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td.
Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that
class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify:
- The total number of physical registers.
- Which target registers are accessible through the register file.
- The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage.
Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td)
def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]>
Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar
(btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM
register definitions only cost 1 physical register.
The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of
register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by
the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register
cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of
physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of
physical registers".
This patch is structured in two parts.
* Part 1 - MC/Tablegen *
A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the
SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files.
Information about register files is accessible through an instance of
MCExtraProcessorInfo.
The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description
which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor
information used by the llvm machine schedulers.
I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra
processor information if they don't want it.
* Part 2 - llvm-mca related *
The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca.
The main differences are:
1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register"
when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage.
2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the
"maximum 32 register files" restriction.
3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra
details related to each register file implemented by the processor.
The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980
llvm-svn: 329067
Before, the instruction builder incorrectly assumed that only explicit reads
could have been associated with ReadAdvance entries.
This patch fixes the issue and adds a test to verify it.
llvm-svn: 328972
Summary:
It seems many CPUs don't implement this instruction as well as the other vector multiplies. Often using a multi uop flow. Silvermont in particular has a 7 uop flow with 11 cycle throughput. Sandy Bridge implements it as a single uop with 5 cycle latency and 1 cycle throughput. But Haswell and later use 2 uops with 10 cycle latency and 2 cycle throughput.
This patch adds a new X86SchedWritePair we can use to tag this instruction separately. I've provided correct information for Silvermont, Btver2, and Sandy Bridge. I've removed the InstRWs for SandyBridge. I've left Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake InstRWs in place because I wasn't sure how to account for the different load latency between 128 and 256 bits. I also left Znver1 InstRWs in place because the existing values don't match Agner's spreadsheet.
I also left a FIXME in the SandyBridge model because it being used for the "generic" model is too optimistic for the 256/512-bit versions since those are multiple uops on all known CPUs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, GGanesh, courbet
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gchatelet, gbedwell, andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44972
llvm-svn: 328914
instructions.
In the Btver2 model, there are a few InstRW overrides that don't specify a
ReadAfterLd for the register input operand.
As a result, a few AVX variants of horizontal operations and most vector logic
operations with a folded memory operand don't have a ReadAdvance info associated
to their input register operands.
llvm-svn: 328865
Verify that the ReadAfterLd is correctly applied to FMA and 4-ops variable blend
instructions.
As Craig pointed out in D44726, some Intel models still have to be fixed.
llvm-svn: 328861
This change adds a couple of tests to verify the change introduced by revision
328823 ([X86] Correct the placement of ReadAfterLd in BEXTR and BZHI).
llvm-svn: 328859
The tool was passing the wrong operand index to method
MCSubtargetInfo::getReadAdvanceCycles(). That method requires a "UseIdx", and
not the operand index. This was found when testing X86 code where instructions
had a memory folded operand.
This patch fixes the issue and adds test read-advance-1.s to ensure that
the ReadAfterLd (a ReadAdvance of 3cy) information is correctly used.
llvm-svn: 328790
Similar to r328694. The number of micro opcodes should be 2 for those
instructions.
This was found when testing AVX code for BtVer2 using llvm-mca.
llvm-svn: 328698
The Jaguar backend natively supports 128-bit data types. Operations on YMM
registers are split into two COPs (complex operations). Each COP consumes a slot
in the dispatch group, and in the reorder buffer.
The scheduling model for Jaguar should mark those instructions as `let
NumMicroOps = 2`.
This was found when testing AVX code for BtVer2 using llvm-mca.
llvm-svn: 328694
We were incorrectly initializing the array of used registers in method checkRAT.
As a consequence, the number of register file stalls was misreported.
Added a test to cover this case.
llvm-svn: 328629
The goal of this patch is to address most of PR36874. To fully fix PR36874 we
need to split the "InstructionInfo" view from the "SummaryView". That would make
easy to check the latency and rthroughput as well.
The patch reuses all the logic from ResourcePressureView to print out the
"instruction tables".
We have an entry for every instruction in the input sequence. Each entry reports
the theoretical resource pressure distribution. Resource pressure is uniformly
distributed across all the processor resource units of a group.
At the moment, the backend pipeline is not configurable, so the only way to fix
this is by creating a different driver that simply sends instruction events to
the resource pressure view. That means, we don't use the Backend interface.
Instead, it is simpler to just have a different code-path for when flag
-instruction-tables is specified.
Once Clement addresses bug 36663, then we can port the "instruction tables"
logic into a stage of our configurable pipeline.
Updated the BtVer2 test cases (thanks Simon for the help). Now we pass flag
-instruction-tables to each modified test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44839
llvm-svn: 328487
This was due to a misunderstanding over what llvm calls a micro-op (retirement unit) is actually called a macro-op on the AMD/Jaguar target. Folded loads don't affect num macro ops.
llvm-svn: 328320
With this patch, the "instruction dispatched" event now provides information
related to the number of microarchitectural registers used in each register
file. Similarly, the "instruction retired" event is now able to tell how may
registers are freed in each register file.
Currently, the BackendStatistics view is the only consumer of register
usage/pressure information. BackendStatistics uses that info to print out a few
general statistics (i.e. max number of mappings used; total mapping created).
Before this patch, the BackendStatistics was forced to query the Backend to
obtain the register pressure information.
This helps removes that dependency. Now views are completely independent from
the Backend. As a consequence, it should be easier to address PR36663 and
further modularize the pipeline.
Added a couple of test cases in the BtVer2 specific directory.
llvm-svn: 328129
Jaguar's FPU has 2 scheduler pipes (JFPU0/JFPU1) which forward to multiple functional sub-units each. We need to model that an micro-op will both consume the scheduler pipe and a functional unit.
This patch just handles the ops defined through JWriteResFpuPair, I'll go through the custom cases later.
llvm-svn: 327791
Hopefully these tests can be easily reused should any other subtarget get in depth llvm-mca coverage (we can either copy the tests or move them into a common dir and run it with multiple prefixes).
llvm-svn: 327788
YMM FDiv/FSqrt are dispatched on pipe JFPU1 but should be performed on the JFPM unit - that is where most of the cycles are spent.
This matches the pipes for WriteFSqrt/WriteFDiv definitions.
llvm-svn: 327682
This patch fixes a problem found when testing zero latency instructions on
target AArch64 -mcpu=exynos-m3 / -mcpu=exynos-m1.
On Exynos-m3/m1, direct branches are zero-latency instructions that don't consume
any processor resources. The DispatchUnit marks zero-latency instructions as
"executed", so that no scheduling is required. The event of instruction
executed is then notified to all the listeners, and the reorder buffer (managed
by the RetireControlUnit) is updated. In particular, the entry associated to the
zero-latency instruction in the reorder buffer is marked as executed.
Before this patch, the DispatchUnit forgot to assign a retire control unit token
(RCUToken) to the zero-latency instruction. As a consequence, the RCUToken was
used uninitialized. This was causing a crash in the RetireControlUnit logic.
Fixes PR36650.
llvm-svn: 327056
llvm-mca is an LLVM based performance analysis tool that can be used to
statically measure the performance of code, and to help triage potential
problems with target scheduling models.
llvm-mca uses information which is already available in LLVM (e.g. scheduling
models) to statically measure the performance of machine code in a specific cpu.
Performance is measured in terms of throughput as well as processor resource
consumption. The tool currently works for processors with an out-of-order
backend, for which there is a scheduling model available in LLVM.
The main goal of this tool is not just to predict the performance of the code
when run on the target, but also help with diagnosing potential performance
issues.
Given an assembly code sequence, llvm-mca estimates the IPC (instructions per
cycle), as well as hardware resources pressure. The analysis and reporting style
were mostly inspired by the IACA tool from Intel.
This patch is related to the RFC on llvm-dev visible at this link:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/121490.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43951
llvm-svn: 326998
Simon Pilgrim