Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ulrich Weigand 53e8cd3dea XFAIL: test/DebugInfo/missing-abstract-variable.ll on s390x as well
llvm-svn: 210264
2014-06-05 14:20:54 +00:00
David Blaikie 36408e7569 DebugInfo: Reapply r209984 (reverted in r210143), asserting that abstract DbgVariables have DIEs.
Abstract variables within abstract scopes that are entirely optimized
away in their first inlining are omitted because their scope is not
present so the variable is never created. Instead, we should ensure the
scope is created so the variable can be added, even if it's been
optimized away in its first inlining.

This fixes the incorrect debug info in missing-abstract-variable.ll
(added in r210143) and passes an asserts self-hosting build, so
hopefully there's not more of these issues left behind... *fingers
crossed*.

llvm-svn: 210221
2014-06-04 23:50:52 +00:00
David Blaikie 484610c69b XFAIL: test/DebugInfo/missing-abstract-variable.ll on mips and ppc64 due to an inlined parameter that goes missing.
llvm-svn: 210200
2014-06-04 17:05:23 +00:00
David Blaikie 19a8b90763 DebugInfo: Partial revert r209984 due to more cases where abstract DbgVariables do not have associated DIEs.
Along with a test case to demonstrate that due to inlining order there
are cases where abstract variable DIEs are not constructed since the
abstract subprogram was built due to a previous inlining that optimized
away those variables. This produces incorrect debug info (the 'missing'
abstract variable causes the inlined instance of that variable to be
emitted with a full description (name, line, file) rather than
referencing the abstract origin), but this commit at least ensures that
it doesn't crash...

llvm-svn: 210143
2014-06-04 01:30:59 +00:00