We could in principle support such pack expansion, using techniques similar to
what we do for pack expansion of lambdas, but it's not clear it's worthwhile.
For now at least, cleanly reject these cases rather than crashing.
llvm-svn: 324160
It seems this somehow made -Wempty-body fire in some macro cases where
it didn't before, e.g.
../../third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/bitstream.c(169,5): error: if statement has empty body [-Werror,-Wempty-body]
ff_dlog(NULL, "new table index=%d size=%d\n", table_index, table_size);
^
../../third_party/ffmpeg\libavutil/internal.h(276,80): note: expanded from macro 'ff_dlog'
# define ff_dlog(ctx, ...) do { if (0) av_log(ctx, AV_LOG_DEBUG, __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
^
../../third_party/ffmpeg/libavcodec/bitstream.c(169,5): note: put the
semicolon on a separate line to silence this warning
Reverting until this can be figured out.
> Do not show it when `if` or `else` come from macros.
> E.g.,
>
> #define USED(A) if (A); else
> #define SOME_IF(A) if (A)
>
> void test() {
> // No warnings are shown in those cases now.
> USED(0);
> SOME_IF(0);
> }
>
> Patch by Ilya Biryukov!
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40185
llvm-svn: 318665
Do not show it when `if` or `else` come from macros.
E.g.,
#define USED(A) if (A); else
#define SOME_IF(A) if (A)
void test() {
// No warnings are shown in those cases now.
USED(0);
SOME_IF(0);
}
Patch by Ilya Biryukov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40185
llvm-svn: 318556
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
We were incorrectly setting PrevTokLocation to the first token in the
annotation token instead of the last when consuming it. To fix this without
adding a complex switch to the hot path through ConsumeToken, we now have a
ConsumeAnnotationToken function for consuming annotation tokens in addition
to the other Consume*Token special case functions.
llvm-svn: 303372
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
This adds the new pragma and the first variant, contract(on/off/fast).
The pragma has the same block scope rules as STDC FP_CONTRACT, i.e. it can be
placed at the beginning of a compound statement or at file scope.
Similarly to STDC FP_CONTRACT there is no need to use attributes. First an
annotate token is inserted with the parsed details of the pragma. Then the
annotate token is parsed in the proper contexts and the Sema is updated with
the corresponding FPOptions using the shared ActOn function with STDC
FP_CONTRACT.
After this the FPOptions from the Sema is propagated into the AST expression
nodes. There is no change here.
I was going to add a 'default' option besides 'on/off/fast' similar to STDC
FP_CONTRACT but then decided against it. I think that we'd have to make option
uppercase then to avoid using 'default' the keyword. Also because of the
scoped activation of pragma I am not sure there is really a need a for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31276
llvm-svn: 299470
- also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17.
- update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed.
llvm-svn: 299316
Summary:
The changes contained in this patch are:
1. Defines a new AST node `CoawaitDependentExpr` for representing co_await expressions while the promise type is still dependent.
2. Correctly detect and transform the 'co_await' operand to `p.await_transform(<expr>)` when possible.
3. Change the initial/final suspend points to build during the initial parse, so they have the correct operator co_await lookup results.
4. Fix transformation of the CoroutineBodyStmt so that it doesn't re-build the final/initial suspends.
@rsmith: This change is a little big, but it's not trivial for me to split it up. Please let me know if you would prefer this submitted as multiple patches.
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: ABataev, rsmith, mehdi_amini, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26057
llvm-svn: 297093
This commit changes code completion results for Objective-C block properties:
clang now suggests an additional completion result that displays the block
property together with '=' and the block literal placeholder for the appropriate
readwrite block properties.
This commit uses a simple heuristic to determine when it's appropriate to
suggest a setter completion for block properties: the additional block setter
completion is provided iff the member access that's being completed is a
standalone statement.
rdar://28481726
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25520
llvm-svn: 284472
No semantic analysis yet.
This is a pain to disambiguate correctly, because the parsing rules for the
declaration form of a condition and of an init-statement are quite different --
for a token sequence that looks like a declaration, we frequently need to
disambiguate all the way to the ')' or ';'.
We could do better here in some cases by stopping disambiguation once we've
decided whether we've got an expression or not (rather than keeping going until
we know whether it's an init-statement declaration or a condition declaration),
by unifying our parsing code for the two types of declaration and moving the
syntactic checks into Sema; if this has a measurable impact on parsing
performance, I'll look into that.
llvm-svn: 274169
-Wfor-loop-analysis warnings for a for-loop with a condition variable. In such
a case, the loop condition variable is modified on each iteration of the loop
by definition.
Original commit message:
Rearrange condition handling so that semantic checks on a condition variable
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
llvm-svn: 273600
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
llvm-svn: 273548
- In functions with try { } catch { }, only the try block would be
skipped, not the catch blocks
- The template functions would still be parsed.
- The initializers within a constructor would still be parsed.
- The inline functions within class would still be stored, only to be
discared later.
- Invalid code with try would assert (as in "int foo() try assert_here")
This attempt to do even less while skipping function bodies.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20821
llvm-svn: 272963
Slightly updated version, double-checked build and tests.
Improve implementation of MS pragmas that use stack + compatibility fixes.
This patch:
1. Changes implementation of #pragma vtordisp to use PragmaStack class
that other stack pragmas use;
2. Fixes "#pragma vtordisp()" behavior - it shouldn't affect the stack;
3. Supports "save-restore" of pragma stacks on enter / exit a C++ method
body, as MSVC does.
TODO:
1. Change implementation of #pragma pack to use the same approach;
2. Introduce diagnostics on popping named stack slots, as MSVC does.
Reviewers:
rnk, thakis
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19361
llvm-svn: 268029
Rework implementation of several MS pragmas that use internal stack:
vtordisp, {bss|code|const|data}_seg.
This patch:
1. Makes #pragma vtordisp use PragmaStack class as *_seg pragmas do;
2. Fixes "#pragma vtordisp()" behavior: it shouldn't affect stack;
3. Saves/restores the stacks on enter/exit a C++ method body.
llvm-svn: 267866
Add support for opencl_unroll_hint attribute from OpenCL v2.0 s6.11.5.
Reusing most of metadata generation from CGLoopInfo helper class.
The code is based on Khronos OpenCL compiler:
https://github.com/KhronosGroup/SPIR/tree/spirv-1.0
Patch by Liu Yaxun (Sam)!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16686
llvm-svn: 261350
Fix the issue discovered by fuzzing (PR23057, comment 18) by handling nullptr in Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeDecl
and correct delayed typos in for-range expression before calling Sema::ActOnCXXForRangeStmt. Also fixes PR26288.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16630
llvm-svn: 259532
Fixes processing of declarative directives and standalone executable directives. Declarative directives should not be allowed as an immediate statements and standalone executable directives are allowed to be used in case-stmt constructs.
llvm-svn: 257586
1) When dumping a declaration that declares a name for a type, also dump the named type.
2) Add a #pragma clang __debug dump X, that dumps the lookup results for X in
the current context.
llvm-svn: 257529
This patch adds support of #pragma vtordisp inside functions in attempt to improve compatibility. Microsoft compiler appears to save the stack of vtordisp modes on entry of struct methods' bodies and restore it on exit (method-local vtordisp).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14467
llvm-svn: 253650
other than the top level, we issue an error. This breaks a fair amount of C++
code wrapping C libraries, where the C library is #included within a namespace
/ extern "C" combination, because the C library (probably) includes C++
standard library headers which may be within modules.
Without modules, this setup is harmless if (and *only* if) the corresponding
standard library module was already included outside the namespace, so
downgrade the error to a default-error extension in that case, so that it can
be selectively disabled for such misbehaving libraries.
llvm-svn: 253398
If an import directive was put into wrong context, the error message was obscure,
complaining on misbalanced braces. To get more descriptive messages, annotation
tokens related to modules are processed where they must not be seen.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11844
llvm-svn: 248085
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
For proper codegen we need to capture variable in the OpenMP region. In loop-based directives loop control variables are private by default and they must be captured in this region. There was a problem with capturing of globals, used as lcv, as they was not marked as private by default.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9336
llvm-svn: 236201
consider C++ that looks like:
inline int &f(bool b) {
if (b) {
static int i;
return i;
}
static int i;
return i;
}
Both 'i' variables must have distinct (and stable) names for linkage
purposes. The MSVC 2013 ABI would number the variables using a count of
the number of scopes that have been created. However, the final 'i'
returns to a scope that has already been created leading to a mangling
collision.
MSVC 2015 fixes this by giving the second 'i' the name it would have if
it were declared before the 'if'. However, this results in ABI breakage
because the mangled name, in cases where there was no ambiguity, would
now be different.
We implement the new behavior and only enable it if we are targeting the
MSVC 2015 ABI, otherwise the old behavior will be used.
This fixes PR18131.
llvm-svn: 232766
ParseCompoundStatement() currently never returns StmtError, but if it did,
Sema would keep the __finally scope on its stack indefinitely. Explicitly
add an error callback that clears it.
llvm-svn: 231625
Since continue, break, return are much more common than __finally, this tries
to keep the work for continue, break, return O(1). Sema keeps a stack of active
__finally scopes (to do this, ActOnSEHFinally() is split into
ActOnStartSEHFinally() and ActOnFinishSEHFinally()), and the various jump
statements then check if the current __finally scope (if present) is deeper
than then destination scope of the jump.
The same warning for goto statements is still missing.
This is the moral equivalent of MSVC's C4532.
llvm-svn: 231623
Jordan Rose