Originally submitted as r326323 and r326324.
Reverted in r326432.
Reverting the commit was a mistake.
The breakage was due to invalid build files in our internal buildsystem,
CMakeLists did not have any cyclic dependencies.
llvm-svn: 326439
Also revert "[analyzer] Fix a compiler warning"
This reverts commits r326323 and r326324.
Reason: the commits introduced a cyclic dependency in the build graph.
This happens to work with cmake, but breaks out internal integrate.
llvm-svn: 326432
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
The aim of this patch is to be minimal to enable incremental development of
the feature on the top of the tree. This patch should be an NFC when the
feature is turned off. It is turned off by default and still considered as
experimental.
Technical details are available in the EuroLLVM Talk:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2017-03//2017/02/20/accepted-sessions.html#7
Note that the initial prototype was done by A. Sidorin et al.: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045730.html
Contributions to the measurements and the new version of the code: Peter Szecsi, Zoltan Gera, Daniel Krupp, Kareem Khazem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30691
llvm-svn: 326323
The SVal for any empty C++ object is an UnknownVal. Because RegionStore does
not have binding extents, binding an empty object to an UnknownVal may
potentially overwrite existing bindings at the same offset.
Therefore, when performing a trivial copy of an empty object, don't try to
take the value of the object and bind it to the copy. Doing nothing is accurate
enough, and it doesn't screw any existing bindings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43714
llvm-svn: 326247
Sometimes it is not known at compile time which temporary objects will be
constructed, eg. 'x ? A() : B()' or 'C() || D()'. In this case we track which
temporary was constructed to know how to properly call the destructor.
Once the construction context for temporaries was introduced, we moved the
tracking code to the code that investigates the construction context.
Bring back the old mechanism because construction contexts are not always
available yet - eg. in the case where a temporary is constructed without a
constructor expression, eg. returned from a function by value. The mechanism
should still go away eventually.
Additionally, fix a bug in the temporary cleanup code for the case when
construction contexts are not available, which could lead to temporaries
staying in the program state and increasing memory consumption.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43666
llvm-svn: 326246
If a variable or an otherwise a concrete typed-value region is being
placement-new'ed into, its dynamic type may change in arbitrary manners. And
when the region is used, there may be a third type that's different from both
the static and the dynamic type. It cannot be *completely* different from the
dynamic type, but it may be a base class of the dynamic type - and in this case
there isn't (and shouldn't be) any indication anywhere in the AST that there is
a derived-to-base cast from the dynamic type to the third type.
Perform a generic cast (evalCast()) from the third type to the dynamic type
in this case. From the point of view of the SVal hierarchy, this would have
produced non-canonical SVals if we used such generic cast in the normal case,
but in this case there doesn't seem to be a better option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43659
llvm-svn: 326245
Automatic destructors are missing in the CFG in situations like
const int &x = C().x;
For now it's better to disable construction inlining, because inlining
constructors while doing nothing on destructors is very bad.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43689
llvm-svn: 326240
ConstructionContext is moved into a separate translation unit and is separated
into multiple classes. The "old" "raw" ConstructionContext is renamed into
ConstructionContextLayer - which corresponds to the idea of building the context
gradually layer-by-layer, but it isn't easy to use in the clients. Once
CXXConstructExpr is reached, layers that we've gathered so far are transformed
into the actual, "new-style" "flat" ConstructionContext, which is put into the
CFGConstructor element and has no layers whatsoever (until it actually needs
them, eg. aggregate initialization). The new-style ConstructionContext is
instead presented as a variety of sub-classes that enumerate different ways of
constructing an object in C++. There are 5 of these supported for now,
which is around a half of what needs to be supported.
The layer-by-layer buildup process is still a little bit weird, but it hides
all the weirdness in one place, that sounds like a good thing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43533
llvm-svn: 326238
This patch uses the reference to MaterializeTemporaryExpr stored in the
construction context since r326014 in order to model that expression correctly.
When modeling MaterializeTemporaryExpr, instead of copying the raw memory
contents from the sub-expression's rvalue to a completely new temporary region,
that we conjure up for the lack of better options, we now have the better
option to recall the region into which the object was originally constructed
and declare that region to be the value of the expression, which is semantically
correct.
This only works when the construction context is available, which is worked on
independently.
The temporary region's liveness (in the sense of removeDeadBindings) is extended
until the MaterializeTemporaryExpr is resolved, in order to keep the store
bindings around, because it wouldn't be referenced from anywhere else in the
program state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43497
llvm-svn: 326236
See D42775 for discussion. Turns out, just exploring nodes which
weren't explored first is not quite enough, as e.g. the first quick
traversal resulting in a report can mark everything as "visited", and
then subsequent traversals of the same region will get all the pitfalls
of DFS.
Priority queue-based approach in comparison shows much greater
increase in coverage and even performance, without sacrificing memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43354
llvm-svn: 326136
Addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36206
rdar://37159026
A proper fix would be much harder, and would involve changing the
appropriate code in ExprEngine to be aware of the size limitations of
the type used for addressing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43218
llvm-svn: 326122
The assertion gets exposed when changing the exploration order.
This is a quick hacky fix, but the intention is that if the nodes do
merge, it should not matter which predecessor should be traverse.
A proper fix would be not to traverse predecessors at all, as all
information relevant for any decision should be avilable locally.
rdar://37540480
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42773
llvm-svn: 325977
In the wild, many cases of null pointer dereference, or uninitialized
value read occur because the value was meant to be initialized by the
inlined function, but did not, most often due to error condition in the
inlined function.
This change highlights the return branch taken by the inlined function,
in order to help user understand the error report and see why the value
was uninitialized.
rdar://36287652
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41848
llvm-svn: 325976
When viewing the report in the collapsed mode the label signifying where
did the execution go is often necessary for properly understanding the
context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43145
llvm-svn: 325975
Array destructors, like constructors, need to be called for each element of the
array separately. We do not have any mechanisms to do this in the analyzer,
so for now all we do is evaluate a single constructor or destructor
conservatively and give up. It automatically causes the necessary invalidation
and pointer escape for the whole array, because this is how RegionStore works.
Implement this conservative behavior for temporary destructors. This fixes the
crash on the provided test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43149
llvm-svn: 325286
Temporary destructors fire at the end of the full-expression. It is reasonable
to attach the path note for entering/leaving the temporary destructor to its
CXXBindTemporaryExpr. This would not affect lifetime-extended temporaries with
their automatic destructors which aren't temporary destructors.
The path note may be confusing in the case of destructors after elidable copy
constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43144
llvm-svn: 325284
Inline them if possible - a separate flag is added to control this.
The whole thing is under the cfg-temporary-dtors flag, off by default so far.
Temporary destructors are called at the end of full-expression. If the
temporary is lifetime-extended, automatic destructors kick in instead,
which are not addressed in this patch, and normally already work well
modulo the overally broken support for lifetime extension.
The patch operates by attaching the this-region to the CXXBindTemporaryExpr in
the program state, and then recalling it during destruction that was triggered
by that CXXBindTemporaryExpr. It has become possible because
CXXBindTemporaryExpr is part of the construction context since r325210.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43104
llvm-svn: 325282
Don't look at the parent statement to figure out if the cxx-allocator-inlining
flag should kick in and prevent us from inlining the constructor within
a new-expression. We now have construction contexts for that purpose.
llvm-svn: 325278
Since r325210, in cfg-temporary-dtors mode, we can rely on the CFG to tell us
that we're indeed constructing a temporary, so we can trivially construct a
temporary region and inline the constructor.
Much like r325202, this is only done under the off-by-default
cfg-temporary-dtors flag because the temporary destructor, even if available,
will not be inlined and won't have the correct object value (target region).
Unless this is fixed, it is quite unsafe to inline the constructor.
If the temporary is lifetime-extended, the destructor would be an automatic
destructor, which would be evaluated with a "correct" target region - modulo
the series of incorrect relocations performed during the lifetime extension.
It means that at least, values within the object are guaranteed to be properly
escaped or invalidated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43062
llvm-svn: 325211
EvalCallOptions were introduced in r324018 for allowing various parts of
ExprEngine to notify the inlining mechanism, while preparing for evaluating a
function call, of possible difficulties with evaluating the call that they
foresee. Then mayInlineCall() would still be a single place for making the
decision.
Use that mechanism for destructors as well - pass the necessary flags from the
CFG-element-specific destructor handlers.
Part of this patch accidentally leaked into r324018, which led into a change in
tests; this change is reverted now, because even though the change looked
correct, the underlying behavior wasn't. Both of these commits were not intended
to introduce any function changes otherwise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42991
llvm-svn: 325209
This only affects the cfg-temporary-dtors mode - in this mode we begin inlining
constructors that are constructing function return values. These constructors
have a correct construction context since r324952.
Because temporary destructors are not only never inlined, but also don't have
the correct target region yet, this change is not entirely safe. But this
will be fixed in the subsequent commits, while this stays off behind the
cfg-temporary-dtors flag.
Lifetime extension for return values is still not modeled correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42875
llvm-svn: 325202
In CFG, every DeclStmt has exactly one decl, which is always a variable.
It is also pointless to check that the initializer is the constructor because
that's how construction contexts work now.
llvm-svn: 325201
See reviews.llvm.org/M1 for evaluation, and
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-January/056718.html for
discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42775
llvm-svn: 324956
Massive false positives were known to be caused by continuing the analysis
after a destructor with a noreturn attribute has been executed in the program
but not modeled in the analyzer due to being missing in the CFG.
Now that work is being done on enabling the modeling of temporary constructors
and destructors in the CFG, we need to make sure that the heuristic that
suppresses these false positives keeps working when such modeling is disabled.
In particular, different code paths open up when the corresponding constructor
is being inlined during analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42779
llvm-svn: 324802
The analyzer was relying on peeking the next CFG element during analysis
whenever it was trying to figure out what object is being constructed
by a given constructor. This information is now available in the current CFG
element in all cases that were previously supported by the analyzer,
so no complicated lookahead is necessary anymore.
No functional change intended - the context in the CFG should for now be
available if and only if it was previously discoverable via CFG lookahead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42721
llvm-svn: 324800
This expression may or may not be evaluated in compile time, so tracking the
result symbol is of potential interest. However, run-time offsetof is not yet
supported by the analyzer, so for now this callback is only there to assist
future implementation.
Patch by Henry Wong!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42300
llvm-svn: 324790
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
It makes it easier to discriminate between values of similar expressions
in different stack frames.
It also makes the separate backtrace section in ExplodedGraph dumps redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42552
llvm-svn: 324660
We already suppress such reports for inlined functions, we should then
get the same behavior for macros.
The underlying reason is that the same macro, can be called from many
different contexts, and nullability can only be expected in _some_ of
them.
Assuming that the macro can return null in _all_ of them sometimes leads
to a large number of false positives.
E.g. consider the test case for the dynamic cast implementation in
macro: in such cases, the bug report is unwanted.
Tracked in rdar://36304776
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42404
llvm-svn: 324161
No in-tree checkers use this callback so far, hence no tests. But better fix
this now than remember to fix this when the checkers actually appear.
Patch by Henry Wong!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42785
llvm-svn: 324053
If the return statement is stored, we might as well allow querying
against it.
Also fix the bug where the return statement is not stored
if there is no return value.
This change un-merges two ExplodedNodes during call exit when the state
is otherwise identical - the CallExitBegin node itself and the "Bind
Return Value"-tagged node.
And expose the return statement through
getStatement helper function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42130
llvm-svn: 324052
We use CXXTempObjectRegion exclusively as a bailout value for construction
targets when we are unable to find the correct construction region.
Sometimes it works correctly, but rather accidentally than intentionally.
Now that we want to increase the amount of situations where it works correctly,
the first step is to introduce a different way of communicating our failure
to find the correct construction region. EvalCallOptions are introduced
for this purpose.
For now EvalCallOptions are communicating two kinds of problems:
- We have been completely unable to find the correct construction site.
- We have found the construction site correctly, and there's more than one of
them (i.e. array construction which we currently don't support).
Accidentally find and fix a test in which the new approach to communicating
failures produces better results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42457
llvm-svn: 324018
Do not attempt to get the pointee of void* while generating a bug report
(otherwise it will trigger an assert inside RegionStoreManager::getBinding
assert(!T->isVoidType() && "Attempting to dereference a void pointer!")).
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42396
llvm-svn: 323382
This allows the analyzer to analyze ("inline") custom operator new() calls and,
even more importantly, inline constructors of objects that were allocated
by any operator new() - not necessarily a custom one.
All changes in the tests in the current commit are intended improvements,
even if they didn't carry any explicit FIXME flag.
It is possible to restore the old behavior via
-analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=false
(this flag is supported by scan-build as well, and it can be into a clang
--analyze invocation via -Xclang .. -Xclang ..). There is no intention to
remove the old behavior for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42219
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 323373
I.e. not after. In the c++-allocator-inlining=true mode, we need to make the
assumption that the conservatively evaluated operator new() has returned a
non-null value. Previously we did this on CXXNewExpr, but now we have to do that
before calling the constructor, because some clever constructors are sometimes
assuming that their "this" is null and doing weird stuff. We would also crash
upon evaluating CXXNewExpr when the allocator was inlined and returned null and
had a throw specification; this is UB even for custom allocators, but we still
need not to crash.
Added more FIXME tests to ensure that eventually we fix calling the constructor
for null return values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42192
llvm-svn: 323370
Analyzing problems which appear in scan-build results can be very
difficult, as after the launch no exact invocation is stored, and it's
super-hard to launch the debugger.
With this patch, the exact analyzer invocation appears in the footer,
and can be copied to debug/check reproducibility/etc.
rdar://35980230
llvm-svn: 323245
The check (inside StackHintGeneratorForSymbol::getMessage)
if (!N)
return getMessageForSymbolNotFound()
is moved to the beginning of the function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42388
Test plan: make check-all
llvm-svn: 323146
PreStmt<CXXNewExpr> was never called.
Additionally, under c++-allocator-inlining=true, PostStmt<CXXNewExpr> was
called twice when the allocator was inlined: once after evaluating the
new-expression itself, once after evaluating the allocator call which, for the
lack of better options, uses the new-expression as the call site.
This patch fixes both problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41934
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322797
Add PostAllocatorCall program point to represent the moment in the analysis
between the operator new() call and the constructor call. Pointer cast from
"void *" to the correct object pointer type has already happened by this point.
The new program point, unlike the previously used PostImplicitCall, contains a
reference to the new-expression, which allows adding path diagnostics over it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41800
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322796
Pointer escape event notifies checkers that a pointer can no longer be reliably
tracked by the analyzer. For example, if a pointer is passed into a function
that has no body available, or written into a global, MallocChecker would
no longer report memory leaks for such pointer.
In case of operator new() under -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining=true,
MallocChecker would start tracking the pointer allocated by operator new()
only to immediately meet a pointer escape event notifying the checker that the
pointer has escaped into a constructor (assuming that the body of the
constructor is not available) and immediately stop tracking it. Even though
it is theoretically possible for such constructor to put "this" into
a global container that would later be freed, we prefer to preserve the old
behavior of MallocChecker, i.e. a memory leak warning, in order to
be able to find any memory leaks in C++ at all. In fact, c++-allocator-inlining
*reduces* the amount of false positives coming from this-pointers escaping in
constructors, because it'd be able to inline constructors in some cases.
With other checkers working similarly, we simply suppress the escape event for
this-value of the constructor, regardless of analyzer options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41797
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322795
Implements finding appropriate source locations for intermediate diagnostic
pieces in path-sensitive bug reports that need to descend into an inlined
operator new() call that was called via new-expression. The diagnostics have
worked correctly when operator new() was called "directly".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41409
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322791
The callback runs after operator new() and before the construction and allows
the checker to access the casted return value of operator new() (in the
sense of r322780) which is not available in the PostCall callback for the
allocator call.
Update MallocChecker to use the new callback instead of PostStmt<CXXNewExpr>,
which gets called after the constructor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41406
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322787
Make sure that with c++-allocator-inlining=true we have the return value of
conservatively evaluated operator new() in the correct memory space (heap).
This is a regression/omission that worked well in c++-allocator-inlining=false.
Heap regions are superior to regular symbolic regions because they have
stricter aliasing constraints: heap regions do not alias each other or global
variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41266
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322780
According to [basic.stc.dynamic.allocation], the return type of any C++
overloaded operator new() is "void *". However, type of the new-expression
"new T()" and the type of "this" during construction of "T" are both "T *".
Hence an implicit cast, which is not present in the AST, needs to be performed
before the construction. This patch adds such cast in the case when the
allocator was indeed inlined. For now, in the case where the allocator was *not*
inlined we still use the same symbolic value (which is a pure SymbolicRegion of
type "T *") because it is consistent with how we represent the casts and causes
less surprise in the checkers after switching to the new behavior.
The better approach would be to represent that value as a cast over a
SymbolicRegion of type "void *", however we have technical difficulties
conjuring such region without any actual expression of type "void *" present in
the AST.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41250
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322777
Represent the symbolic value for results of pointer arithmetic on void pointers
in a different way: instead of making void-typed element regions, make
char-typed element regions.
Add an assertion that ensures that no void-typed regions are ever constructed.
This is a refactoring of internals that should not immediately affect
the analyzer's (default) behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40939
llvm-svn: 322775
The -analyzer-config c++-allocator-inlining experimental option allows the
analyzer to reason about C++ operator new() similarly to how it reasons about
regular functions. In this mode, operator new() is correctly called before the
construction of an object, with the help of a special CFG element.
However, the subsequent construction of the object was still not performed into
the region of memory returned by operator new(). The patch fixes it.
Passing the value from operator new() to the constructor and then to the
new-expression itself was tricky because operator new() has no call site of its
own in the AST. The new expression itself is not a good call site because it
has an incorrect type (operator new() returns 'void *', while the new expression
is a pointer to the allocated object type). Additionally, lifetime of the new
expression in the environment makes it unsuitable for passing the value.
For that reason, an additional program state trait is introduced to keep track
of the return value.
Finally this patch relaxes restrictions on the memory region class that are
required for inlining the constructor. This change affects the old mode as well
(c++-allocator-inlining=false) and seems safe because these restrictions were
an overkill compared to the actual problems observed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40560
rdar://problem/12180598
llvm-svn: 322774
In most cases using
`N->getState()->getSVal(E, N->getLocationContext())`
is ugly, verbose, and also opens up more surface area for bugs if an
inconsistent location context is used.
This patch introduces a helper on an exploded node, and ensures
consistent usage of either `ExplodedNode::getSVal` or
`CheckContext::getSVal` across the codebase.
As a result, a large number of redundant lines is removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42155
llvm-svn: 322753
All usages of isSubRegionOf separately check for reflexive case, and in
any case, set theory tells us that each set is a subset of itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42140
llvm-svn: 322752
HTML diagnostics can be an overwhelming blob of pages of code.
This patch adds a checkbox which filters this list down to only the
lines *relevant* to the counterexample by e.g. skipping branches which
analyzer has assumed to be infeasible at a time.
The resulting amount of output is much smaller, and often fits on one
screen, and also provides a much more readable diagnostics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41378
llvm-svn: 322612
Simple refactoring attempt: factor out some code, remove some
repetition, use auto where appropriate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41751
llvm-svn: 322151
The current code used to not suppress the report, if the dereference was
performed in a macro, assuming it is that same macro.
However, the assumption might not be correct, and XNU has quite a bit of
code where dereference is actually performed in a different macro.
As the code uses macro name and not a unique identifier it might be fragile,
but in a worst-case scenario we would simply emit an extra diagnostic.
rdar://36160245
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41749
llvm-svn: 322149
This addresses an issue introduced in r183451: since
`removePiecesWithInvalidLocations` is called *after* `adjustCallLocations`,
it is not necessary, and in fact harmful, to have this assertion in
adjustCallLocations.
Addresses rdar://36170689
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41680
llvm-svn: 321682
Using ARC, strong, weak, and autoreleasing stack variables are implicitly
initialized with nil. This includes variable-length arrays of Objective-C object
pointers. However, in the analyzer we don't zero-initialize them. We used to,
but it accidentally regressed after r289618.
Under ARC, the array variable's initializer within DeclStmt is an
ImplicitValueInitExpr. Environment doesn't maintain any bindings for this
expression kind - instead it always knows that it's a known constant
(0 in our case), so it just returns the known value by calling
SValBuilder::makeZeroVal() (see EnvironmentManager::getSVal().
Commit r289618 had introduced reasonable behavior of SValBuilder::makeZeroVal()
for the arrays, which produces a zero-length compoundVal{}. When such value
is bound to arrays, in RegionStoreManager::bindArray() "remaining" items in the
array are default-initialized with zero, as in
RegionStoreManager::setImplicitDefaultValue(). The similar mechanism works when
an array is initialized by an initializer list that is too short, eg.
int a[3] = { 1, 2 };
would result in a[2] initialized with 0. However, in case of variable-length
arrays it didn't know if any more items need to be added,
because, well, the length is variable.
Add the default binding anyway, regardless of how many actually need
to be added. We don't really care how many, because the default binding covers
the whole array anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41478
rdar://problem/35477763
llvm-svn: 321290
The bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue() mechanism contains a system of bug
reporter visitors that recursively call each other in order to track where a
null or undefined value came from, where each visitor represents a particular
tracking mechanism (track how the value was stored, track how the value was
returned from a function, track how the value was constrained to null, etc.).
Each visitor is only added once per value it needs to track. Almost. One
exception from this rule would be FindLastStoreBRVisitor that has two operation
modes: it contains a flag that indicates whether null stored values should be
suppressed. Two instances of FindLastStoreBRVisitor with different values of
this flag are considered to be different visitors, so they can be added twice
and produce the same diagnostic twice. This was indeed the case in the affected
test.
With the current logic of this whole machinery, such duplication seems
unavoidable. We should be able to safely add visitors with different flag
values without constructing duplicate diagnostic pieces. Hence the effort
in this commit to de-duplicate diagnostics regardless of what visitors
have produced them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41258
llvm-svn: 321135
When trying to figure out where a null or undefined value came from,
parentheses and cast expressions are either completely irrelevant, or,
in the case of lvalue-to-rvale cast, straightforwardly lead us in the right
direction when we remove them.
There is a regression that causes a certain diagnostic to appear twice in the
path-notes.cpp test (changed to FIXME). It would be addressed in the next
commit.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41254
llvm-svn: 321133
When reporting certain kinds of analyzer warnings, we use the
bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue mechanism, which is part of public checker
API, to understand where a zero, null-pointer, or garbage value came from,
which would highlight important events with respect to that value in the
diagnostic path notes, and help us suppress various false positives that result
from values appearing from particular sources.
Previously, we've lost track of the value when it was written into a memory
region that is not a plain variable. Now try to resume tracking in this
situation by finding where the last write to this region has occured.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41253
llvm-svn: 321130
Since C++17, classes that have base classes can potentially be initialized as
aggregates. Trying to construct such objects through brace initialization was
causing the analyzer to crash when the base class has a non-trivial constructor,
while figuring target region for the base class constructor, because the parent
stack frame didn't contain the constructor of the subclass, because there is
no constructor for subclass, merely aggregate initialization.
This patch avoids the crash, but doesn't provide the actually correct region
for the constructor, which still remains to be fixed. Instead, construction
goes into a fake temporary region which would be immediately discarded. Similar
extremely conservative approach is used for other cases in which the logic for
finding the target region is not yet implemented, including aggregate
initialization with fields instead of base-regions (which is not C++17-specific
but also never worked, just didn't crash).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40841
rdar://problem/35441058
llvm-svn: 321128
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
This is a follow-up from r314910. When a checker developer attempts to
dereference a location in memory through ProgramState::getSVal(Loc) or
ProgramState::getSVal(const MemRegion *), without specifying the second
optional QualType parameter for the type of the value he tries to find at this
location, the type is auto-detected from location type. If the location
represents a value beyond a void pointer, we thought that auto-detecting the
type as 'char' is a good idea. However, in most practical cases, the correct
behavior would be to specify the type explicitly, as it is available from other
sources, and the few cases where we actually need to take a 'char' are
workarounds rather than an intended behavior. Therefore, try to fail with an
easy-to-understand assertion when asked to read from a void pointer location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38801
llvm-svn: 320451
Array subscript is almost always an lvalue, except for a few cases where
it is not, such as a subscript into an Objective-C property, or a
return from the function.
This commit prevents crashing in such cases.
Fixes rdar://34829842
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40584
llvm-svn: 319834
They are now printed as HeapSymRegion{$x} in order to discriminate between that
and regular SymRegion{$x}, which are two different regions, having different
parent reginos (memory spaces) - HeapSpaceRegion and UnknownSpaceRegion
respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40793
llvm-svn: 319793
Two copies of getSymLERange in RangeConstraintManager are virtually
identical, which is clearly bad.
This patch uses lambdas to call one from another (assuming that we would
like to avoid getting ranges from the state when necessary).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39709
llvm-svn: 319697
RegionStore has special logic to evaluate captured constexpr variables.
However, if the constexpr initializer cannot be evaluated as an integer, the
value is treated as undefined. This leads to false positives when, for example,
a constexpr float is captured by a lambda.
To fix this, treat a constexpr capture that cannot be evaluated as unknown
rather than undefined.
rdar://problem/35784662
llvm-svn: 319638
In the original design of the analyzer, it was assumed that a BlockEntrance
doesn't create a new binding on the Store, but this assumption isn't true when
'widen-loops' is set to true. Fix this by finding an appropriate location
BlockEntrace program points.
Patch by Henry Wong!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37187
llvm-svn: 319333
We didn't support the following syntax:
(std::initializer_list<int>){12}
which suddenly produces CompoundLiteralExpr that contains
CXXStdInitializerListExpr.
Lift the assertion and instead pass the value through CompoundLiteralExpr
transparently, as it doesn't add much.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39803
llvm-svn: 319058
We were crashing whenever a C++ pointer-to-member was taken, that was pointing
to a member of an anonymous structure field within a class, eg.
struct A {
struct {
int x;
};
};
// ...
&A::x;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39800
llvm-svn: 319055
This is the issue breaking the postgresql bot, purely by chance exposed
through taint checker, somehow appearing after
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38358 got committed.
The backstory is that the taint checker requests SVal for the value of
the pointer, and analyzer has a "fast path" in the getter to return a
constant when we know that the value is constant.
Unfortunately, the getter requires a cast to get signedness correctly,
and for the pointer `void *` the cast crashes.
This is more of a band-aid patch, as I am not sure what could be done
here "correctly", but it should be applied in any case to avoid the
crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39862
llvm-svn: 317839
Patches the solver to assume that bitwise OR of an unsigned value with a
constant always produces a value larger-or-equal than the constant, and
bitwise AND with a constant always produces a value less-or-equal than
the constant.
This patch is especially useful in the context of using bitwise
arithmetic for error code encoding: the analyzer would be able to state
that the error code produced using a bitwise OR is non-zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39707
llvm-svn: 317820
Do not crash when trying to compute x && y or x || y where x and y are
of a vector type.
For now we do not seem to properly model operations with vectors. In particular,
operations && and || on a pair of vectors are not short-circuit, unlike regular
logical operators, so even our CFG is incorrect.
Avoid the crash, add respective FIXME tests for later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39682
rdar://problem/34317663
llvm-svn: 317700
Ilya Biryukov