BaseIndexOffset supercedes findBaseOffset analysis save only Constant
Pool addresses. Migrate analysis to BaseIndexOffset.
Relanding after correcting base address matching check.
llvm-svn: 321389
This seems to improve X86's ability to match this into an address computation. Otherwise the other operand gets assigned to the base register and the stack pointer + frame index ends up in the index register. But index registers can't encode ESP/RSP so we end up having to move it into another register to meet the constraint.
I could try to improve the address matcher in X86, but swapping the producer seemed easier. Several other places already have the operands in this order so this is at least consistent.
llvm-svn: 321370
The knownbits_mask_or_shuffle_uitofp change is interesting - shuffle combines manage to kick in, removing the AND constant mask load. For targets with fast-variable-shuffle this should reduce further to VPOR+VPSHUFB+VCVTDQ2PS.
llvm-svn: 321279
If the SRL node is only used by an AND, we may be able to set the
ExtVT to the width of the mask, making the AND redundant. To support
this, another check has been added in isLegalNarrowLoad which queries
whether the load is valid.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41350
llvm-svn: 321259
When intrinsics are allowed to have mem operands, there
are two ways this can happen. First is an intrinsic
that is marked has having a mem operand, but is not handled
by getTgtMemIntrinsic.
The second way can occur even for intrinsics which do not
have a mem operand. It seems the selector table does
some kind of sorting based on the opcode, and the
mem ref recording can happen in the same scope for
intrinsics that both do and do not have mem refs.
I haven't been able to figure out exactly why this happens
(although it happens even with the matcher optimizations disabled).
I'm not sure if it's worth trying to avoid hitting this for
these nodes since I think it's still reasonable to handle
this in case getTgtMemIntrinic is not implemented.
llvm-svn: 321208
These functions simply call their counterparts in the associated SDNode,
which do take an optional SelectionDAG. This change makes the legalization
debug trace a little easier to read, since target-specific nodes will
now have their names shown instead of "Unknown node #123".
llvm-svn: 321180
Summary:
Extend overlapping store elision to handle overwrites of stores by
larger stores.
Nontemporal tests have been modified to add memory dependencies to
prevent store elision.
Reviewers: craig.topper, rnk, t.p.northover
Subscribers: javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40969
llvm-svn: 321089
Search from AND nodes to find whether they can be propagated back to
loads, so that the AND and load can be combined into a narrow load.
We search through OR, XOR and other AND nodes and all bar one of the
leaves are required to be loads or constants. The exception node then
needs to be masked off meaning that the 'and' isn't removed, but the
loads(s) are narrowed still.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41177
llvm-svn: 320962
Summary:
Currently we don't handle v32i1/v64i1 insert_vector_elt correctly as we fail to look at the number of elements closely and assume it can only be v16i1 or v8i1.
We also can't type legalize v64i1 insert_vector_elt correctly on KNL due to the type not being byte addressable as required by the legalizing through memory accesses path requires.
For the first issue, the patch now tries to pick a 512-bit register with the correct number of elements and promotes to that.
For the second issue, we now extend the vector to a byte addressable type, do the stores to memory, load the two halves, and then truncate the halves back to the original type. Technically since we changed the type, we may not need two loads, but actually checking that is more work and for the v64i1 case we do need them.
Reviewers: RKSimon, delena, spatel, zvi
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40942
llvm-svn: 320849
This makes it work better with some build_vector and concat_vectors creations.
Adjust the NewSDValueDbgMsg in getConstant to avoid duplicating the print when it calls getSplatBuildVector since getSplatBuildVector didn't trigger a print before.
llvm-svn: 320783
While investigating LLVM PR22316 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22316)
I started wondering if it were not always preferable to emit the
initial DBG_VALUEs for stack arguments as FI locations instead of
describing the first register they get copied into. The advantage of
doing this is that the arguments will be available as soon as the
stack is setup. As illustrated by the testcase in the PR, the first
copy of the FI into a register may be sunk by MachineSink.cpp into a
later basic block. By describing the argument on the stack, we nicely
circumvent this problem.
<rdar://problem/19583723>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41135
llvm-svn: 320758
Most of the -Wsign-compare warnings are due to the fact that
enums are signed by default in the MS ABI, while the
tautological comparison warnings trigger on x86 builds where
sizeof(size_t) is 4 bytes, so N > numeric_limits<unsigned>::max()
is always false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41256
llvm-svn: 320750
Rather than adding more bits to express every
MMO flag you could want, just directly use the
MMO flags. Also fixes using a bunch of bool arguments to
getMemIntrinsicNode.
On AMDGPU, buffer and image intrinsics should always
have MODereferencable set, but currently there is no
way to do that directly during the initial intrinsic
lowering.
llvm-svn: 320746
Recommitting rL319773, which was reverted due to a recursive issue
causing timeouts. This happened because I failed to check whether
the discovered loads could be narrowed further. In the case of a tree
with one or more narrow loads, that could not be further narrowed, as
well as a node that would need masking, an AND could be introduced
which could then be visited and recombined again with the same load.
This could again create the masking load, with would be combined
again... We now check that the load can be narrowed so that this
process stops.
Original commit message:
Search from AND nodes to find whether they can be propagated back to
loads, so that the AND and load can be combined into a narrow load.
We search through OR, XOR and other AND nodes and all bar one of the
leaves are required to be loads or constants. The exception node then
needs to be masked off meaning that the 'and' isn't removed, but the
loads(s) are narrowed still.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41177
llvm-svn: 320679
A v32i1 CONCAT_VECTORS of v16i1 uses promotion to v32i8 to legalize the v32i1. This results in a bunch of extract_vector_elts and a build_vector that ultimately gets scalarized.
This patch checks to see if v16i8 is legal and inserts a any_extend to that so that we can concat v16i8 to v32i8 and avoid creating the extracts.
llvm-svn: 320674
If so go ahead and get the promoted input vector to extract from. Previously, we would create a bunch of any_extends of extract_vector_elts with illegal input type that needs to be promoted. The legalization of those extract_vector_elts would then potentially introduce a truncate. So now we have a bunch of any_extends of truncates. By legalizing both parts together we avoid creating these extra nodes.
The test changes seem to be because we were previously combining the build_vector with the any_extend before the any_extend got combined with the truncate.
llvm-svn: 320669
At first, I tried to thread the x86 needle and use a target hook (isVectorShiftByScalarCheap())
to disable the transform only for non-splat pow-of-2 constants, but not AVX2, but only some
element types, but...it's difficult.
Here we just avoid the loop with the x86 vector transform that conflicts with the general DAG
combine and preserve all of the existing behavior AFAICT otherwise.
Some tests that will probably fail if someone does try to restrict this in a more targeted way
for x86-only may be found in:
test/CodeGen/X86/combine-mul.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/vector-mul.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/widen_arith-5.ll
This should prevent the infinite looping seen with:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35579
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41040
llvm-svn: 320374
This commit is the first part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D40348.
In order to allow target combines to be performed on newly combined
indexed loads, add them back to the worklist. The remainder of the
above patch will be committed in subsequent revisions and will use
this. Test cases will be included with those follow-up commits.
llvm-svn: 320365
This is a preparatory step for D34515.
This change:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) ← (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) ← (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRYinto ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) → C
- fixes PR34045
- fixes PR34564
- fixes PR35103
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
llvm-svn: 320355
Introduces the AddrFI "addressing mode", which is necessary simply because
it's not possible to write a pattern that directly matches a frameindex.
Ensure callee-saved registers are accessed relative to the stackpointer. This
is necessary as callee-saved register spills are performed before the frame
pointer is set.
Move HexagonDAGToDAGISel::isOrEquivalentToAdd to SelectionDAGISel, so we can
make use of it in the RISC-V backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39848
llvm-svn: 320353
Summary:
This relaxes an assertion inside SelectionDAGBuilder which is overly
restrictive on targets which have no concept of alignment (such as AVR).
In these architectures, all types are aligned to 8-bits.
After this, LLVM will only assert that accesses are aligned on targets
which actually require alignment.
This patch follows from a discussion on llvm-dev a few months ago
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/llvm-dev-Unaligned-atomic-load-store-td112815.html
Reviewers: bogner, nemanjai, joerg, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, cactus, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39946
llvm-svn: 320243
I noticed this pattern in D38316 / D38388. We failed to combine a shuffle that is either
repeating a scalar insertion at the same position in a vector or translated to a different
element index.
Like the earlier patch, this could be an instcombine too, but since we opted to make this
a DAG transform earlier, I've made this one a DAG patch too.
We do not need any legality checking because the new insert is identical to the existing
insert except that it may have a different constant insertion operand.
The constant insertion test in test/CodeGen/X86/vector-shuffle-combining.ll was the
motivation for D38756.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40209
llvm-svn: 320050
If the mask needs to be promoted that should occur by the legalizer detecting the mask operand needs to be promoted not as a side effect of another action.
llvm-svn: 319852
The mask will be promoted if necessary when operands are promoted. It's possible the mask type is legal, but the setcc result type is a different. We shouldn't promote to the setcc result type unless the mask needs to be promoted.
llvm-svn: 319850
The patch originally broke Chromium (crbug.com/791714) due to its failing to
specify that the new pseudo instructions clobber EFLAGS. This commit fixes
that.
> Summary: This strengthens the guard and matches MSVC.
>
> Reviewers: hans, etienneb
>
> Subscribers: hiraditya, JDevlieghere, vlad.tsyrklevich, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40622
llvm-svn: 319824
There's no such thing as a setcc with vector operands and scalar result. And if we're trying to widen the result we would have to already be looking at a vector result type.
So this patch renames the VSETCC function as the SETCC function and delete the original SETCC function.
llvm-svn: 319799
Search from AND nodes to find whether they can be propagated back to
loads, so that the AND and load can be combined into a narrow load.
We search through OR, XOR and other AND nodes and all bar one of the
leaves are required to be loads or constants. The exception node then
needs to be masked off meaning that the 'and' isn't removed, but the
loads(s) are narrowed still.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39604
llvm-svn: 319773
Summary:
Found out, at code inspection, that there was a fault in
DAGCombiner::CombineConsecutiveLoads for big-endian targets.
A BUILD_PAIR is always having the least significant bits of
the composite value in element 0. So when we are doing the checks
for consecutive loads, for big endian targets, we should check
if the load to elt 1 is at the lower address and the load
to elt 0 is at the higher address.
Normally this bug only resulted in missed oppurtunities for
doing the load combine. I guess that in some rare situation it
could lead to faulty combines, but I've not seen that happen.
Note that this patch actually will trigger load combine for
some big endian regression tests.
One example is test/CodeGen/PowerPC/anon_aggr.ll where we now get
t76: i64,ch = load<LD8[FixedStack-9]
instead of
t37: i32,ch = load<LD4[FixedStack-10]>
t35: i32,ch = load<LD4[FixedStack-9]>
t41: i64 = build_pair t37, t35
before legalization. Then the legalization will split the LD8
into two loads, so the end result is the same. That should
verify that the transfomation is correct now.
Reviewers: niravd, hfinkel
Reviewed By: niravd
Subscribers: nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40444
llvm-svn: 319771
Pull the checks upon the load out from ReduceLoadWidth into their own
function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40833
llvm-svn: 319766
The CONCAT_VECTORS operand get its type from getSetCCResultType, but if the mask type and the setcc have different scalar sizes this creates an illegal CONCAT_VECTORS operation. The concat type should be 2x the mask type, and then an extend should be added if needed.
llvm-svn: 319744
MatchRotate assumes the types of the types of LHS and RHS are equal,
which is always the case then they come from an OR node, but here
we're getting them from two different TRUNC nodes, so we have to check
the types.
llvm-svn: 319695
If the truncation has been pushed past the or-node, look through it and
truncate afterwards.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40792
llvm-svn: 319692
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
Both LoadedVT and NarrowLoad are passed as references and neither
of them are used by any of its callers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40713
llvm-svn: 319645
If we have a non-splat constant shift amount, the minimum shift amount can be used to infer the number of zero upper bits of the result. There's probably a lot more that we can do here, but this
fixes a case where I wanted to infer the sign bit as zero when all the shift amounts are non-zero.
llvm-svn: 319639
SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments assumes sret addr space is 0, which is
not true for amdgcn---amdgiz target.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40255
llvm-svn: 319630
Two issues found when doing codegen for splitting vector with non-zero alloca addr space:
DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_INSERT_VECTOR_ELT/SplitVecOp_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT uses dummy pointer info for creating
SDStore. Since one pointer operand contains multiply and add, InferPointerInfo is unable to
infer the correct pointer info, which ends up with a dummy pointer info for the target to lower
store and results in isel failure. The fix is to introduce MachinePointerInfo::getUnknownStack to
represent MachinePointerInfo which is known in alloca address space but without other information.
TargetLowering::getVectorElementPointer uses value type of pointer in addr space 0 for
multiplication of index and then add it to the pointer. However the pointer may be in an addr
space which has different size than addr space 0. The fix is to use the pointer value type for
index multiplication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39758
llvm-svn: 319622
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been extended, such that it promotes Scale to
accommodate similar operand appearing in the DAG e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will now look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs so that if there is an opportunity
then complex LEAs (having 3 operands) could be factored out e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops, thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
4/ Simplify LEA converts (lea (BASE,1,INDEX,0) --> add (BASE, INDEX) which offers better through put.
PR32755 will be taken care of by this pathc.
Previous patch revisions : r313343 , r314886
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy, jbhateja
Reviewed By: lsaba, RKSimon, jbhateja
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 319543
Type promotion makes no guarantee about the contents of the promoted bits. Since the gather/scatter instruction will use the bits to calculate addresses, we need to ensure they aren't garbage.
llvm-svn: 319520
These command line options are not intended for public use, and often
don't even make sense in the context of a particular tool anyway. About
90% of them are already hidden, but when people add new options they
forget to hide them, so if you were to make a brand new tool today, link
against one of LLVM's libraries, and run tool -help you would get a
bunch of junk that doesn't make sense for the tool you're writing.
This patch hides these options. The real solution is to not have
libraries defining command line options, but that's a much larger effort
and not something I'm prepared to take on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40674
llvm-svn: 319505
output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always use `printReg` to print all kinds of registers.
Updated the tests using '_' instead of '%noreg' until we decide which
one we want to be the default one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40421
llvm-svn: 319445
visitAND attempts to narrow the width of extending loads that are
then masked off. ReduceLoadWidth already exists for a similar purpose
and handles shifts, so I've moved the code to handle AND nodes there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39595
llvm-svn: 319421
If we put in an assertsext/zext here, we're able to generate better truncate code using pack on pre-avx512 targets.
Similar is already done during type legalization. This is the equivalent for op legalization
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40591
llvm-svn: 319368
The object can't straddle the address space
wrap around, so I think it's OK to assume any
offsets added to the base object pointer can't
overflow. Similar logic already appears to be
applied in SelectionDAGBuilder when lowering
aggregate returns.
llvm-svn: 319272
Previously we had an isel pattern to add the truncate. Instead use Promote to add the truncate to the DAG before isel.
The Promote legalization code had to be updated to prevent an infinite loop if promotion took multiple steps because it wasn't remembering the previously tried value.
llvm-svn: 319259
Summary:
Recommitting this with the correct sorting predicate. The Low field of Clusters is a ConstantInt and
cannot be directly compared. So we needed to invoke slt (signed less than) to compare correctly.
This fixes failures in the following tests uncovered by D39245:
LLVM :: CodeGen/ARM/ifcvt3.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/ARM/switch-minsize.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/switch.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/switch-bt.ll
LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/switch-density.ll
Reviewers: hans, fhahn
Reviewed By: hans
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40541
llvm-svn: 319210
This is needed for cases when the memory access is not as big as the width of
the data type. For instance, storing i1 (1 bit) would be done in a byte (8
bits).
Using 'BitSize >> 3' (or '/ 8') would e.g. give the memory access of an i1 a
size of 0, which for instance makes alias analysis return NoAlias even when
it shouldn't.
There are no tests as this was done as a follow-up to the bugfix for the case
where this was discovered (r318824). This handles more similar cases.
Review: Björn Petterson
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40339
llvm-svn: 319173
LLVM Coding Standards:
Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and
command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel
case, and start with a lower case letter (e.g. openFile() or isFoo()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40416
llvm-svn: 319168
Unoptimized IR can have linear sequences of stores to an array, where the
initial GEP for the first store is formed from the pointer to the array, and the
GEP for each store after the first is formed from the previous GEP with some
offset in an inductive fashion.
The (large) resulting DAG when analyzed by DAGCombine undergoes an excessive
number of combines as each store node is examined every time its' offset node
is combined with any child of the offset. One of the transformations is
findBetterNeighborChains which assists MergeConsecutiveStores. The former
relies on repeated chain walking to do its' work, however MergeConsecutiveStores
is disabled at O0 which makes the transformation redundant.
Any optimization level other than O0 would invoke InstCombine which would
resolve the chain of GEPs into flat base + offset GEP for each store which
does not exhibit the repeated examination of each store to the array.
Disabling this optimization fixes an excessive compile time issue (30~ minutes
for the test case provided) at O0.
Reviewers: niravd, craig.topper, t.p.northover
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40193
llvm-svn: 319142
With AVX512 vXi1 types are legal so we shouldn't be extending them.
This change is similar to existing code in the zext(setcc) combine.
llvm-svn: 319120
Summary:
Currently ScalarizeVecRes_SETCC checks for the result type being a vector and jumps to ScalarizeVecRes_VSETCC. But if we're scalarizing a vector result, aren't we guaranteed to be looking at a vector type?
This patch deletes the current ScalarizeVecRes_SETCC and renames ScalarizeVecRes_VSETCC to ScalarizeVecRes_SETCC.
Reviewers: RKSimon, arsenm, eladcohen, zvi
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40452
llvm-svn: 318982
This patch reverts change to X86TargetLowering::getScalarShiftAmountTy in
rL318727 and move the logic to DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger.
The reason is that getScalarShiftAmountTy returns a shift amount type that
is suitable for common use cases in CodeGen. DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger
is a rare situation which requires a shift amount type larger than what
getScalarShiftAmountTy. In this case, it is more reasonable to do special
handling of shift amount type in DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger only. If
similar situations arises the logic may be moved to a separate function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40320
llvm-svn: 318890
Since i1 is a legal type, this:
NumBytes = Op1->getMemoryVT().getSizeInBits() >> 3;
is wrong and should be instead
NumBytes = Op0->getMemoryVT().getStoreSize();
There seems to be more places where this should be fixed outside DAGCombiner.
Review: Hal Finkel
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35366
llvm-svn: 318824
DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger uses default pointer size as shift amount constant type,
which causes less performant ISA in amdgcn---amdgiz target since the default pointer
type is i64 whereas the desired shift amount type is i32.
This patch fixes that by using TLI.getScalarShiftAmountTy in DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger.
The X86 change is necessary since splitting i512 requires shifting amount of 256, which
cannot be held by i8.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40148
llvm-svn: 318727
Normally this would be cleaned up by promoting the condition operand next. But in the attached case we promoted the result from v2i48 to v2i64 and the condition from v2i1 to v2i48. Then we tried to "promote" the v2i48 condition back to v2i1 because that's what the SetCC result type for v2i64 is on X86 with VLX. But promote is either a NOP or SIGN_EXTEND and this would need a truncation.
With the change here we now get the SetCC type of v2i1 when we're handling the result promotion and the operand no longer needs to be promoted itself.
Fixes PR35272.
llvm-svn: 318706
Previously we were assuming all results were vectors and calling SetWidenedVector, but if its a chain result we should just replace uses instead.
This fixes an error found by expensive checks after r318368.
llvm-svn: 318509
TransferDbgValues (capital 'T') is wired into ReplaceAllUsesWith, and
transferDbgValues (lowercase 't') is used elsewhere (e.g in Legalize).
Both functions should be doing the exact same thing. This patch
consolidates the logic into one place.
This was reverted in r318455 because some newly introduced asserts,
which I thought were NFC, were firing. I filed PR35338. For now I've
weakened the asserts.
Testing: check-llvm, check-clang, and a stage2 Rel+Deb build of clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40104
llvm-svn: 318498
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
The sign extend might be from an i16 or i8 type and was inserted by InstCombine to match the pointer width. X86 gather legalization isn't currently detecting this to reinsert a sign extend to make things legal.
It's a bit weird for the SelectionDAGBuilder to do this kind of optimization in the first place. With this removed we can at least lean on InstCombine somewhat to ensure the index is i32 or i64.
I'll work on trying to recover some of the test cases by removing sign extends in the backend when its safe to do so with an understanding of the current legalizer capabilities.
This should fix PR30690.
llvm-svn: 318466
TransferDbgValues (capital 'T') is wired into ReplaceAllUsesWith, and
transferDbgValues (lowercase 't') is used elsewhere (e.g in Legalize).
Both functions should be doing the exact same thing. This patch
consolidates the logic into one place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40104
llvm-svn: 318448
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitAlloca assumes alloca address space is 0, which is
incorrect for triple amdgcn---amdgiz and causes isel failure.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40095
llvm-svn: 318392
Change the calculation for the desired ValueType for non-sign
extending loads, as in those cases we don't care about the
higher bits. This creates a smaller ExtVT and allows for such
combinations as:
(srl (zextload i16, [addr]), 8) -> (zextload i8, [addr + 1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40034
llvm-svn: 318390
For example, this is currently reachable by X86 if you use a masked store intrinsic with a v1iX type.
Using a fatal error seems like a better user experience if someone were to encounter this on a release build. There are several other similar places that have been converted from unreachable to fatal error previously.
llvm-svn: 318379
processDbgDeclares assumes pointer size is the same for different addr spaces.
It uses pointer size for addr space 0 for all pointers, which causes assertion
in stripAndAccumulateInBoundsConstantOffsets for amdgcn---amdgiz since
pointer in addr space 5 has different size than in addr space 0.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40085
llvm-svn: 318370
Due to integer precision, we might have numerator greater than denominator in
the branch probability scaling. Add a check to prevent this from happening.
llvm-svn: 318353
This patch peels off the top case in switch statement into a branch if the
probability exceeds a threshold. This will help the branch prediction and
avoids the extra compares when lowering into chain of branches.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D39262
llvm-svn: 318202
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo assumes that sret value type corresponds to a
pointer in default address space, which is incorrect, since sret value type
should correspond to a pointer in alloca address space, which may not
be the default address space. This causes assertion for amdgcn target
in amdgiz environment.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39996
llvm-svn: 318167
This is a fix for a bug in r317947. We were supposed to check that all the indices are are constant 0, but instead we're only make sure that indices that are constant are 0. Non-constant indices are being ignored.
llvm-svn: 317950
Currently we can only get a uniform base from a simple GEP with 2 operands. This causes us to miss address folding opportunities for simple global array accesses as the test case shows.
This patch adds support for larger GEPs if the other indices are 0 since those don't require any additional computations to be inserted.
We may also want to handle constant splats of zero here, but I'm leaving that for future work when I have a real world example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39911
llvm-svn: 317947
This patch implements Chandler's idea [0] for supporting languages that
require support for infinite loops with side effects, such as Rust, providing
part of a solution to bug 965 [1].
Specifically, it adds an `llvm.sideeffect()` intrinsic, which has no actual
effect, but which appears to optimization passes to have obscure side effects,
such that they don't optimize away loops containing it. It also teaches
several optimization passes to ignore this intrinsic, so that it doesn't
significantly impact optimization in most cases.
As discussed on llvm-dev [2], this patch is the first of two major parts.
The second part, to change LLVM's semantics to have defined behavior
on infinite loops by default, with a function attribute for opting into
potential-undefined-behavior, will be implemented and posted for review in
a separate patch.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-July/088103.html
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965
[2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118632.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38336
llvm-svn: 317729
In 2010 a commit with no testcase and no further explanation
explicitly disabled the handling of inlined variables in
EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue(). I don't think there is a good reason for
this any more and re-enabling this adds debug locations for variables
associated with an LLVM function argument in functions that are
inlined into the first basic block. The only downside of doing this is
that we may insert a DBG_VALUE before the inlined scope, but (1) this
could be filtered out later, and (2) LiveDebugValues will not
propagate it into subsequent basic blocks if they don't dominate the
variable's lexical scope, so this seems like a small price to pay.
rdar://problem/26228128
llvm-svn: 317702
Some of the AMDGPU stack addressing modes require knowing the sign
bit is zero. We used to accomplish this by custom lowering
frame indexes, and then putting an AssertZext around a
TargetFrameIndex. This required specifically looking for
the AssextZext + frame index pattern which was moderately
disgusting. The same could probably be accomplished
with a target specific node, but would still
require special handling of frame indexes.
llvm-svn: 317671
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107104.html
and again more recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118118.html
...this is a step in cleaning up our fast-math-flags implementation in IR to better match
the capabilities of both clang's user-visible flags and the backend's flags for SDNode.
As proposed in the above threads, we're replacing the 'UnsafeAlgebra' bit (which had the
'umbrella' meaning that all flags are set) with a new bit that only applies to algebraic
reassociation - 'AllowReassoc'.
We're also adding a bit to allow approximations for library functions called 'ApproxFunc'
(this was initially proposed as 'libm' or similar).
...and we're out of bits. 7 bits ought to be enough for anyone, right? :) FWIW, I did
look at getting this out of SubclassOptionalData via SubclassData (spacious 16-bits),
but that's apparently already used for other purposes. Also, I don't think we can just
add a field to FPMathOperator because Operator is not intended to be instantiated.
We'll defer movement of FMF to another day.
We keep the 'fast' keyword. I thought about removing that, but seeing IR like this:
%f.fast = fadd reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp contract afn float %op1, %op2
...made me think we want to keep the shortcut synonym.
Finally, this change is binary incompatible with existing IR as seen in the
compatibility tests. This statement:
"Newer releases can ignore features from older releases, but they cannot miscompile
them. For example, if nsw is ever replaced with something else, dropping it would be
a valid way to upgrade the IR."
( http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility )
...provides the flexibility we want to make this change without requiring a new IR
version. Ie, we're not loosening the FP strictness of existing IR. At worst, we will
fail to optimize some previously 'fast' code because it's no longer recognized as
'fast'. This should get fixed as we audit/squash all of the uses of 'isFast()'.
Note: an inter-dependent clang commit to use the new API name should closely follow
commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39304
llvm-svn: 317488
This header already includes a CodeGen header and is implemented in
lib/CodeGen, so move the header there to match.
This fixes a link error with modular codegeneration builds - where a
header and its implementation are circularly dependent and so need to be
in the same library, not split between two like this.
llvm-svn: 317379
When splitting a large load to smaller legally-typed loads, the last load should be padded to reach the size of the previous one so a CONCAT_VECTORS node could reunite them again.
The code currently pads the last load to reach the size of the first load (instead of the previous).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38495
Change-Id: Ib60b55ed26ce901fabf68108daf52683fbd5013f
llvm-svn: 317206
Summary:
For reference, see: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/116589.html
This patch fleshes out the instruction class hierarchy with respect to atomic and
non-atomic memory intrinsics. With this change, the relevant part of the class
hierarchy becomes:
IntrinsicInst
-> MemIntrinsicBase (methods-only class)
-> MemIntrinsic (non-atomic intrinsics)
-> MemSetInst
-> MemTransferInst
-> MemCpyInst
-> MemMoveInst
-> AtomicMemIntrinsic (atomic intrinsics)
-> AtomicMemSetInst
-> AtomicMemTransferInst
-> AtomicMemCpyInst
-> AtomicMemMoveInst
-> AnyMemIntrinsic (both atomicities)
-> AnyMemSetInst
-> AnyMemTransferInst
-> AnyMemCpyInst
-> AnyMemMoveInst
This involves some class renaming:
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemCpyInst -> AtomicMemCpyInst
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemMoveInst -> AtomicMemMoveInst
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemSetInst -> AtomicMemSetInst
A script for doing this renaming in downstream trees is included below.
An example of where the Any* classes should be used in LLVM is when reasoning
about the effects of an instruction (ex: aliasing).
---
Script for renaming AtomicMem* classes:
PREFIXES="[<,([:space:]]"
CLASSES="MemIntrinsic|MemTransferInst|MemSetInst|MemMoveInst|MemCpyInst"
SUFFIXES="[;)>,[:space:]]"
REGEX="(${PREFIXES})ElementUnorderedAtomic(${CLASSES})(${SUFFIXES})"
REGEX2="visitElementUnorderedAtomic(${CLASSES})"
FILES=$( grep -E "(${REGEX}|${REGEX2})" -r . | tr ':' ' ' | awk '{print $1}' | sort | uniq )
SED_SCRIPT="s~${REGEX}~\1Atomic\2\3~g"
SED_SCRIPT2="s~${REGEX2}~visitAtomic\1~g"
for f in $FILES; do
echo "Processing: $f"
sed -i ".bak" -E "${SED_SCRIPT};${SED_SCRIPT2};${EA_SED_SCRIPT};${EA_SED_SCRIPT2}" $f
done
Reviewers: sanjoy, deadalnix, apilipenko, anna, skatkov, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jholewinski, arsenm, sdardis, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38419
llvm-svn: 316950
Introduce a isConstOrDemandedConstSplat helper function that can recognise a constant splat build vector for at least the demanded elts we care about.
llvm-svn: 316866
For cases where we know the floating point representations match the bitcasted integer equivalent, allow bitcasting to these types.
This is especially useful for the X86 floating point compare results which return all/zero bits but as a floating point type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39289
llvm-svn: 316831
In function DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG, sext can be combined with extload even if sextload is not supported by target, then
if sext is the only user of extload, there is no big difference, no harm no benefit.
if extload has more than one user, the combined sextload may block extload from combining with other zext, causes extra zext instructions generated. As demonstrated by the attached test case.
This patch add the constraint that when sextload is not supported by target, sext can only be combined with extload if it is the only user of extload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39108
llvm-svn: 316802
Not having the subclass data on an MemIntrinsicSDNodes means it was possible
to try to fold 2 nodes with the same operands but differing MMO flags. This
would trip an assertion when trying to refine the alignment between the 2
MachineMemOperands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38898
llvm-svn: 316737
This code added in r297930 assumed that it could create
a select with a condition type that is just an integer
bitcast of the selected type. For AMDGPU any vselect is
going to be scalarized (although the vector types are legal),
and all select conditions must be i1 (the same as getSetCCResultType).
This logic doesn't really make sense to me, but there's
never really been a consistent policy in what the select
condition mask type is supposed to be. Try to extend
the logic for skipping the transform for condition types
that aren't setccs. It doesn't seem quite right to me though,
but checking conditions that seem more sensible (like whether the
vselect is going to be expanded) doesn't work since this
seems to depend on that also.
llvm-svn: 316554
Similar to how llvm::salvagDebugInfo hooks into InstCombine, this adds
a hook that can be invoked before an SDNode that is associated with an
SDDbgValue is erased to capture the effect of the deleted node in a
DIExpression.
The motivating example is an SDDebugValue attached to an ADD operation
that gets folded into a LOAD+OFFSET operation.
rdar://problem/32121503
llvm-svn: 316525
This fixes a bug where we'd crash given code like the test-case from
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 . Instead, we let the
offending clobber silently slide through.
This doesn't fully fix said bug, since the assembler will still complain
the moment it sees a crypto/fp/vector op, and we still don't diagnose
calls that require vector regs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39030
llvm-svn: 316374
combineShuffleOfScalars is very conservative about shuffled BUILD_VECTORs that can be combined together.
This patch adds one additional case - if both BUILD_VECTORs represent splats of the same scalar value but with different UNDEF elements, then we should create a single splat BUILD_VECTOR, sharing only the UNDEF elements defined by the shuffle mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38696
llvm-svn: 316331
We don't need to do any additional recursion, we just need to analyze the APInt stored in the node. This matches what the ValueTracking versions do for IR.
llvm-svn: 316256
Summary:
We shouldn't recurse any further but it doesn't mean we shouldn't be able to give the known bits for a constant. The caller would probably like that we always return the right answer for a constant RHS. This matches what InstCombine does in this case.
I don't have a test case because this showed up while trying to revive D31724.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38967
llvm-svn: 316255
Minor addition and follow up of r314773 and r311533: this adds more
debug messages to the type legalizer. For each node, it dumps
legalization info for results and operands nodes, rather than just the
final legalized node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38726
llvm-svn: 315904
This is only currently used for mad/fma transforms.
This is the only case where it should be used for AMDGPU,
so add an opcode to be sure.
llvm-svn: 315740
I don't know if we ever hit this case or not. Turning it into an assert only fired on expanding some atomic operation in a SystemZ lit test.
llvm-svn: 315648
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
Eg:
insert v4i32 V, (v2i16 X), 2 --> shuffle v8i16 V', X', {0,1,2,3,8,9,6,7}
This is a generalization of the IR fold in D38316 to handle insertion into a non-undef vector.
We may want to abandon that one if we can't find value in squashing the more specific pattern sooner.
We're using the existing legal shuffle target hook to avoid AVX512 horror with vXi1 shuffles.
There may be room for improvement in the shuffle lowering here, but that would be follow-up work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38388
llvm-svn: 315460
The NumFixedArgs field of CallLoweringInfo is used by
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo to determine whether a given argument is passed
using the vararg calling convention or not (specifically, to set IsFixed for
each ISD::OutputArg).
Firstly, CallLoweringInfo::setLibCallee and CallLoweringInfo::setCallee both
incorrectly set NumFixedArgs based on the _previous_ args list. Secondly,
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo failed to increment NumFixedArgs when modifying
the argument list so a pointer is passed for the return value.
If your backend uses the IsFixed property or directly accesses NumFixedArgs,
it is _possible_ this change could result in codegen changes (although the
previous behaviour would have been incorrect). No such cases have been
identified during code review for any in-tree architecture.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37898
llvm-svn: 315457
Summary:
See https://llvm.org/PR33743 for more details
It seems that for non-power of 2 vector sizes, the algorithm can produce
non-matching sizes for input and result causing an assert.
This usually isn't a problem as the isAnyExtend check will weed these out, but
in some cases (most often with lots of undefined values for the mask indices) it
can pass this check for non power of 2 vectors.
Adding in an extra check that ensures that bit size will match for the result
and input (as required)
Subscribers: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35241
llvm-svn: 315307
Summary:
FastISel::hasTrivialKill() was the only user of the "IntPtrTy" version of
Cast::isNoopCast(). According to review comments in D37894 we could instead
use the "DataLayout" version of the method, and thus get rid of the
"IntPtrTy" versions of isNoopCast() completely.
With the above done, the remaining isNoopCast() could then be simplified
a bit more.
Reviewers: arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38497
llvm-svn: 314969
It broke the Chromium / SQLite build; see PR34830.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314919
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314886
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.
This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.
I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.
Original patch was reverted due to using -stop-after=isel in
the test case (but that is only working when AMDGPU target
is included in the llc build). The test case has now been
updated to use -stop-before=expand-isel-pseudos instead.
Patch by: dstenb
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172
llvm-svn: 314781
This adds some more debug messages to the type legalizer and functions
like PromoteNode, ExpandNode, ExpandLibCall in an attempt to make
the debug messages a little bit more informative and useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38450
llvm-svn: 314773
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.
This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.
I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.
Patch by: dstenb
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172
llvm-svn: 314666
Currently expandUnalignedLoad/Store uses place holder pointer info for temporary memory operand
in stack, which does not have correct address space. This causes unaligned private double16 load/store to be
lowered to flat_load instead of buffer_load for amdgcn target.
This fixes failures of OpenCL conformance test basic/vload_private/vstore_private on target amdgcn---amdgizcl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35361
llvm-svn: 314566
Without this, we could end up trying to get the Nth (0-indexed) element
from a subvector of size N.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37880
llvm-svn: 314380
This teach simplifyDemandedBits to handle constant splat vector shifts.
This required changing some uses of getZExtValue to getLimitedValue since we can't rely on legalization using getShiftAmountTy for the shift amount.
I believe there may have been a bug in the ((X << C1) >>u ShAmt) handling where we didn't check if the inner shift was too large. I've fixed that here.
I had to add new patterns to ARM because the zext/sext the patterns were trying to look for got turned into an any_extend with this patch. Happy to split that out too, but not sure how to test without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37665
llvm-svn: 314139
Summary:
This code iterates the 'Orders' vector in parallel with the DbgValue
list, emitting all DBG_VALUEs that occurred between the last IR order
insertion point and the next insertion point. This assumes the
SDDbgValue list is sorted in IR order, which it usually is. However, it
is not sorted when a node with a debug value is replaced with another
one. When this happens, TransferDbgValues is called, and the new value
is added to the end of the list.
The problem can be solved by stably sorting the list by IR order.
Reviewers: aprantl, Ka-Ka
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: MatzeB, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38197
llvm-svn: 314114
At least for the 64-bit and less case, we should be able to determine if we even have a mask without counting any bits. This also removes the need to explicitly check for 0 active bits, isMask will return false for 0.
llvm-svn: 313908
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
Summary:
SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments is associating arguments
with frame indices (FuncInfo->setArgumentFrameIndex). That
information is later on used by EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue to
create DBG_VALUE instructions that denotes that a variable
can be found on the stack.
I discovered that for our (big endian) out-of-tree target
the association created by SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments
sometimes is wrong. I've seen this happen when a 64-bit value
is passed on the stack. The argument will occupy two stack
slots (frame index X, and frame index X+1). The fault is
that a call to setArgumentFrameIndex is associating the
64-bit argument with frame index X+1. The effect is that the
debug information (DBG_VALUE) will point at the least significant
part of the arguement on the stack. When printing the
argument in a debugger I will get the wrong value.
I managed to create a test case for PowerPC that seems to
show the same kind of problem.
The bugfix will look at the datalayout, taking endianness into
account when examining a BUILD_PAIR node, assuming that the
least significant part is in the first operand of the BUILD_PAIR.
For big endian targets we should use the frame index from
the second operand, as the most significant part will be stored
at the lower address (using the highest frame index).
Reviewers: bogner, rnk, hfinkel, sdardis, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: nemanjai, aprantl, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37740
llvm-svn: 313901
.. as well as the two subsequent changes r313826 and r313875.
This leads to segfaults in combination with ASAN. Will forward repro
instructions to the original author (rnk).
llvm-svn: 313876
Summary:
This implements the design discussed on llvm-dev for better tracking of
variables that live in memory through optimizations:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117222.html
This is tracked as PR34136
llvm.dbg.addr is intended to be produced and used in almost precisely
the same way as llvm.dbg.declare is today, with the exception that it is
control-dependent. That means that dbg.addr should always have a
position in the instruction stream, and it will allow passes that
optimize memory operations on local variables to insert llvm.dbg.value
calls to reflect deleted stores. See SourceLevelDebugging.rst for more
details.
The main drawback to generating DBG_VALUE machine instrs is that they
usually cause LLVM to emit a location list for DW_AT_location. The next
step will be to teach DwarfDebug.cpp how to recognize more DBG_VALUE
ranges as not needing a location list, and possibly start setting
DW_AT_start_offset for variables whose lifetimes begin mid-scope.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37768
llvm-svn: 313825
Add support for passing SwiftError through a register on the Windows x64
calling convention. This allows the use of swifterror attributes on
parameters which is used by the swift front end for the `Error`
parameter. This partially enables building the swift standard library
for Windows x86_64.
llvm-svn: 313791
If we have an AssertZext of a truncated value that has already been AssertZext'ed,
we can assert on the wider source op to improve the zext-y knowledge:
assert (trunc (assert X, i8) to iN), i1 --> trunc (assert X, i1) to iN
This moves a fold from being Mips-specific to general combining, and x86 shows
improvements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37017
llvm-svn: 313577
rL310710 allowed store merging to occur after legalization to catch stores that are created late,
but this exposes a logic hole seen in PR34217:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34217
We will miss merging stores if the target lowers vector extracts into target-specific operations.
This patch allows store merging to occur both before and after legalization if the target chooses
to get maximum merging.
I don't think the potential regressions in the other tests are relevant. The tests are for
correctness of weird IR constructs rather than perf tests, and I think those are still correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37987
llvm-svn: 313564
For cases where we are BITCASTing to vectors of smaller elements, then if the entire source was a splatted sign (src's NumSignBits == SrcBitWidth) we can say that the dst's NumSignBit == DstBitWidth, as we're just splitting those sign bits across multiple elements.
We could generalize this but at the moment the only use case I have is to peek through bitcasts to vector comparison results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37849
llvm-svn: 313543
This caused PR34629: asserts firing when building Chromium. It also broke some
buildbots building test-suite as reported on the commit thread.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313376
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313343
These are removed in C++17. We still have some users of
unary_function::argument_type, so just spell that typedef out. No
functionality change intended.
Note that many of the argument types are actually wrong :)
llvm-svn: 313287
We already have a combine for this pattern when the input to shl is add, so we just need to enable the transformation when the input is or.
Original patch by @tstellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19325
llvm-svn: 313251
Use RotAmt.urem(VTBits) instead of AND(RotAmt, VTBits - 1)
TBH I don't expect non-power-of-2 types to be created, but it makes the logic clearer and matches what we do in other rotation combines.
llvm-svn: 313245
After the split of the Scatter operation, the order of the new instructions is well defined - Lo goes before Hi. Otherwise the semantic of Scatter (from LSB to MSB) is broken.
I'm chaining 2 nodes to prevent reordering.
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D37670
llvm-svn: 312894
Fixes some combine issues for AMDGPU where we weren't
getting the many extract_vector_elt combines expected
in a future patch.
This should really be checking isOperationLegalOrCustom on
the extract. That improves a number of x86 lit tests, but
a few get stuck in an infinite loop from one place
where a similar looking extract is created. I have a
different workaround in the backend for that which
keeps many of those improvements, but also adds a few
regressions.
llvm-svn: 312730
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904
llvm-svn: 312569
The function combineShuffleToVectorExtend in DAGCombine might generate an illegal typed node after "legalize types" phase, causing assertion on non-simple type to fail afterwards.
Adding a type check in case the combine is running after the type legalize pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37330
llvm-svn: 312438
Previously we would just describe the first register and then call it
quits. This patch emits fragment expressions for each register.
<rdar://problem/34075307>
llvm-svn: 312169
The loop dependence check looks for dependencies between store merge
candidates not captured by the chain sub-DAG doing a check of
predecessors which may be very large. Conservatively bound number of
nodes checked for compilation time. (Resolves PR34326).
Landing on behalf of Nirav Dave to unblock the 5.0.0 release.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37220
llvm-svn: 312022
Only do this before operations are legalized of BUILD_VECTOR is Legal for the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37186
llvm-svn: 311892
Summary:
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the
vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
This will also fix PR 33784
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon, thakis
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: chandlerc, eladcohen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 311833
This goes back to a discussion about IR canonicalization. We'd like to preserve and convert
more IR to 'select' than we currently do because that's likely the best choice in IR:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105335.html
...but that's often not true for codegen, so we need to account for this pattern coming in
to the backend and transform it to better DAG ops.
Steps in this patch:
1. Add an EVT param to the existing convertSelectOfConstantsToMath() TLI hook to more finely
enable this transform. Other targets will probably want that anyway to distinguish scalars
from vectors. We're using that here to exclude AVX512 targets, but it may not be necessary.
2. Convert a vselect to ext+add. This eliminates a constant load/materialization, and the
vector ext is often free.
Implementing a more general fold using xor+and can be a follow-up for targets that don't have
a legal vselect. It's also possible that we can remove the TLI hook for the special case fold
implemented here because we're eliminating a constant, but it needs to be tested on other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36840
llvm-svn: 311731
When one operand is a user of another in a promoted binary operation
we may replace and delete the returned value before returning
triggering an assertion. Reorder node replacements to prevent this.
Fixes PR34137.
Landing on behalf of Nirav.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36581
llvm-svn: 311623
This partially reverts r311429 in favor of making ISD::isConstantSplatVector do something not confusing. Turns out the only other user of it was also having to deal with the weird property of it returning a smaller size.
So rather than continue to deal with this quirk everywhere, just make the interface do something sane.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37039
llvm-svn: 311510
I was contacted by Jesper Antonsson from Ericsson who ran into problems
with r311181 in their test suites with for an out-of-tree target.
Because of the latter I don't have a reproducer, but we definitely don't
want to modify the data structure on which we are iterating inside the
loop.
llvm-svn: 311466
When expanding a BRCOND into a BR_CC, do not create an AND 1
if one already exists.
Review: D36705
Patch by Joel Galenson <jgalenson@google.com>
llvm-svn: 311447
This adds debug messages to various functions that create new SDValue nodes.
This is e.g. useful to have during legalization, as otherwise it can prints
legalization info of nodes that did not appear in the dumps before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36984
llvm-svn: 311444
ISD::isConstantSplatVector can shrink to the smallest splat width. But we don't check the size of the resulting APInt at all. This can cause us to misinterpret the results.
This patch just adds a flag to prevent the APInt from changing width.
Fixes PR34271.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36996
llvm-svn: 311429
Summary:
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the
vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon, thakis
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: chandlerc, eladcohen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 311255
This patch teaches the SDag type legalizer how to split up debug info for
integer values that are split into a hi and lo part.
(re-commit)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36805
llvm-svn: 311181
This patch teaches the SDag type legalizer how to split up debug info for
integer values that are split into a hi and lo part.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36805
llvm-svn: 311102
The SelectionDAGBuilder translates various conditional branches into
CaseBlocks which are then translated into SDNodes. If a conditional
branch results in multiple CaseBlocks only the first CaseBlock is
translated into SDNodes immediately, the rest of the CaseBlocks are
put in a queue and processed when all LLVM IR instructions in the
basic block have been processed.
When a CaseBlock is transformed into SDNodes the SelectionDAGBuilder
is queried for the current LLVM IR instruction and the resulting
SDNodes are annotated with the debug info of the current
instruction (if it exists and has debug metadata).
When the deferred CaseBlocks are processed, the SelectionDAGBuilder
does not have a current LLVM IR instruction, and the resulting SDNodes
will not have any debuginfo. As DwarfDebug::beginInstruction() outputs
a .loc directive for the first instruction in a labeled
block (typically the case for something coming from a CaseBlock) this
tends to produce a line-0 directive.
This patch changes the handling of CaseBlocks to store the current
instruction's debug info into the CaseBlock when it is created (and the
SelectionDAGBuilder knows the current instruction) and to always use
the stored debug info when translating a CaseBlock to SDNodes.
Patch by Frej Drejhammar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36671
llvm-svn: 311097
Nirav Dave