Remove #include of Transforms/Scalar.h from Transform/Utils to fix layering.
Transforms depends on Transforms/Utils, not the other way around. So
remove the header and the "createStripGCRelocatesPass" function
declaration (& definition) that is unused and motivated this dependency.
Move Transforms/Utils/Local.h into Analysis because it's used by
Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp.
llvm-svn: 328165
LICM deletes trivially dead instructions which it won't attempt to sink.
Attempt to salvage debug values which reference these instructions.
llvm-svn: 327800
Move computeLoopSafetyInfo, defined in Transforms/Utils/LoopUtils.h,
into the corresponding LoopUtils.cpp, as opposed to LICM where it resides
at the moment. This will allow other functions from Transforms/Utils
to reference it.
llvm-svn: 325151
Update BlockColors after splitting predecessors. Do not allow splitting
EHPad for sinking when the BlockColors is not empty, so we can
simply assign predecessor's color to the new block.
Fixes PR36184
llvm-svn: 324916
This recommits r320823 reverted due to the test failure in sink-foldable.ll and
an unused variable. Added "REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target" in the test
and removed unused variable.
Original commit message:
Continue trying to sink an instruction if its users in the loop is foldable.
This will allow the instruction to be folded in the loop by decoupling it from
the user outside of the loop.
Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer, davidxl, efriedma, danielcdh, bmakam, mcrosier
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: javed.absar, bmakam, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37076
llvm-svn: 320858
This recommit r320823 after fixing a test failure.
Original commit message:
Continue trying to sink an instruction if its users in the loop is foldable.
This will allow the instruction to be folded in the loop by decoupling it from
the user outside of the loop.
Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer, davidxl, efriedma, danielcdh, bmakam, mcrosier
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: javed.absar, bmakam, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37076
llvm-svn: 320833
Summary:
Continue trying to sink an instruction if its users in the loop is foldable.
This will allow the instruction to be folded in the loop by decoupling it from
the user outside of the loop.
Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer, davidxl, efriedma, danielcdh, bmakam, mcrosier
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: javed.absar, bmakam, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37076
llvm-svn: 320823
Summary:
First step in adding MemorySSA as dependency for loop pass manager.
Adding the dependency under a flag.
New pass manager: MSSA pointer in LoopStandardAnalysisResults can be null.
Legacy and new pass manager: Use cl::opt EnableMSSALoopDependency. Disabled by default.
Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, gberry
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40274
llvm-svn: 318772
Summary: This change fix PR35342 by replacing only the current use with undef in unreachable blocks.
Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, igor-laevsky
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40184
llvm-svn: 318551
Summary:
The current LICM allows sinking an instruction only when it is exposed to exit
blocks through a trivially replacable PHI of which all incoming values are the
same instruction. This change enhance LICM to sink a sinkable instruction
through non-trivially replacable PHIs by spliting predecessors of loop
exits.
Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer, davidxl, bmakam, mcrosier, danielcdh, efriedma, jtony
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: nemanjai, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37163
llvm-svn: 317335
When going to explain this to someone else, I got tripped up by the complicated meaning of IsKnownNonEscapingObject in load-store promotion. Extract a helper routine and clarify naming/scopes to make this a bit more obvious.
llvm-svn: 316699
parameterized emit() calls
Summary: This is not functional change to adopt new emit() API added in r313691.
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38285
llvm-svn: 315476
Sinking of unordered atomic load into loop must be disallowed because it turns
a single load into multiple loads. The relevant section of the documentation
is: http://llvm.org/docs/Atomics.html#unordered, specifically the Notes for
Optimizers section. Here is the full text of this section:
> Notes for optimizers
> In terms of the optimizer, this **prohibits any transformation that
> transforms a single load into multiple loads**, transforms a store into
> multiple stores, narrows a store, or stores a value which would not be
> stored otherwise. Some examples of unsafe optimizations are narrowing
> an assignment into a bitfield, rematerializing a load, and turning loads
> and stores into a memcpy call. Reordering unordered operations is safe,
> though, and optimizers should take advantage of that because unordered
> operations are common in languages that need them.
Patch by Daniil Suchkov!
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38392
llvm-svn: 315438
Summary: Move to LoopUtils method that collects all children of a node inside a loop.
Reviewers: majnemer, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37870
llvm-svn: 313322
Summary:
The current promoteLoopAccessesToScalars method receives an AliasSet, but
the information used is in fact a list of Value*, known to must alias.
Create the list ahead of time to make this method independent of the AliasSet class.
While there is no functionality change, this adds overhead for creating
a set of Value*, when promotion would normally exit earlier.
This is meant to be as a first refactoring step in order to start replacing
AliasSetTracker with MemorySSA.
And while the end goal is to redesign LICM, the first few steps will focus on
adding MemorySSA as an alternative to the AliasSetTracker using most of the
existing functionality.
Reviewers: mkuper, danielcdh, dberlin
Subscribers: sanjoy, chandlerc, gberry, davide, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35439
llvm-svn: 313075
Large CFGs can cause us to blow up the stack because we would have a
recursive step for each basic block in a region.
Instead, create a worklist and iterate it. This limits the stack usage
to something more manageable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35609
llvm-svn: 308582
Summary:
Instead of keeping a variable indicating whether there are early exits
in the loop. We keep all the early exits. This improves LICM's ability to
move instructions out of the loop based on is-guaranteed-to-execute.
I am going to update compilation time as well soon.
Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy, efriedma, mkuper
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32433
llvm-svn: 301196
When allowed, we can hoist a division out of a loop in favor of a
multiplication by the reciprocal. Fixes PR32157.
Patch by vit9696!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30819
llvm-svn: 299911
Extend our store promotion code to deal with unordered atomic accesses. Ordered atomics continue to be unhandled.
Most of the change is straight-forward, the only complicated bit is in the reasoning around mixing of atomic and non-atomic memory access. Rather than trying to reason about the complex semantics in these cases, I simply disallowed promotion when both atomic and non-atomic accesses are present. This is conservatively correct.
It seems really tempting to just promote all access to atomics, but the original accesses might have been conditional. Since we can't lower an arbitrary atomic type, it might not be safe to promote all access to atomic. Consider a loop like the following:
while(b) {
load i128 ...
if (can lower i128 atomic)
store atomic i128 ...
else
store i128
}
It could be there's no race on the location and thus the code is perfectly well defined even if we can't lower a i128 atomically.
It's not clear we need to be this conservative - arguably the program above is brocken since it can't be lowered unless the branch is folded - but I didn't want to have to fix any fallout which might result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15592
llvm-svn: 295015
Summary:
We can hoist out loads that are dominated by invariant.start, to the preheader.
We conservatively assume the load is variant, if we see a corresponding
use of invariant.start (it could be an invariant.end or an escaping
call).
Reviewers: mkuper, sanjoy, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29331
llvm-svn: 293887
skip sub-subloops.
The logic to skip subloops dated from when this code was shared with the
cached case. Once it was factored out to only run in the case of
recomputed subloops it became a dangerous bug. If a subsubloop contained
an interfering instruction it would be silently skipped from the alias
sets for LICM.
With the old pass manager this was extremely hard to trigger as it would
require failing to visit these subloops with the LICM pass but then
visiting the outer loop somehow. I've not yet contrived any test case
that actually manages to trigger this.
But with the new pass manager we don't do the cross-loop caching hack
that the old PM does and so we recompute alias set information from
first principles. While this seems much cleaner and simpler it exposed
this bug and would subtly miscompile code due to failing to correctly
model the aliasing constraints of deeply nested loops.
llvm-svn: 293273
Summary:
In case of non-alloca pointers, we check for whether it is a pointer
from malloc-like calls and it is not captured. In such case, we can
promote the pointer, as the caller will have no way to access this pointer
even if there is unwinding in middle of the loop.
Reviewers: hfinkel, sanjoy, reames, eli.friedman
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28834
llvm-svn: 292510
a function's CFG when that CFG is unchanged.
This allows transformation passes to simply claim they preserve the CFG
and analysis passes to check for the CFG being preserved to remove the
fanout of all analyses being listed in all passes.
I've gone through and removed or cleaned up as many of the comments
reminding us to do this as I could.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28627
llvm-svn: 292054
the latter to the Transforms library.
While the loop PM uses an analysis to form the IR units, the current
plan is to have the PM itself establish and enforce both loop simplified
form and LCSSA. This would be a layering violation in the analysis
library.
Fundamentally, the idea behind the loop PM is to *transform* loops in
addition to running passes over them, so it really seemed like the most
natural place to sink this was into the transforms library.
We can't just move *everything* because we also have loop analyses that
rely on a subset of the invariants. So this patch splits the the loop
infrastructure into the analysis management that has to be part of the
analysis library, and the transform-aware pass manager.
This also required splitting the loop analyses' printer passes out to
the transforms library, which makes sense to me as running these will
transform the code into LCSSA in theory.
I haven't split the unittest though because testing one component
without the other seems nearly intractable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28452
llvm-svn: 291662
arguments much like the CGSCC pass manager.
This is a major redesign following the pattern establish for the CGSCC layer to
support updates to the set of loops during the traversal of the loop nest and
to support invalidation of analyses.
An additional significant burden in the loop PM is that so many passes require
access to a large number of function analyses. Manually ensuring these are
cached, available, and preserved has been a long-standing burden in LLVM even
with the help of the automatic scheduling in the old pass manager. And it made
the new pass manager extremely unweildy. With this design, we can package the
common analyses up while in a function pass and make them immediately available
to all the loop passes. While in some cases this is unnecessary, I think the
simplicity afforded is worth it.
This does not (yet) address loop simplified form or LCSSA form, but those are
the next things on my radar and I have a clear plan for them.
While the patch is very large, most of it is either mechanically updating loop
passes to the new API or the new testing for the loop PM. The code for it is
reasonably compact.
I have not yet updated all of the loop passes to correctly leverage the update
mechanisms demonstrated in the unittests. I'll do that in follow-up patches
along with improved FileCheck tests for those passes that ensure things work in
more realistic scenarios. In many cases, there isn't much we can do with these
until the loop simplified form and LCSSA form are in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28292
llvm-svn: 291651
These are interesting again because the user may not be aware that this
is a common reason preventing LICM.
A const is removed from an instruction pointer declaration in order to
pass it to ORE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27940
llvm-svn: 291649
order to avoid jumpy line tables. Calls are left alone because they may be inlined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28390
llvm-svn: 291258
Promotion is always legal when a store within the loop is guaranteed to execute.
However, this is not a necessary condition - for promotion to be memory model
semantics-preserving, it is enough to have a store that dominates every exit
block. This is because if the store dominates every exit block, the fact the
exit block was executed implies the original store was executed as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28147
llvm-svn: 291171
This is similar to the allocfn case - if an alloca is not captured, then it's
necessarily thread-local.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28170
llvm-svn: 290738
"Changed" doesn't actually change within the loop, so there's
no reason to keep track of it - we always return false during
analysis and true after the transformation is made.
llvm-svn: 290735
This moves the exit block and insertion point computation to be eager,
instead of after seeing the first scalar we can promote.
The cost is relatively small (the computation happens anyway, see discussion
on D28147), and the code is easier to follow, and can bail out earlier
if there's a catchswitch present.
llvm-svn: 290729
We would check whether we have a prehader *or* dedicated exit blocks,
and go into the promotion loop. Then, for each alias set we'd check
if we have a preheader *and* dedicated exit blocks, and bail if not.
Instead, bail immediately if we don't have both.
llvm-svn: 290728
We want to recompute LCSSA only when we actually promoted a value.
This means we only need to look at changes made by promotion when
deciding whether to recompute it or not, not at regular sinking/hoisting.
(This was what the code was documented as doing, just not what it did)
Hopefully NFC.
llvm-svn: 290726
Philip Reames