provided when the optimization is disabled. In particular, split
the completion context CCC_Other into two contexts: CCC_Other, which
means that it's an undisclosed context for which any other results are
unwelcome, and CCC_Recovery, which is used in recovery cases.
Since we're now using the completion context within the completion
results builder, make sure that it's always set to something.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8470644>.
llvm-svn: 114704
This matches the behavior for setters.
Also pass the class extension to ProcessPropertyDecl as the lexical DeclContext, even when not redeclaring the @property.
This fixes the remaining issues in <rdar://problem/7410145>.
llvm-svn: 114477
ObjCMethodDecls. Further, use the location of the new property declaration as the location of new ObjCMethodDecls
(if they didn't previously exist).
This fixes more of the issues reported in <rdar://problem/7410145>.
llvm-svn: 114456
message send, e.g.,
[[NSString alloc] initWithCString:<CC>
look up all of the possible methods and determine the preferred type
for the argument expression based on the type of the corresponding
parameter.
llvm-svn: 114379
Objective-C message sends. There is no functionality change here; this
is prep work for using the parameter types to help guide the
expression results when code-completing the argument.
llvm-svn: 114375
at the statement level or in Objective-C message receivers. Therefore,
just give types and declarations the same basic priority, and adjust
from there.
llvm-svn: 114374
statement context; it really isn't helpful in practice (remember
printf!) and we'll be doing other adjustments for statements very soon.
llvm-svn: 114358
- In Objective-C, we prefer BOOL to bool for historic reasons;
slightly penalize "bool".
- Treat Nil macro as a NULL pointer constant.
- Treat YES, NO, true, and false macros as constants.
- Treat the bool macro as a type.
llvm-svn: 114356
LHS and when conditional expression is an array. Since
it will be decayed, saved expression must be saved with
decayed expression. This is necessary to preserve semantics
of this extension (and prevent an IRGen crash which expects
an array to always be decayed). I am sure there will be other
cases in c++ (aggregate conditionals for example) when saving of the
expression must happen after some transformation on conditional
expression has happened.
Doug, please review. Fixes // rdar://8446940
llvm-svn: 114296
unless we're on a platform without __cxa_atexit (or use thereof has been
disabled). This patch actually just disables the check completely for
static locals, but I've filed http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8176 to
track the platform-specific fix.
llvm-svn: 114269
the cleanup might not be dominated by the allocation code.
In this case, we have to store aside all the delete arguments
in case we need them later. There's room for optimization here
in cases where we end up not actually needing the cleanup in
different branches (or being able to pop it after the
initialization code).
Also make sure we only call this operator delete along the path
where we actually allocated something.
Fixes rdar://problem/8439196.
llvm-svn: 114145
prototype scope, temporarily set the context of the enumeration
declaration to the translation unit. We do the same thing for
parameters, until we have an actual function declaration on which to
hang them. Fixes <rdar://problem/8435682>.
There is more work to do in this area, since we have existing bugs
with tags being declared/defined in function parameter lists. This fix
is correct, and we'll end up extending it when we deal with those
existing bugs.
llvm-svn: 114135
missing the opening bracket '[', e.g.,
NSArray <CC>
at function scope. Previously, we would only give trivial completions
(const, volatile, etc.), because we're in a "declaration name"
scope. Now, we also provide completions for class methods of NSArray,
e.g.,
alloc
Note that we already had support for this after the first argument,
e.g.,
NSArray method:x <CC>
would get code completion for class methods of NSArray whose selector
starts with "method:". This was already present because we recover
as if NSArray method:x were a class message send missing the opening
bracket (which was committed in r114057).
llvm-svn: 114078
sends. These are far trickier than instance messages, because we
typically have something like
NSArray alloc]
where it appears to be a declaration of a variable named "alloc" up
until we see the ']' (or a ':'), and at that point we can't backtrace.
So, we use a combination of syntactic and semantic disambiguation to
treat this as a message send only when the type is an Objective-C type
and it has the syntax of a class message send (which would otherwise
be ill-formed).
llvm-svn: 114057
are expanded from macros (and if so, omit the warning). Previously we were just looking at the
location of the binary expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8435950>.
llvm-svn: 114044
narrow, almost useless case where we're inside a parenthesized
expression, e.g.,
(NSArray alloc])
The solution to the general case still eludes me.
llvm-svn: 114039
'[' is missing. Prior commits improving recovery also improved code
completion beyond the first selector, e.g., at or after the "to" in
calculator add:x to:y
but not after "calculator". We now provide the same completions for
calculator <CC>
that we would for
[calculator <CC>
if "calculator" is an expression whose type is something that can
receive Objective-C messages.
This code completion works for instance and super message sends, but not
class message sends.
llvm-svn: 113976
part of parser recovery. For example, given:
a method1:arg];
we detect after parsing the expression "a" that we have the start of a
message send expression. We pretend we've seen a '[' prior to the a,
then parse the remainder as a message send. We'll then give a
diagnostic+fix-it such as:
fixit-objc-message.m:17:3: error: missing '[' at start of message
send expression
a method1:arg];
^
[
The algorithm here is very simple, and always assumes that the open
bracket goes at the beginning of the message send. It also only works
for non-super instance message sends at this time.
llvm-svn: 113968
slot. The easiest way to do that was to bundle up the information
we care about for aggregate slots into a new structure which demands
that its creators at least consider the question.
I could probably be convinced that the ObjC 'needs GC' bit should
be rolled into this structure.
Implement generalized copy elision. The main obstacle here is that
IR-generation must be much more careful about making sure that exactly
llvm-svn: 113962
expression, e.g., after the '(' that could also be a type cast. Here,
we provide types as code-completion results in C/Objective-C (C++
already had them), although we wouldn't in a normal expression context.
llvm-svn: 113904
Fariborz Jahanian