Add memory synchronization semantics to LSE Atomics.
The memory semantics feature will be added in a subsequent patch.
In this patch, several corrections were added to the existing LSE Atomics
implementation, based on the ARM Errata D11904 from 05/12/2017.
Patch by: steleman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35319
llvm-svn: 310167
Summary:
Direct calls to dllimport functions are very common Windows. We should
add them to the -O0 fast path.
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36197
llvm-svn: 310152
Its sole purpose was to avoid spreading around ifdefs related to
building global-isel. Since r309990, GlobalISel is not optional anymore,
thus, we can get rid of this mechanism all together.
NFC.
llvm-svn: 310115
This adds support for the main 128-bit atomic operations,
using the SystemZ instructions LPQ, STPQ, and CDSG.
Generating these instructions is a bit more complex than usual
since the i128 type is not legal for the back-end. Therefore,
we have to hook the LowerOperationWrapper and ReplaceNodeResults
TargetLowering callbacks.
llvm-svn: 310094
We currently emit a serialization operation (bcr 14, 0) before every
atomic load and after every atomic store. This is overly conservative.
The SystemZ architecture actually does not require any serialization
for atomic loads, and a serialization after an atomic store only if
we need to enforce sequential consistency. This is what other compilers
for the platform implement as well.
llvm-svn: 310093
Summary:
This intrinsic lets us set inactive lanes to an identity value when
implementing wavefront reductions. In combination with Whole Wavefront
Mode, it lets inactive lanes be skipped over as required by GLSL/Vulkan.
Lowering the intrinsic needs to happen post-RA so that RA knows that the
destination isn't completely overwritten due to the EXEC shenanigans, so
we need another pseudo-instruction to represent the un-lowered
intrinsic.
Reviewers: tstellar, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34719
llvm-svn: 310088
Summary:
Whole Wavefront Wode (WWM) is similar to WQM, except that all of the
lanes are always enabled, regardless of control flow. This is required
for implementing wavefront reductions in non-uniform control flow, where
we need to use the inactive lanes to propagate intermediate results, so
they need to be enabled. We need to propagate WWM to uses (unless
they're explicitly marked as exact) so that they also propagate
intermediate results correctly. We do the analysis and exec mask munging
during the WQM pass, since there are interactions with WQM for things
that require both WQM and WWM. For simplicity, WWM is entirely
block-local -- blocks are never WWM on entry or exit of a block, and WWM
is not propagated to the block level. This means that computations
involving WWM cannot involve control flow, but we only ever plan to use
WWM for a few limited purposes (none of which involve control flow)
anyways.
Shaders can ask for WWM using the @llvm.amdgcn.wwm intrinsic. There
isn't yet a way to turn WWM off -- that will be added in a future
change.
Finally, it turns out that turning on inactive lanes causes a number of
problems with register allocation. While the best long-term solution
seems like teaching LLVM's register allocator about predication, for now
we need to add some hacks to prevent ourselves from getting into trouble
due to constraints that aren't currently expressed in LLVM. For the gory
details, see the comments at the top of SIFixWWMLiveness.cpp.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, mgorny, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35524
llvm-svn: 310087
Summary:
Right now, the WQM pass conflates two different things when tracking the
Needs of an instruction:
1. Needs can be StateWQM, which is propagated to other instructions, and
means that this instruction (and everything it depends on) must be
calculated in WQM.
2. Needs can be StateExact, which is not propagated to other
instructions, and means that this instruction must not be calculated in
WQM and WQM-ness must not be propagated past this instruction.
This works now because there are only two different states, but in the
future we want to be able to express things like "calculate this in WQM,
but please disable WWM and don't propagate it" (to implement
@llvm.amdgcn.set.inactive). In order to do this, we need to split the
per-instruction Needs field in two: a new Needs field, which can only
contain StateWQM (and in the future, StateWWM) and is propagated to
sources, and a Disables field, which can also contain just StateWQM or
nothing for now.
We keep the per-block tracking the same for now, by translating
Needs/Disables to the old representation with only StateWQM or
StateExact. The other place that needs special handling is when we
emit the state transitions. We could just translate back to the old
representation there as well, which we almost do, but instead of 0 as a
placeholder value for "any state," we explicitly or together all the
states an instruction is allowed to be in. This lets us refactor the
code in preparation for WWM, where we'll need to be able to handle
things like "this instruction must be in Exact or WQM, but not WWM."
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35523
llvm-svn: 310086
Summary:
Previously, we assumed that certain types of instructions needed WQM in
pixel shaders, particularly DS instructions and image sampling
instructions. This was ok because with OpenGL, the assumption was
correct. But we want to start using DPP instructions for derivatives as
well as other things, so the assumption that we can infer whether to use
WQM based on the instruction won't continue to hold. This intrinsic lets
frontends like Mesa indicate what things need WQM based on their
knowledge of the API, rather than second-guessing them in the backend.
We need to keep around the old method of enabling WQM, but eventually we
should remove it once Mesa catches up. For now, this will let us use DPP
instructions for computing derivatives correctly.
Reviewers: arsenm, tpr, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, llvm-commits, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35167
llvm-svn: 310085
This is a continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D36219
This patch uses reverse mapping (encoding->name) in
ARMInstPrinter::printBankedRegOperand to get rid of
hard-coded values (as pointed out by @olista01).
Reviewed by: @fhahn, @rovka, @olista01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36260
llvm-svn: 310072
Error was:
field of type 'llvm::ArgDescriptor' has private default constructor
const AMDGPUFunctionArgInfo AMDGPUArgumentUsageInfo::ExternFunctionInfo{};
^
llvm-svn: 310048
Author: milena.vujosevic.janicic
The patch extends size reduction pass for MicroMIPS.
The following instructions are examined and transformed, if possible:
ADDIU instruction is transformed into 16-bit instruction ADDIUSP
ADDIU instruction is transformed into 16-bit instruction ADDIUR1SP
Usage of u_int64_t replaced by uint64_t to avoid issues because of which previous patch version was reverted:
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34511
llvm-svn: 310044
In case if SI_KILL is in between of the SI_IF and SI_END_CF we need
to preserve the bits actually flipped by if rather then restoring
the original mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36299
llvm-svn: 310031
Summary:
Following the docs, we need at least 5 wait states between an EXEC write
and an instruction that uses DPP.
Reviewers: tstellar, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34849
llvm-svn: 310013
With this change, the GlobalISel library gets always built. In
particular, this is not possible to opt GlobalISel out of the build
using the LLVM_BUILD_GLOBAL_ISEL variable any more.
llvm-svn: 309990
This reverts commit r309821.
My suggestion was wrong because it left the MachineOperands tied which
confused the verifier. Since there's no easy way to untie operands, the
original BuildMI solution is probably best.
llvm-svn: 309962
Summary:
If a PHI has at lease one VGPR operand, we have to fix the PHI
in SIFixSGPRCopies.
Reviewer:
Matt
Differential Revision:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D34727
llvm-svn: 309959
Add support in the instruction selector for G_GLOBAL_VALUE for ELF and
MachO for the static relocation model. We don't handle Windows yet
because that's Thumb-only, and we don't handle Thumb in general at the
moment.
Support for PIC, ROPI, RWPI and TLS will be added in subsequent commits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35883
llvm-svn: 309927
This patch:
- makes nodes ISD::ADDCARRY and ISD::SUBCARRY legal for i32
- lowering is done by first converting the boolean value into the carry flag
using (_, C) <- (ARMISD::ADDC R, -1) and converted back to an integer value
using (R, _) <- (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C). An ARMISD::ADDE between the two
operations does the actual addition.
- for subtraction, given that ISD::SUBCARRY second result is actually a
borrow, we need to invert the value of the second operand and result before
and after using ARMISD::SUBE. We need to invert the carry result of
ARMISD::SUBE to preserve the semantics.
- given that the generic combiner may lower ISD::ADDCARRY and
ISD::SUBCARRY into ISD::UADDO and ISD::USUBO we need to update their lowering
as well otherwise i64 operations now would require branches. This implies
updating the corresponding test for unsigned.
- add new combiner to remove the redundant conversions from/to carry flags
to/from boolean values (ARMISD::ADDC (ARMISD::ADDE 0, 0, C), -1) -> C
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35192
llvm-svn: 309923
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
Moves encoding (SYSm) information of banked registers to ARMSystemRegister.td,
where it rightly belongs and forms a single point of reference in the code.
Reviewed by: @fhahn, @rovka, @olista01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36219
llvm-svn: 309910
I was surprised to see the code model being passed to MC. After all,
it assembles code, it doesn't create it.
The one place it is used is in the expansion of .cfi directives to
handle .eh_frame being more that 2gb away from the code.
As far as I can tell, gnu assembler doesn't even have an option to
enable this. Compiling a c file with gcc -mcmodel=large produces a
regular looking .eh_frame. This is probably because in practice linker
parse and recreate .eh_frames.
In llvm this is used because the JIT can place the code and .eh_frame
very far apart. Ideally we would fix the jit and delete this
option. This is hard.
Apart from confusion another problem with the current interface is
that most callers pass CodeModel::Default, which is bad since MC has
no way to map it to the target default if it actually needed to.
This patch then replaces the argument with a boolean with a default
value. The vast majority of users don't ever need to look at it. In
fact, only CodeGen and llvm-mc use it and llvm-mc just to enable more
testing.
llvm-svn: 309884
Power 9 has instructions to do absolute difference (VABSDUB, VABSDUH, VABSDUW)
for byte, halfword and word. We should take advantage of these.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34684
llvm-svn: 309876
If there are no calls, this is a faster path than
searching the entire program for calls.
This was supposed to be left in r309781.
Fixes unused variable warning.
llvm-svn: 309832
This was failing on out of bounds access to the extra operands
on the s_swappc_b64 beyond those in the instruction definition.
This was working, but somehow regressed within the past few weeks,
although I don't see any obvious commit.
llvm-svn: 309782
Previous change "Turn s_and_saveexec_b64 into s_and_b64 if
result is unused" introduced asan use-after-poison error.
Instruction was analyzed after eraseFromParent() calls.
Move analysys higher than erase.
llvm-svn: 309779
With SI_END_CF elimination for some nested control flow we can now
eliminate saved exec register completely by turning a saveexec version
of instruction into just a logical instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36007
llvm-svn: 309766
Florian Hahn