Previously we were always trying to emit the zext or truncate before any shift. This meant if the 'and' mask was larger than the size of the truncate we would skip the transformation.
Now we shift the result of the and right first leaving the bit within the range of the truncate.
This matches what we are doing in foldSelectICmpAndOr for the same problem.
llvm-svn: 310159
Summary:
The bug was uncovered after fix of PR23384 (part 3 of 3).
The patch restricts pointer multiplication in SCEV computaion for ICmpZero.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D36170
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
<evgeny.v.stupachenko@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 310092
The frontend may have requested a higher alignment for any reason, and
downstream optimizations may already have taken advantage of it. We
should keep the same alignment when moving the allocation from the
parameter area to the local variable area.
Fixes PR34038
llvm-svn: 310071
Summary:
The (not (sext)) case is really (xor (sext), -1) which should have been simplified to (sext (xor, 1)) before we got here. So we shouldn't need to handle it.
With that taken care of we only need to two cases so don't need the swap anymore. This makes us in sync with the equivalent code in visitOr so inline this to match.
Reviewers: spatel, eli.friedman, majnemer
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36240
llvm-svn: 310063
Name: narrow_shift
Pre: C1 < 8
%zx = zext i8 %x to i32
%l = lshr i32 %zx, C1
=>
%narrowC = trunc i32 C1 to i8
%ns = lshr i8 %x, %narrowC
%l = zext i8 %ns to i32
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/jIV
This isn't directly applicable to PR34046 as written, but we
need to have more narrowing folds like this to be sure that
rotate patterns are recognized.
llvm-svn: 310060
Summary:
This fixes PR31777.
If both stores' values are ConstantInt, we merge the two stores
(shifting the smaller store appropriately) and replace the earlier (and
larger) store with an updated constant.
In the future we should also support vectors of integers. And maybe
float/double if we can.
Reviewers: hfinkel, junbuml, jfb, RKSimon, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30703
llvm-svn: 310055
Summary:
This commit allows matchSelectPattern to recognize clamp of float
arguments in the presence of FMF the same way as already done for
integers.
This case is a little different though. With integers, given the
min/max pattern is recognized, DAGBuilder starts selecting MIN/MAX
"automatically". That is not the case for float, because for them only
full FMINNAN/FMINNUM/FMAXNAN/FMAXNUM ISD nodes exist and they do care
about NaNs. On the other hand, some backends (e.g. X86) have only
FMIN/FMAX nodes that do not care about NaNS and the former NAN/NUM
nodes are illegal thus selection is not happening. So I decided to do
such kind of transformation in IR (InstCombiner) instead of
complicating the logic in the backend.
Reviewers: spatel, jmolloy, majnemer, efriedma, craig.topper
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, n.bozhenov, llvm-commits
Patch by Andrei Elovikov <andrei.elovikov@intel.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33186
llvm-svn: 310054
This is similar to what we are doing in "regular" SROA and creates
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operations to describe the resulting variables.
rdar://problem/33654891
llvm-svn: 310014
Summary:
Detect when the working set size of a profiled application is huge,
by comparing the number of counts required to reach the hot percentile
in the profile summary to a large threshold*.
When the working set size is determined to be huge, disable peeling
to avoid bloating the working set further.
*Note that the selected threshold (15K) is significantly larger than the
largest working set value in SPEC cpu2006 (which is gcc at around 11K).
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36288
llvm-svn: 310005
Summary:
Peeling should not occur during the full unrolling invocation early
in the pipeline, but rather later with partial and runtime loop
unrolling. The later loop unrolling invocation will also eventually
utilize profile summary and branch frequency information, which
we would like to use to control peeling. And for ThinLTO we want
to delay peeling until the backend (post thin link) phase, just as
we do for most types of unrolling.
Ensure peeling doesn't occur during the full unrolling invocation
by adding a parameter to the shared implementation function, similar
to the way partial and runtime loop unrolling are disabled.
Performance results for ThinLTO suggest this has a neutral to positive
effect on some internal benchmarks.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36258
llvm-svn: 309966
Summary:
This is largely NFC*, in preparation for utilizing ProfileSummaryInfo
and BranchFrequencyInfo analyses. In this patch I am only doing the
splitting for the New PM, but I can do the same for the legacy PM as
a follow-on if this looks good.
*Not NFC since for partial unrolling we lose the updates done to the
loop traversal (adding new sibling and child loops) - according to
Chandler this is not very useful for partial unrolling, but it also
means that the debugging flag -unroll-revisit-child-loops no longer
works for partial unrolling.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36157
llvm-svn: 309886
As far as I can tell this should be handled by foldCastedBitwiseLogic which is called later in visitXor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36214
llvm-svn: 309882
This adds support for sext in foldLogicCastConstant. This is a prerequisite for D36214.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36234
llvm-svn: 309880
Summary:
This patch makes LoopDeletion use the incremental DominatorTree API.
We modify LoopDeletion to perform the deletion in 5 steps:
1. Create a new dummy edge from the preheader to the exit, by adding a conditional branch.
2. Inform the DomTree about the new edge.
3. Remove the conditional branch and replace it with an unconditional edge to the exit. This removes the edge to the loop header, making it unreachable.
4. Inform the DomTree about the deleted edge.
5. Remove the unreachable block from the function.
Creating the dummy conditional branch is necessary to perform incremental DomTree update.
We should consider using the batch updater when it's ready.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, grosser, sanjoy
Reviewed By: dberlin, grosser
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35391
llvm-svn: 309850
Summary:
Currently most of the time vectors of extractelement instructions are
treated as scalars that must be gathered into vectors. But in some
cases, like when we have extractelement instructions from single vector
with different constant indeces or from 2 vectors of the same size, we
can treat this operations as shuffle of a single vector or blending of 2
vectors.
```
define <2 x i8> @g(<2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y) {
%x0 = extractelement <2 x i8> %x, i32 0
%y1 = extractelement <2 x i8> %y, i32 1
%x0x0 = mul i8 %x0, %x0
%y1y1 = mul i8 %y1, %y1
%ins1 = insertelement <2 x i8> undef, i8 %x0x0, i32 0
%ins2 = insertelement <2 x i8> %ins1, i8 %y1y1, i32 1
ret <2 x i8> %ins2
}
```
can be converted to something like
```
define <2 x i8> @g(<2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y) {
%1 = shufflevector <2 x i8> %x, <2 x i8> %y, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 3>
%2 = mul <2 x i8> %1, %1
ret <2 x i8> %2
}
```
Currently this type of conversion is considered as high cost
transformation.
Reviewers: mzolotukhin, delena, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon
Subscribers: ashahid, RKSimon, spatel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30200
llvm-svn: 309812
infinite-inlining across multiple runs of the inliner by keeping a tiny
history of internal-to-SCC inlining decisions.
This is still a bit gross, but I don't yet have any fundamentally better
ideas and numerous people are blocked on this to use new PM and ThinLTO
together.
The core of the idea is to detect when we are about to do an inline that
has a chance of re-splitting an SCC which we have split before with
a similar inlining step. That is a critical component in the inlining
forming a cycle and so far detects all of the various cyclic patterns
I can come up with as well as the original real-world test case (which
comes from a ThinLTO build of libunwind).
I've added some tests that I think really demonstrate what is going on
here. They are essentially state machines that march the inliner through
various steps of a cycle and check that we stop when the cycle is closed
and that we actually did do inlining to form that cycle.
A lot of thanks go to Eric Christopher and Sanjoy Das for the help
understanding this issue and improving the test cases.
The biggest "yuck" here is the layering issue -- the CGSCC pass manager
is providing somewhat magical state to the inliner for it to use to make
itself converge. This isn't great, but I don't honestly have a lot of
better ideas yet and at least seems nicely isolated.
I have tested this patch, and it doesn't block *any* inlining on the
entire LLVM test suite and SPEC, so it seems sufficiently narrowly
targeted to the issue at hand.
We have come up with hypothetical issues that this patch doesn't cover,
but so far none of them are practical and we don't have a viable
solution yet that covers the hypothetical stuff, so proceeding here in
the interim. Definitely an area that we will be back and revisiting in
the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36188
llvm-svn: 309784
Summary:
As far as I can tell the earlier call getLimitedValue will guaranteed ShiftAmt is saturated to BitWidth-1 preventing it from ever being equal or greater than BitWidth.
At one point in the past the getLimitedValue call was only passed BitWidth not BitWidth - 1. This would have allowed the equality case to get here. And in fact this check was initially added as just BitWidth == ShiftAmt, but was changed shortly after to include > which should have never been possible.
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36123
llvm-svn: 309690
To the best of my knowledge -metarenamer is used in two cases:
1) obfuscate names, when e.g. they contain informations that
can't be shared.
2) Improve clarity of the textual IR for testcases.
One of the usecases if getting the output of `opt` and passing it
to the lli interpreter to run the test. If metarenamer renames
@main, lli can't find an entry point.
llvm-svn: 309657
Summary:
Adding part of the changes in D30369 (needed to make progress):
Current patch updates AliasAnalysis and MemoryLocation, but does _not_ clean up MemorySSA.
Original summary from D30369, by dberlin:
Currently, we have instructions which affect memory but have no memory
location. If you call, for example, MemoryLocation::get on a fence,
it asserts. This means things specifically have to avoid that. It
also means we end up with a copy of each API, one taking a memory
location, one not.
This starts to fix that.
We add MemoryLocation::getOrNone as a new call, and reimplement the
old asserting version in terms of it.
We make MemoryLocation optional in the (Instruction, MemoryLocation)
version of getModRefInfo, and kill the old one argument version in
favor of passing None (it had one caller). Now both can handle fences
because you can just use MemoryLocation::getOrNone on an instruction
and it will return a correct answer.
We use all this to clean up part of MemorySSA that had to handle this difference.
Note that literally every actual getModRefInfo interface we have could be made private and replaced with:
getModRefInfo(Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>)
and
getModRefInfo(Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>, Instruction, Optional<MemoryLocation>)
and delegating to the right ones, if we wanted to.
I have not attempted to do this yet.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, dblaikie
Subscribers: sanjoy, hfinkel, chandlerc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35441
llvm-svn: 309641
D33925 added a control flow simplification for -O2 --lto-O0 builds that
manually splits blocks and reassigns conditional branches but does not
correctly update phi nodes. If the else case being branched to had
incoming phi nodes the control-flow simplification would leave phi nodes
in that BB with an unhandled predecessor.
Patch by Vlad Tsyrklevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36012
llvm-svn: 309621
Dinar Temirbulatov