This is better for a few reasons:
+ It matches the other tooling for iOS.
+ It matches EABI in more cases (i.e. Thumb-mode, and in practice we don't
use ARM mode).
+ It leads to infinitesimally smaller code (0.2%, yay!).
rdar://25369506
llvm-svn: 266003
When we see a .arch or .cpu directive, we should try to avoid switching
ARM/Thumb mode if possible.
If we do have to switch modes, we also need to emit the correct mapping
symbol for the new ISA. We did not do this previously, so could emit
ARM code with Thumb mapping symbols (or vice-versa).
The GAS behaviour is to always stay in the same mode, and to emit an
error on any instructions seen when the current mode is not available on
the current target. We can't represent that situation easily (we assume
that Thumb mode is available if ModeThumb is set), so we differ from the
GAS behaviour when switching to a target that can't support the old
mode. I've added a warning for when this implicit mode-switch occurs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18955
llvm-svn: 265936
Added ISelDAGToDAG functions to enable selection of the smlawb, smlawt,
smulwb and smulwt instructions for the ARM backend. Also updated the smul
CodeGen test and removed the smulw one.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18892
llvm-svn: 265793
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.
The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).
This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.
As a follow-up I'll add:
bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.
Reviewers: jyknight, reames
Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775
llvm-svn: 265602
Removed the SDNode argument passed to the AI_smul and AI_smla multiclass
definitions as they are always mul.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18791
llvm-svn: 265409
We can only perform a tail call to a callee that preserves all the
registers that the caller needs to preserve.
This situation happens with calling conventions like preserver_mostcc or
cxx_fast_tls. It was explicitely handled for fast_tls and failing for
preserve_most. This patch generalizes the check to any calling
convention.
Related to rdar://24207743
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18680
llvm-svn: 265329
Summary:
This adds the same checks that were added in r264593 to all
target-specific passes that run after register allocation.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18525
llvm-svn: 265313
ThreadModel::Single is already handled already by ARMPassConfig adding
LowerAtomicPass to the pass list, which lowers all atomics to non-atomic
ops and deletes fences.
So by the time we get to ISel, there's no atomic fences left, so they
don't need special handling.
llvm-svn: 265178
Some ARM instructions encode 32-bit immediates as a 8-bit integer (0-255)
and a 4-bit rotation (0-30, even) in its least significant 12 bits. The
original fixup, FK_Data_4, patches the instruction by the value bit-to-bit,
regardless of the encoding. For example, assuming the label L1 and L2 are
0x0 and 0x104 respectively, the following instruction:
add r0, r0, #(L2 - L1) ; expects 0x104, i.e., 260
would be assembled to the following, which adds 1 to r0, instead of 260:
e2800104 add r0, r0, #4, 2 ; equivalently 1
The new fixup kind fixup_arm_mod_imm takes care of the encoding:
e2800f41 add r0, r0, #260
Patch by Ting-Yuan Huang!
llvm-svn: 265122
This will become necessary in a subsequent change to make this method
merge adjacent stack adjustments, i.e. it might erase the previous
and/or next instruction.
It also greatly simplifies the calls to this function from Prolog-
EpilogInserter. Previously, that had a bunch of logic to resume iteration
after the call; now it just continues with the returned iterator.
Note that this changes the behaviour of PEI a little. Previously,
it attempted to re-visit the new instruction created by
eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(). That code was added in r36625,
but I can't see any reason for it: the new instructions will obviously
not be pseudo instructions, they will not have FrameIndex operands,
and we have already accounted for the stack adjustment.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18627
llvm-svn: 265036
These checks are redundant and can be removed
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18564
llvm-svn: 264872
It is possible to have a fallthrough MBB prior to MBB placement. The original
addition of the BB would result in reordering the BB as not preceding the
successor. Because of the fallthrough nature of the BB, we could end up
executing incorrect code or even a constant pool island! Insert the spliced BB
into the same location to avoid that.
Thanks to Tim Northover for invaluable hints and Fiora for the discussion on
what may have been occurring!
llvm-svn: 264454
We did not have an explicit branch to the continuation BB. When the check was
hoisted, this could permit control follow to fall through into the division
trap. Add the explicit branch to the continuation basic block to ensure that
code execution is correct.
llvm-svn: 264370
This introduces a custom lowering for ISD::SETCCE (introduced in r253572)
that allows us to emit a short code sequence for 64-bit compares.
Before:
push {r7, lr}
cmp r0, r2
mov.w r0, #0
mov.w r12, #0
it hs
movhs r0, #1
cmp r1, r3
it ge
movge.w r12, #1
it eq
moveq r12, r0
cmp.w r12, #0
bne .LBB1_2
@ BB#1: @ %bb1
bl f
pop {r7, pc}
.LBB1_2: @ %bb2
bl g
pop {r7, pc}
After:
push {r7, lr}
subs r0, r0, r2
sbcs.w r0, r1, r3
bge .LBB1_2
@ BB#1: @ %bb1
bl f
pop {r7, pc}
.LBB1_2: @ %bb2
bl g
pop {r7, pc}
Saves around 80KB in Chromium's libchrome.so.
Some notes on this patch:
- I don't much like the ARMISD::BRCOND and ARMISD::CMOV combines I
introduced (nothing else needs them). However, they are necessary in
order to avoid poor codegen, and they seem similar to existing combines
in other backends (e.g. X86 combines (brcond (cmp (setcc Compare))) to
(brcond Compare)).
- No support for Thumb-1. This is in principle possible, but we'd need
to implement ARMISD::SUBE for Thumb-1.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15256
llvm-svn: 263962
We need to be careful on which registers can be explicitly handled
via copies. Prologue, Epilogue use physical registers and if one belongs
to the set of CSRsViaCopy, it will no longer be CSRed, since PEI overwrites
it after the explicit copies.
llvm-svn: 263857
The two changes together weakened the test and caused a regression with division
handling in MSVC mode. They were applied to avoid an assertion being triggered
in the block frequency analysis. However, the underlying problem was simply
being masked rather than solved properly. Address the actual underlying problem
and revert the changes. Rather than analyze the cause of the assertion, the
division failure was assumed to be an overflow.
The underlying issue was a subtle bug in the BB construction in the emission of
the div-by-zero check (WIN__DBZCHK). We did not construct the proper successor
information in the basic blocks, nor did we update the PHIs associated with the
basic block when we split them. This would result in assertions being triggered
in the block frequency analysis pass.
Although the original tests are being removed, the tests themselves performed
very little in terms of validation but merely tested that we did not assert when
generating code. Update this with new tests that actually ensure that we do not
regress on the code generation.
llvm-svn: 263714
- Rename getATOMIC to getSYNC, as llvm will soon be able to emit both
'__sync' libcalls and '__atomic' libcalls, and this function is for
the '__sync' ones.
- getInsertFencesForAtomic() has been replaced with
shouldInsertFencesForAtomic(Instruction), so that the decision can be
made per-instruction. This functionality will be used soon.
- emitLeadingFence/emitTrailingFence are no longer called if
shouldInsertFencesForAtomic returns false, and thus don't need to
check the condition themselves.
llvm-svn: 263665
`MCSymbolRefExpr` variant kind for TLSCALL is prefixed with
_ARM_ since this is how it was originally implemented.
The X86_64 version is exactly the same so there's no reason
to create a new variant, we can just rename the existing
one to be machine-independent.
This generalization is the first step to implement support
for GNU2 TLS dialect in MC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18160
llvm-svn: 263515
This patch adds Cortex-R8 to Target Parser and TableGen.
It also adds CodeGen tests for the build attributes.
Patch by Pablo Barrio.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17925
llvm-svn: 263132
The initial change was insufficiently complete for always getting the semantics
of __builtin_longjmp correct. The builtin is translated into a
`tInt_eh_sjlj_longjmp` DAG node. This node set R7 as clobbered. However, the
code would then follow up with a clobber of R11. I had failed to notice the
imp-def,kill on R7 in the isel. Unfortunately, it seems that it is not possible
to conditionalise the Defs list via an !if. Instead, construct a new parallel
WIN node and prefer that when targeting windows. This ensures that we now both
correctly model the __builtin_longjmp as well as construct the frame in a more
ABI conformant manner.
llvm-svn: 263123
WoA uses r11 as the FP even though it is a pure thumb-2 environment in contrast
to AAPCS which states r7. This adjusts __builtin_longjmp to not clobber r7 and
to properly restore the frame pointer on execution.
llvm-svn: 263118
This change adds a support for a preserve_most calling convention to the AArch64 backend, similar to how it was done for X86-64.
There is also a subsequent patch on top of this one to add a tail-calls support for this calling convention.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18016
llvm-svn: 263092
When div+rem calls on the same arguments are found, the ARM back-end merges the
two calls into one __aeabi_divmod call for up to 32-bits values. However,
for 64-bit values, which also have a lib call (__aeabi_ldivmod), it wasn't
merging the calls, and thus calling ldivmod twice and spilling the temporary
results, which generated pretty bad code.
This patch legalises 64-bit lib calls for divmod, so that now all the spilling
and the second call are gone. It also relaxes the DivRem combiner a bit on the
legal type check, since it was already checking for isLegalOrCustom on every
value, so the extra check for isTypeLegal was redundant.
Second attempt, creating TLI.isOperationCustom like isOperationExpand, to make
sure we only emit valid types or the ones that were explicitly marked as custom.
Now, passing check-all and test-suite on x86, ARM and AArch64.
This patch fixes PR17193 (and a long time FIXME in the tests).
llvm-svn: 262738
When div+rem calls on the same arguments are found, the ARM back-end merges the
two calls into one __aeabi_divmod call for up to 32-bits values. However,
for 64-bit values, which also have a lib call (__aeabi_ldivmod), it wasn't
merging the calls, and thus calling ldivmod twice and spilling the temporary
results, which generated pretty bad code.
This patch legalises 64-bit lib calls for divmod, so that now all the spilling
and the second call are gone. It also relaxes the DivRem combiner a bit on the
legal type check, since it was already checking for isLegalOrCustom on every
value, so the extra check for isTypeLegal was redundant.
This patch fixes PR17193 (and a long time FIXME in the tests).
llvm-svn: 262507
Most of the time ARM has the CCR.UNALIGN_TRP bit set to false which
means that unaligned loads/stores do not trap and even extensive testing
will not catch these bugs. However the multi/double variants are not
affected by this bit and will still trap. In effect a more aggressive
load/store optimization will break existing (bad) code.
These bugs do not necessarily manifest in the broken code where the
misaligned pointer is formed but often later in perfectly legal code
where it is accessed. This means recompiling system libraries (which
have no alignment bugs) with a newer compiler will break existing
applications (with alignment bugs) that worked before.
So (under protest) I implemented this safe mode which limits the
formation of multi/double operations to cases that are not affected by
user code (stack operations like spills/reloads) or cases where the
normal operations trap anyway (floating point load/stores). It is
disabled by default.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17015
llvm-svn: 262504
TableGen checks at compiletime that for scheduling models with
"CompleteModel = 1" one of the following holds:
- Is marked with the hasNoSchedulingInfo flag
- The instruction is a subclass of Sched
- There are InstRW definitions in the scheduling model
Typical steps necessary to complete a model:
- Ensure all pseudo instructions that are expanded before machine
scheduling (usually everything handled with EmitYYY() functions in
XXXTargetLowering).
- If a CPU does not support some instructions mark the corresponding
resource unsupported: "WriteRes<WriteXXX, []> { let Unsupported = 1; }".
- Add missing scheduling information.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17747
llvm-svn: 262384
Change MachineInstr API to prefer MachineInstr& over MachineInstr*
whenever the parameter is expected to be non-null. Slowly inching
toward being able to fix PR26753.
llvm-svn: 262149
We were emitting only one half of a the paired relocations needed for these
instructions because we decided that an offset needed a scattered relocation.
In fact, movw/movt relocations can be paired without being scattered.
llvm-svn: 261679
Summary:
Currently, the ARM Constant Island may not converge (or not converge quickly).
This patch let it move to the closest water after the user if it doesn't converge after 15 iterations.
This address https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25339
Reviewers: t.p.northover, srhines, kristof.beyls, aadg, rengolin
Subscribers: weimingz, aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16890
llvm-svn: 261665
Summary:
If we want classify OoO or not, using getSchedModel().isOutOfOrder()
could be more proper way than using Subtarget->isLikeA9().
Reviewers: jmolloy, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17433
llvm-svn: 261623
Change TargetInstrInfo API to take `MachineInstr&` instead of
`MachineInstr*` in the functions related to predicated instructions
(I'll try to come back later and get some of the rest). All of these
functions require non-null parameters already, so references are more
clear. As a bonus, this happens to factor away a host of implicit
iterator => pointer conversions.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 261605
This is a little embarrassing.
When I reverted r261504 (getIterator() => getInstrIterator()) in
r261567, I did a `git grep` to see if there were new calls to
`getInstrIterator()` that I needed to migrate. There were 10-20 hits,
and I blindly did a `sed ...` before calling `ninja check`.
However, these were `MachineInstrBundleIterator::getInstrIterator()`,
which predated r261567. Perhaps coincidentally, these had an identical
name and return type.
This commit undoes my careless sed and restores
`MachineBasicBlock::iterator::getInstrIterator()`.
llvm-svn: 261577
Tim Northover