Summary:
Bringing some come duplicated in the AT&T and the Intel printers
into a common parent class.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47682
llvm-svn: 334005
The IntelPrinter and the ATTPrinter produce the same strings for the same input. We already use the ATTPrinter explicitly in several other places.
llvm-svn: 328762
X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.
This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879
llvm-svn: 327767
The asm parser puts the lock prefix in the MCInst flags so we need to check that in addition to TSFlags. This matches what the ATT printer does.
llvm-svn: 323469
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
per-function subtarget.
Currently, code-gen passes the default or generic subtarget to the constructors
of MCInstPrinter subclasses (see LLVMTargetMachine::addPassesToEmitFile), which
enables some targets (AArch64, ARM, and X86) to change their instprinter's
behavior based on the subtarget feature bits. Since the backend can now use
different subtargets for each function, instprinter has to be changed to use the
per-function subtarget rather than the default subtarget.
This patch takes the first step towards enabling instprinter to change its
behavior based on the per-function subtarget. It adds a bit "PassSubtarget" to
AsmWriter which tells table-gen to pass a reference to MCSubtargetInfo to the
various print methods table-gen auto-generates.
I will follow up with changes to instprinters of AArch64, ARM, and X86.
llvm-svn: 233411
Summary:
X86BaseInfo.h defines an enum for the offset of each operand in a memory operand
sequence. Some code uses it and some does not. This patch replaces (hopefully)
all remaining locations where an integer literal was used instead of this enum.
No functionality change intended.
Reviewers: nadav
CC: llvm-commits, t.p.northover
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3108
llvm-svn: 204158
-Assembly parser now properly check the size of the memory operation specified in intel syntax. So 'mov word ptr [5], al' is no longer accepted.
-x86-32 disassembly of these instructions no longer sign extends the 32-bit address immediate based on size.
-Intel syntax printing prints the ptr size and places brackets around the address immediate.
Known remaining issues with these instructions:
-Segment override prefix is not supported. PR16962 and PR16961.
-Immediate size should be changed by address size prefix.
llvm-svn: 189201
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
- Instead of embedding 'lock' into each mnemonic of atomic
instructions except 'xchg', we teach X86 assembly printer to output 'lock'
prefix similar to or consistent with code emitter.
llvm-svn: 164659
rdar://10873652
As part of this I updated the llvm-mc disassembler C API to always call the
SymbolLookUp call back even if there is no getOpInfo call back. If there is a
getOpInfo call back that is tried first and then if that gets no information
then the SymbolLookUp is called. I also made the code more robust by
memset(3)'ing to zero the LLVMOpInfo1 struct before then setting
SymbolicOp.Value before for the call to getOpInfo. And also don't use any
values from the LLVMOpInfo1 struct if getOpInfo returns 0. And also don't
use any of the ReferenceType or ReferenceName values from SymbolLookUp if it
returns NULL. rdar://10873563 and rdar://10873683
For the X86 target also fixed bugs so the annotations get printed.
Also fixed a few places in the ARM target that was not producing symbolic
operands for some instructions. rdar://10878166
llvm-svn: 151267
with the newer, cleaner model. It uses the IAPrinter class to hold the
information that is needed to match an instruction with its alias. This also
takes into account the available features of the platform.
There is one bit of ugliness. The way the logic determines if a pattern is
unique is O(N**2), which is gross. But in reality, the number of items it's
checking against isn't large. So while it's N**2, it shouldn't be a massive time
sink.
llvm-svn: 129110
Gabor Buella