This patch introduces support of hip_pinned_shadow variable for HIP.
A hip_pinned_shadow variable is a global variable with attribute hip_pinned_shadow.
It has external linkage on device side and has no initializer. It has internal
linkage on host side and has initializer or static constructor. It can be accessed
in both device code and host code.
This allows HIP runtime to implement support of HIP texture reference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62738
llvm-svn: 364381
Rather than create JSON objects for source locations and ranges, we instead stream them out directly. This allows us to elide duplicate information (without JSON field reordering causing an issue) like file names and line numbers, similar to the text dump. This also adds token length information when dumping the source location.
llvm-svn: 364226
This also details what filters, if any, were used to generate the test output. Updates all the current JSON testing files to include the automated note.
llvm-svn: 364055
Previously, we attempted to write out template parameters and specializations to their own array, but due to the architecture of the ASTNodeTraverser, this meant that other nodes were not being written out. This now follows the same behavior as the regular AST dumper and puts all the (correct) information into the "inner" array. When we correct the AST node traverser itself, we can revisit splitting this information into separate arrays again.
llvm-svn: 363819
Summary:
When using ConstantExpr we often need the result of the expression to be kept in the AST. Currently this is done on a by the node that needs the result and has been done multiple times for enumerator, for constexpr variables... . This patch adds to ConstantExpr the ability to store the result of evaluating the expression. no functional changes expected.
Changes:
- Add trailling object to ConstantExpr that can hold an APValue or an uint64_t. the uint64_t is here because most ConstantExpr yield integral values so there is an optimized layout for integral values.
- Add basic* serialization support for the trailing result.
- Move conversion functions from an enum to a fltSemantics from clang::FloatingLiteral to llvm::APFloatBase. this change is to make it usable for serializing APValues.
- Add basic* Import support for the trailing result.
- ConstantExpr created in CheckConvertedConstantExpression now stores the result in the ConstantExpr Node.
- Adapt AST dump to print the result when present.
basic* : None, Indeterminate, Int, Float, FixedPoint, ComplexInt, ComplexFloat,
the result is not yet used anywhere but for -ast-dump.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, hiraditya, dexonsmith, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62399
llvm-svn: 363493
regenerate the test expectations.
(Only two tests change, as a result of no longer matching the 0x in a
pointer; the other tests were already excluding that.)
llvm-svn: 362316
and returned to the context in which 'this' should be captured.
This means we now always mark 'this' referenced from the context in
which it's actually referenced, rather than potentially from some
context nested within that.
llvm-svn: 362182
capturing expression or statement.
No functionality change yet. The intent is that we will also delay
building the initialization expression until the enclosing context, so
that:
a) we build the initialization expression in the right context, and
b) we can elide captures that are not odr-used, as suggested by P0588R1.
This also consolidates some duplicated code building capture fields into
a single place.
llvm-svn: 361893
This patch adjusts `PragmaOpenMPHandler` to set the location of
`tok::annot_pragma_openmp` to the `#pragma` location instead of the
`omp` location so that the former becomes the start location of the
OpenMP AST node. This can be useful when, for example, rewriting a
directive using Clang's Rewrite facility. Most of this patch updates
tests for changes to locations in diagnostics and `-ast-dump` output.
Reviewed By: ABataev, lebedev.ri, Meinersbur, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61509
llvm-svn: 361867
This adds tests for dumping expressions in C. It also updates a comment to note an issue to be fixed with printing character literals discovered as part of this testing.
llvm-svn: 361193
This adds the -ast-dump=json cc1 flag (in addition to -ast-dump=default, which is the default if no dump format is specified), as well as some initial AST dumping functionality and tests.
llvm-svn: 360622
Summary:
currently for:
```
template<typename ... T>
void f(T... t) {
auto l = [t...]{};
}
```
`clang -ast-print file.cpp`
outputs:
```
template <typename ...T> void f(T ...t) {
auto l = [t] {
}
;
}
```
notice that there is not `...` in the capture list of the lambda. this patch fixes this issue. and add test for it.
Patch by Tyker
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61556
llvm-svn: 359980
The FIXME of this test case has been addressed in r335084/r338800. Its
execution still does not succeed because of multiple syntax errors.
First, the "clang" namespace is missing on each of the 4 pragmas.
Second, the pragma for defining the vector width is "vectorize_width(4)"
instead of "vectorize(4)". Third, the pragma for defining the interleave
factor is "interleave_count(8)" instead of "interleave(8)".
The file was already using the wrong syntax when added in
r210925 2014-06-13. The file ast-print-pragmas.cpp already checks for
the correct pragma order, making this test redundant even if fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60749
llvm-svn: 358507
Fails on MSVC buildbot (but not locally).
Not important as it is 'testing' something that isn't supported yet anyway:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41022
llvm-svn: 356577
Summary:
https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/OpenMP-API-Specification-5.0.pdf, page 3:
```
structured block
For C/C++, an executable statement, possibly compound, with a single entry at the
top and a single exit at the bottom, or an OpenMP construct.
COMMENT: See Section 2.1 on page 38 for restrictions on structured
blocks.
```
```
2.1 Directive Format
Some executable directives include a structured block. A structured block:
• may contain infinite loops where the point of exit is never reached;
• may halt due to an IEEE exception;
• may contain calls to exit(), _Exit(), quick_exit(), abort() or functions with a
_Noreturn specifier (in C) or a noreturn attribute (in C/C++);
• may be an expression statement, iteration statement, selection statement, or try block, provided
that the corresponding compound statement obtained by enclosing it in { and } would be a
structured block; and
Restrictions
Restrictions to structured blocks are as follows:
• Entry to a structured block must not be the result of a branch.
• The point of exit cannot be a branch out of the structured block.
C / C++
• The point of entry to a structured block must not be a call to setjmp().
• longjmp() and throw() must not violate the entry/exit criteria.
```
Of particular note here is the fact that OpenMP structured blocks are as-if `noexcept`,
in the same sense as with the normal `noexcept` functions in C++.
I.e. if throw happens, and it attempts to travel out of the `noexcept` function
(here: out of the current structured-block), then the program terminates.
Now, one of course can say that since it is explicitly prohibited by the Specification,
then any and all programs that violate this Specification contain undefined behavior,
and are unspecified, and thus no one should care about them. Just don't write broken code /s
But i'm not sure this is a reasonable approach.
I have personally had oss-fuzz issues of this origin - exception thrown inside
of an OpenMP structured-block that is not caught, thus causing program termination.
This issue isn't all that hard to catch, it's not any particularly different from
diagnosing the same situation with the normal `noexcept` function.
Now, clang static analyzer does not presently model exceptions.
But clang-tidy has a simplisic [[ https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-exception-escape.html | bugprone-exception-escape ]] check,
and it is even refactored as a `ExceptionAnalyzer` class for reuse.
So it would be trivial to use that analyzer to check for
exceptions escaping out of OpenMP structured blocks. (D59466)
All that sounds too great to be true. Indeed, there is a caveat.
Presently, it's practically impossible to do. To check a OpenMP structured block
you need to somehow 'get' the OpenMP structured block, and you can't because
it's simply not modelled in AST. `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` is not it's representation.
Now, it is of course possible to write e.g. some AST matcher that would e.g.
match every OpenMP executable directive, and then return the whatever `Stmt` is
the structured block of said executable directive, if any.
But i said //practically//. This isn't practical for the following reasons:
1. This **will** bitrot. That matcher will need to be kept up-to-date,
and refreshed with every new OpenMP spec version.
2. Every single piece of code that would want that knowledge would need to
have such matcher. Well, okay, if it is an AST matcher, it could be shared.
But then you still have `RecursiveASTVisitor` and friends.
`2 > 1`, so now you have code duplication.
So it would be reasonable (and is fully within clang AST spirit) to not
force every single consumer to do that work, but instead store that knowledge
in the correct, and appropriate place - AST, class structure.
Now, there is another hoop we need to get through.
It isn't fully obvious //how// to model this.
The best solution would of course be to simply add a `OMPStructuredBlock` transparent
node. It would be optimal, it would give us two properties:
* Given this `OMPExecutableDirective`, what's it OpenMP structured block?
* It is trivial to check whether the `Stmt*` is a OpenMP structured block (`isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`)
But OpenMP structured block isn't **necessarily** the first, direct child of `OMP*Directive`.
(even ignoring the clang's `CapturedStmt`/`CapturedDecl` that were inserted inbetween).
So i'm not sure whether or not we could re-create AST statements after they were already created?
There would be other costs to a new AST node: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563#c12
```
1. You will need to break the representation of loops. The body should be replaced by the "structured block" entity.
2. You will need to support serialization/deserialization.
3. You will need to support template instantiation.
4. You will need to support codegen and take this new construct to account in each OpenMP directive.
```
Instead, there **is** an functionally-equivalent, alternative solution, consisting of two parts.
Part 1:
* Add a member function `isStandaloneDirective()` to the `OMPExecutableDirective` class,
that will tell whether this directive is stand-alone or not, as per the spec.
We need it because we can't just check for the existance of associated statements,
see code comment.
* Add a member function `getStructuredBlock()` to the OMPExecutableDirective` class itself,
that assert that this is not a stand-alone directive, and either return the correct loop body
if this is a loop-like directive, or the captured statement.
This way, given an `OMPExecutableDirective`, we can get it's structured block.
Also, since the knowledge is ingrained into the clang OpenMP implementation,
it will not cause any duplication, and //hopefully// won't bitrot.
Great we achieved 1 of 2 properties of `OMPStructuredBlock` approach.
Thus, there is a second part needed:
* How can we check whether a given `Stmt*` is `OMPStructuredBlock`?
Well, we can't really, in general. I can see this workaround:
```
class FunctionASTVisitor : public RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor> {
using Base = RecursiveASTVisitor<FunctionASTVisitor>;
public:
bool VisitOMPExecDir(OMPExecDir *D) {
OmpStructuredStmts.emplace_back(D.getStructuredStmt());
}
bool VisitSOMETHINGELSE(???) {
if(InOmpStructuredStmt)
HI!
}
bool TraverseStmt(Stmt *Node) {
if (!Node)
return Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node)
++InOmpStructuredStmt;
Base::TraverseStmt(Node);
if (OmpStructuredStmts.back() == Node) {
OmpStructuredStmts.pop_back();
--InOmpStructuredStmt;
}
return true;
}
std::vector<Stmt*> OmpStructuredStmts;
int InOmpStructuredStmt = 0;
};
```
But i really don't see using it in practice.
It's just too intrusive; and again, requires knowledge duplication.
.. but no. The solution lies right on the ground.
Why don't we simply store this `i'm a openmp structured block` in the bitfield of the `Stmt` itself?
This does not appear to have any impact on the memory footprint of the clang AST,
since it's just a single extra bit in the bitfield. At least the static assertions don't fail.
Thus, indeed, we can achieve both of the properties without a new AST node.
We can cheaply set that bit right in sema, at the end of `Sema::ActOnOpenMPExecutableDirective()`,
by just calling the `getStructuredBlock()` that we just added.
Test coverage that demonstrates all this has been added.
This isn't as great with serialization though. Most of it does not use abbrevs,
so we do end up paying the full price (4 bytes?) instead of a single bit.
That price, of course, can be reclaimed by using abbrevs.
In fact, i suspect that //might// not just reclaim these bytes, but pack these PCH significantly.
I'm not seeing a third solution. If there is one, it would be interesting to hear about it.
("just don't write code that would require `isa<OMPStructuredBlock>(ptr)`" is not a solution.)
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40563 | PR40563 ]].
Reviewers: ABataev, rjmccall, hfinkel, rsmith, riccibruno, gribozavr
Reviewed By: ABataev, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, aaron.ballman, steveire, guansong, jfb, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59214
llvm-svn: 356570
Jan Korous