The problem is that the parameter pack in a function type type alias is not
reexpanded after being transformed. Also remove an incorrect comment in a
similar function. Fixes PR26017.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21030
llvm-svn: 274566
non-dependent types, in CXXScalarValueInitExprs and in the
nested-name-specifier or template arguments of a DeclRefExpr in particular.
llvm-svn: 220028
Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
llvm-svn: 172485
exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
expression kinds. This is (indirectly) a test verifying that the
recursive AST visitor is visiting the children of these expression
nodes.
llvm-svn: 123198
packs, e.g.,
template<typename T, unsigned ...Dims> struct multi_array;
along with semantic analysis support for finding unexpanded non-type
template parameter packs in types, expressions, and so on.
Template instantiation involving non-type template parameter packs
probably doesn't work yet. That'll come soon.
llvm-svn: 122527
whose patterns are template arguments. We can now instantiate, e.g.,
typedef tuple<pair<OuterTypes, InnerTypes>...> type;
where OuterTypes and InnerTypes are template type parameter packs.
There is a horrible inefficiency in
TemplateArgumentLoc::getPackExpansionPattern(), where we need to
create copies of TypeLoc data because our interfaces traffic in
TypeSourceInfo pointers where they should traffic in TypeLocs
instead. I've isolated in efficiency in this one routine; once we
refactor our interfaces to traffic in TypeLocs, we can eliminate it.
llvm-svn: 122278
pack expansions, e.g. given
template<typename... Types> struct tuple;
template<typename... Types>
struct tuple_of_refs {
typedef tuple<Types&...> types;
};
the type of the "types" typedef is a PackExpansionType whose pattern
is Types&.
This commit introduces support for creating pack expansions for
template type arguments, as above, but not for any other kind of pack
expansion, nor for any form of instantiation.
llvm-svn: 122223
declarations. This is a work in progress, as I go through the C++
declaration grammar to identify where unexpanded parameter packs can
occur.
llvm-svn: 121912
parameter packs within a statement, type, etc. Use this visitor to
provide improved diagnostics for the presence of unexpanded parameter
packs in a full expression, base type, declaration type, etc., by
highlighting the unexpanded parameter packs and providing their names,
e.g.,
test/CXX/temp/temp.decls/temp.variadic/p5.cpp:28:85: error: declaration type
contains unexpanded parameter packs 'VeryInnerTypes',
'OuterTypes', ...
...VeryInnerTypes, OuterTypes>, pair<InnerTypes, OuterTypes> > types;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
llvm-svn: 121883
whether the expression contains an unexpanded parameter pack, in the
same vein as the changes to the Type hierarchy. Compute this bit
within all of the Expr subclasses.
This change required a bunch of reshuffling of dependency
calculations, mainly to consolidate them inside the constructors and
to fuse multiple loops that iterate over arguments to determine type
dependence, value dependence, and (now) containment of unexpanded
parameter packs.
Again, testing is painfully sparse, because all of the diagnostics
will change and it is more important to test the to-be-written visitor
that collects unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 121831
and TemplateArgument with an operation that determines whether there
are any unexpanded parameter packs within that construct. Use this
information to diagnose the appearance of the names of parameter packs
that have not been expanded (C++ [temp.variadic]p5). Since this
property is checked often (every declaration, ever expression
statement, etc.), we extend Type and Expr with a bit storing the
result of this computation, rather than walking the AST each time to
determine whether any unexpanded parameter packs occur.
This commit is deficient in several ways, which will be remedied with
future commits:
- Expr has a bit to store the presence of an unexpanded parameter
pack, but it is never set.
- The error messages don't point out where the unexpanded parameter
packs were named in the type/expression, but they should.
- We don't check for unexpanded parameter packs in all of the places
where we should.
- Testing is sparse, pending the resolution of the above three
issues.
llvm-svn: 121724
Erik Pilkington