Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
Summary:
Breakpoint shouldn't need to depend on any specific details from a
programming language. Currently the only language-specific detail it takes
advantage of are the different qualified names an objective-c method name might
have when adding a name lookup. This is reasonably generalizable.
The current method name I introduced is "GetVariantMethodNames", which I'm not
particularly tied to. If you have a better suggestion, please do let me know.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61746
llvm-svn: 360509
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
An Obj-C array type _NSCallStackArray is used in NSException backtraces. This patch adds a synthetic frontend for _NSCallStackArray, which now correctly returns frame PCs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44081
llvm-svn: 346708
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
Summary:
This patch adds syntax highlighting support to LLDB. When enabled (and lldb is allowed
to use colors), printed source code is annotated with the ANSI color escape sequences.
So far we have only one highlighter which is based on Clang and is responsible for all
languages that are supported by Clang. It essentially just runs the raw lexer over the input
and then surrounds the specific tokens with the configured escape sequences.
Reviewers: zturner, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: labath, teemperor, llvm-commits, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49334
llvm-svn: 338662
This patch adds a data formatter for NSDecimalNumber. The latter is a
Foundation object used for representing and performing arithmetic on
base-10 numbers that bridges to Decimal.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48114
llvm-svn: 334638
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
Summary:
Don't access `name[1] if the string is only of length 1. Avoids a
crash/assertion failure when parsing the string `-`.
Test Plan:
Debug a swift binary, set a breakpoint, watch lldb not crash
Original change by Paul Menage <menage@fb.com>
Reviewers: lldb-commits, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33853
llvm-svn: 304725
Summary:
The std::call_once implementation in libstdc++ has problems on few systems: NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux PPC. LLVM ships with a homegrown implementation llvm::call_once to help on these platforms.
This change is required in the NetBSD LLDB port. std::call_once with libstdc++ results with crashing the debugger.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: labath, joerg, emaste, mehdi_amini, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29288
llvm-svn: 294202
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
This is a large API change that removes the two functions from
StreamString that return a std::string& and a const std::string&,
and instead provide one function which returns a StringRef.
Direct access to the underlying buffer violates the concept of
a "stream" which is intended to provide forward only access,
and makes porting to llvm::raw_ostream more difficult in the
future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26698
llvm-svn: 287152
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This latter determination may or may not be possible on a per-language basis; and neither is mandatory to implement for any language
Use this knowledge in the ValueObjectPrinter to generalize the notion of IsObjCNil() and the respective printout
llvm-svn: 252663
Introduce the notion of Language-based formatter prefix/suffix
This is meant for languages that share certain data types but present them in syntatically different ways, such that LLDB can now have language-based awareness of which of the syntax variations it has to present to the user when formatting those values
This is goodness for new languages and interoperability, but is NFC for existing languages. As such, existing tests cover this
llvm-svn: 249587
This is meant to support languages that can do some sort of bridging from<-->to these ObjC types via types that statically vend themselves as Cocoa types, but dynamically have an implementation that does not match any of our well-known types, but where an introspecting formatter can be vended by the bridged language
llvm-svn: 249185
Currently, it only supports Objective-C - C++ types can be looked up through debug info via 'image lookup -t', whereas ObjC types via this command are looked up by runtime introspection
This behavior is in line with type lookup's behavior in Xcode 7, but I am definitely open to feedback as to what makes the most sense here
llvm-svn: 249047
This used to be hardcoded in the FormatManager, but in a pluginized world that is not the right way to go
So, move this step to the Language plugin such that appropriate language plugins for a type get a say about adding candidates to the formatters lookup tables
llvm-svn: 247112
The Language plugin is menat to answer language-specific questions that are not bound to the existence of a process. Those are still the domain of the LanguageRuntime plugin
The Language plugin will, instead, answer questions such as providing language-specific data formatters or expression evaluation
At the moment, the interface is hollowed out, and empty do-nothing plugins have been setup for ObjC, C++ and ObjC++
llvm-svn: 246212
Alex Langford