operator new doesn't return a null pointer, even if one turns off
exceptions (it calls std::terminate instead). Therefore, all of this is
dead code.
llvm-svn: 364744
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
Summary:
First part of a fix for JITed code debugging. This has been a regression from 5.0 to 6.0 and it's is still reproducible on current master: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36209
The address of the breakpoint site is corrupt: the 0x4 value we end up with, looks like an offset on a zero base address. When we parse the ELF section headers from the JIT descriptor, the load address for the text section we find in `header.sh_addr` is correct.
The bug manifests in `VMAddressProvider::GetVMRange(const ELFSectionHeader &)` (follow it from `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()`). Here we think the object type was `eTypeObjectFile` and unleash some extra logic [1] which essentially overwrites the address with a zero value.
The object type is deduced from the ELF header's `e_type` in `ObjectFileELF::CalculateType()`. It never returns `eTypeJIT`, because the ELF header has no representation for it [2]. Instead the in-memory ELF object states `ET_REL`, which leads to `eTypeObjectFile`. This is what we get from `lli` at least since 3.x. (Might it be better to write `ET_EXEC` on the JIT side instead? In fact, relocations were already applied at this point, so "Relocatable" is not quite exact.)
So, this patch proposes to set `eTypeJIT` explicitly whenever we read from a JIT descriptor. In `ObjectFileELF::CreateSections()` we can then call `GetType()`, which returns the explicit value or otherwise falls back to `CalculateType()`.
LLDB then sets the breakpoint successfully. Next step: debug info.
```
Process 1056 stopped
* thread #1, name = 'lli', stop reason = breakpoint 1.2
frame #0: 0x00007ffff7ff7000 JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp()
JIT(0x3ba2030)`jitbp:
-> 0x7ffff7ff7000 <+0>: pushq %rbp
0x7ffff7ff7001 <+1>: movq %rsp, %rbp
0x7ffff7ff7004 <+4>: movabsq $0x7ffff7ff6000, %rdi ; imm = 0x7FFFF7FF6000
0x7ffff7ff700e <+14>: movabsq $0x7ffff6697e80, %rcx ; imm = 0x7FFFF6697E80
```
[1] It was first introduced with https://reviews.llvm.org/D38142#change-lF6csxV8HdlL, which has also been the original breaking change. The code has changed a lot since then.
[2] ELF object types: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/2d2277f5/llvm/include/llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h#L110
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere, bkoropoff, clayborg, espindola, alexshap, stella.stamenova
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: probinson, emaste, aprantl, arichardson, MaskRay, AlexDenisov, yurydelendik, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61611
llvm-svn: 360354
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
Summary:
When we want to compare a ConstString against a string literal (or any other non-ConstString),
we currently have to explicitly turn the other string into a ConstString. This makes sense as
comparing ConstStrings against each other is only a fast pointer comparison.
However, currently we (rather incorrectly) use in several places in LLDB temporary ConstStrings when
we just want to compare a given ConstString against a hardcoded value, for example like this:
```
if (extension != ConstString(".oat") && extension != ConstString(".odex"))
```
Obviously this kind of defeats the point of ConstStrings. In the comparison above we would
construct two temporary ConstStrings every time we hit the given code. Constructing a
ConstString is relatively expensive: we need to go to the StringPool, take a read and possibly
an exclusive write-lock and then look up our temporary string in the string map of the pool.
So we do a lot of heavy work for essentially just comparing a <6 characters in two strings.
I initially wanted to just fix these issues by turning the temporary ConstString in static variables/
members, but that made the code much less readable. Instead I propose to add a new overload
for the ConstString comparison operator that takes a StringRef. This comparison operator directly
compares the ConstString content against the given StringRef without turning the StringRef into
a ConstString.
This means that the example above can look like this now:
```
if (extension != ".oat" && extension != ".odex")
```
It also no longer has to unlock/lock two locks and call multiple functions in other TUs for constructing
the temporary ConstString instances. Instead this should end up just being a direct string comparison
of the two given strings on most compilers.
This patch also directly updates all uses of temporary and short ConstStrings in LLDB to use this new
comparison operator. It also adds a some unit tests for the new and old comparison operator.
Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere, espindola, amccarth
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, amccarth
Subscribers: amccarth, clayborg, JDevlieghere, emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60667
llvm-svn: 359281
D59433 and D60501 changed the way UUIDs are computed from minidump
files. This was done to synchronize the U(G)UID representation with the
native tools of given platforms, but it created a mismatch between
minidumps and breakpad files.
This updates the breakpad algorithm to match the one found in minidumps,
and also adds a couple of tests which should fail if these two ever get
out of sync. Incidentally, this means that the module id in the breakpad
files is almost identical to our notion of UUIDs, so the computation
algorithm can be somewhat simplified.
llvm-svn: 358500
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Summary:
This patch adds support for parsing STACK CFI records from breakpad
files. The expressions specifying the values of registers are not
parsed.The idea is that these will be handed off to the postfix
expression -> dwarf compiler, once it is extracted from the internals of
the NativePDB plugin.
Reviewers: clayborg, amccarth, markmentovai
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60268
llvm-svn: 357975
Previously we would classify all STACK records into a single bucket.
This is not really helpful, because there are three distinct types of
records beginning with the token "STACK" (STACK CFI INIT, STACK CFI,
STACK WIN). To be consistent with how we're treating other records, we
should classify these as three different record types.
It also implements the logic to put "STACK CFI INIT" and "STACK CFI"
records into the same "section" of the breakpad file, as they are meant
to be read together (similar to how FUNC and LINE records are treated).
The code which performs actual parsing of these records will come in a
separate patch.
llvm-svn: 357691
My apologies for the large patch. With the exception of ConstString.h
itself it was entirely produced by sed.
ConstString has exactly one const char * data member, so passing a
ConstString by reference is not any more efficient than copying it by
value. In both cases a single pointer is passed. But passing it by
value makes it harder to accidentally return the address of a local
object.
(This fixes rdar://problem/48640859 for the Apple folks)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59030
llvm-svn: 355553
Summary:
This file implements some general purpose data structures, and so it
belongs to the Utility module.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, JDevlieghere, clayborg, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, javed.absar, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58970
llvm-svn: 355509
Summary:
These functions should always return the opposite of the
`Triple{Environment,OS,Vendor}WasSpecified` functions. Unspecified unknown is
the same as unspecified, which is why one set of functions should give us what
we want. It's possible to have specified unknown, which is why we can't just
rely on checking the enum values of vendor/os/environment. We must also ensure
that the names of these are empty and not "unknown".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58653
llvm-svn: 354933
Split the recognition into NetBSD executables & shared libraries
and core(5) files.
Introduce new owner type: "NetBSD-CORE", as core(5) files are not tagged
in the same way as regular NetBSD executables.
Stop using incorrectly ABI_TAG and ABI_SIZE. Introduce IDENT_TAG,
IDENT_DECSZ, IDENT_NAMESZ and PROCINFO.
The new values detect correctly the NetBSD images.
The patch has been originally written by Kamil Rytarowski. I've added
tests and applied minor code changes per review. The work has been
sponsored by the NetBSD Foundation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42870
llvm-svn: 354466
COFF files are modelled in lldb as having one big container section
spanning the entire module image, with the actual sections being
subsections of that. In this model, the base address is simply the
address of the first byte of that section.
This also removes the hack where ObjectFilePECOFF was using the
m_file_offset field to communicate this information. Using file offset
for this purpose is completely wrong, as that is supposed to indicate
where is this ObjectFile located in the file on disk. This field is only
meaningful for fat binaries, and should normally be 0.
Both PDB plugins have been updated to use GetBaseAddress instead of
GetFileOffset.
llvm-svn: 354258
Summary:
This is a preparatory step to enable adding extra unwind strategies by
symbol file plugins. This has been discussed on the lldb-dev mailing
list: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-February/014703.html>.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, espindola
Subscribers: lemo, emaste, lldb-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58129
llvm-svn: 354033
Summary:
This is coming from the discussion in D55356 (the most interesting part
happened on the mailing list, so it isn't reflected on the review page).
In short the issue is that lldb assumes that all bytes of a module image
in memory will be backed by a "section". This isn't the case for PECOFF
files because the initial bytes of the module image will contain the
file header, which does not correspond to any normal section in the
file. In particular, this means it is not possible to implement
GetBaseAddress function for PECOFF files, because that's supposed point
to the first byte of that header.
If my (limited) understanding of how PECOFF files work is correct, then
the OS is expecded to load the entire module into one continuous chunk
of memory. The address of that chunk (+/- ASLR) is given by the "image
base" field in the COFF header, and it's size by "image size". All of
the COFF sections are then loaded into this range.
If that's true, then we can model this behavior in lldb by creating a
"container" section to represent the entire module image, and then place
other sections inside that. This would make be consistent with how MachO
and ELF files are modelled (except that those can have multiple
top-level containers as they can be loaded into multiple discontinuous
chunks of memory).
This change required a small number of fixups in the PDB plugins, which
assumed a certain order of sections within the object file (which
obivously changes now). I fix this by changing the lookup code to use
section IDs (which are unchanged) instead of indexes. This has the nice
benefit of removing spurious -1s in the plugins as the section IDs in
the pdbs match the 1-based section IDs in the COFF plugin.
Besides making the implementation of GetBaseAddress possible, this also
improves the lookup of addresses in the gaps between the object file
sections, which will now be correctly resolved as belonging to the
object file.
Reviewers: zturner, amccarth, stella.stamenova, clayborg, lemo
Reviewed By: clayborg, lemo
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56537
llvm-svn: 353916
The `ap` suffix is a remnant of lldb's former use of auto pointers,
before they got deprecated. Although all their uses were replaced by
unique pointers, some variables still carried the suffix.
In r353795 I removed another auto_ptr remnant, namely redundant calls to
::get for unique_pointers. Jim justly noted that this is a good
opportunity to clean up the variable names as well.
I went over all the changes to ensure my find-and-replace didn't have
any undesired side-effects. I hope I didn't miss any, but if you end up
at this commit doing a git blame on a weirdly named variable, please
know that the change was unintentional.
llvm-svn: 353912
Apparently there are multiple places where MSVC complains about
instantiations with extended aligment. I think it's better to define
`_ENABLE_EXTENDED_ALIGNED_STORAGE` as suggested by the error message.
I don't have access to a Windows machine so this is all speculative.
llvm-svn: 353778
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
instead of returning the UUID through by-ref argument and a boolean
value indicating success, we can just return it directly. Since the UUID
class already has an invalid state, it can be used to denote the failure
without the additional bool.
llvm-svn: 353714
LLDB testsuite fails when built by GCC8 on:
LLDB :: SymbolFile/DWARF/find-basic-namespace.cpp
This is because this code in LLDB codebase has undefined behavior:
#include <algorithm>
#include <string.h>
// lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp:1731
static struct section_64 {
char sectname[16];
char segname[16];
} sect64 = { {'_','_','a','p','p','l','e','_','n','a','m','e','s','p','a','c'}, "__DWARF" };
int main() {
return std::min<size_t>(strlen(sect64.sectname), sizeof(sect64.sectname));
}
It has been discussed as a (false) bugreport to GCC:
wrong-code: LLDB testcase fails: SymbolFile/DWARF/find-basic-namespace.cpp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672436
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57781
llvm-svn: 353280
The two records aren't used by anything yet, but this part can be
separated out easily, so I am comitting it separately to simplify
reviews of the followup patch.
llvm-svn: 352507
Summary:
This addresses the issues raised in D56844. It removes the accessors from the
breakpad record structures by making the fields public. Also, I refactor the
UUID parsing code to remove hard-coded constants.
Reviewers: lemo
Subscribers: clayborg, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57037
llvm-svn: 352021
This patch extends SymbolFileBreakpad::AddSymbols to include the symbols
from the FUNC records too. These symbols come from the debug info and
have a size associated with them, so they are given preference in case
there is a PUBLIC record for the same address.
To achieve this, I first pre-process the symbols into a temporary
DenseMap, and then insert the uniqued symbols into the module's symtab.
Reviewers: clayborg, lemo, zturner
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56590
llvm-svn: 351781
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This centralizes parsing of breakpad records, which was previously
spread out over ObjectFileBreakpad and SymbolFileBreakpad.
For each record type X there is a separate breakpad::XRecord class, and
an associated parse function. The classes just store the information in
the breakpad records in a more accessible form. It is up to the users to
determine what to do with that data.
This separation also made it possible to write some targeted tests for
the parsing code, which was previously unaccessible, so I write a couple
of those too.
Reviewers: clayborg, lemo, zturner
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, fedor.sergeev, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56844
llvm-svn: 351541
The code was assuming that the elf file will have a PT_LOAD segment
starting from the first byte of the file. While this is true for files
generated by most linkers (it's a way of saving space), it is not a
requirement. And files not satisfying this constraint can still be
perfectly executable. yaml2obj is one of the tools which produces files
like this.
This patch relaxes the check in ObjectFileELF to take the address of the
first PT_LOAD segment as the base address of the object (instead of the
one with the offset 0). Since the PT_LOAD segments are supposed to be
sorted according to the VM address, this entry will also be the one with
the lowest VM address.
If we ever run into files which don't have the PT_LOAD segments sorted,
we can easily change this code to return the lowest VM address as the
base address (if that is the correct thing to do for these files).
llvm-svn: 350923
If a section name is exactly 8 bytes long (or has been truncated to 8
bytes), it will not contain the terminating nul character. This means
reading the name as a c string will pick up random data following the
name field (which happens to be the section vm size).
This fixes the name computation to avoid out-of-bounds access and adds a
test.
Reviewers: zturner, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56124
llvm-svn: 350809
Summary:
The concept of a base address was already present in the implementation
(it's needed for computing section load addresses properly), but it was
never exposed through this function. This fixes that.
llvm-svn: 350804
Summary:
This is the result of the discussion in D55356, where it was suggested
as a solution to representing the addresses that logically belong to a
module in memory, but are not a part of any of its sections.
The ELF PT_LOAD segments are similar to the MachO "load commands",
except that the relationship between them and the object file sections
is a bit weaker. While in the MachO case, the sections belonging to a
specific segment are placed directly inside it in the object file
logical structur, in the ELF case, the sections and segments form two
separate hierarchies. This means that it is in theory possible to create
an elf file where only a part of a section would belong to some segment
(and another part to a different one). However, I am not aware of any
tool which would produce such a file (and most tools will have problems
ingesting them), so this means it is still possible to follow the MachO
model and make sections children of the PT_LOAD segments.
In case we run into (corrupt?) files with overlapping sections, I have
added code (and tests) which adjusts the sizes and/or drops the offending
sections in order to present a reasonable image to the upper layers of
LLDB. This is mostly done for completeness, as I don't anticipate
running into this situation in the real world. However, if we do run
into it, and the current behavior is not suitable for some reason, we
can implement this logic differently.
Reviewers: clayborg, jankratochvil, krytarowski, joerg, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55998
llvm-svn: 350742
Summary:
This patch allows ObjectFileBreakpad to parse the contents of Breakpad
files into sections. This sounds slightly odd at first, but in essence
its not too different from how other object files handle things. For
example in elf files, the symtab section consists of a number of
"records", where each record represents a single symbol. The same is
true for breakpad's PUBLIC section, except in this case, the records will be
textual instead of binary.
To keep sections contiguous, I create a new section every time record
type changes. Normally, the breakpad processor will group all records of
the same type in one block, but the format allows them to be intermixed,
so in general, the "object file" may contain multiple sections with the
same record type.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner, lemo, markmentovai, amccarth
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55434
llvm-svn: 350511
Summary:
instead of returning the architecture through by-ref argument and a
boolean value indicating success, we can just return the ArchSpec
directly. Since the ArchSpec already has an invalid state, it can be
used to denote the failure without the additional bool.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56129
llvm-svn: 350291
Prior to this there were 3 places that were duplicating the logic to detect if a section can/should be loaded and some were doing things a bit differently. Now it is all centralized in one place and it is done correctly.
llvm-svn: 349926
Summary:
The first section header does not define a real section. Instead it is
used for various elf extensions. This patch skips creation of a section
for index 0.
This has one furtunate side-effect, in that it allows us to use the section
header index as the Section ID (where 0 is also invalid). This way, we
can get rid of a lot of spurious +1s in the ObjectFileELF code.
Reviewers: clayborg, krytarowski, joerg, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55757
llvm-svn: 349498
Pavel Labath