Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerCall to accept several
virtual registers for each argument, instead of just one. This is a
follow-up to D46018.
CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660 and
lowerFormalArguments in D63549.
With this change, we no longer pack the virtual registers generated for
aggregates into one big lump before delegating to the target. Therefore,
the target can decide itself whether it wants to handle them as separate
pieces or use one big register.
ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers
directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many
merge/extract instructions.
NFCI for AMDGPU, Mips and X86.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63551
llvm-svn: 364512
Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerCall to accept several
virtual registers for the call result, instead of just one. This is a
follow-up to D46018.
CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660 and
lowerFormalArguments in D63549.
With this change, we no longer pack the virtual registers generated for
aggregates into one big lump before delegating to the target. Therefore,
the target can decide itself whether it wants to handle them as separate
pieces or use one big register.
ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers
directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many
merge/extract instructions.
NFCI for AMDGPU, Mips and X86.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63550
llvm-svn: 364511
Change the interface of CallLowering::lowerFormalArguments to accept
several virtual registers for each formal argument, instead of just one.
This is a follow-up to D46018.
CallLowering::lowerReturn was similarly refactored in D49660. lowerCall
will be refactored in the same way in follow-up patches.
With this change, we forward the virtual registers generated for
aggregates to CallLowering. Therefore, the target can decide itself
whether it wants to handle them as separate pieces or use one big
register. We also copy the pack/unpackRegs helpers to CallLowering to
facilitate this.
ARM and AArch64 have been updated to use the passed in virtual registers
directly, which means we no longer need to generate so many
merge/extract instructions.
AArch64 seems to have had a bug when lowering e.g. [1 x i8*], which was
put into a s64 instead of a p0. Added a test-case which illustrates the
problem more clearly (it crashes without this patch) and fixed the
existing test-case to expect p0.
AMDGPU has been updated to unpack into the virtual registers for
kernels. I think the other code paths fall back for aggregates, so this
should be NFC.
Mips doesn't support aggregates yet, so it's also NFC.
x86 seems to have code for dealing with aggregates, but I couldn't find
the tests for it, so I just added a fallback to DAGISel if we get more
than one virtual register for an argument.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63549
llvm-svn: 364510
Allow CallLowering::ArgInfo to contain more than one virtual register.
This is useful when passes split aggregates into several virtual
registers, but need to also provide information about the original type
to the call lowering. Used in follow-up patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63548
llvm-svn: 364509
Avoids using a plain unsigned for registers throughoug codegen.
Doesn't attempt to change every register use, just something a little
more than the set needed to build after changing the return type of
MachineOperand::getReg().
llvm-svn: 364191
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
The original commit did not remap byval types when linking modules, which broke
LTO. This version fixes that.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362128
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362012
swifterror marks an argument as a register pretending to be a pointer, so we
need a guaranteed mem2reg-like analysis of its uses. Fortunately most of the
infrastructure can be reused from the DAG world.
llvm-svn: 361608
This crash was introduced in r358032 as we try to construct an EVT from an MVT
in order to find the register type for the calling conv. Fall back instead of
trying to do this with an invalid MVT coming from i256.
llvm-svn: 358314
required to be passed as different register types. E.g. <2 x i16> may need to
be passed as a larger <2 x i32> type, so formal arg lowering needs to be able
truncate it back. Likewise, when dealing with returns of these types, they need
to be widened in the appropriate way back.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60425
llvm-svn: 358032
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51147
Asserting if any extend of vectors should be up to the target's
legalizer/target specific code not in CallLowering.
reviewed by : dsanders.
llvm-svn: 343325
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
We end up creating COPY's that are either truncating/extending and this
should be illegal.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37640
Patch for X86 and ARM by igorb, rovka
llvm-svn: 315240
Summary:
Do three things to help with that:
- Add AttributeList::FirstArgIndex, which is an enumerator currently set
to 1. It allows us to change the indexing scheme with fewer changes.
- Add addParamAttr/removeParamAttr. This just shortens addAttribute call
sites that would otherwise need to spell out FirstArgIndex.
- Remove some attribute-specific getters and setters from Function that
take attribute list indices. Most of these were only used from
BuildLibCalls, and doesNotAlias was only used to test or set if the
return value is malloc-like.
I'm happy to split the patch, but I think they are probably easier to
review when taken together.
This patch should be NFC, but it sets the stage to change the indexing
scheme to this, which is more convenient when indexing into an array:
0: func attrs
1: retattrs
2...: arg attrs
Reviewers: chandlerc, pete, javed.absar
Subscribers: david2050, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32811
llvm-svn: 302060
This broke the Clang build. (Clang-side patch missing?)
Original commit message:
> [IR] Make add/remove Attributes use AttrBuilder instead of
> AttributeList
>
> This change cleans up call sites and avoids creating temporary
> AttributeList objects.
>
> NFC
llvm-svn: 301712
The method is called "get *Param* Alignment", and is only used for
return values exactly once, so it should take argument indices, not
attribute indices.
Avoids confusing code like:
IsSwiftError = CS->paramHasAttr(ArgIdx, Attribute::SwiftError);
Alignment = CS->getParamAlignment(ArgIdx + 1);
Add getRetAlignment to handle the one case in Value.cpp that wants the
return value alignment.
This is a potentially breaking change for out-of-tree backends that do
their own call lowering.
llvm-svn: 301682
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
This commit adds a parameter that lets us pass in the calling convention
of the call to CallLowering::lowerCall. This allows us to handle
situations where the calling convetion of the callee is different from
that of the caller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31039
llvm-svn: 298254
For the hard float calling convention, we just use the D registers.
For the soft-fp calling convention, we use the R registers and move values
to/from the D registers by means of G_SEQUENCE/G_EXTRACT. While doing so, we
make sure to honor the endianness of the target, since the CCAssignFn doesn't do
that for us.
For pure soft float targets, we still bail out because we don't support the
libcalls yet.
llvm-svn: 295295
Well, sort of. But the lower-level code that invoke used to be using completely
botched the handling of varargs functions, which hopefully won't be possible if
they're using the same code.
llvm-svn: 293670
Some platforms (notably iOS) use a different calling convention for unnamed vs
named parameters in varargs functions, so we need to keep track of this
information when translating calls.
Since not many platforms are involved, the guts of the special handling is in
the ValueHandler class (with a generic implementation that should work for most
targets).
llvm-svn: 292283
We were rounding size in bits down rather than up, leading to 0-sized slots for
i1 (assert!) and bugs for other types not byte-aligned.
llvm-svn: 288848
This function seems target-independent so far: all the target-specific behaviour
is isolated in the CCAssignFn and the ValueHandler (which we're also extracting
into the generic CallLowering).
The intention is to use this in the ARM backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27045
llvm-svn: 288658
We still don't really have an equivalent of "AssertXExt" in DAG, so we don't
exploit the guarantees on the receiving side yet, but this should produce
conservatively correct code on iOS ABIs.
llvm-svn: 282069
This should match the existing behaviour for passing complicated struct and
array types, in particular HFAs come through like that from Clang.
For C & C++ we still need to somehow support all the weird ABI flags, or at
least those that are present in the IR (signext, byval, ...), and stack-based
parameter passing.
llvm-svn: 281977
More preparation for dropping source types from MachineInstrs: regsters coming
out of already-selected code (i.e. non-generic instructions) don't have a type,
but that information is needed so we must add it manually.
This is done via a new G_TYPE instruction.
llvm-svn: 280292
There should be no functional change here, I'm just making the implementation
of "frem" (to libcall) legalization easier for a followup.
llvm-svn: 279987
Diana Picus