Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Markus Lavin 4dc4ebd606 [PM] Port LoadStoreVectorizer to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54848

llvm-svn: 348570
2018-12-07 08:23:37 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea 3f8f7840bf [LoadStoreVectorizer] Change VectorSet to Vector to match head and tail positions. Resolves PR29148.
Summary:
LSV was using two vector sets (heads and tails) to track pairs of adjiacent position to vectorize.
A recent optimization is trying to obtain the longest chain to vectorize and assumes the positions
in heads(H) and tails(T) match, which is not the case is there are multiple tails for the same head.

e.g.:
i1: store a[0]
i2: store a[1]
i3: store a[1]
Leads to:
H: i1
T: i2 i3
Instead of:
H: i1 i1
T: i2 i3
So the positions for instructions that follow i3 will have different indexes in H/T.
This patch resolves PR29148.

This issue also surfaced the fact that if the chain is too long, and TLI
returns a "not-fast" answer, the whole chain will be abandoned for
vectorization, even though a smaller one would be beneficial.
Added a testcase and FIXME for this.

Reviewers: tstellarAMD, arsenm, jlebar

Subscribers: mzolotukhin, wdng, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24057

llvm-svn: 280179
2016-08-30 23:53:59 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea 6f937b1144 LoadStoreVectorizer: Remove TargetBaseAlign. Keep alignment for stack adjustments.
Summary:
TargetBaseAlign is no longer required since LSV checks if target allows misaligned accesses.
A constant defining a base alignment is still needed for stack accesses where alignment can be adjusted.

Previous patch (D22936) was reverted because tests were failing. This patch also fixes the cause of those failures:
- x86 failing tests either did not have the right target, or the right alignment.
- NVPTX failing tests did not have the right alignment.
- AMDGPU failing test (merge-stores) should allow vectorization with the given alignment but the target info
  considers <3xi32> a non-standard type and gives up early. This patch removes the condition and only checks
  for a maximum size allowed and relies on the next condition checking for %4 for correctness.
  This should be revisited to include 3xi32 as a MVT type (on arsenm's non-immediate todo list).

Note that checking the sizeInBits for a MVT is undefined (leads to an assertion failure),
so we need to create an EVT, hence the interface change in allowsMisaligned to include the Context.

Reviewers: arsenm, jlebar, tstellarAMD

Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23068

llvm-svn: 277735
2016-08-04 16:38:44 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea 640a61cd8b Extended LoadStoreVectorizer to vectorize subchains.
Summary:
LSV used to abort vectorizing a chain for interleaved load/store accesses that alias.
Allow a valid prefix of the chain to be vectorized, mark just the prefix and retry vectorizing the remaining chain.

Reviewers: llvm-commits, jlebar, arsenm

Subscribers: mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22119

llvm-svn: 275317
2016-07-13 21:20:01 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea cbc6ac2afd Correct ordering of loads/stores.
Summary:
Aiming to correct the ordering of loads/stores. This patch changes the
insert point for loads to the position of the first load.
It updates the ordering method for loads to insert before, rather than after.

Before this patch the following sequence:
"load a[1], store a[1], store a[0], load a[2]"
Would incorrectly vectorize to "store a[0,1], load a[1,2]".
The correctness check was assuming the insertion point for loads is at
the position of the first load, when in practice it was at the last
load. An alternative fix would have been to invert the correctness check.
The current fix changes insert position but also requires reordering of
instructions before the vectorized load.

Updated testcases to reflect the changes.

Reviewers: tstellarAMD, llvm-commits, jlebar, arsenm

Subscribers: mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22071

llvm-svn: 275117
2016-07-11 22:34:29 +00:00