We use both -long-option and --long-option in tests. Switch to --long-option for consistency.
In the "llvm-readelf" mode, -long-option is discouraged as it conflicts with grouped short options and it is not accepted by GNU readelf.
While updating the tests, change llvm-readobj -s to llvm-readobj -S to reduce confusion ("s" is --section-headers in llvm-readobj but --symbols in llvm-readelf).
llvm-svn: 359649
Currently, YAML has the following syntax for describing the symbols:
Symbols:
Local:
LocalSymbol1:
...
LocalSymbol2:
...
...
Global:
GlobalSymbol1:
...
Weak:
...
GNUUnique:
I.e. symbols are grouped by their bindings. That is not very convenient,
because:
It does not allow to set a custom binding, what can be useful for producing
broken/special outputs for test cases. Adding a new binding would require to
change a syntax (what we observed when added GNUUnique recently).
It does not allow to change the order of the symbols in .symtab/.dynsym,
i.e. currently all Local symbols are placed first, then Global, Weak and GNUUnique
are following, but we are not able to change the order.
It is not consistent. Binding is just one of the properties of the symbol,
we do not group them by other properties.
It makes the code more complex that it can be. This patch shows it can be simplified
with the change performed.
The patch changes the syntax to just:
Symbols:
Symbol1:
...
Symbol2:
...
...
With that, we are able to work with the binding field just like with any other symbol property.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60122
llvm-svn: 357595
If a relocation group doesn't have the RELOCATION_GROUP_HAS_ADDEND_FLAG set, then this implies the group's addend equals zero.
In this case android packed format won't encode an explicit addend delta, instead we need to set Addend, the "previous addend" variable, to zero by ourself.
Patch by Yi-Yo Chiang!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50601
llvm-svn: 339799
With '-elf-output-style=GNU -relocations', a header containing the number
of entries is printed before all the relocation entries in the section.
For Android packed format, we need to perform the unpacking first before
we can get the actual number of relocations in the section.
Patch by Rahul Chaudhry!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47800
llvm-svn: 334147
This is in preparation for testing lld's upcoming relocation packing
feature (D39152). I have verified that this implementation correctly
unpacks the relocations from a Chromium DSO built with gold and the
Android relocation packer for ARM32 and ARM64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39272
llvm-svn: 316543