to recover from parse error parsing the default
argument. Patch prevents crash after spewing 100s
of errors caused by someone who forgot to compile in c++11
mode. So no test. rdar://18508589
llvm-svn: 218780
As PR20495 demonstrates, Clang currenlty infers the CUDA target (host/device,
etc) for implicit members (constructors, etc.) incorrectly. This causes errors
and even assertions in Clang when compiling code (assertions in C++11 mode where
implicit move constructors are added into the mix).
Fix the problem by inferring the target from the methods the implicit member
should call (depending on its base classes and fields).
llvm-svn: 218624
r218053: Use exceptions() instead of getNumExceptions()/getExceptionType() to avoid
r218011: Work around MSVC parser bug by putting redundant braces around the body of
r217997: Skip parens when detecting whether we're instantiating a function declaration.
r217995: Instantiate exception specifications when instantiating function types (other
The Windows build was broken for 16 hours and no one had any good ideas of how to
fix it. Reverting for now to make the builders green. See the cfe-commits thread [1] for
more info.
This was the build error (from [2]):
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1590) : error C2668: '`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R\llvm-project\clang\lib\Sema\SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp(1313): could be 'clang::QualType `anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
c:\bb-win7\ninja-clang-i686-msc17-r\llvm-project\clang\lib\sema\TreeTransform.h(4532): or 'clang::QualType clang::TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformFunctionProtoType<clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>>(clang::TypeLocBuilder &,clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc,clang::CXXRecordDecl *,unsigned int,Fn)'
with
[
Derived=`anonymous-namespace'::TemplateInstantiator,
Fn=clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>
]
while trying to match the argument list '(clang::TypeLocBuilder, clang::FunctionProtoTypeLoc, clang::CXXRecordDecl *, unsigned int, clang::Sema::SubstFunctionDeclType::<lambda_756edcbe7bd5c7584849a6e3a1491735>)'
1. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140915/115011.html
2. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R/builds/10515/steps/build_clang_tools_1/logs/stdio
llvm-svn: 218058
than the type of a function declaration). We previously didn't instantiate
these at all! This also covers the pathological case where the only mention of
a parameter pack is within the exception specification; this gives us a second
way (other than alias templates) to reach the horrible state where a type
contains an unexpanded pack, but its canonical type does not.
llvm-svn: 217995
In line with SemaOpenMP.cpp, etc. CUDA-specific semantic analysis code goes into
a separate file. This is in anticipation of adding extra functionality here in
the near future.
No change in functionality.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5160
llvm-svn: 217043
don't mark the field as initialized until the next initializer instead of
instantly. Since this checker is AST based, statements are processed in tree
order instead of following code flow. This can result in different warnings
from just reordering the code. Also changed to use one checker per constructor
instead of creating a new checker per field.
class T {
int x, y;
// Already warns
T(bool b) : x(!b ? (1 + y) : (y = 5)) {}
// New warning added here, previously (1 + y) comes after (y = 5) in the AST
// preventing the warning.
T(bool b) : x(b ? (y = 5) : (1 + y)) {}
};
llvm-svn: 216641
Fix r216438 to catch more complicated self-initialized in std::move. For
instance, "Foo f = std::move(cond ? OtherFoo : (UNUSED_VALUE, f));"
Make sure that BinaryConditionalOperator, ConditionalOperator, BinaryOperator
with comma operator, and OpaqueValueExpr perform the correct usage forwarding
across the three uninitialized value checkers.
llvm-svn: 216627
pattern of an alias template declaration. Use this to merge alias templates
properly when they're members of class template specializations.
llvm-svn: 216437
We would previously assert (a decl cannot have two DLL attributes) on this code:
template <typename T> struct __declspec(dllimport) S { T f() { return T(); } };
template struct __declspec(dllexport) S<int>;
The problem was that when instantiating, we would take the attribute from the
template even if the instantiation itself already had an attribute.
Also, don't inherit DLL attributes from the template to its members before
instantiation, as the attribute may change.
I couldn't figure out what MinGW does here, so I'm leaving that open. At least
we're not asserting anymore.
llvm-svn: 216340
Normally we mark all members of exported classes referenced to get them emitted.
However, MSVC doesn't do this for class templates that are implicitly specialized or
just have an explicit instantiation declaration. For such specializations, the members
are emitted when referenced.
The exception is the case when the dllexport attribute is propagated from a base class
to a base class template that doesn't have an explicit attribute: in this case all
methods of the base class template do get instantiated.
llvm-svn: 216145
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
FunctionProtoType::ExtProtoInfo. Most of the users of these fields don't care
about the other ExtProtoInfo bits and just want to talk about the exception
specification.
llvm-svn: 214450
If function parameters have default values, and that of the second
parameter is parsed with errors, function declaration would have
a parameter without default value that follows a parameter with
that. Such declaration breaks logic of selecting overloaded
function. As a solution, put opaque object as default value in such case.
This patch fixes PR20055.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4378
llvm-svn: 213594
ExtWarn/Warnings. Mostly the name of the warning was changed to match the
semantics, but in the PR20356 cases, the warning was about valid code, so the
diagnostic was changed from ExtWarn to Warning instead.
llvm-svn: 213443
I don't think other implicit members like copy assignment and move
assignment require this treatment, because they should already be
operating on a constructed object.
Fixes PR20351.
llvm-svn: 213346
-- a constructor list initialization that unpacked an initializer list into
constructor arguments and
-- a list initialization that created as std::initializer_list and passed it
as the first argument to a constructor
in the AST. Use this flag while instantiating templates to provide the right
semantics for the resulting initialization.
llvm-svn: 213224
This source range is useful for all kinds of diagnostic QOI and refactoring
work, so let's make it more discoverable.
This commit also makes use of the new function to enhance various diagnostics
relating to return types and resolves an old FIXME.
llvm-svn: 212154
Consider the following code:
template <typename T> class Base {};
class __declspec(dllexport) class Derived : public Base<int> {}
When the base of an exported or imported class is a class template
specialization, MSVC will propagate the dll attribute to the base.
In the example code, Base<int> becomes a dllexported class.
This commit makes Clang do the proopagation when the base hasn't been
instantiated yet, and warns about it being unsupported otherwise.
This is different from MSVC, which allows changing a specialization
back and forth between dllimport and dllexport and seems to let the
last one win. Changing the dll attribute after instantiation would be
hard for us, and doesn't seem to come up in practice, so I think this
is a reasonable limitation to have.
MinGW doesn't do this kind of propagation.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4264
llvm-svn: 211725
When adding the implicit compound statement (required for Codegen?), the
end location was previously overridden by the start location, probably
based on the assumptions:
* The location of the compound statement should be the member's location
* The compound statement if present is the last element of a FunctionDecl
This patch changes the location of the compound statement to the
member's end location.
Code review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4175
llvm-svn: 211344
The compilation pipeline doesn't actually need to know about the high-level
concept of diagnostic mappings, and hiding the final computed level presents
several simplifications and other potential benefits.
The only exceptions are opportunistic checks to see whether expensive code
paths can be avoided for diagnostics that are guaranteed to be ignored at a
certain SourceLocation.
This commit formalizes that invariant by introducing and using
DiagnosticsEngine::isIgnored() in place of individual level checks throughout
lex, parse and sema.
llvm-svn: 211005
CRTP-like patterns involve a class which inherits from another class
using itself as a template parameter.
However, the base class itself may try to create a pointer-to-member
which involves the derived class. This is problematic because we
may not have finished parsing the most derived classes' base specifiers
yet.
It turns out that MSVC simply uses the unspecified inheritance model
instead of doing anything fancy.
This fixes PR19987.
llvm-svn: 210886
Previously we would do the access check from the context of
MarkVTableUsed.
Also update this test to C++11, since that is typically used with the MS
C++ ABI.
Fixes PR20005.
llvm-svn: 210850
Current MSVC versions don't have move assignment operators, so we
can't rely on them being available in the dll. If we have the
definition, we can just use that directly. This breaks pointer
equality, but should work fine otherwise.
When there is an MSVC version that supports move assignment,
we can key this off the -fmsc-ver option.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4105
llvm-svn: 210715
We would previously end up with an error when instantiating the
following template:
template <typename> struct __declspec(dllimport) S {
void foo() = delete;
};
S<int> s;
error: attribute 'dllimport' cannot be applied to a deleted function
llvm-svn: 210550
will never be true in a well-defined context. The checking for null pointers
has been moved into the caller logic so it does not rely on undefined behavior.
llvm-svn: 210498
This implements the central part of support for dllimport/dllexport on
classes: allowing the attribute on class declarations, inheriting it
to class members, and forcing emission of exported members. It's based
on Nico Rieck's patch from http://reviews.llvm.org/D1099.
This patch doesn't propagate dllexport to bases that are template
specializations, which is an interesting problem. It also doesn't
look at the rules when redeclaring classes with different attributes,
I'd like to do that separately.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3877
llvm-svn: 209908
These note diags have the same message and can be unified further but for now
let's just bring them together.
Incidental change: Display a source range in the final attr diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 209728
The base class is the culprit/risk here - a sealed/final derived class
with virtual functions and a non-virtual dtor can't accidentally be
polymorphically destroyed (if the base class's dtor is protected - which
also suppresses this warning).
llvm-svn: 208449
class template member classes (PR19613)
Also improve this code in general by implementing suggestions
from Richard.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3555?id=9020
llvm-svn: 207822
declaration is not visible. Previously we didn't find hidden friend names in
this redeclaration lookup, because we forgot to treat it as a redeclaration
lookup. Conversely, we did find some local extern names, but those don't
actually conflict with a namespace-scope using declaration, because the only
conflicts we can get are scope conflicts, not conflicts due to the entities
being members of the same namespace.
llvm-svn: 206011
Summary:
Declaring a function as inline after it has been defined is in violation
of [dcl.fct.spec]p4. The program would get a strong definition instead
of getting a function with linkonce_odr linkage.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3220
llvm-svn: 205129
that implicitly converts to 'bool' (such as pointers, and the first operand of
?:). Clean up issues found by this. Patch by Stephan Tolksdorf!
llvm-svn: 203735
This is a reapplication of r203236 with modifications to the definition of attrs() and following the new style guidelines on auto usage.
llvm-svn: 203362
or virtual functions, but permit that error to be downgraded to
a warning (with -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct), and officially
support this kind of dual, ABI-mixing layout.
The basic problem here is that projects which use ms_struct are often
not very circumspect about what types they annotate; for example,
some projects enable the pragma in a prefix header and then only
selectively disable it around system header inclusions. They may
only care about binary compatibility with MSVC for a subset of
those structs, but that doesn't mean they have no binary
compatibility concerns at all for the rest; thus we are essentially
forced into supporting this hybrid ABI. But it's reasonable for
us to at least point out the places where we're not making
any guarantees.
The original diagnostic was for dynamic classes, i.e. those with
virtual functions or virtual bases; I've extended it to include
all classes with bases, because we are not actually making any
attempt to duplicate MSVC's base subobject layout in ms_struct
(and it is indeed quite different from Itanium, even for
non-virtual bases).
rdar://16178895
llvm-svn: 202427
We were previously checking at every destructor declaration, but that was a bit
excessive. Since the deleting destructor is emitted with the vtable, do the
check when the vtable is marked used.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2851
llvm-svn: 202046
Fariborz Jahanian