AArch32/Armv8A introduced the performance deprecation of certain patterns
of IT instructions. After some debate internal to ARM, this is now being
reverted; i.e. no IT instruction patterns are performance deprecated
anymore, as the perfomance degredation is not significant enough.
This reverts the following:
"ARMv8-A deprecates some uses of the T32 IT instruction. All uses of
IT that apply to instructions other than a single subsequent 16-bit
instruction from a restricted set are deprecated, as are explicit
references to the PC within that single 16-bit instruction. This permits
the non-deprecated forms of IT and subsequent instructions to be treated
as a single 32-bit conditional instruction."
The deprecation no longer applies, but the behaviour may be controlled
by the -arm-restrict-it and -arm-no-restrict-it command-line options,
with the latter being the default. No warnings about complex IT blocks
will be generated.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118044
This just pulls the MVEVPTBlockPass into a separate file, as opposed to being
wrapped up in Thumb2ITBlockPass.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66579
llvm-svn: 370187
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
We need to ensure that the number of T's is correct when adding multiple
instructions into the same VPT block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65049
llvm-svn: 366684
A minor iteration on the MVE VPT Block pass to enable more efficient VPT Block
code generation: consecutive VPT predicated statements, predicated on the same
condition, will be placed within the same VPT Block. This essentially is also
an exercise to write some more tests for the next step, which should be more
generic also merging instructions when they are not consecutive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63711
llvm-svn: 364298
Summary:
Their names began with a mishmash of `MVE_`, `t2` and no prefix at
all. Now they all start with `MVE_`, which seems like a reasonable
choice on the grounds that (a) NEON is the thing they're most at risk
of being confused with, and (b) MVE implies Thumb-2, so a prefix
indicating MVE is strictly more specific than one indicating Thumb-2.
Reviewers: ostannard, SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63492
llvm-svn: 363690
Some more refactoring, like registering the IT Block pass, less cryptic
variable names, and some simplification of loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63419
llvm-svn: 363666
Initial commit of a new pass to create vector predication blocks, called VPT
blocks, that are supported by the Armv8.1-M MVE architecture.
This is a first naive implementation. I.e., for 2 consecutive predicated
instructions I1 and I2, for example, it will generate 2 VPT blocks:
VPST
I1
VPST
I2
A more optimal implementation would obviously put instructions in the same VPT
block when they are predicated on the same condition and when it is allowed to
do this:
VPTT
I1
I2
We will address this optimisation with follow up patches when the groundwork is
in. Creating VPT Blocks is very similar to IT Blocks, which is the reason I
added this to Thumb2ITBlocks.cpp. This allows reuse of the def use analysis
that we need for the more optimal implementation.
VPT blocks cannot be nested in IT blocks, and vice versa, and so these 2 passes
cannot interact with each other. Instructions allowed in VPT blocks must
be MVE instructions that are marked as VPT compatible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63247
llvm-svn: 363370
During assembly, the mask operand to an IT instruction (storing the
sequence of T/E for 'Then' and 'Else') is parsed out of the mnemonic
into a representation that encodes 'Then' and 'Else' in the same way
regardless of the condition code. At some point during encoding it has
to be converted into the instruction encoding used in the
architecture, in which the mask encodes a sequence of replacement
low-order bits for the condition code, so that which bit value means
'then' and which 'else' depends on whether the original condition code
had its low bit set.
Previously, that transformation was done by processInstruction(), half
way through assembly. So an MCOperand storing an IT mask would
sometimes store it in one format, and sometimes in the other,
depending on where in the assembly pipeline you were. You can see this
in diagnostics from `llvm-mc -debug -triple=thumbv8a -show-inst`, for
example: if you give it an instruction such as `itete eq`, you'd see
an `<MCOperand Imm:5>` in a diagnostic become `<MCOperand Imm:11>` in
the final output.
Having the same data structure store values with time-dependent
semantics is confusing already, and it will get more confusing when we
introduce the MVE VPT instruction which reuses the Then/Else bitmask
idea in a different context. So I'm refactoring: now, all `ARMOperand`
and `MCOperand` representations of an IT mask work exactly the same
way, namely, 0 means 'Then' and 1 means 'Else', regardless of what
original predicate is being referred to. The architectural encoding of
IT that depends on the original condition is now constructed at the
point when we turn the `MCOperand` into the final instruction bit
pattern, and decoded similarly in the disassembler.
The previous condition-independent parse-time format used 0 for Else
and 1 for Then. I've taken the opportunity to flip the sense of it
while I'm changing all of this anyway, because it seems to me more
natural to use 0 for 'leave the starting condition unchanged' and 1
for 'invert it', as if those bits were an XOR mask.
Reviewers: ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63219
llvm-svn: 363244
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
Rename AllVRegsAllocated to NoVRegs. This avoids the connotation of
running after register and simply describes that no vregs are used in
a machine function. With that we can simply compute the property and do
not need to dump/parse it in .mir files.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23850
llvm-svn: 279698
Summary:
This adds the same checks that were added in r264593 to all
target-specific passes that run after register allocation.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18525
llvm-svn: 265313
Change TargetInstrInfo API to take `MachineInstr&` instead of
`MachineInstr*` in the functions related to predicated instructions
(I'll try to come back later and get some of the rest). All of these
functions require non-null parameters already, so references are more
clear. As a bonus, this happens to factor away a host of implicit
iterator => pointer conversions.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 261605
This is a little embarrassing.
When I reverted r261504 (getIterator() => getInstrIterator()) in
r261567, I did a `git grep` to see if there were new calls to
`getInstrIterator()` that I needed to migrate. There were 10-20 hits,
and I blindly did a `sed ...` before calling `ninja check`.
However, these were `MachineInstrBundleIterator::getInstrIterator()`,
which predated r261567. Perhaps coincidentally, these had an identical
name and return type.
This commit undoes my careless sed and restores
`MachineBasicBlock::iterator::getInstrIterator()`.
llvm-svn: 261577
Delete MachineInstr::getIterator(), since the term "iterator" is
overloaded when talking about MachineInstr.
- Downcast to ilist_node in iplist::getNextNode() and getPrevNode() so
that ilist_node::getIterator() is still available.
- Add it back as MachineInstr::getInstrIterator(). This matches the
naming in MachineBasicBlock.
- Add MachineInstr::getBundleIterator(). This is explicitly called
"bundle" (not matching MachineBasicBlock) to disintinguish it clearly
from ilist_node::getIterator().
- Update all calls. Some of these I switched to `auto` to remove
boiler-plate, since the new name is clear about the type.
There was one call I updated that looked fishy, but it wasn't clear what
the right answer was. This was in X86FrameLowering::inlineStackProbe(),
added in r252578 in lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp. I opted to
leave the behaviour unchanged, but I'll reply to the original commit on
the list in a moment.
llvm-svn: 261504
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
MIOperands/ConstMIOperands are classes iterating over the MachineOperand
of a MachineInstr, however MachineInstr::mop_iterator does the same
thing.
I assume these two iterators exist to have a uniform interface to
iterate over the operands of a machine instruction bundle and a single
machine instruction. However in practice I find it more confusing to have 2
different iterator classes, so this patch transforms (nearly all) the
code to use mop_iterators.
The only exception being MIOperands::anlayzePhysReg() and
MIOperands::analyzeVirtReg() still needing an equivalent, I leave that
as an exercise for the next patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9932
This version is slightly modified from the proposed revision in that it
introduces MachineInstr::getOperandNo to avoid the extra counting
variable in the few loops that previously used MIOperands::getOperandNo.
llvm-svn: 238539
When forming an IT block from the first MOV here:
%R2<def> = t2MOVr %R0, pred:1, pred:%CPSR, opt:%noreg
%R3<def> = tMOVr %R0<kill>, pred:14, pred:%noreg
the move in to R3 is moved out of the IT block so that later instructions on the same predicate can be inside this block, and we can share the IT instruction.
However, when moving the R3 copy out of the IT block, we need to clear its kill flags for anything in use at this point in time, ie, R0 here.
This appeases the machine verifier which thought that R0 wasn't defined when used.
I have a test case, but its extremely register allocator specific. It would be too fragile to commit a test which depends on the register allocator here.
llvm-svn: 236468
It appears to ignore or find ambiguous MachineInstrBuilder's conversion
operators that allow conversion to MachineInstr* and
MachineBasicBlock::bundle_iterator.
As a workaround, add an explicit way to get the MachineInstr.
llvm-svn: 221017
By default, the behavior of IT block generation will be determinated
dynamically base on the arch (armv8 vs armv7). This patch adds backend
options: -arm-restrict-it and -arm-no-restrict-it. The former one
restricts the generation of IT blocks (the same behavior as thumbv8) for
both arches. The later one allows the generation of legacy IT block (the
same behavior as ARMv7 Thumb2) for both arches.
Clang will support -mrestrict-it and -mno-restrict-it, which is
compatible with GCC.
llvm-svn: 194592
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
There are some that I didn't remove this round because they looked like
obvious stubs. There are dead variables in gtest too, they should be
fixed upstream.
llvm-svn: 158090
No functional change intended.
Sorry for the churn. The iterator classes are supposed to help avoid
giant commits like this one in the future. The TableGen-produced
register lists are getting quite large, and it may be necessary to
change the table representation.
This makes it possible to do so without changing all clients (again).
llvm-svn: 157854
Revert r153519: "ARMLoadStoreOptimizer invalidates register liveness."
These patches caused miscompilations in povray by turning off branch
folding's updating of live-in lists.
It turns out the the late scheduler depends on the live-in lists, even
if it doesn't need correct kill flags.
<rdar://problem/11139228>
llvm-svn: 153593
to instruction right after the last instruction in the bundle.
- Add a finalizeBundle() variant that doesn't specify LastMI. Instead, the code
will find the last instruction in the bundle by following the 'InsideBundle'
marker. This is useful in case bundles are formed early (i.e. during MI
scheduling) but finalized later (i.e. after register allocator has finished
rewriting virtual registers with physical registers).
llvm-svn: 148444
to finalize MI bundles (i.e. add BUNDLE instruction and computing register def
and use lists of the BUNDLE instruction) and a pass to unpack bundles.
- Teach more of MachineBasic and MachineInstr methods to be bundle aware.
- Switch Thumb2 IT block to MI bundles and delete the hazard recognizer hack to
prevent IT blocks from being broken apart.
llvm-svn: 146542
generator to it. For non-bundle instructions, these behave exactly the same
as the MC layer API.
For properties like mayLoad / mayStore, look into the bundle and if any of the
bundled instructions has the property it would return true.
For properties like isPredicable, only return true if *all* of the bundled
instructions have the property.
For properties like canFoldAsLoad, isCompare, conservatively return false for
bundles.
llvm-svn: 146026
block. E.g., if we have:
movs r1, r1
rsb r1, 0
movs r2, r2
rsb r2, 0
we don't want this to be converted to:
movs r1, r1
movs r2, r2
itt mi
rsb r1, 0
rsb r2, 0
PR11107 & <rdar://problem/10259534>
llvm-svn: 141589
Zongwei Lan