This patch adds 3 new _VL RISCVISD opcodes to represent VFMA_VL with
different portions negated. It also adds a DAG combine to peek
through FNEG_VL to create these new opcodes.
This is modeled after similar code from X86.
This makes the isel patterns more regular and reduces the size of
the isel table by ~37K.
The test changes look like regressions, but they point to a bug that
was already there. We aren't able to commute a masked FMA instruction
to improve register allocation because we always use a mask undisturbed
policy. Prior to this patch we matched two multiply operands in a
different order and hid this issue for these test cases, but a different
test still could have encountered it.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128310
This adds RISCVISD opccodes for LA, LA_TLS_IE, and LA_TLS_GD to
remove creation of MachineSDNodes form get*Addr. This makes the
code consistent with the previous patches that added RISCVISD::HI,
ADD_LO, LLA, and TPREL_ADD.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128325
Put it before the VL instead of as the first operand. I want to add
passthru to more operands, but the commutable ones like VADD_VL
require the commutable operands to be operand 0 and 1. So we can't
have the passthru as operand 0 for those.
Use it in place of VSELECT_VL+VRGATHER*_VL.
This simplifies the isel patterns.
Overall, I think trying to match select+op to create masked instructions
in isel doesn't scale. We either need to do it in DAG combine, pre-isel
peepole, or post-isel peephole. I don't yet know which is the right
answer, but for this case it seemed best to be able to request the
masked form directly from lowering.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128023
This allows computeKnownBits to see the constant being loaded.
This recovers the rv64zbp test case changes from D127520.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127679
Rather than emitting a MachineSDNode from lowering. Let isel match it.
This is consistent with the RISCVISD::HI and ADD_LO nodes that were
also added. Having them both the same will make D127679 consistent.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127714
Instead add RISCVISD opcodes that will be selected to LUI/ADDI
during isel.
I'm looking into maybe moving doPeepholeLoadStoreADDI into isel.
Having the ADDI as a RISCVISD node will make it visible to isel.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127713
This simplifies the isel code by removing the manual load creation.
It also improves our ability to use 0 strided loads for vector splats.
There is an assumption here that Mask and ShiftedMask constants are
cheap enough that they don't become constant pool loads so that our
isel optimizations involving And still work. I believe those constants
are 3 instructions in the worst case.
The rv64zbp-intrinsic.ll changes is a regression caused by intrinsics
being expanded to RISCVISD also occuring during lowering. So the optimizations
were only happening during the last DAGCombine, which can't see through the
load. I believe we can fix this test by implementing
TargetLowering::getTargetConstantFromLoad for RISC-V or by adding the intrinsic
to computeKnownBitsForTargetNode to enable earlier DAG combine. Since Zbp is not
a ratified extension, I don't view these as blocking this patch.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127520
Based on D24038.
LLVM has an @llvm.eh.dwarf.cfa intrinsic, used to lower the GCC-compatible __builtin_dwarf_cfa() builtin.
Reviewed By: StephenFan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126181
When lowering GlobalAddressNodes, we were removing a non-zero offset and
creating a separate ADD.
It already comes out of SelectionDAGBuilder with a separate ADD. The
ADD was being removed by DAGCombiner.
This patch disables the DAG combine so we don't have to reverse it.
Test changes all look to be instruction order changes. Probably due
to different DAG node ordering.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126558
This hook determines if SimplifySetcc transforms (X & (C l>>/<< Y))
==/!= 0 into ((X <</l>> Y) & C) ==/!= 0. Where C is a constant and
X might be a constant.
The default implementation favors doing the transform if X is not
a constant. Otherwise the code is left alone. There is a provision
that if the target supports a bit test instruction then the transform
will favor ((1 << Y) & X) ==/!= 0. RISCV does not say it has a variable
bit test operation.
RISCV with Zbs does have a BEXT instruction that performs (X >> Y) & 1.
Without Zbs, (X >> Y) & 1 still looks preferable to ((1 << Y) & X) since
we can fold use ANDI instead of putting a 1 in a register for SLL.
This patch overrides this hook to favor bit extract patterns and
otherwise falls back to the "do the transform if X is not a constant"
heuristic.
I've added tests where both C and X are constants with both the shl form
and lshr form. I've also added a test for a switch statement that lowers
to a bit test. That was my original motivation for looking at this.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124639
This patch adds rvv codegen support for vp.fpext. The lowering of fp_round, vp.fptrunc, fp_extend and vp.fpext share most code so use a common lowering function to handle these four.
And this patch changes the intermediate cast from ISD::FP_EXTEND/ISD::FP_ROUND to the RVV VL version op RISCVISD::FP_EXTEND_VL and RISCVISD::FP_ROUND_VL for scalable vectors.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123975
This patch adds rvv codegen support for vp.fptrunc. The lowering of fp_round and vp.fptrunc share most code so use a common lowering function to handle those two, similar to vp.trunc.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123841
Materializing constants on RISCV is simpler if the constant is sign
extended from i32. By default i32 constant operands of phis are
zero extended.
This patch adds a hook to allow RISCV to override this for i32. We
have an existing isSExtCheaperThanZExt, but it operates on EVT which
we don't have at these places in the code.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122951
Modified DAGCombiner to pass the shift the bittest input and the shift amount
to hasBitTest. This matches the other call to hasBitTest in TargetLowering.h
This is an alternative to D122454.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122458
Similar to what we do for other loads/stores, use the intrinsic
version that we already have custom isel for.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121166
vslide1up/down have this flag set, but the value isn't a splat.
Rename for clarity.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121037
This lowers VECTOR_SPLICE of scalable vectors to a slidedown follow by a slideup.
Fixed vectors are encouraged to use shufflevector instruction. The equivalent patch
for fixed vectors is D119039.
I've used a tail agnostic slidedown and limited the VL to only the
elements that will not be overwritten by the slideup. The slideup
uses VLMax for its VL. It unfortunately uses tail undisturbed policy
but it isn't required as there is no tail. We just need the merge
operand to carry the bits for the lower portion of the result.
Care was taken to ensure that either the slideup or slidedown will
be able to use a .vi instruction when the immediate is small. Which
one uses the immediate depends on the sign of the immediate.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119303
Add a new ISD opcode to represent the sign extending behavior of
vmv.x.h. Keep the previous anyext opcode to allow the existing
(fmv_x_anyexth (fmv_h_x X)) combine to keep working without needing
to generate a sign extend.
For fmv.x.w we are able to match the sext_inreg in an isel pattern,
but a 16-bit sext_inreg is lowered to a shift pair before isel. This
seemed like a larger match than we should do in isel.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118974
Internally to DAGCombiner the SDValues were passed by non-const
reference despite not being modified. They were then passed by
const reference to TLI.
This patch passes them by value which is consistent with the vast
majority of code.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120420
Add the passthru operand for
VMV_V_X_VL, VFMV_V_F_VL and SPLAT_VECTOR_SPLIT_I64_VL also.
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119688
The goal is support tail and mask policy in RVV builtins.
We focus on IR part first.
If the passthru operand is undef, we use tail agnostic, otherwise
use tail undisturbed.
Add passthru operand for VSLIDE1UP_VL and VSLIDE1DOWN_VL to support
i64 scalar in rv32.
The masked VSLIDE1 would only emit mask undisturbed policy regardless
of giving mask agnostic policy until InsertVSETVLI supports mask agnostic.
Reviewed by: craig.topper, rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117989
Add a new ISD opcode to represent the sign extending behavior of
vmv.x.h. Keep the previous anyext opcode to allow the existing
(fmv_x_anyexth (fmv_h_x X)) combine to keep working without needing
to generate a sign extend.
For fmv.x.w we are able to match the sext_inreg in an isel pattern,
but a 16-bit sext_inreg is lowered to a shift pair before isel. This
seemed like a larger match than we should do in isel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118974
SPLAT_VECTOR_I64 has the same semantics as RISCVISD::VMV_V_X_VL, it
just assumed VLMax instead of carrying a VL operand.
Include order of RISCVInstrInfoVSDPatterns.td and RISCVInstrInfoVVLPatterns.td
has been swapped to avoid moving riscv_vmv_v_x_vl into
RISCVInstrInfoVSDPatterns.td and to allow moving other "_vl" SDNodes back to
RISCVInstrInfoVVLPatterns.td
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118841
This adds or reuses ISD opcodes for vadd.wv, vaddu.wv, vadd.vv, vaddu.vv
and a similar set for sub.
I've included support for narrowing scalar splats that have known
sign/zero bits similar to what was done for MUL_VL.
The conversion to vwadd.vv proceeds in two phases. First we'll form
a vwadd.wv by narrowing one of the operands. Then we'll visit the
vwadd.wv to try to narrow the other operand. This turned out to be
simpler than catching all the cases in one step. The forming of of
vwadd.wv can happen for either operand for add, but only the right
hand side for sub since sub isn't commutable.
An interesting quirk is that ADD_VL and VZEXT_VL/VSEXT_VL are formed
during vector op legalization, but VMV_V_X_VL isn't usually formed
until op legalization when BUILD_VECTORS are handled. This leads to
VWADD_W_VL forming in one DAG combine round, and then a later DAG combine
round sees the VMV_V_X_VL and needs to commute the operands to get the
splat in position. This alone necessitated a VWADD_W_VL combine function
which made forming vwadd.vv in two stages an easy choice.
I've left out trying hard to form vwadd.wx instructions for now. It would
only save an extend in the scalar domain which isn't as interesting.
Might need to review the test coverage a bit. Most of the vwadd.wv
instructions are coming from vXi64 tests on rv64. The tests were
copy pasted from the existing multiply tests.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117954
We already have an ISD opcode for the more general GREV/GREVI
instructon. We can just use it with the encoding that corresponds
to the behavior of brev8. This is similar to what we do for orc.b
where we use the GORC ISD opcode.
According to riscv-v-spec-1.0, widening signed(vs2)-unsigned integer multiply
vwmulsu.vv vd, vs2, vs1, vm # vector-vector
vwmulsu.vx vd, vs2, rs1, vm # vector-scalar
It is worth noting that signed op is only for vs2.
For vwmulsu.vv, we can swap two ops, and don't care which is sign extension,
but for vwmulsu.vx signExt can not be a vector extended from scalar (rs1).
I specifically added two functions ending with _swap in the test case.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118215
This patch adds lowering of the llvm.vp.merge.* intrinsic
(ISD::VP_MERGE) to RVV vmerge/vfmerge instructions. It introduces a
special pseudo form of vmerge which allows a tied merge operand,
allowing us to specify the tail elements as being equal to the "on
false" operand, using a tied-def constraint and a "tail undisturbed"
policy.
While this strategy allows us to often lower the intrinsic to just one
instruction, it may be less efficient in fixed-vector types as the
number of tail elements may extend far beyond the length of the fixed
vector. Another strategy could be to use a vmerge/vfmerge instruction
with an AVL equal to the length of the vector type, and manipulate the
condition operand such that mask elements greater than the operation's
EVL are false.
I've also observed inefficient codegen in which our 'VF' patterns don't
match raw floating-point SPLAT_VECTORs, which occur in scalable-vector
code.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117561
RISCV only has a unary shuffle that requires places indices in a
register. For interleaving two vectors this means we need at least
two vrgathers and a vmerge to do a shuffle of two vectors.
This patch teaches shuffle lowering to use a widening addu followed
by a widening vmaccu to implement the interleave. First we extract
the low half of both V1 and V2. Then we implement
(zext(V1) + zext(V2)) + (zext(V2) * zext(2^eltbits - 1)) which
simplifies to (zext(V1) + zext(V2) * 2^eltbits). This further
simplifies to (zext(V1) + zext(V2) << eltbits). Then we bitcast the
result back to the original type splitting the wide elements in half.
We can only do this if we have a type with wider elements available.
Because we're using extends we also have to be careful with fractional
lmuls. Floating point types are supported by bitcasting to/from integer.
The tests test a varied combination of LMULs split across VLEN>=128 and
VLEN>=512 tests. There a few tests with shuffle indices commuted as well
as tests for undef indices. There's one test for a vXi64/vXf64 vector which
we can't optimize, but verifies we don't crash.
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117743
This reverts the revert commit e328385739.
Accidental demanded bits change has been removed. The demanded bits
code itself was remove in a pre-commit since it isn't tested.
Original commit message:
Previous we used the fshl/fshr operand ordering for simplicity. This
made things confusing when D117468 proposed adding intrinsics for
the instructions. We can't just use the generic funnel shifting
intrinsics because fsl/fsr have different functionality that should
be exposed to software.
Now we use rs1, rs3, rs2/shamt order which matches the instruction
printing order and the order used in this intrinsic header
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/main-history/cproofs/rvintrin.h
Previous we used the fshl/fshr operand ordering for simplicity. This
made things confusing when D117468 proposed adding intrinsics for
the instructions. We can't just use the generic funnel shifting
intrinsics because fsl/fsr have different functionality that should
be exposed to software.
Now we use rs1, rs3, rs2/shamt order which matches the instruction
printing order and the order used in this intrinsic header
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/main-history/cproofs/rvintrin.h
Currently, users expected VL is the last operand. However, since some
intrinsics has tail policy in the last operand, this rule cannot be used
anymore.
Reviewed By: craig.topper, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117452
Current SplatOperand starts from 1 because operand 0 (or 1) is intrinsic
id in SelectionDAG.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117453
When we know the value we're extending is a negative constant then it
makes sense to use SIGN_EXTEND because this may improve code quality in
some cases, particularly when doing a constant splat of an unpacked vector
type. For example, for SVE when splatting the value -1 into all elements
of a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i32> the element type will get promoted
from i32 -> i64. In this case we want the splat value to sign-extend from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 -1), whereas currently it zero-extends from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 0xFFFFFFFF). Sign-extending the constant means we can use
a single mov immediate instruction.
New tests added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I believe we see some code quality improvements in these existing
tests too:
CodeGen/AArch64/reduce-and.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/unfold-masked-merge-vector-variablemask.ll
The apparent regressions in CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-cmp-vec.ll only
occur because the test disables codegen prepare and branch folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114357
When we know the value we're extending is a negative constant then it
makes sense to use SIGN_EXTEND because this may improve code quality in
some cases, particularly when doing a constant splat of an unpacked vector
type. For example, for SVE when splatting the value -1 into all elements
of a vector of type <vscale x 2 x i32> the element type will get promoted
from i32 -> i64. In this case we want the splat value to sign-extend from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 -1), whereas currently it zero-extends from
(i32 -1) -> (i64 0xFFFFFFFF). Sign-extending the constant means we can use
a single mov immediate instruction.
New tests added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-vector-splat.ll
I believe we see some code quality improvements in these existing
tests too:
CodeGen/AArch64/dag-numsignbits.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/reduce-and.ll
CodeGen/AArch64/unfold-masked-merge-vector-variablemask.ll
The apparent regressions in CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-cmp-vec.ll only
occur because the test disables codegen prepare and branch folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114357
The code can only address the whole RV32 address space or the lower 2 GiB
of the RV64 address space in small code model, so 32 bits entry is enough.
Cache hit ratio and code size have some improvements.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116435
When `Zbt` is enabled, we can generate SELECT for division by power
of 2, so that there is no data dependency.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114856
Craig Topper