the section or the visibility from one global
value to another: copyAttributesFrom. This is
particularly useful for duplicating functions:
previously this was done by explicitly copying
each attribute in turn at each place where a
new function was created out of an old one, with
the result that obscure attributes were regularly
forgotten (like the collector or the section).
Hopefully now everything is uniform and nothing
is forgotten.
llvm-svn: 51567
The SimplifyCFG pass looks at basic blocks that contain only phi nodes,
followed by an unconditional branch. In a lot of cases, such a block (BB) can
be merged into their successor (Succ).
This merging is performed by TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock. It does
this by taking all phi nodes in the succesor block Succ and expanding them to
include the predecessors of BB. Furthermore, any phi nodes in BB are moved to
Succ and expanded to include the predecessors of Succ as well.
Before attempting this merge, CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs checks to see if
all phi nodes can be properly merged. All functional changes are made to
this function, only comments were updated in
TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock.
In the original code, CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs looks quite convoluted
and more like stack of checks added to handle different kinds of situations
than a comprehensive check. In particular the first check in the function did
some value checking for the case that BB and Succ have a common predecessor,
while the last check in the function simply rejected all cases where BB and
Succ have a common predecessor. The first check was still useful in the case
that BB did not contain any phi nodes at all, though, so it was not completely
useless.
Now, CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs is restructured to to look a lot more
similar to the code that actually performs the merge. Both functions now look
at the same phi nodes in about the same order. Any conflicts (phi nodes with
different values for the same source) that could arise from merging or moving
phi nodes are detected. If no conflicts are found, the merge can happen.
Apart from only restructuring the checks, two main changes in functionality
happened.
Firstly, the old code rejected blocks with common predecessors in most cases.
The new code performs some extra checks so common predecessors can be handled
in a lot of cases. Wherever common predecessors still pose problems, the
blocks are left untouched.
Secondly, the old code rejected the merge when values (phi nodes) from BB were
used in any other place than Succ. However, it does not seem that there is any
situation that would require this check. Even more, this can be proven.
Consider that BB is a block containing of a single phi node "%a" and a branch
to Succ. Now, since the definition of %a will dominate all of its uses, BB
will dominate all blocks that use %a. Furthermore, since the branch from BB to
Succ is unconditional, Succ will also dominate all uses of %a.
Now, assume that one predecessor of Succ is not dominated by BB (and thus not
dominated by Succ). Since at least one use of %a (but in reality all of them)
is reachable from Succ, you could end up at a use of %a without passing
through it's definition in BB (by coming from X through Succ). This is a
contradiction, meaning that our original assumption is wrong. Thus, all
predecessors of Succ must also be dominated by BB (and thus also by Succ).
This means that moving the phi node %a from BB to Succ does not pose any
problems when the two blocks are merged, and any use checks are not needed.
llvm-svn: 51478
address of the PassInfo directly instead of calling getPassInfo.
This eliminates a bunch of dynamic initializations of static data.
Also, fold RegisterPassBase into PassInfo, make a bunch of its
data members const, and rearrange some code to initialize data
members in constructors instead of using setter member functions.
llvm-svn: 51022
as a global helper function. At the same type, switch it from taking
a vector of predecessors to an arbitrary sequential input. This allows
us to switch LoopSimplify to use a SmallVector for various temporary
vectors that it passed into SplitBlockPredecessors.
llvm-svn: 50020
needs to be fixed here - a previous commit made sure
that intrinsics always get the right attributes.
So remove no-longer needed code, and while there use
Intrinsic::getDeclaration rather than getOrInsertFunction.
llvm-svn: 49337
2. Do not use # of basic blocks as part of the cost computation since it doesn't really figure into function size.
3. More aggressively inline function with vector code.
llvm-svn: 49061
not marked nounwind, or for all functions when -enable-eh
is set, provided the target supports Dwarf EH.
llvm-gcc generates nounwind in the right places; other FEs
will need to do so also. Given such a FE, -enable-eh should
no longer be needed.
llvm-svn: 49006
Furthermore, double the limit when more than 10% of the callee instructions are vector instructions. Multimedia kernels tend to love inlining.
llvm-svn: 48725
before trying to merge the block into its predecessors.
This allows two-entry-phi-return.ll to be simplified
into a single basic block.
llvm-svn: 48252
Secondly, we have to check whether the branch is actually pointing to the block
with the unwind in it. We could have gotten here because of the unwind_to alone.
llvm-svn: 48099
define void @f() {
...
call i32 @g()
...
}
define void @g() {
...
}
The hazards are:
- @f and @g have GC, but they differ GC. Inlining is invalid. This
may never occur.
- @f has no GC, but @g does. g's GC must be propagated to @f.
The other scenarios are safe:
- @f and @g have the same GC.
- @f and @g have no GC.
- @g has no GC.
This patch adds inliner checks for the former two scenarios.
llvm-svn: 45351
calls 'nounwind'. It is important for correct C++
exception handling that nounwind markings do not get
lost, so this transformation is actually needed for
correctness.
llvm-svn: 45218
calls. Remove special casing of inline asm from the
inliner. There is a potential problem: the verifier
rejects invokes of inline asm (not sure why). If an
asm call is not marked "nounwind" in some .ll, and
instcombine is not run, but the inliner is run, then
an illegal module will be created. This is bad but
I'm not sure what the best approach is. I'm tempted
to remove the check in the verifier...
llvm-svn: 45073
Reimplement the xform in Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp where we can use
targetdata to validate that it is safe. While I'm in there, fix some const
correctness issues and generalize the interface to the "operand folder".
llvm-svn: 44817
methods are new to Function:
bool hasCollector() const;
const std::string &getCollector() const;
void setCollector(const std::string &);
void clearCollector();
The assembly representation is as such:
define void @f() gc "shadow-stack" { ...
The implementation uses an on-the-side table to map Functions to
collector names, such that there is no overhead. A StringPool is
further used to unique collector names, which are extremely
likely to be unique per process.
llvm-svn: 44769
throw exceptions", just mark intrinsics with the nounwind
attribute. Likewise, mark intrinsics as readnone/readonly
and get rid of special aliasing logic (which didn't use
anything more than this anyway).
llvm-svn: 44544
the function type, instead they belong to functions
and function calls. This is an updated and slightly
corrected version of Reid Spencer's original patch.
The only known problem is that auto-upgrading of
bitcode files doesn't seem to work properly (see
test/Bitcode/AutoUpgradeIntrinsics.ll). Hopefully
a bitcode guru (who might that be? :) ) will fix it.
llvm-svn: 44359
Dan Gohman